| 研究生: |
何佳倫 Ho, Chia-Lun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
家樂福綠色產品推廣策略之質性研究—以非籠飼雞蛋為例 A Qualitative Study on Carrefour's Green Product Promotion Strategies: The Case of Cage-Free Eggs |
| 指導教授: |
黃正忠
李佳玲 |
| 口試委員: |
張子超
翁晶晶 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) Master of Business Administration Program(MBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 91 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 非籠飼雞蛋 、綠色產品推廣 、食物轉型 、顧客旅程 、策略行銷 4C |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Cage-free Eggs, Green Product Promotion, Food Transition, Customer Journey, Strategic Marketing, 4C Framework |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:68 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,永續消費、動物福利與食品安全議題逐漸受到重視,零售通路如何將綠色產品從理念倡議轉化為消費者的日常選擇,成為重要課題。本研究以家樂福推動非籠飼雞蛋為個案,主要因家樂福在非籠飼雞蛋推動上具政策承諾、通路實踐與外部肯定,適合作為零售通路推廣食物類綠色產品之代表性個案。本研究旨在探討消費者如何認知、理解與選購非籠飼雞蛋,分析其在購買歷程中面臨的主要考量與阻礙,檢視非籠飼雞蛋是否能作為其他食物類綠色產品的推廣入口,並進一步提出零售通路在資訊溝通、消費者教育與綠色產品推廣上的策略建議。
本研究採質性研究取徑,並以顧客旅程五階段與策略行銷 4C 理論作為分析架構。資料來源包含家樂福個案資料、6 位具日常購蛋經驗消費者之訪談,以及於家樂福內湖影響力概念店完成之 70 位購蛋消費者賣場出口調查。
研究結果顯示,非籠飼雞蛋推廣主要面臨四項斷點。第一,在認知面,消費者對非籠飼雞蛋的認知高度依賴賣場現場,但對產品差異與價值理解仍不完整。第二,在價值面,動物福利能引發理念認同,但若要擴大至一般消費者,仍需連結健康、安全、安心感與來源透明等個人利益。第三,在行動面,完成購買不代表已形成穩定習慣,價格、家庭用量、品牌習慣、通路便利性與促銷因素仍會影響後續選擇。第四,在延伸面,食物類產品較容易成為消費者接受綠色產品的入口,因此非籠飼雞蛋具有延伸至動物福利鮮乳、有機蔬果、小農友善與生態農業產品的潛力。
根據研究發現,本研究提出階段性綠色產品推廣策略,建議零售通路可從認知入口、日常食用場景、人員與社群推廣,以及綠色產品生態系四個層面,推動非籠飼雞蛋與其他食物類綠色產品。整體而言,零售通路不應只作為商品販售平台,更可扮演綠色產品的篩選者、資訊轉譯者與供應端轉型推動者,降低消費者採用綠色產品的門檻。
本研究受限於調查場域主要集中於家樂福內湖影響力概念店,且以質性訪談與賣場出口調查為主,研究結果尚不宜直接推論至所有消費者或零售通路。未來研究可擴大至不同地區、門市類型與通路進行比較,並進一步針對其他食物類綠色產品進行獨立或量化研究。
In recent years, sustainable consumption, animal welfare, and food safety have received increasing attention. How retail channels translate the values of green products into consumers’ everyday choices has become an important issue. This study takes Carrefour’s promotion of cage-free eggs as a case study. Carrefour was selected because of its policy commitment, retail implementation, and external recognition in promoting cage-free eggs, making it a representative case for examining how retail channels promote food-related green products. This study aims to explore how consumers perceive, understand, and purchase cage-free eggs; analyze the key considerations and barriers in their purchase journey; examine whether cage-free eggs can serve as an entry point for promoting other food-related green products; and propose strategic recommendations for retail channels in information communication, consumer education, and green product promotion.
This study adopts a qualitative research approach and uses the five-stage customer journey and the strategic marketing 4C framework as its analytical framework. Data sources include Carrefour case materials, interviews with six consumers with everyday egg-purchasing experience, and an in-store exit survey of 70 egg-purchasing consumers conducted at Carrefour’s Neihu Impact Concept Store.
The findings indicate four major gaps in the promotion of cage-free eggs. First, in terms of awareness, consumers’ understanding of cage-free eggs relies heavily on in-store information, yet their comprehension of product differences and value remains incomplete. Second, in terms of value perception, animal welfare can foster consumers’ value-based identification with the product, but to reach broader consumers, it must be further connected to personal benefits such as health, safety, peace of mind, and source traceability. Third, in terms of action, completing a purchase does not necessarily mean that a stable purchasing habit has been formed. Price, household consumption volume, brand habits, channel convenience, and promotional factors continue to influence consumers’ subsequent choices. Fourth, in terms of extension, food-related products are more likely to serve as an entry point for consumers to accept green products. Therefore, cage-free eggs have the potential to serve as a starting point for promoting animal-welfare milk, organic fruits and vegetables, small-farmer-friendly products, and ecological agricultural products.
Based on the findings, this study proposes a staged green product promotion strategy. Retail channels are advised to promote cage-free eggs and other food-related green products through four dimensions: awareness entry points, everyday food consumption scenarios, frontline staff and social media promotion, and a green product ecosystem. Overall, retail channels should not merely serve as sales platforms, but can also act as green product curators, information translators, and supply-side transformation facilitators, thereby lowering the barriers for consumers to adopt green products.
This study is limited by the fact that its fieldwork was mainly conducted at Carrefour’s Neihu Impact Concept Store. In addition, as the study primarily relies on qualitative interviews and an in-store exit survey, the findings should not be directly generalized to all consumers or retail channels. Future research may expand comparisons across different regions, store types, and retail channels, and further conduct independent or quantitative studies on other food-related green products.
謝誌 II
摘要 III
ABSTRACT IV
目次 1
圖次 3
表次 4
第一章 緒論 5
第一節 研究動機 5
第二節 研究問題與目的 7
第三節 研究流程 8
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 綠色產品定義 9
第二節 綠色行銷定義 12
第三節 非籠飼雞蛋 14
第四節 顧客旅程觀點 17
第五節 策略行銷 4C 理論 20
第三章 研究方法 22
第一節 研究問題與研究設計 22
第二節 研究個案選擇 24
第三節 資料來源與蒐集方式 25
第四章 質性研究結果 28
第一節 家樂福個案研究結果 28
第二節 消費者訪談結果 43
第三節 賣場出口調查結果 55
第五章 結論與討論 64
第一節 研究結論 64
第二節 實務建議 68
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 74
參考文獻 76
附錄一、訪談問題 80
附錄二、賣場出口調查問題 82
附錄三、消費者訪談逐字稿 83
友善雞蛋聯盟 (2021),友善雞蛋聯盟官網, https://eastfree0511.wixsite.com/cagefreealliance/henwelfare,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
台灣家樂福 (n.d.),從 i 開始官方網站,https://www.uni-prosperity.com.tw/impactstartswithi/,擷取日期:2026 年 6 月 13 日。
台灣動物社會研究會 (2023),善待動物當道!全球「廢籠」進展與期程,https://www.east.org.tw/news/8681,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
台灣動物社會研究會 (2024),買蛋最好的選擇!「動物福利標章」+「友善雞蛋聯盟」雙標章,給你和動物更好的生活,https://eastcertified.east.org.tw/zh_tw/2024/07/30/differences/,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
台灣動物社會研究會 (2025),2025 四家零售通路動物福利大驗收—C 碼格子籠雞蛋退場進度揭露,https://www.east.org.tw/action/869661,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 26 日。
台灣動物社會研究會 (2025),家樂福宣布 100% 非籠飼雞蛋邁向最後一哩路|台北市門市即日起全面廢籠!2026 年 10 月達成全台 100% 非籠飼!,https://www.east.org.tw/action/869663,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 26日。
行政院農業委員會 (2021),訂定「指定洗選鮮蛋為應登錄溯源資訊之農產品與其應登錄之項目及標示方式」公告,並自中華民國一百十一年一月一日生效,https://www.moa.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=publication&id=5596,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花 (2005),質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析,身心障礙研究季刊,第 3 卷第 2 期,頁 122-136
邱志聖 (2014),策略行銷分析,台北:華泰文化。
邱志聖、巫立宇 (2020),銷售與顧客關係管理,臺北:華泰文化。
財團法人家樂福文教基金會 (n.d.),家樂福影響力概念店官方網站,https://www.carrefour.org.tw/carrefourImpact.php,擷取日期:2026 年 6 月 13 日。
黃正忠 (2017),透明與信任,才是社會企業的基本 DNA,今周刊 ESG 永續台灣,https://esg.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/180688/post/201712130007,擷取日期:2026年 5 月 12 日。
農業部 (2022),雞蛋友善生產系統定義及指南, https://law.moa.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000691,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
輔仁大學管理學院服務設計研究中心 (2023),永續服務模式之建構與評估—永續旅程地圖之應用,https://www.s3tw.org.tw/OnePage_List.aspx?tid=1152&id=1480,擷取日期:2026 年 6 月 13 日。
盧廷羲 (2024),量販店龍頭的永續轉型!不再「天天都便宜」的家樂福 如何讓員工、顧客都買單?,食力 FoodNEXT ,https://www.foodnext.net/news/industry/paper/5357988496,擷取日期:2026 年 6 月 12 日。
蕭玉品 (2023),台灣家樂福:以食物轉型計畫帶動產業鏈革命,VERSE,https://www.verse.com.tw/article/carrefour-taiwan,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
謝承學 (2022),【友善動物】請讓雞離開籠子!家樂福邀請 Z 世代從飲食選擇改善動物福利,食力 FoodNEXT,https://www.foodnext.net/news/industry/paper/5234664206,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
蘇楓雅 (2021),用 1 歐元加入會員就能參與生產線決策!這個品牌為何讓消費者當家作主?,食力 FoodNEXT ,https://www.foodnext.net/column/columnist/paper/5111616013,擷取日期:2026 年 5 月 12 日。
Belz, F. M., & Peattie, K. (2012). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
C’est qui le Patron?! (n.d.). Oeufs x6. Retrieved from https://agir.cestquilepatron.com/produits/oeufs-x6 on May 12, 2026.
Capturly. (2021). Everything You Need to Know About Non-Linear Customer Journeys. Retrieved from
https://capturly.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-non-linear-customer-journeys/#The_importance_of_a_customer_journey_maps on May 20, 2025.
Carrefour. (2018). Act for Food, a world program of concrete initiatives for better eating. Retrieved from
https://www.carrefour.com/en/news/act-food-world-program-concrete-initiatives-better-eating on May 14, 2026.
Dangelico, R. M., & Vocalelli, D. (2017). “Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1263-1279.
de Medeiros, J. F., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2017). Environmentally sustainable innovation: Expected attributes in the purchase of green products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 240-248.
Følstad, A., & Kvale, K. (2018). Customer journeys: A systematic literature review. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(2), 196–227.
Gurău, C., & Ranchhod, A. (2005). International green marketing: A comparative study of British and Romanian firms. International Marketing Review, 22(5), 547-561.
Herberger Jr, R. A. (1975). The ecological product buying motive: a challenge for consumer education. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 9(2), 187-195.
Jain, S. K., & Kaur, G. (2004). Green Marketing: An Indian Perspective. Decision (0304-0941), 31(2).
Jasti, N. V. K., Sharma, A., & Karinka, S. (2015). Development of a framework for green product development. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(3), 426-445.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96.
Maccoby E. & Maccoby N. (1954). The Interview: A Tool of Social Science. In: G. Lindzey(Ed.)Handbook of Social Psychology. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Maniatis, P. (2016). Investigating factors influencing consumer decision-making while choosing green products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 215-228.
Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995). In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman.
Nissen, U. (1995). A methodology for the development of cleaner products: The ideal-eco-product approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3(1-2), 83-87.
Ottman, J.A. (1993). Green Marketing: Challenges and Opportunities for the New Marketing Age. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC.
Peattie, K. (1995). Environmental Marketing Management: Meeting the Green Challenge. London: Pitman Publishing.
Peattie, K. (2001). Towards sustainability: the third age of green marketing. The Marketing Review, 2(2), 129-146.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1995/09/green-and-competitive-ending-the-stalemate
Reinhardt, F. L. (1998). Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40(4), 43-73.
Sdrolia, E., & Zarotiadis, G. (2019). A comprehensive review for green product term: From definition to evaluation. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(1), 150-178.
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
Soo Wee, Y., & Quazi, H. A. (2005). Development and validation of critical factors of environmental management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(1), 96-114.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025). Use of the “healthy” claim on food labeling. Retrieved from
https://www.fda.gov/food/nutrition-food-labeling-and-critical-foods/use-healthy-claim-food-labeling#Products on May 14, 2026.
Waxman, A. (2025). What are cage-free eggs? The difference between cage-free and free range. The Humane League. Retrieved from
https://thehumaneleague.org/article/cage-free on May 12, 2026.
全文公開日期 2031/06/25