| 研究生: |
黃郁茹 Huang, Yu-Ju |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
美國政策不確定性對其公債便利性收益與避險溢酬之影響 The impact of U.S. policy uncertainty on treasury convenience yields and safe-haven premiums |
| 指導教授: |
張元晨
Chang, Yuan-chen |
| 口試委員: |
黃柏凱
Huang, Po-Kai 蔡湘萍 Tsai, Hsiang-ping |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 財務管理學系 Department of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 69 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 便利性收益 、美國公債 、Flight to Safety 、政策不確定性 、DCC-GARCH 、股債共變異數 、關稅衝擊 、替代性安全資產 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Convenience yield, US treasury bonds, Flight to safety, Political uncertainty, DCC-GARCH, Stock-Bond covariance, Tariff shock, Alternative safe haven |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:40 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
2025年川普政府的全面關稅與聯準會干預、債務僵局及極端地緣政治言論等疊加衝擊,嚴重動搖了美國公債作為終極安全資產之地位。名目公債(Nominal Treasury)因具備高流動性及危機時期的終極避險特質,享有獨特的「便利性收益(Convenience yield)」。當美國政策不確定性升溫,市場疑慮將直接侵蝕此一安全溢酬。本研究以川普第二任期首年為樣本,以TIPS-Treasury利差衡量名目公債之便利性收益,並運用DCC-GARCH模型與虛擬變數迴歸,分析四類政策衝擊(關稅、聯準會獨立性、債務協商、地緣政治)之高頻動態與傳導效果。
實證結果揭示五項核心發現:第一,便利性收益期限結構呈現長降短升至全線下跌之非對稱演變。第二,單一關稅衝擊雖驅動避險需求,但多重異質衝擊同步疊加卻反噬美債之安全溢酬。第三,不確定性常態化下市場出現「適應性疲乏」,單次事件之避險反應遞減,惟結構性折價持續累積。第四,黃金具備條件性避險功能,急性衝擊期承接美債失靈之外溢資金,緩和期則與公債同向吸納避險需求。第五,四類衝擊傳導路徑存在系統性差異:關稅衝擊呈跨期限非對稱效果,債務協商衝擊兼具長端水準上升與中長端即時下滑之雙重特徵,地緣政治衝擊則主要體現於長端便利性收益之當日即時下滑。
The 2025 Trump administration's sweeping tariffs and political shocks—threats to Fed independence, debt standoffs, and geopolitical rhetoric—have cast doubt on U.S. Treasuries as the ultimate safe asset. Nominal Treasuries command a unique "convenience yield" by virtue of their superior liquidity and crisis-time safe-haven role. When policy uncertainty intensifies, such doubts directly erode this safety premium.
Using TIPS-Treasury spreads to measure convenience yields and employing a DCC-GARCH model alongside dummy variable regressions, we analyze covariance dynamics and transmission effects across four shock categories during the first year of President Trump's second term in office.
We document five main findings. First, the convenience yield term structure reveals structural asymmetry, shifting from short-end appreciation and long-end decline to a broad-based fall. Second, isolated tariff shocks bolster safe-haven demand, while simultaneous heterogeneous shocks undermine the Treasury safety premium. Third, markets exhibit adaptation fatigue as uncertainty normalizes, with decaying event-level hedging responses alongside persistent structural erosion. Fourth, gold acts as a conditional safe haven, absorbing flows when Treasuries fail during acute shock periods but co-hedging alongside Treasuries during easing phases. Fifth, the four shock categories exhibit systematically distinct transmission channels: tariff shocks produce asymmetric cross-maturity repricing; debt negotiation shocks drive same-day declines at intermediate and long maturities; geopolitical shocks target long-end yields.
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第三章 資料描述 7
第一節 資料來源與樣本選取 7
一、日內高頻資料來源 7
二、整體市場與殖利率曲線資料 7
第二節 便利性收益的估計方式 8
第四章 研究方法 11
第一節 共變異數 11
一、高頻日內已實現共變異數 11
二、日資料滾動共變異數 12
第二節 相關係數 13
第三節 DCC-GARCH 14
第四節 市場狀態識別與政治不確定性事件之分類定義 16
一、雙重角色分類 16
二、政治不確定性事件之分類定義 17
第五節 政策不確定性事件之迴歸分析 18
一、應變數設定 18
二、解釋變數設定 19
三、迴歸模型設定 19
四、廻歸分析的計量處理 20
第五章 實證結果與分析 22
第一節 敘述性統計與模型適配性檢驗 22
一、敘述性統計 22
二、單根檢定與資料平穩性驗證 23
三、樣本之波動聚集與厚尾特徵 25
第二節 便利性收益期限結構之變異 27
一、樣本期間各天期公債之便利性收益 28
二、便利性收益之避險服務流特徵與侵蝕機制 29
第三節 美國公債避險屬性之動態變化 32
第四節 美國公債雙重角色之識別與政策事件對應 33
一、風險資產狀態日之時群分析 33
二、高度避險狀態日之時群分析 36
第五節 政策不確定性事件對公債便利性收益之迴歸結果 39
一、便利性收益水準值 40
二、將便利性收益取一階差分後的實證結果 41
三、小結 42
第六節 替代避險資產之驗證:黃金之角色 42
一、樣本期間內的階段性替代 43
二、股-黃金動態相關性之實證結果 43
第六章 結論 46
一、主要實證發現 46
二、政策意涵 48
三、研究限制與未來研究方向 49
參考文獻 51
附錄 68
Acharya, V. V., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of financial Economics, 77(2), 375-410.
Acharya, V. V., & Laarits, T. (2026a). Tariff War Shock and the Convenience Yield of US Treasuries—A Hedging Perspective. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Acharya, V. V., & Laarits, T. (2026b). When do treasuries earn the convenience yield?: A hedging perspective. Journal of Finance.
Adrian, T., Fleming, M., & Vogt, E. (2017). An index of Treasury Market liquidity: 1991-2017 (No. 827). Staff Report.
Amihud, Yakov and Haim Mendelson. (1991). Liquidity, maturity, and the yields on US Treasury securities. The Journal of Finance, 46 (4), 1411–1425.
Baele, Lieven, Geert Bekaert, and Koen Inghelbrecht. (2010). The determinants of stock and bond return comovements. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(6), 2374–2428.
Baele, L., Bekaert, G., Inghelbrecht, K., & Wei, M. (2020). Flights to safety. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(2), 689-746.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2012). Comovement and predictability relationships between bonds and the cross-section of stocks. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 2(1), 57-87.
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The quarterly journal of economics, 131(4), 1593-1636.
Backus, D., Boyarchenko, N., & Chernov, M. (2018). Term structures of asset prices and returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 129(1), 1-23.
Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. The Financial Review, 45(2), 217-229.
Brooks, C. (2014). Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge university press.
Brunnermeier, M. K., Merkel, S. A., & Sannikov, Y. (2022). Debt as safe asset (No. w29626). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Campbell, J. Y., Sunderam, A., & Viceira, L. M. (2017). Inflation bets or deflation hedges? The changing risks of nominal bonds. Critical Finance Review, 6(2), 263-301.
Choi, J., Richardson, M., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2022). Capital structure priority effects in durations, stock-bond comovements, and factor pricing models. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 12(3), 706-753.
Cieslak, A., & Pang, H. (2021). Common shocks in stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 880-904.
Connolly, R., Stivers, C., & Sun, L. (2005). Stock market uncertainty and the stock-bond return relation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(1), 161-194.
Du, W., Im, J., & Schreger, J. (2018). The us treasury premium. Journal of International Economics, 112, 167-181.
Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of business & economic statistics, 20(3), 339-350.
Ermolov, A. (2022). Time-varying risk of nominal bonds: How important are macroeconomic shocks?. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(1), 1-28.
Feldhütter, P., & Lando, D. (2008). Decomposing swap spreads. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 375-405.
Fernández-Villaverde, J., Guerrón-Quintana, P., Kuester, K., & Rubio-Ramírez, J. (2015). Fiscal volatility shocks and economic activity. American Economic Review, 105(11), 3352-3384.
Fleckenstein, M., Longstaff, F. A., & Lustig, H. (2014). The TIPS‐treasury bond puzzle. Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2151-2197.
Fu, J. Z., Li, J., & Xie, Y. (2025). Convenience yield, inflation expectations, and public debt growth. The Review of Financial Studies, hhaf093.
Gandhi, M. A. (2025). The Term Structure of Stock-Bond Covariances.
Gorton, G., & Ordonez, G. (2022). The supply and demand for safe assets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 125, 132-147.
Gürkaynak, R. S., Sack, B., & Wright, J. H. (2007). The US Treasury yield curve: 1961 to the present. Journal of monetary Economics, 54(8), 2291-2304.
Gürkaynak, R. S., Sack, B., & Wright, J. H. (2010). The TIPS yield curve and inflation compensation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1), 70-92.
Haddad, V., Moreira, A., & Muir, T. (2021). When selling becomes viral: Disruptions in debt markets in the COVID-19 crisis and the Fed’s response. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(11), 5309-5351.
He, Z., Nagel, S., & Song, Z. (2022). Treasury inconvenience yields during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(1), 57-79.
Hu, G. X., Jin, Z., & Pan, J. (2025). The stock-bond correlation: A tale of two days in the us treasury bond market. Working Paper.
Jiang, Z., Krishnamurthy, A., Lustig, H., Richmond, R., & Xu, C. (2025a). Dollar upheaval: This time is different. Available at SSRN.
Jiang, Z., Krishnamurthy, A., Lustig, H., & Richmond, R. (2025b). Dollar Erosion: Understanding the Loss of Reserve Currency Status. Available at SSRN.
Jiang, Z., Richmond, R. J., & Zhang, T. (2025c). Convenience lost (No. w33940). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Koijen, R. S., Lustig, H., & Van Nieuwerburgh, S. (2017). The cross-section and time series of stock and bond returns. Journal of Monetary Economics, 88, 50-69.
Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2012). The aggregate demand for treasury debt. Journal of Political Economy, 120(2), 233-267.
Laarits, T. (2020). Precautionary savings and the stock-bond covariance. NYU Stern School of Business.
Liang, Nellie, “What’s going on in the US Treasury market, and why does it matter?,” April 2025.
Li, F., & Xie, Y. (2025). Trade Policy Surprises and US Convenience Yields: Evidence from Prediction Markets. Available at SSRN.
Longstaff, F. A. (2004). The flight-to-liquidity premium in US Treasury bond prices. Journal of Business, 77 (3).
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation. International Economic Review, 777-787.
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The review of economic studies, 61(4), 631-653.
Schwert, G. W. (2002). Tests for unit roots: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of business & economic statistics, 20(1), 5-17.
Tsay, R. S. (2005). Analysis of financial time series. John wiley & sons.
van Binsbergen, J., Diamond, W., & Van Tassel, P. (2023). Options for calculating risk-free rates. Liberty Street Economics, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
全文公開日期 2031/06/16