跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳沛慈
Chen, Pei-Cih
論文名稱: 策略性投資之股權收購:以P 公司收購T 公司為例
A Study on Strategic Equity Investment: The Case of P Company’s Acquisition of T Company
指導教授: 梁嘉紋
口試委員: 黃政仁
郭翠菱
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration(EMBA)
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 115
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 42
中文關鍵詞: 策略性股權投資決策節奏問題代理問題家族企業治理白馬騎士資產與控制權分離
外文關鍵詞: strategic equity investment, decision-cadence problem, agency problem, family business governance, white knight, asset–control separation
相關次數: 點閱:71下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 策略性股權投資係企業取得關鍵資源與控制權之重要途徑,惟當投資標的為家族企業時,其成敗高度取決於目標公司之家族治理結構、派系動態及外部競爭者介入等多重因素之交互作用。本研究以 P 公司對 T 公司之策略性股權投資事件為個案,探討食品飲料產業以取得通路資源為目的之策略性收購、家族企業對外部投資者之防禦邏輯,以及外部投資者可行之管理策略。
    透過公開資訊觀測站、公司年報及媒體報導之事件歷程分析,本研究歸納出四項理論延伸。第一,收購方於關鍵時點之決策節奏延宕,稱為「收購方之決策節奏問題」。第二,白馬騎士於中長期可能實質轉化為新的控制權競爭者,形成「假性白馬騎士」與「盟友轉換風險」現象。第三,家族企業之防禦邏輯由「保全控制權」演化為「資產與控制權分離」進階模式,即家族大股東可能主動處分核心策略資產,阻絕外部投資者取得關鍵價值。第四,被收購者於控制權競逐過程中,具備主動消滅自身策略性資源之能力,稱為「策略性資源之可消滅性」。
    本研究之觀察對外部策略投資者、家族企業經營者及主管機關均具實務啟示,並就策略性股權投資與家族企業治理相關理論提供新的分析視角。


    Strategic equity investment is a key means by which firms acquire critical resources and secure corporate control. When the target is a family business, however, its outcome depends largely on how the target’s family governance structure, factional dynamics, and external competitor intervention interact. Situated in Taiwan’s food and beverage industry, this study takes P Company’s strategic equity investment in T Company as a case study, examining the strategic acquisition motivated by distribution-channel resources, the defensive logic that family firms adopt against external investors, and the managerial strategies available to such investors.
    Drawing on an event-history analysis of data from the Market Observation Post System (MOPS), corporate annual reports, and media coverage, this study identifies four theoretical extensions. First, an acquirer’s delays at key decision points are termed the “acquirer’s decision-cadence problem.” Second, a white knight may substantively evolve into a new contender for corporate control, giving rise to the “pseudo white knight” and “ally-shift risk” phenomena. Third, family firms’ defensive logic advances from “preserving control” to an “asset–control separation” model, whereby the controlling family may proactively divest core strategic assets to prevent external investors from capturing the underlying value. Fourth, target firms may actively eliminate their own strategic resources during a contest for control, a phenomenon termed the “dispensability of strategic resources.”
    These findings offer practical implications for external strategic investors, family business operators, and regulators, and contribute a new analytical perspective to the theoretical literature on strategic equity investment and family business governance.

    摘要 I
    Abstract II
    圖次 V
    表次 V
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 1
    第二節 研究目的 2
    第三節 研究架構 3
    第二章 文獻探討 5
    第一節 食品飲料業之通路策略相關文獻 5
    第二節 企業策略管理之相關文獻 8
    第三節 企業併購與股權收購相關文獻 10
    第四節 家族傳承治理相關文獻 16
    第三章 研究方法 18
    第一節 個案公司沿革 18
    第二節 家族治理與股權派系分析 22
    第四章 個案研究分析 26
    第一節 股權收購動機 26
    第二節 股權收購歷程 27
    第三節 目標公司之防禦策略 32
    第四節 股權收購結果 33
    第五章 結論與建議 34
    第一節 研究結論 34
    第二節 管理意涵 36
    第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 38
    參考文獻 39

    一、中文文獻
    公視新聞網2025/10/17台灣便利商店年增率3% 每2.57平方公里即有1間 https://news.pts.org.tw/article/775582
    司徒達賢(2021),家族企業的治理、傳承與接班,天下文化。
    李佩珊(2018),半導體封測業收購策略之研究—以日月光收購矽品為例,未出版碩士論文,國立中山大學財務管理研究所。
    郭宗銘(2016),歷久彌堅-理性與感性的傳承實務,財團法人資誠教育基金會。
    陳琪媛(2023),併購對零售通路銷售額之影響研究—以家樂福併購案為例,未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣大學社會科學院經濟學研究所。
    湯麗芬(2010),家族企業特質與盈餘品質之關聯性,當代會計,11(專刊) :371~ 410 。
    萬國法律事務所(2022),問鼎:經營權攻防策略,天下文化。
    葉銀華(1999),家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證卷市場之比較,管理評論,18(2):59~86
    資誠聯合會計師事務所(2020),2020臺灣家族企業傳承白皮書,資誠聯合會計師事務所。
    蔡鴻青(2015),有效管理家族企業的利益衝突,哈佛商業評論,2015年9月。
    二、英文文獻
    Aaker, D. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1979), Unobservable variables in structural equation models with an application in industrial selling. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (2), 147-158.
    Adendorff, C., Venter, E., Boshoff, C. (2008), The impact of family harmony on governance practices in South African Greek family businesses, Management Dynamics 17(3): 28-44.
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988), Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411- 423.
    Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing 54(1): 42-58.
    Applegate, J. (1994), Keep your firm in the family, Money 23(1): 88-91.
    Bagozzi, R., Edwards, J. (1998), A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods 1(1): 45-87.
    Barney, J. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
    Barros, P. P., Brito, D., & de Lucena, D. (2006). Mergers in the food retailing sector: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review 50(2): 447–468.
    Berkovitch, E., & Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28(3): 347–362.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asia corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1): 81-112.
    Cushman, L. M., & Dyer, C. L. (1997). Post-acquisition performance of apparel retailers: Is bigger necessarily better? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 2(1): 34–40.
    Denis, D. J., & Denis, D. K. (1995), Performance changes following top management dismissals. Journal of Finance 50(4): 1029–1057.
    Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. (2002), Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 401-425.
    Galbraith, J. K. (1952). American capitalism: The concept of countervailing power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Galbraith, J. K. (1954). Countervailing power. American Economic Review 44(2): 1–6.
    Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    Holmström, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics 10(1):74–91.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225–264.
    Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.), Pearson Education.
    La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance 54(2): 471–517.
    Manne, H. G. (1965). Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 73(2): 110–120.
    Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4): 370–396.
    McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1990). Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions? The Journal of Finance 45(1): 31–48.
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance 52(2): 737–783.
    Stamm, I., & Sandham, A. (2026). A bird’s-eye view on family business succession: Ownership transfer regimes and how they change. Family Business Review 39(1): 14–39.
    Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80(2): 385–417.
    Weitz, B. A., & Jap, S. D. (1995). Relationship marketing and distribution channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23(4):305–320
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/07/29
    QR CODE
    :::