跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林煌賄
Lin,Huang Hui
論文名稱: 漢語中動賓結構之研究--以併入為本之分析
A Study of Verb-Object Constructions in Mandarin Chinese: An Incorporation Approach
指導教授: 張郇慧
Chang,Shuen Hui
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 外國語文學院 - 英國語文學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 1993
畢業學年度: 81
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 148
中文關鍵詞: 動賓複合詞併入競爭互補
外文關鍵詞: verb-object compound, incorporation, competition, complementation
相關次數: 點閱:419下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文裡有一種特別的結構,稱為動賓複合詞(Verb-object compound)。根

    據李與湯普森(Li & Thompson)觀察:從歷史的觀點來看,這種動賓複合

    詞是從動賓詞組衍生得來。在本論文中,嘗試以貝克(Baker,1988)的併入

    理論(Incorporation Theory)來證明他們的這個觀察。我們認為有一名為

    「名詞併入」(Noun Incorporation)的句法移位律對動賓詞組產生作用。

    在經過此規律作用後,動詞和它的直接賓語便在句法層次上結合成一帶動

    詞性的複雜結構,此外,我們在此理論中,我們主張應加入一條構詞結合

    律。此律在名詞併入後作用,把名詞併入後新產生的句法性複雜結構變換

    成一構詞單位,即複合詞。這樣的解釋方式不只具有「解釋充份性」

    (explanatory adequacy),而且從歷史的觀點來看此一名詞併入現象,上

    述方式也可以妥善地解決一個爭議已久有關動賓複合詞是否可以離合的問

    題,以及有關雙重分類的動賓複合詞所造成的難題。藉著這樣的分析,我

    們討論了八類動賓結構。這八類恰好形成一個漸次變化。其大抵反映出動

    賓結構從詞組變成複合詞的詞彙化過程。至於此八類之間的句法變異,我

    們發現其「分類差異」(status variation)與及物性變異(transitivity

    variation)是一些規律互相競爭(competition)與互補(complementation)

    的結果。此現象在謝(Hsieh,1989)的交互作用理論(Interaction Theory)

    中早已被指出。而此理論在解釋句法變異上的完善,更證明了我們先前利

    用名詞併入方式分析動賓結構是正確的。


    In Mandarin Chinese, there is a special construction called

    verb-object compounds. It has been observed by Li & Thompson

    (1981) that the verb-object compounds are derived historically

    from verb-object phrases. In this thesis, we attempt to verify

    this observation by means of the Incorporation Theory by Baker

    (1988). We argue that a syntactic rule, noun incorporation,

    applies to verb-object phrases and combines the verb and its

    direct object together to form a syntactic verbal complex. A

    morphological merging rule is added into the Theory, and

    applies immediately after the former rule to transform the

    newly created syntactic construct into a morphological one, a

    compound. Such and approach not only achieves the explanatory

    adequacy, but also resolves the long-standing controversies on

    the expandability of verb-object compounds and the paradox of

    verb-object compounds with dual status, if we keep a historical

    view on the process of the noun incorporation. Based on this

    analysis, the eight types of verb-object constructions form a

    continuum which roughly reflects a lexicalization process from

    verb-object phrases to verb-object compounds. As for the

    syntactic variation--status variation and transitivity

    variation--among different types verb-object consrtuctions, it

    is found to be a result of the competition and complementation

    among some rules, a fact evidenced in Hsieh's (1989)

    Interaction theory. the success of the interaction account

    further justifies our incorporation analysis on verb-object

    construcitons.

    Acknowledgement‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  i
    Abstract‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  ii
    Table of Contents‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ iv
    Chapter

    1 Introduction‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 1
    1.1 Variation and Change in Language‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  1
    1.1.1 Syntax and Morphology‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  1
    1.1.2 Issues on the Formation of VO Compounds‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  2
    1.2 Some Baic Notions in the Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  5
    1.2.1 The Notion of Word‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  5
    1.2.2 The Notion of Compound‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  7
    1.2.3 The Notion of Verb-Object Construction (VOC) ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  9
    1.3 The Organization of the Thesis‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  11
    Notes‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  14
    2 Background of the Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  17
    2.1 Introduction‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  17
    2.2 Some Previous Studies on Vo Compounds‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  18
    2.2.1 Chao’s Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  19
    2.2.2 Chi’s study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  19
    2.2.3 Rao’s Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 21
    2.2.4 Huang’s Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 22
    2.2.5 Tang’s Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 23
    2.2.6 Her’s Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 26
    2.2.7 Summary‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 27
    2.3 The Approach of This Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  28
    2.3.1 The Incorporation Theory‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  31
    2.3.1.1 The Principle of UTAH‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  32
    2.3.1.2 The Principle of HMC‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  33
    2.3.1.3 The Principle of GTC‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 38
    2.3.2 The Place of Morphology‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  41
    2.3.2.1 Morphology in the Incorporation Theory‧‧‧‧‧ 42
    2.3.2.2 A Modification on the Incorporation Theory‧‧‧‧ 44
    Notes‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 47
    3 VO Compounds as a Result of Noun Incorporation‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  50
    3.1 Introduction‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  50
    3.2 The Incorporation Analysis on VO Constructions‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  51
    3.2.1 The Classification of VOC’s‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 51
    3.2.2 VOC’s with Dual Status‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  52
    3.2.2.1 The Dan-xin Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  53
    3.2.2.2 The Chi-cu Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 58
    3.2.2.3 The Bang-piao Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  61
    3.2.2.4 The Yi-ming Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  65
    3.2.3 The More Phrase-like VOC’s‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  68
    3.2.3.1 The Shi-yi Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  69
    3.2.3.2 The Chi-fan Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  72
    3.2.4 The More Compound-like VOC’s‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  76
    3.2.4.1 The Guo-mu Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  76
    3.2.4.2 The De-zui Type‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 79
    3.2.5 Summary‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 82
    3.3 Further Justification for the Incorporation Account‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 83
    3.3.1 Tang’s Study‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 83
    3.3.2 Grimshaw’s Thematic Prominence Hierarchy‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 83
    3.3.2 Argument Against the Incorporation of Elements of      Other Roles‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 85
    3.4 The Implication on a Plausible Classification‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 87
    3.5 Summary‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  89
    Notes‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  91
    4 Rule Interaction and Syntactic Variation‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  97
    4.1 Introduction‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  97
    4.2 Hsieh’s Interaction Theory‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 98
    4.3 The Interaction Theory and the Syntactic Variation of VOC’S in  Mandarin Chinese‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 100
    4.3.1 Status Variation and Rule Interaction‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 101
    4.3.2 Transitivity Variation‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  105
    4.3.2.1 Mithun’s Incorporation Theory‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  105
    4.3.2.2 Transitivity Variation and Rule Interaction‧‧  108
    4.3.2.2.1 The Transitivity Variation Among VOC’s 108
    4.3.2.2.2 The Account of rule Interaction‧‧‧ 109
    4.4 Summary‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 123
    Notes‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 125
    5 Conclusion‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 128
    5.1 Introduction‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 128
    5.2 Word and Compound in Mandarin Chinese‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 128
    5.3 The Formation of VO Compounds as a Case of the Noun    Incorporation‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 129
    5.4 The Interface Between Syntax and Morphology‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  129
    5.5 The Paradox of Dual Status and the Incorporation Theory‧‧‧  130
    5.6 An Implicational Scale for the Lexicalization Process‧‧‧‧‧‧ 130
    5.7 The Syntactic Variation Among VOC’s as a Case of rule Interaction 131
    5.8 Uncovered Issues with Potential Significance‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  131
    5.9 Concluding Remarks‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  138
    Notes‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  140
    Bibliography‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 141
    Appendix I‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  147
    Appendix II‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧  150

    Bibliography
    Allen, Margaret Reece. 1978. Morphological Investigation.
    Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Connecticut.
    Anderson, stephen R. "Where's Morphology. II Linguistic
    Inquiry 13: 571-612.
    Antilla, Raimo. 1972. An Introduction to Historical and
    Comparative Linguistics.
    Publishers.
    New York: Macmillan
    Aoun, J. and D. Sportiche. 1983. liOn the Formal Theory of
    Government. II The Linguistic Review 3: 211-35.
    Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical
    Function Changing.
    Press.
    Chicago: The University of Chicago
    Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt,
    Rinehart and Winston Inc.
    Borer, Hagit. 1991. liThe Causative-Inchoative Alternation:
    A Case study in Parallel Morphology. II The Linguistic
    Review 8: 119-58.
    Chao, Y. R. 1968 . A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley:
    University of California Press.
    Chi, Telee R. 1985. A Lexical Analysis of Verb-Noun
    Compounds in Mandarin Chinese.
    Publication.
    Taipei: The Crane
    Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding.
    Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
    --- 1986. "Barriers." Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 13.
    Cambridge: MIT Press.
    DeFrancis, John. 1990. The Chinese Language: Facts and
    Fantasy. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
    Crystal, David. 1980. A First Dictionary of Linguistics
    and Phonetics. London: Andre Deutsch.
    Dai, Xiang-ling. 1992. Chinese Morphology and Its
    Interface with the Syntax. Ph. .D. diss. The Ohio state
    University.
    Desirat, Micheli and Alain Peyraube. 1992. "Some Remarks
    on the Demonstratives in the fu zhou Dialect with
    Reference to Their Historical Evolution in Medieval and
    Modern Chinese." Chinese Language and Linguistics,
    P.493-522.
    Di sciullo, Anna-Maria, and Edwin Williams. 1989. On the
    Definition of Word. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Elson, Benjamin F., and Velma B. Picket. 1988. Beginning
    Morphology and Syntax. Dallas: The Summer Institute of
    Linguistics, Inc.
    Everaert, Martin, et al. 1988. Morphology and Modularity.
    Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
    Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge: The
    MIT Press.
    Guo, Liang-Fu. 1990. cihui Yu Cidian. Beijin: Shang Wu
    Publishers.
    Her, Da An. 1989. Sheng Yun Xue Zhong De Guan Nian Yu Fang
    Fa. Taipei: Da An Publishers .
    Her, One-Soon. "Interaction of Syntactic Changes. II
    Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on
    Chinese Language and Linguistics, 238-50.
    to appear. IIModularity and Interaction in Grammar. II
    Hocket, Charles. A Course in Modern Linguistics. NevI York:
    The Macmillan Company.
    Hong, Chi. 1992. "Noun Incorporation: A Chinese Case?1I
    Word 43, No . 2: 233-48.
    Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980.
    IITransitivity in Grammar and Discourse. 1I Language 56,
    No.2: 251-99.
    1984. liThe Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in
    universal Grammar. II Language 60, No.4: 703-52.
    Hsieh, H. 1989. History, Structure, and Competition.
    Paper Presented at the Eight Internationa l Workshop on
    Chinese Linguistics, POLA, University of California,
    Berkeley, March 20-21.
    1990. "In Search of a Grammatical Foundation for
    Dialect Subgrouping. 1I Proceedings of the First
    International Symposium on Chinese Language and
    Linguistics, 146-67.
    Huang, Chu-Ren. 1989. IIS ubcategorized Topics in Mandarin
    Chinese. II Paper presented at 1989 CLTA Annual Meeting,
    November 17-19, Boston, Mass.
    Huang, James. 1984. "Phrase structure, Lexical Integrity,
    and Chinese Compounds." JCLTA, vol. XIX, No.2: 53-78.
    1991. "Verb Movement, (In)definiteness, and the
    Thematic Hierarchy. II Proceedings of the Second
    International Symposium on Chinese Languages and
    Linguistics, 481-98.
    1992. "On Lexical structure and Syntactic structure."
    Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on
    Chinese Languages and Linguistics.
    Huang, Shuan-Fan. 1984. "Morphology as Cause of Syntactic
    Change. II Journal of Chinese Linguistics 12: 54-84.
    Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live
    Qy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lapointe, S. 1979. A Theory of Grammatical Agreement.
    Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts,
    Amherst.
    Larson, Richard K. 1988. "On the Double Object
    Construction." Linguistic Inguiry 19: 335-91.
    Lederer, Richard. 1980. English Word Making. Ph.D.
    dissertation. Harvard University.
    Lehmann, Winfred P. 1973. Historical Linguistics: An
    Introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
    Inc.
    Li, Audrey Y. H. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin
    Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin
    Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley:
    University of California Press.
    Li, Y. C. 1980. liThe Historical Development of the Coverb
    and the Coverbial Phrase in Chinese." Journal of
    Chinese Linguistics 8: 273-93.
    Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical
    Relations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Mathews, P. H. 1974. Morphology: An Introduction to the
    Theory of Word-Structure. London: cambridge University
    Press.
    Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The Evolution of Noun
    Incorporation." Language 60: 847-94.
    O'grady, William and Michael Dobrovolsky. 1987.
    Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction.
    N.p. :Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.
    Pesetsky, David. 1985. "Morphology and Logical Form."
    Linguistic Inguiry 16: 193-246.
    Radford, Andrew. 1989. Transformational Grammar: A First
    Course. New York: Cambridge university Press.
    Rao, Chang-Rong. 1984. "Dong Bin Zu He Dai Bin Yu. II Zhong
    Guo Yu Wen, No.6: 413-18.
    Schane, Sanford A. 1978. Workbook in Generative Phonology.
    New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    Selkirk, Elizabeth o. 1982. The Syntax of Words.
    Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Shibatani, Masayoshi and Taro Kageyama. 1988.
    “Postsyntactic Compounds in Janpanes.” Language 64, No. 3: 451-84.
    Sloat, Clarence and Sharon Taylor. 1985. The Structure of English words. N.p.: Kendall/hunt Publishing company.
    Starosta, Stanley, ms. 1992. “VR Compounding and Chinese Linguistic Methodology.” University of Hawaii.
    Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT
    Tang, C.C. 1989. “Movement in Chinese , Subjacency and the Ecp. “ Paper read at the second World Conference on Chinese Linguistics and Teaching.
    ---, 1990. Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X’-Theory. Ph.D. diss. Cornell Univeristy.
    Tang, T. C. 1989. Hang Yu Yu Fa Ju Fa Xu Ji. Taipei : The Student Store.
    ---. 1992. Han Yu Ci Fa Ju Fa San Ji. Taipei : The Studen Store.
    Travis ,. L. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT
    Wang, Williams S-Y. 1969. “Competing Changes as a Cause of Residue”

    無法下載圖示 (限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)
    QR CODE
    :::