| 研究生: |
嚴如恆 Yan, Run-hen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
行銷資訊系統使用者態度與使用現況關係之實証研究 An Empirical Study of the Impact of User Attitude on Marketing Information System Usage |
| 指導教授: |
傅豐玲
Fu FongLing Linda |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 資訊管理學系 Department of Management Information System |
| 論文出版年: | 1996 |
| 畢業學年度: | 84 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 95 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 行銷資訊系統 、使用者態度 、使用現況 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | MKIS |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:281 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著個人化行銷時代的來臨,企業在從事行銷活動時常需要倚靠資訊系統的幫助, 並透過蒐集、過濾、分析與組織等步驟,以獲得有關行銷決策的資訊,而促成這一系列 活動的資訊系統就是行銷資訊系統。
針對行銷資訊系統的使用現況,國外有學者做過不同時期的比較報告,反觀國內對 於行銷資訊系統的探討,則僅於系統架構的提出與建置,而在使用情形方面則付之厥如 。因此,本研究首先以台灣600大製造業、300大服務業及60大金融業為對象,根據使用 時間、行銷決策模式、資訊內容與資訊來源等四個構面為基準,來瞭解台灣企業的行銷 資訊系統之使用概況。
接著探討使用者在以輸出資訊、決策過程品質、系統彈性與工作績效等四項組成的 態度構面的差異,是否會對四種使用現況有不同的影響。結果顯示,決策過程品質和工 作績效兩項態度構面與使用時間、行銷決策模式及資訊來源等現況有顯著地正相關,且 將使用者分為高度滿意群與低度滿意群兩組時,高度滿意群在使用時間、行銷決策模式 使用與資訊來源種類的平均分數皆比低度滿意群高。此意味著,對行銷資訊系統的滿意度愈高,在時間、行銷決策模式與資訊來源的使用上愈多;這也証明了不同的態度使用 者確實會影響行銷資訊系統的使用現況。
最後,本研究以工作自主化、規範監控程度、工作程序化、權限層級與決策參與程 度等五項組織因素;及包含電腦課程訓練、年齡、教育程度與行銷工作經驗等四項的使 用者因素為中介變數,探討是否會影響態度與使用現況間的關係。
在組織因素方面,由統計分析的結果得知,沒有任何一項的組織因素被証實具有中 介變數的性質,但是在中介主效果部份,則有規範監控程度、工作程序化與權限層級對 使用時間、行銷決策模式、資訊內容與資訊來源等的整體現況或是個別現況有顯著的影響。
在使用者因素方面,証實年齡與行銷工作經驗分別為態度群組與行銷決策模式和態 度群組與使用時間的中介變數,並且除了特殊情況外,高度滿意者在行銷決策模式與時 間的使用都比低度滿意者為高。而在中介主效果部份,年齡、教育程度與行銷工作經驗 則分別對個別現況之顧客特性分析模式、公司內部會計系統與內部財務資料等項目產生 明顯的差異性。
The relation of impact of user attitude on system usage is proved,and it may be positive or negative influence. Equally, if the marketinginformation system-a system is to help marketing managers make a more optimal decision,has a alike result ,it will be reaearched in the thesis. In the study, first we will see the status which large enterprises in Taiwan use marketing information systems(MKIS) by four criteria.Second, inadvance study what MKIS's status items will be influenced by user attitude.Even-tually,find user attitude really influences the MKIS status positivelly and supp-ose the back cautions of every one. Last, the study includes user's factors(i.e.,age,degree of education,etc.)and organization's factors(i.e.,job codification, job specificity,etc.) to prob whether these items will moderate the relation between user attitude and thestatus of MKIS. In result, the age and experience of marketing task both are the moderator between user attitude and MkIS usage.
第一章緒論
第一節研究動機..........1
第二節研究目的..........4
第三節研究流程..........5
第四節論文結構..........6
第五節研究限制..........7
第二章文獻探討
第一節行銷資訊系統相關研究..........8
第二節使用者態度相關研究..........17
第三節組織因素相關研究探討..........23
第四節使用者因素相關研究探討..........26
第三章研究架構與研究方法
第一節研究架構..........28
第二節研究假設..........30
第三節研究變數與操作性定義..........31
第四節研究方法..........32
第五節信度與效度分析..........36
第六節分析方法..........39
第四章統計分析與討論
第一節行銷資訊系統使用現況的..........40
第二節組織因素相關探討..........46
第三節使用者因素相關探討..........48
第四節使用者態度與使用現況之關係..........50
第五節中介變數與使用者態度對系統使用現況之影響..........56
第五章結論與建議
第一節研究結論..........65
第二節研究貢獻..........70
第三節後續研究建議..........71
參考文獻..........72
附錄一:本研究問卷
一、中文部份
1.1995/1996 台灣地區企業經理人名錄,中華徵信所,民國84 年.
2. 中華民國八十四年資訊工業年鑑,財團法人資訊工業策進會編印,民國84 年.
3. 天下雜誌1000 大磁片資料,民國84 年.
4. 方世榮譯,行銷管理學,第八版,東華書局,民國84 年.
5. 周文賢,多變量分析未出版之課堂講義,政治大學企業管理研究所,民國84
年.
6. 黃俊英、林震岩. SAS精析與實例,華泰書局,民國83 年.
7. 黃俊英,多變量分析,第五版,中國經濟企業研究所出版,民國84年.
8. 葉進成,行銷資訊系統之建立一一以個案公司為例,淡江大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文,民國77年.
9 謝安田,企業研究方法,民國82 年.
二、英文部份
1.Aiken,M.and J.Hage, "Organizational Independence and Intra Organization Structure", American Sociological Review, December 1968, pp.912-930.
2.Alavi,M., "An Assessment of the Concept of Decision Support Systems as Viewed by Senior-Level Executives", MIS Quarterly, December 1982, pp.1-9.
3.Alter,S.L., Decision Spport Systems:Current Practice and
Continuting Challenges, Addison-Wesley, reading, MA, 1980.
4.Aydin,C.E.and Rice,R.E., HSocial world, individual differences,and inplementation--Predicting attitudes toward a medival information system", Imformation & Management, No.20, 1990, pp.119-136.
5.Bailey, .J.E.and Pearson,S.W., "Development Of A Tool For Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction", Management Science, Vol.29, No.5, May 1983, pp.530-545.
6.B8rki,H.and Huff,S.L., "Change,Attitude to Change, and Decision Support System Success", Information & Management, No.9, 1985, pp.261-268.
7.Baroudi,J.J. ,0lson,M.H.and Ives,B., "An Empirical Study of the Impact of User Involvement on System Usage and Information Satisfaction", Communications of the ACM, Vol.29, No.3, March 1986, pp.232-238.
8. Baroudi ,J. J. and Orlikowski , W. J ., H A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.4, No.4, Spring 1988, pp.44-59.
9.Berenson,C,"Marketing Information Systems", Journal of Marketing, Vol.33, October 1969, pp.16-23.
10.Cheney,P.H.and Dickson,C.W., "Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems:An Exploratory Investigation", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.25, No.1, 1992, pp.170-184.
11.Cohen,J.and Cohen,P., Applied Multiple Regrression/Correlation Analysis For the Behavioral Sciences, Lowrence Eribaum Assoc., Hilldale, NJ, 1975.
12.Cox,D.F.and Good,R.E, "How to Build a Marketing Information System", Harvard Business Review, Vol.45, NO.3, May-June 1967, pp.145-154.
13. Deshpande ,R. , "The Organizational Context of Market Research Use", Journal of Marketing, Vol.46, Fall 1982, pp.91-101.
14.Dewar,R.D. ,Whetten,D.A.and Boje,D., "An Examination of the Reliability and Validity of the Aiken and Hage Scales of
Centralization,Forma1ization,and Task Routinness",
Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.25, March 1980, pp.120-128.
15.Ein-Dor,P.and Segev,E., "Organizational Contest and The Success Of Management Information Systems", Managemen Sceince, Vol.24, No.10, June 1978, pp.1064-1077.
16.Ein-Dor,P.and Segev,E., "Organizational Context and MIS
Structure:Some Empirical Evidence", MIS Quarterly, September
1982, pp.55-68.
17.Eldon Y.Li, "Marketing information systems in the top U.S. companies:A longitudinal analysis", Information & Management, No.28, 1995, pp.13-31.
18.Evans,G.E.and Riha,J.R., "Assessing DSS Effectiveness Using Evaluation Research Methods", Information & Management, No.16, 1989, pp.197~206.
19.Fishbein,M and Ajzen,I., Be1ief,Attitude, Intention,And Behavior-An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, California London, 1975 .
20.Gallagher,C.A., "Perceptions of the Value of a Management
Information System", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.17, No.1, March 1974, pp.46-55.
21.Ginzberg,M.J., "Finding and Adequate Measure of OR/MS
Effectiveness", Interfaces, Vol.8, No.4, August 1978, pp.59-62.
22.Gordon,P.N., "Is Your Management Information System Effective: A Checklist", Corporate Accounting, Summer 1987, pp.71-73.
23.Higby,M.A and Farah,B.N, "The status of marketing information systems,decision support systems and expert systems in the marketing function of U.S. firms", Information & Management, No.20, 1990, pp.29-35.
24.Ives,B. ,Olson,M.H.and Baroudi,J.J., "The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction", Communications of the ACM, Vol.26, No.10, October 1983, pp.785-793.
25. Johnston,S and Woodward,S, "Marketing Management Information Systems-A Review of Current Practice",
Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 1988, pp.27-29.
26.Kabasakal,H. ,Sozen,Z.and Usdiken,B., "Organizational
context,structural attributes and management systems in
construction", Construction Management and Economics, July
1989, pp.347-356.
27.Keen,G.W.P., "Value Analysis:Justifying Decision Support
Systems", MIS Quarterly, March 1981, pp.1-15.
28.Kerlinger,Fred.N .. , Foundations of Behavioral Research,Third Edition McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986.
29.Kotler,P., Marketing Management-Analysis,Planning, Implementation and Control, 8th ed., Prentice-Hall International, London, 1994.
30.Li,E.Y., Mcleod,R.JR and Rogers,J.C, "Marketing Information Systems in the Fortune 500 Companies:Past,Present,and Future", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.10. No.1, Summer 1993, pp.165-l92.
31.Maish,M.A., "A User's Behavior Toward His MIS", MIS Quarterly, March 1979, pp.39-53.
32.Marshall,K.P.and LaMotte,S.W., "Marketing Information systems:A Marriage of Systems Analysis and Marketing Management", Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol.8, No.3, 1992, pp.61-73.
33.McCullough,C.and wooten,B., "Education,exposure help top
executives accept computers", Data Management, September 1986, pp.38-40.
34.Mcloed,R.Jr.and Rogers,J, "Marketing Information Systems: Uses in the Fortune 500", California Management review, Vol.25, No.1, Fall 1982.
35.Mcloed,R.Jr.and Rogers,J,"Marketing Information Systems:The Current Status in Fortune 1000 Companies" ,
Journal of Management Systems, Vol.l, No.4, Spring 1985, pp.57-75.
36.Melone,N.P., "A Theoretical Assessment of The User-Satisfaction Construct Information Systems Research", Management Science, Vol.36, No.1, January 1990, pp.76-91.
37.Miller,J.and Doyle,B.A. ,"Measuring the Effectiveness of Computer Based Information Systems in the Financial Services Sector", MIS Quarterly, March 1987, pp.l07-124.
38.Nunnally,J.C, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
39.Proctor,R.A,"Marketing Information Systems", Management Decision, Vol.29, No.4, 1991, pp.55-60.
40.Raymond,L., "Validating and Applying User Satisfaction as a Measure of MIS Success in Small Organizations",
Information & Management. No.12, 1987, pp.173-179.
41.Raymond,L .. "Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success In the Context of Small Business". MIS Quarterly, March 1985. pp.37-52.
42.Robey,D., "User Attitudes and Management Information System Use", Academy of Management Journal. Vol.22, No.3. 1979.
pp.527-538.
43.Sainfort,C.F .. Gustafson,D.H .. Bosworth.K.and Hawkins,R.P.,
"Decision Support Systems Effectiveness:Conceptual Framework
and Empirical Evaluation", Organizational Brhavior and HUJ]Jan Decision Processes, No.45, 1990. pp.232-252.
44.Schiffman,S.J. ,Meile,L.C.and Igbaria,M., "An examination of end user types", Information & Management, No.22, 1992, pp.207-215.
45.Snitkin,S.R.and King,W.R., "Determinants of the Effectiveness of Personal Decision Support Systems", Information & Management, No.10, 1986, pp.83-89.
46.Srinivasan,A., "Alternative Measures of System Effectiveness: Associations and Implications", MIS Quarterly, September, 1985, pp.243-253.
47.Swanson,E.B., "Measuring User Attitudes 1n MIS Research:a
Review", OMEGA, Vol.10, No.2, 1982, pp.157-165.
48.Talvinen,J.M., "Information systems in Marketing-Identifying opportunities for new applications", European Journal of Marketing, Vol.29, No.1, 1995, pp.8-26.
49.Taylor,R.N., "Age and Experience as Determinants of Management Information Processing and Decision Making Performance", Acedemy of Management Journal, Vol.18, No.1, March 1975, pp.74-81.
50.Udo,G., "Rethinking the effectiiveness measures of decision support systems", Information & Management, No.22, 1992, pp.123-135.
51.Udo,G.J.and Davis,J.S., "A Comparative Analysis of DSS User friendliness and Effectiveness",
International Journal of Information Management, No.12, 1992, pp.209-223.
52.Vandermerwe,S and Carney,W, "Integrating Computers and Marketing Management:A European Overview", European Management Journal, Vol.6, No.1, 1987, pp.10-15.
53.Yaverbaum,G.J.and Nosek,J., "Effects of information system education and training on user satisfaction" ,
Information & Management, No.22, 1992, pp.217-225.
54.Zeffane,R.and Cheek,B., "The differential use of written,computer based and verbal information in an organizational context:An empirical exploration", Information & Management, No.28, 1995, pp.107-121.
55.Zikmund,W.G., Business Research Methods, fouth ed, Harcourt Brace College, New York, 1994.
56.Zinkhan,G .. M. ,Joachimsthaler,E.A.and Kinnear,T.C., "Individua Differences and Marketing Dcision Support System Usage and
Satisfaction", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.XXIV, May 1987, pp.208-214.
57.Zmud,R.W., "Individual differences and MIS Success: A Review of The Empirical Literature", Management Science, Vol.25, No.IO, October 1979, pp.966-979.
(限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)