股價為一高噪音、非線性和非平穩的時間序列資料，因此股價預測長期以來均是一項具有挑戰性之熱門研究。本文提出一基於變分模態分解 (Variational Mode Decomposition, VMD)和經驗模態分解 (Empirical Mode Decomposition, EMD)之二次分解技術，結合極限學習機 (Extreme Learning Machines, ELM)和改良式和弦搜尋優化演算法 (Improved Harmony Search Algorithm, IHS)之二階段混合模型，並利用此混合模型預測台灣加權股價指數之股價。本文將VMD分解技術應用於分解台灣加權股價指數之收盤價，取得多個子序列和噪音項後，再將EMD分解技術應用於分解噪音項，最後將子序列和由台灣加權股價指數衍生出之技術指標透過ELM模型得出初步預測結果，再以IHS演算法整合並優化最終結果。而為驗證模型的有效性，本文將此混合模型和單一ELM模型以及單一VMD分解技術之混合模型進行比較，並比較預測一日、三日和五日之結果。實證結果顯示，本文所提出之混合模型無論在短天期或是長天期，均具有較好的預測效果，其中二次分解技術優於一次分解技術之結果亦說明：深入分析噪音項所含之有效資訊，不僅更完善的捕捉原始序列的特徵，亦更有效地提升模型的預測能力。

As stock data is characterized by high-noise, non-linear, and non-stationary, predicting stock price is usually subject to a main challenge. In this study, to enhance the predictive performance, we proposed a new two-stage hybrid model by combining with extreme learning machine (ELM) and improved harmony search algorithm (IHS) which based on the secondary decomposition technique of variational mode decomposition (VMD) and empirical mode decomposition (EMD), named VMD-EMD-ELM-IHS model. The hybrid model applies VMD techniques to the original closing price of TAIEX to obtain different subsequences and the residual term, then applies EMD techniques to the residual term, then predicts all subsequences and technical analysis indicators by ELM models, and then applies IHS to integrate the prediction results of ELM models to obtain the final prediction results. To verify the performance and robustness of the hybrid model, the results were compared with other models, including single ELM model, and VMD-ELM-IHS model, and respectively, tested by one-step, three-step, and five-step forward forecasting. The empirical results show that the hybrid model we proposed achieves the best prediction performance in other models and all prediction scenarios. Also, the secondary decomposition technique superior to the single decomposition technique shows that fully considering the residual term not only captures the characteristics of the original sequence but also effectively improves the prediction accuracy.

蜂行資本 (Hive Ventures)有限公司 (2022)。2022台灣企業AI趨勢報告。
Ariyo, Adebiyi A., Adewumi, Adewumi O., & Ayo, Charles K. (2014). Stock price prediction using the ARIMA model. IEEE, 106–112. doi:10.1109/uksim.2014.67
Arowolo, W. B. (2013). Predicting stock prices returns using GARCH model. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 2(5), 32-37.
Assad, A., & Deep, K. (2018). A hybrid harmony search and simulated annealing algorithm for continuous optimization. Information Sciences, 450, 246–266.
Baştanlar, Y., & Özuysal, M. (2013). Introduction to Machine Learning. Methods in Molecular Biology, 105–128. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-748-8_7
Bisoi, R., Dash, P., & Parida, A. (2019). Hybrid Variational Mode Decomposition and evolutionary robust kernel extreme learning machine for stock price and movement prediction on daily basis. Applied Soft Computing, 74, 652–678.
Blum, C., & Roli, A. (2003). Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(3), 268–308.
Brown, R. G., & Meyer, R. F. (1961). The fundamental theorem of exponential smoothing. Operations Research, 9(5), 673–685. doi: 10.1287/opre.9.5.673
Bughin J., Seong J., Manyika J., Chui M., Joshi R. (2018, September). Notes from the AI frontier: Modeling the impact of AI on the world economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
Cheng, C. H., & Wei, L. Y. (2014). A novel time-series model based on empirical mode decomposition for forecasting TAIEX. Economic Modelling, 36, 136–141.
David M. Q. Nelson, Adriano C. M. Pereira, & Renato A. de Oliveira (2017). Stock market's price movement prediction with LSTM neural networks. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966019
Dragomiretskiy, K., & Zosso D. (2014). Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(3), 531–544.
Dutta, G., Jha, P., Laha, A. K., & Mohan, N. (2006). Artificial neural network models for forecasting stock price index in the Bombay stock exchange. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 5(3), 283–295. doi: 10.1177/097265270600500305
Gogna, A., & Tayal, A. (2013). Metaheuristics: review and application. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 25(4), 503–526.
H., Singh Rupal, Mohanty, Soumya R., Kishor, N., Singh, & Dushyant K. (2019). Comparison of empirical mode decomposition and wavelet transform for power quality assessment in FPGA. IEEE, 1–6. doi: 10.1109/PEDES.2018.8707444
Harvey, A. (2006). Handbook of Economic Forecasting (1st ed.), 1(1). 327–412. doi:10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01007-4
Hosni, M., Idri, A., Nassif, A., & Abran, A. (2016). Heterogeneous ensembles for software development effort estimation. IEEE, 174–178.
Huang, G. B., Zhu, Q. Y., & Siew, C. K. (2004). Extreme learning machine: A new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. IEEE, 2, 985–990.
Huang, G., Huang, G.B., Song, S., & You, K. (2015). Trends in extreme learning machines: A review. Neural Networks, 61, 32–48.
Huang, G., Zhu, Q., & Siew, C. (2006). Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications designs. Neurocomputing, 70(1), 489–501.
Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N. C., Tung, C. C., & Liu, H. H. (1998). The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings A, 454(1971), 903–995. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
Kim, K. J. (2003). Financial time series forecasting using support vector machines. Neurocomputing, 55(1-2), 307–319. doi: 10.1016/s0925-2312(03)00372-2
Kim, T., & Kim, H. Y. (2019). Forecasting stock prices with a feature fusion LSTM-CNN model using different representations of the same data. PLOS ONE, 14(2), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212320
Lahmiri, S. (2016). Intraday stock price forecasting based on variational mode decomposition. Journal of Computational Science, 12, 23–27.
Lazzeri, F. (2020). Machine Learning for Time Series Forecasting with Python (1st ed.). Wiley Publishers. 61-99. doi: 10.1002/9781119682394.ch3
Moore, E.H. (1920). On the Reciprocal of the General Algebraic Matrix. Bulletin of American Mathematical Society, 26, 394-395.
Shalabi, L., & Shaaban, Z. (2006). Normalization as a preprocessing engine for data mining and the approach of preference matrix. IEEE Computer Society, 207–214. doi: 10.1109/depcos-relcomex.2006.38
Wang, D., Luo, H., Grunder, O., Lin, Y., & Guo, H. (2017). Multi-step ahead electricity price forecasting using a hybrid model based on two-layer decomposition technique and BP neural network optimized by firefly algorithm. Applied Energy, 190, 390–407. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.134
Wang, R., Kwong, S., & Wang, Debby D. (2013). An analysis of elm approximate error based on random weight matrix. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based systems, 21(2), 1–12.
Wei, L. Y. (2016). A hybrid ANFIS model based on empirical mode decomposition for stock time series forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 42(C), 368–376.
Zhang, X., Shi, J., Wang, D., & Fang, B. (2018). Exploiting investors social network for stock prediction in China’s market. Journal of Computational Science, 28, 294–303.
Zou, D., Gao, L., Wu, J., Li, S., Li, Y. (2010). A novel global harmony search algorithm for reliability problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(2), 307–316.