跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳昀鍾
論文名稱: 此在的時間性與存有的超越界域──對《存有與時間》的一個探究
指導教授: 羅麗君
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 哲學系
Department of Philosophy
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 113
中文關鍵詞: 此在存有時間性時間狀態超越界域
外文關鍵詞: Dasein, Sein, Zeitlichkeit; temporality, Temporalität; Temporality, transcendental horizon
相關次數: 點閱:432下載:248
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文作為對《存有與時間》的一個探究,其研究焦點主要是針對《存有與時間》第一部的寫作計畫──藉由時間性詮釋此在,解說時間之為存有問題的超越界域──探究為何任何一種存有理解皆必須以時間為其可能界域?我首先闡釋了存有理解的可能性條件──此在的時間性,而其所綻出的超越界域,乃是存有的時間狀態,此在理解投設存有之所在。不過,在海德格的前期思路中,尚未超出界域思維,徹底達致存有自身,對於這部分我將從後期思維加以補充說明。


    前言.......................................................1

    第一章:此在的時間性.........................................5
     第一節:存有與此在.........................................6
     第二節:此在.............................................11
     二之一:現身情態.........................................15
     二之二:理解.............................................19
     二之三:言說.............................................22
     二之四:陷溺.............................................24
     第三節:此在的存有──關念................................27
     第四節:關念的意義──時間性...............................36
     第五節:非本真時間性......................................53
     第六節:本真時間性........................................59

    第二章:理解存有的超越界域..................................68
     第一節:此在的時間性與存有的時間狀態.......................69
     第二節:以存有的時間狀態詮釋存有...........................78

    第三章:對於解說時間之為存有理解之界域的檢討..................84
     第一節:將時間解說為存有之超越界域的疑難之處................85
     第二節:對於綻出界域的時間性之補充.........................96

    結語.....................................................105

    參考書目.................................................109

    海德格原著:
    德文部分:
    Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, Gesamtausgabe Band 24, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1997.
    Logik : die Frage nach der Wahrheit, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1995.
    Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz, Gesamtausgabe Band 26, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1990.
    Sein und Zeit, Gesamtausgabe Band 2, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1977.
    英文翻譯部分:
    An Introduction to Metaphysics, translated by Manheim, R. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.
    Being and Time, translated by John and Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, New York: Harper & Row Publishers. 1962.
    Contributions to Philosophy : From Enowning, translated by Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly Bloomington, Ind. : Indiana University Press, 1999.
    Discourse on Thinking : a translation of Gelassenheit, translated by John M. Anderson and E. Hans Freund, New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
    Early Greek Thinking, translated by David Farrell Krell and Frank A. Capuzzi. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1984, 1975.
    History of the concept of time: prolegomena, translated by Theodore Kisiel, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.
    Identity and Difference, translated by Joan Stambaugh, Chicago, Ill. : University of Chicago, 2002.
    Introduction to Metaphysics, translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt, New Haven, Conn. : Yale University Press, 2000.
    Nietzsche, translated by David Farrell Krell, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1979.
    Off the Beaten Track, translated by Julian Young and Kenneth Haynes Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    “The Origin of the Work of Art”. In: Off the Beaten Track, p.1~56.
    “Nietzsche’s Words: ‘God is dead’”. In: Off the Beaten Track, p.157~199.
    “Why Poets?”. In: Off the Beaten Track, p.200~241.
    “Anaximander’s Saying”. In: Off the Beaten Track, p.242~281.
    On the Way to Language, translated by Peter D. Hertz, New York, Harper & Row, 1971.
    On Time and Being, translated by Joan Stambaugh, Chicago, Ill. : University of Chicago, 2002.
    “Time and Being”. In: On Time and Being, p.1~24.
    “Summary of a Seminar on the Lecture‘Time and Being’”. In: On Time and Being, p.25~54.
    “The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking” . In: On Time and Being, p.55~73.
    “My Way to Phenomenology” . In: On Time and Being, p.74~82.
    Pathmarks, edited by William McNeill, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
    “What is Metaphysics”. In: Pathmarks, p.82~96.
    “On the Essence of Ground”. In: Pathmarks, p.97~135.
    “On the Essence of Truth”. In: Pathmarks, p.136~154.
    “Letter on Humanism”. In: Pathmarks, p.239~276.
    “Introduction to ‘What is Metaphysics’”. In: Pathmarks, p.277~290.
    “On the Question of Being”. In: Pathmarks, p.291~322.
    Poetry, language, thought, translated by Albert Hofstadter, New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
    “The Origin of the Work of Art”. In: Poetry, language, thought, p.15~88.
    The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, translated by Albert Hofstadter, Bloomington, Ind. : Indiana University Press, 1988.
    The concept of time, translated by William McNeill Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass., USA: B. Blackwell, 1992.
    The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, translated by Michael Heim, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.
    中文翻譯部分:
    陳嘉映、王慶節 譯,《存在與時間》,台北:桂冠圖書有限公司,2002 年。
    孫周興 譯,《路標》,北京:商務印書館,2000 年。
    孫周興 選編,《海德格選集》,上海市:上海三聯書店,1996年。
    孫周興 譯,《走向語言之途》,臺北市:時報文化,1993年。
    孫周興 譯,《林中路》,臺北市:時報文化,1994年。
    孫周興 譯,《演講與論文集》,北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯出版:新華經銷,2005年。
    丁耘 譯,《現象學之基本問題》,上海譯文出版社,2008年。

    其他英文書目:
    Carol J. White, Time and Death: Heidegger's Analysis of Finitude, Aldershot, Ashgate Press, 2005.
    Christopher Macann, Martin Heidegger : critical assessments, London; New York: Routledge, 1992.
    Thomas Sheehan, “‘Time and being,’1925-7”. In: Martin Heidegger : critical assessments, p.29~67.
    Françoise Dastur, “The ekstatico-horizonal constitution of temporality”. In: Martin Heidegger : critical assessments, p.170~182.
    David Frarrell Krell, Intimations of Mortality, The Pennsylvania State University Press: 1986.
    Hubert L. Dreyfus, Being-in-the-world : A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and time, Division I. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1991.
    Hubert Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall, Heidegger Reexamined V.1, New York: London: Taylor & Francis, 2002. p.191~284.
    Jacques Derrida, Margins of Philosophy, translated by Alan Bass, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
    Jacques Taminiaux, Heidegger and the Project of Fundamental Ontology, translated by Michael Gendre. Albany, N.Y. : State University of New York Press, 1991.
    James E. Faulconer and Mark A. Wrathall, Appropriating Heidegger, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
    Hubert L. Dreyfus, “Could anything be more intelligible than everyday intelligibility? Reinterpreting division I of Being and Time in the light of division II”. In: Appropriating Heidegger, p155~174.
    Joan Stambaugh, The Finitude of Being, State University of New York Press, 1992.
    John Sallis, Reading Heidegger: commemorations, In: Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.
    Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, “Being and Time and The Basic Problems of Phenomenology”. In: Reading Heidegger : commemorations, p.118~135.
    Joseph J. Kockelmans, On the Truth of Being: Reflections on Heidegger's Later Philosophy, Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Dissertation Services, A Bell & Howell Co., 2000 printing, 1984.
    Joseph J. Kockelmans, Heidegger's "Being and time": the Analytic of Dasein as Fundamental Ontology, Washington, D.C. Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology: University Press of America, 1989.
    Otto Pöggeler, Martin Heidegger's Path of Thinking, translated by D. Magurshak and S. Barber. Atlantic Highlands, NJ. : Humanities Press International, 1987.
    Stephen Mulhall, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Heidegger and Being and time, London; New York: Routledge, 1996.
    William Mcneill, The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory, State University of New York Press, 1999.
    William Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1974.
    Zimmerman, Michael E, “Some Important Themes in Current Heidegger Research (Book Review)”. Research in Phenomenology 7, 1977. p.259~281.

    其他中文書目:
    項退結,《海德格》,臺北市:東大出版:三民經銷,1989年。
    陳嘉映,《海德格爾哲學槪論》,北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯出版:新華經銷,1995年。
    陳榮華,《海德格「存有與時間」闡釋》,臺北市:國立臺灣大學出版中心,2003年。
    克勞斯‧黑爾德(Klaus Held),《世界現象學》,孫周興 編,倪梁康等 譯,臺北縣新店市:左岸文化出版:遠足文化發行,2004年。
    汪文聖,《胡賽爾與海德格》,台北市:遠流,1997年。
    黃文宏,〈海德格「轉向」(Kehre)的一個詮釋—以真理問題為線索〉,載於《歐美研究》第三十一卷第二期,民國九十年六月,頁187~324。
    克勞斯‧黑爾德(Klaus Held),〈胡塞爾與海德格爾的本真時間現象學〉,收錄於《中國現象學與哲學評論》第六輯,上海市:上海譯文出版社,2004年。

    QR CODE
    :::