| 研究生: |
徐嘉佑 Hsu, Chia-Yu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
交易稅負擔與臺灣股票市場流動性之關聯:
以持有期間有效稅率(ETW)為核心的實證研究 The Relationship Between Transaction Tax Burden and Stock Market Liquidity in Taiwan: An Empirical Study Focusing on Effective Tax Rates over Holding Periods |
| 指導教授: |
吳文傑
周德宇 |
| 口試委員: |
吳文傑
周德宇 毛治文 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 財政學系 Department of Public Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 60 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 證券交易稅 、有效稅率 、ETW 、Amihud不流動性 、股票市場流動性 、臺灣股票市場 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | securities transaction tax, effective tax weight, ETW, Amihud illiquidity, liquidity, Taiwan stock market |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:56 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討臺灣證券交易稅制度下,投資人面臨的交易稅相對負擔是否會反映於股票市場不流動性。臺灣股票賣出端通常按成交金額課徵固定比例之證券交易稅,且不論投資人獲利或虧損皆須支付,使交易稅在投資行為中具有固定交易摩擦之特性。相較於單純觀察名目稅率,本研究進一步由持有期間報酬狀態出發,建構持有期間有效稅率(Effective Tax Weight, ETW),用以衡量固定交易稅率在不同報酬情境下對投資績效之相對負擔。
本文以臺灣上市普通股為研究對象,依 1 年至 5 年不同持有期間分別建構 ETW,並以 Amihud 不流動性指標之對數形式 ln(ILLIQ) 作為主要被解釋變數。Amihud 指標衡量每單位成交金額所造成的價格反應,數值越大代表價格衝擊越大、流動性越差,因此其本質為不流動性指標。本研究進一步控制公司規模、獲利能力、財務槓桿、評價狀態、股本規模與產業固定效果,並以原始資料與排除極端值兩種版本檢驗結果穩健性。
實證結果顯示,ETW 在所有持有期間下皆與 ln(ILLIQ) 呈現穩定顯著正向關係。由於 ln(ILLIQ) 越高代表不流動性越高,故此結果表示 ETW 越高時,股票市場流動性越差。此方向與交易成本提高可能降低交易意願、削弱市場深度並提高價格衝擊之理論直覺一致。研究結果亦顯示,原始資料與排除極端值版本方向一致,代表主要結論並非由極端值所驅動。
本研究的貢獻在於提供一個由持有期間視角衡量證券交易稅相對負擔的操作型指標,並將其連結至臺灣股票市場不流動性。惟因 ETW 與持有期間報酬存在機械關聯,本文在因果詮釋上採取保守立場,將實證結果定位為交易稅相對負擔與不流動性之系統性關聯。未來可進一步利用證券交易稅政策變動或更高頻之交易資料進行更嚴謹的因果識別。
This thesis investigates whether the relative burden of transaction taxes is associated with stock market illiquidity in Taiwan. Under the Taiwanese securities transaction tax system, stock sales are subject to a fixed proportional tax rate. Unlike income-based taxation, the tax is levied on transaction value regardless of whether the investor realizes a gain or a loss. This institutional feature motivates the construction of an effective tax burden measure from a holding-period perspective.
The key explanatory variable is the Effective Tax Weight (ETW), which transforms the statutory transaction tax rate into a holding-period relative tax burden adjusted by the compound annual growth rate. The dependent variable is the logarithm of the Amihud illiquidity measure, which captures price impact per unit of trading value. The empirical analysis uses Taiwan listed common stocks and estimates separate models for one- to five-year holding periods, controlling for firm size, profitability, leverage, valuation, capital stock, and industry fixed effects.
The results show a stable and statistically significant positive association between ETW and ln(ILLIQ) across holding periods. Since Amihud ILLIQ is an illiquidity measure, the positive coefficient indicates that a higher ETW is associated with higher illiquidity, or equivalently, lower liquidity. The results remain robust after 1%–99% Winsor ization. The findings suggest that the relative burden of transaction taxes is systematically related to market quality in the Taiwanese stock market.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究方法與範圍 3
第三節 研究限制 7
第四節 研究架構 8
第二章 文獻回顧 11
第一節 交易稅、交易成本與市場流動性 11
第二節 市場微結構、價格衝擊與 Amihud 不流動性指標 16
第三節 公司特徵、報酬狀態與不流動性 19
第三章 研究方法及變數 22
第一節 假說建立 22
第二節 實證模型設定 24
第三節 變數說明與資料來源 26
第四章 敘述統計分析 28
第一節 樣本結構與持有期間資料整理 28
第二節 主要變數敘述統計 30
第三節 ETW分布與門檻特性 32
第四節 解釋變數相關性 37
第五章 實證結果分析 41
第一節 普通最小平方法 41
第二節 普通最小平方法控制產業之分析 44
第三節 穩健性檢驗:排除極端值 47
第四節 持有期間差異與經濟意涵 51
第六章 結論與建議 55
參考文獻 59
Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31–56.
Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Liquidity and asset prices. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 1(4), 269–364.
Barber, B. M., Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J., & Odean, T. (2007). Is the aggregate investor reluctant to realise losses? Evidence from Taiwan. European Financial Management, 13(3), 423–447.
Barber, B. M., Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J., & Odean, T. (2009). Just how much do individual investors lose by trading? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 609–632.
Barber, B. M., Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J., Odean, T., & Zhang, K. (2014). The cross-section of speculator skill: Evidence from day trading. Journal of Financial Markets, 18, 1–24.
Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton University Press.
Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2000). Commonality in liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(1), 3–28.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22.
Glosten, L. R., & Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 71–100.
Greene, W. H. (2018). Econometric analysis. Pearson.
Hasbrouck, J. (2009). Trading costs and returns for U.S. equities: Estimating effective costs from daily data. Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1445–1477.
Holden, C. W. (2009). New low-frequency spread measures. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(4), 778–813.
Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1335.
Lee, C. M. C., & Ready, M. J. (1991). Inferring trade direction from intraday data. Journal of Finance, 46(2), 733–746.
Lesmond, D. A., Ogden, J. P., & Trzcinka, C. A. (1999). A new estimate of transaction costs. Review of Financial Studies, 12(5), 1113–1141.
Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798.
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.
Roll, R. (1984). A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market. Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1127–1139.
Stoll, H. R. (2000). Friction. Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1479–1514.
Umlauf, S. R. (1993). Transaction taxes and the behavior of the Swedish stock market. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(2), 227–240.