跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 海玫瑰
Kaya Rose Heimowitz
論文名稱: 觀看、關注、消費 : KOL 網紅對台灣與美國年輕人消費行為的量化分析研究
Watch, Follow, Spend: A Quantitative Analysis of KOL/Influencer Impact on Young Adult Consumer Spending in Taiwan and the United States
指導教授: 蔡葵希
Cook, Christine
口試委員: 施琮仁
Shih, Tsung-Jen
楊孟潔
Yang, Jacie
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 傳播學院 - 國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
International Master's Program in International Communication Studies(IMICS)
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 71
中文關鍵詞: 關鍵意見領袖(KOL)社群媒體影響者線上消費行為跨文化比較研究
外文關鍵詞: Influencers, KOLs, Social Media Marketing, Moderated Mediation
相關次數: 點閱:160下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著社群媒體平台的興起,帶動著創新行銷方式的蓬勃發展,社群媒體影響者(Social Media Influencers)也隨之快速崛起。在亞洲市場上,這些影響者通常被稱為「關鍵意見領袖」(Key Opinion Leaders, KOLs)。當品牌商持續提高給影響者的行銷預算,而影響者與KOL也透過品牌合作進一步拓展其數位廣告影響力,我們極需進行公共意見研究來探討其對消費者的影響以及此影響如何因文化脈絡而產生差異。
    本研究採用跨文化比較研究設計,探討千禧世代(Millennials)與Z世代(Generation Z)消費者之間,追蹤流行文化內容(包括KOL)、KOL參與程度、對影響者影響公共意見之擔憂,以及每月線上消費支出之關係。臺灣樣本使用2022年臺灣傳播調查(Taiwan Communication Survey, TCS)資料,該調查為採用分層多階段機率比例抽樣(Probability Proportional to Size, PPS)設計之全國代表性調查。美國樣本則來自研究者自行設計,並透過Qualtrics平台施測之問卷。調查對象為相同年齡層之美國成年人。
    本研究以精細化可能性模式(Elaboration Likelihood Model, ELM)、擬社會互動理論(Parasocial Interaction Theory)及偶像依附理論(Idol Attachment Theory)為理論基礎,運用Hayes PROCESS Model 7 調節式中介分析(moderated mediation analysis)來檢驗KOL、影響者參與程度是否在追蹤者身分與線上消費支出的關係中發揮中介作用,並對影響者影響力的擔憂是否調節此間接效應。
    研究結果顯示出明顯的跨文化差異。在臺灣與美國,追蹤者身分皆能顯著預測KOL參與程度。然而,KOL參與程度僅在美國樣本中能顯著預測線上消費支出,因此中介效果僅獲得美國樣本支持,而未在臺灣樣本中成立。此外,對影響者影響公共意見之擔憂在兩個樣本中皆未顯著調節此間接效果。
    進一步的探索性分析發現,不同社群平台呈現特定模式。例如,在臺灣與美國樣本中,Facebook使用與線上消費支出呈現正向關係。在美國樣本中,以平台參與程度為基礎的分析顯示,Instagram、Facebook、X、YouTube及TikTok均支持中介效果;而以接觸程度為基礎的分析則顯示,追蹤更多影響者會直接預測較高的消費支出,且此效果獨立於參與程度之外。


    The rise of social media platforms has led to innovative marketing techniques and the rise of social media influencers, also commonly referred to as “key opinion leaders” (KOLs) in Asian markets. As brands contemplate influencer marketing budgets and influencers and KOLs grow their platforms and collaborate with brands to move into online advertising, there is a growing need for public opinion research to measure the effect on consumers and how these effects vary across cultural contexts.
    This study used a cross-cultural comparative design to investigate the relationship between following popular culture (including KOLs), KOL engagement, concern about influencer impact on public opinion, and monthly online spending among Millennial and Generation Z consumers. The Taiwanese sample utilized data from the 2022 Taiwan Communication Survey (TCS), a nationally representative survey based on a stratified multi-stage probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling design. The US sample consisted of an original Qualtrics survey administered to American adults in the same age groups. Guided by the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), Parasocial Interaction Theory, and Idol Attachment Theory, this study employed PROCESS Model 7 moderated mediation analyses to examine whether KOL/Influencer engagement mediated the relationship between follower status and online spending and whether concern about influencer influence moderated this indirect effect.
    Results revealed notable cross-cultural differences. In both Taiwan and the United States, follower status significantly predicted KOL engagement. However, KOL engagement significantly predicted online spending only in the US sample, resulting in a supported mediation effect among American participants but not among Taiwanese participants. Concern about influencer impact did not significantly moderate the indirect effect in either sample. Exploratory analyses further revealed platform-specific patterns, including a positive relationship between Facebook use and online spending in both countries. In the US sample, platform-specific engagement models supported mediation across Instagram, Facebook, X, YouTube, and TikTok, while exposure-based analyses suggested that following more influencers directly predicted higher spending independent of engagement.

    Introduction 1
    Literature Review 2
    Methodology 9
    Participants 10
    Measures 13
    Procedure 17
    Results 21
    Hypothesis Testing 22
    Exploratory Analyses 23
    Summary of Results Across Taiwanese and American Samples 29
    Discussion 30
    Theoretical Implications 32
    Practical Implications 33
    Limitations 34
    Future Research Directions 36
    Conclusion 36
    References 39
    Appendix A 48
    Appendix B 52
    Appendix C 54
    Appendix D 70

    Ahuja, S. (2025). Top 20 Taiwan Influencers in 2025 - Favikon. Favikon. https://www.favikon.com/blog/top-taiwan-influencers
    Asquith, K., & Fraser, E. (2020). A critical analysis of attempts to regulate native advertising and influencer marketing. International Journal of Communication, 14, 21. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:228937609
    Bao, H. W. S. (2021). bruceR: Broadly useful convenient and efficient R functions (Version 2026.1) [Computer software]. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.bruceR
    Bartholomew, M. (2017). Adcreep : the case against modern marketing. Stanford Law Books, An Imprint Of Stanford University Press.
    Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1995). Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1086/209432
    Chan-Olmsted, S., & Wang, R. (2020). Understanding podcast users: Consumption motives and behaviors. New Media & Society, 24(3), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820963776
    Chen C (2025), "YouTube influencer marketing through parasocial interaction: a dyadic perspective". Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 3 pp. 460–481, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2024-0112
    Chen, Jason D. (2011) "The Globalizing Effect of Korean Pop Culture," Mountaineer Undergraduate Research Review: Vol. 3, Article 7.Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/murr/vol3/iss1/7
    Chen, T. Y., Yeh, T. L., & Lee, F. Y. (2021). The impact of Internet celebrity characteristics on followers’ impulse purchase behavior: the mediation of attachment and parasocial interaction. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-09-2020-0183
    Chen, Y.-H., Lin, I-Kai., Huang, C.-I., & Chen, H.-S. (2024). How Key Opinion Leaders’ Expertise and Renown Shape Consumer Behavior in Social Commerce: An Analysis Using a Comprehensive Model. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 3370–3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19040163
    Chiu, Y.-J., Hong, L.-S., Song, S.-R., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2024). Unveiling the Dynamics of Consumer Attention: A Two-Stage Hybrid MCDM Analysis of Key Factors and Interrelationships in Influencer Marketing. Mathematics, 12(7), 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12070981
    Chris Allen Thomas. (2009). Using Technology to Reintegrate Learning and Doing: : IBM’s Approach and its Implications for Education. IGI Global EBooks, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-739-3.ch005
    De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram Influencers: the Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
    Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
    Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., & Carlson, J. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59(1), 1–37. ScienceDirect.
    Eldridge, A. (2025). Generation Z. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Generation-Z
    Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Yuan, Y. (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59(1), 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371
    Federal Trade Commission. (2019, November). Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/disclosures-101-social-media-influencers
    Global social media users by region 2025| Statista. (2025). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/454772/number-social-media-user-worldwide-region/
    Gottfried, J. (2024, January 31). Americans’ Social Media Use. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/01/31/americans-social-media-use/
    Guan, C., & Li, E. (2021). Emerging Issues in Social Media Influencers. Int. J. Internet Marketing and Advertising, 15(2), 124–128.
    Gutfreund, J. (2026, February 23). How TikTok Shop Is Amazon’s Most Powerful Commerce Demand Engine. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiegutfreund/2026/02/23/tiktok-shop-is-now-amazons-most-powerful-commerce-demand-engine/
    Hamdan, E., Noryusnita Ramli, Siti Nasarah Ismail, & Nur, S. (2023, October 31). ID0036 -KEY OPINION LEADERS (KOLs) vs. INFLUENCERS. ResearchGate; unknown. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375829142_ID0036_-KEY_OPINION_LEADERS_KOLs_vs_INFLUENCERS
    Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
    Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
    Huang, Y.-A., Lin, C., & Phau, I. (2015). Idol attachment and human brand loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 49(7/8), 1234–1255. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-07-2012-0416
    Huang, Y.-T., & Gong, A.-D. (2024). “Will You Buy It If They Recommend It?” Exploring the Antecedents of Intention to Purchase Podcaster-Endorsed Items. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 1682–1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030082
    Influencer Intelligence. (2018). Influencer Marketing 2020. In Influencer Intelligence. Influencer Intelligence & Econsultancy. https://www.influencerintelligence.com/insights/HW/Influencer-Marketing-2020
    Jun, S., & Yi, J. (2020). What Makes Followers loyal? The Role of Influencer Interactivity in Building Influencer Brand Equity. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(6), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-02-2019-2280
    Kanwar, A., & Huang, Y.-C. (2022). Exploring the impact of social media influencers on customers’ purchase intention: A sequential mediation model in Taiwan context. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2022.100308
    Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
    King, J. (2024, August 5). Guide to influencer marketing: Trends, tactics, creators and KPIs. EMARKETER. https://www.emarketer.com/learningcenter/guides/influencer-marketing-report/
    KOLs vs Influencers: What They Are & What Differentiates Them. (2020). Influencity.com; Influencity. https://influencity.com/resources/guide/what-are-kols-and-what-sets-them-apart-from-influencers
    Lefty. (2024). 2024’s Top Influencers of the Year. Lefty. https://lefty.io/blog/2024-top-influencers
    Lien, N.-H. (2001). Elaboration Likelihood Model in Consumer Research: A Review. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(C), 11(4), 301–310.
    Lin, C. A., Crowe, J., Pierre, L., & Lee, Y. (2021). Effects of Parasocial Interaction with an Instafamous Influencer on Brand Attitudes and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Social Media in Society, 10(1). https://thejsms.org/index.php/JSMS/article/view/811
    Lin, Y.-T. (2026, March 18). Why Threads is so popular in Taiwan . Taiwan News. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/news/6323133
    Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
    Moeran, B. (2001). Asian media productions. University of Hawai’i Press.
    Morra, M. C., Gelosa, V., Ceruti, F., & Mazzucchelli, A. (2017). Original or counterfeit luxury fashion brands? The effect of social media on purchase intention. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 9(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2017.1399079
    Moskowitz, M. L., Morris, A., Van Fleit Hang, K., Allen, J. R., Chun, A., Lee, A., Tung, C.-H., Huwy-Min Liu, L., & Silvio, T. (2010). Popular Culture in Taiwan. Popular Culture in Taiwan Charismatic Modernity, 3. Routledge Research on Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842072
    Taiwan Communication Survey Research Team. (2022). Taiwan Communication Survey 2022: Communication and Civil Society – Citizen and Political Communication [臺灣傳播調查2022:傳播與公民社會-公民與政治傳播] [Data set]. Communication Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University. https://crctaiwan.dcat.nycu.edu.tw/annualsurvey_e.asp
    Neal, S., & Wellins, R. (2018, April 12). Generation X — not millennials — is changing the nature of work. CNBC; Consumer News and Business Channel. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/11/generation-x--not-millennials--is-changing-the-nature-of-work.html
    Nguyen DM, Nguyen T (2025), "Fostering second-hand luxury purchases through social media influencers: insights from young adults in Taiwan". Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, Vol. 26 No. 4 pp. 606–628, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-12-2024-2359
    Nilesh, C., & Pepe, V. (2025). As millions adopt grok to fact-check, misinformation abounds. Singer Island: Newstex. Retrieved from https://proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/blogs-podcasts-websites/as-millions-adopt-grok-fact-check-misinformation/docview/3229221796/se-2
    Octavia, J. (2025). Online Fraud and Scams in Taiwan. In Safer Internet Lab. Safter Internet Lab. https://saferinternetlab.org/publications/page/3/
    Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Communication and Persuasion, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
    Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2019). A Call for Authenticity: Audience Responses to Social Media Influencer Endorsements in Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1609965
    Pradhan, D., Kuanr, A., Pahi, S. A., & Akram, M. S. (2022). Influencer marketing: When and why gen Z consumers avoid influencers and endorsed brands. Psychology & Marketing, 40(1), 27–47. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21749
    Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
    Schulz, M. (2025a, January 6). What influencer marketing budgets should look like in 2025. Vogue Business. https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/companies/what-influencer-marketing-budgets-should-look-like-in-2025
    Schulz, M. (2025b, January 6). What influencer marketing budgets should look like in 2025. Vogue Business. https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/companies/what-influencer-marketing-budgets-should-look-like-in-2025
    Scott, N. (2024a, December 13). Which beauty brands and influencers won on social media in 2024? Vogue Business. https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/beauty/which-beauty-brands-and-influencers-won-on-social-media-in-2024
    Scott, N. (2024b, December 13). Which beauty brands and influencers won on social media in 2024? Vogue Business. https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/beauty/which-beauty-brands-and-influencers-won-on-social-media-in-2024
    Taiwan: leading online shopping websites 2023| Statista. (2023). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1553701/taiwan-leading-online-shopping-websites/
    Team LTK. (2024, October 23). LTK and Northwestern University Retail Analytics Council Announce Annual Creator Marketing Study. Shopltk.com; rewardStyle | LTK. https://onbrand.shopltk.com/en/latest-news/ltk-and-northwestern-university-retail-analytics-council-announce-annual-creator-marketing-study
    Wang S, Huang CK (2025), "Associations between followers’ perceptions of social media influencer personality traits, perceptions of influencer credibility and intentions to purchase endorsed dietary supplements". British Food Journal, Vol. 127 No. 7 pp. 2328–2347, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2024-0630
    We Are Social. (2025). Digital 2025: Taiwan. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-taiwan
    Wellman, M. L., Stoldt, R., Tully, M., & Ekdale, B. (2020). Ethics of Authenticity: Social Media Influencers and the Production of Sponsored Content. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2020.1736078. Definition of influencers: “individuals who leverage their social and cultural capital on social media to shape the opinions and purchasing decisions of others” .
    Xiang, L., Zheng, X., Lee, M. K. O., & Zhao, D. (2016). Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.002
    Yuan, C. L., Kim, J., & Kim, S. J. (2016). Parasocial relationship effects on customer equity in the social media context. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3795–3803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.071
    Yudha, D. N., Suliyanto, Rezi Muhamad, T. P., Azib, & Hadiarti, D. (2024). Impulsive purchase behaviour of Z generation of Muslim women on TikTok shop: the application of S-O-R framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(2), 493-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2022-0182
    Zelazko, A. (2024, November 20). Millennials. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/millennial
    Zhou, S., Blazquez, M., McCormick, H., & Barnes, L. (2021). How social media influencers’ narrative strategies benefit cultivating influencer marketing: Tackling issues of cultural barriers, commercialised content, and sponsorship disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 134(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.011
    Zitelli, A. (2025). How Elon Musk’s powerful disinformation machine works – EDMO (E. Panizio, Ed.). Edmo.eu; European Digital Media Observatory. https://edmo.eu/publications/how-elon-musks-powerful-disinformation-machine-works/

    QR CODE
    :::