企業經營是一項長期的工作，隨著時間的增加，公司內部會因工作的遞增而累積愈來愈多的知識與技術，這些知識屬於企業的無形資本，若能透過管理妥善的保存，對企業內部知識與技術的傳承，以及員工的學習與成長都有很大的益處。而在企業中，專案的進行是累積工作經驗與知識的一大管道，做好專案管理不但有助於專案目標的達成，也能藉此蒐集公司的無形資產，進一步將之知識化，最終對經營績效產生影響。因此，本研究將以專案管理、知識管理與經營績效為主軸，並以個案公司採用的知識管理方法，即技術文件制度，為主要的探討方向，對個案公司進行研究，同時分析三構面間的關係。
本研究採用的研究方法包括文獻分析法、個案研究法，以及深度訪談法。一開始先對研究構面進行過去文獻資料的探討與分析，並以光電產業的T公司為主要的訪談對象，進行與研究主題相關的資料蒐集，將個案資料經整理與分析後，陳述與個案相關的事實於本文中，並在文末對研究結論做總結。
本研究主要的結論為技術文件制度有助於降低工作困難度。經過對個案公司的分析，本研究發現個案公司所執行的技術文件制度確實有助於降低員工間的工作困難度，且因工作困難度的降低，使技術人員的出錯率也降低，因此，對員工來說，技術文件制度是一個良好的學習管道與方法；而專案管理有助於知識管理前期知識蒐集的工作，且技術文件制度讓技術人員的出錯率降低，進而使公司除錯成本的支出也大幅減少，對公司整體的經營績效來說有正向的成長，因此，本研究經由個案公司的實證發現，專案管理、知識管理與經營績效間確實存在著互相影響的正向關係。

That is a long-term work for business administration. As time goes on, more and more knowledge and skills accumulate in a company due to increasing works. Because the knowledge belongs to the intangible capital of the enterprise, if the company can store knowledge through management process, it should be advantage for knowledge inheritance of skills of the company, as well as the growth for staff. In addition, project management is a way of accumulating work experience and knowledge, and it not only help achieve targets of project, but also increasing operational performance for the company. Therefore, the research subject is study on the relationship between project management, knowledge management, and operating performance.
The study collects the information by the documentary analysis, case study method, and in-depth interview. Based on the collecting past literature, the information and data from interviews for T company are analyzed for the topics of study, and write down the conclusions and findings in the final statement.
The main conclusion in this study is that knowledge management is advantage for decreasing difficulty of work. Through the case study, the research shows that technical documentation system in T company exactly helps for reducing difficulty of work among staff, and also decrease defect rate among technician. Therefore, technical documentation system is a good way for learning for staff. Additionally, because that project management is good at collecting information at the beginning of knowledge management, and that knowledge management reduce error rate also debugging costs in the company, the study shows that there is positive relationship between project management, knowledge management, and operating performance.

一、中文部分
1. 吳承芬(1990)。知識管理的基礎與實例。台北市:小知堂文化。
2. 吳思華(2001)。知識資本在台灣。遠流出版公司。
3. 吳瓊恩，李允傑與陳銘薰 (2001) 公共管理。台北市:智勝。
4. 李育（2001）企業研發部門知識管理能力、組織能耐與研發績效關係模式之研究-「台灣高科技業之實證」。長榮大學管理學院碩士論文，台南市。
5. 徐永道(2015)。生產管理經驗實錄。桃園市:台灣電路板協會。
6. 梁定澎，許如欽(2005)。影響台灣企業採用知識管理之因素。 資訊管理學報，12(3)，1-38。
7. 黃英忠(1988)。現代管理學。台北市︰華泰。
8. 榮泰生(1997)。策略管理。台北市:華泰。
9. 劉京偉(2000)。知識管理的第一本書。台北市:商周。
10. 鄭丞庭(2006)。委外策略選擇對組織效益之影響—企業與派遣服務業之觀點，國立中山大學碩士論文，高雄市。
11. 謝安田(1989)。企業研究方法。台北市:著者發行。

二、網頁部分
1. BONI CHEN(101年2月17日)。取自:http://ntnumot.blogspot.tw/
2. MBA智庫百科。外部失敗成本。取自:http://wiki.mbalib.com/zhtw/%E5%A4%96%E9%83%A8%E5%A4%B1%E8%B4%A5%E6%88%90%E6%9C%AC
3. 維基百科，利害關係人理論。取自: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%88%A9%E5%AE%B3%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%82%E4%BA%BA%E7%90%86%E8%AB%96
4. 維基百科。設備效率評價。取自: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%A8%AD%E5%82%99%E6%95%88%E7%8E%87%E8%A9%95%E5%83%B9#.E8.89.AF.E7.8E.87.28Quality.29
5. 維基百科。資料探勘。取自: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E6%8C%96%E6%8E%98
6. 劉常勇(1999)。幾個有關知識管理議題之初探。 取自:http://www. cme. org. tw/know/paper/paper1. html.
7. 賴志宏(2015)，專案管理的五大流程定義與架構。取自: http://www.krispmschool.com/blog/pm/pm-principle/pm-five-processes-structure/

三、英文部分
1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1(2), 1.
2. Al Saifi, S. A. (2015). Positioning organisational culture in knowledge management research. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 164-189.
3. Andersen, A. (1999). Business Consulting. Zukai Knowledge Management, Tokyo Keizar Inc., Japan, 2001.
4. Bosua, R., & Venkitachalam, K. (2013). Aligning strategies and processes in knowledge management: a framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 331-346.
5. Choi, F. D., & Mueller, G. G. (1992). International accounting . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Cleland, D. I., & King, W. R. (1975). Systems analysis and Project management. McGraw-Hill.
7. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
8. Cooke, H. S., & Tate, K. (2010). The McGraw-Hill 36-hour Course: Project Management. McGraw Hill Professional.
9. Cui, A. S., Griffith, D. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2005). The influence of competitive intensity and market dynamism on knowledge management capabilities of multinational corporation subsidiaries. Journal of International Marketing, 13(3), 32-53.
10. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. MIT Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43.
11. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California management review, 41(2), 79-94.
12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
13. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
14. Grupe, F. H., & Mehdi Owrang, M. (1995). Data base mining discovering new knowledge and competitive advantage. Information System Management, 12(4), 26-31.
15. Gottschalk, P. (2005). Strategic knowledge management technology. Macmillan.
16. Hill Charles, W. L., & Jones, G. R. (2004). Strategic Management theory: An integrated approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 7.
17. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
18. Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Lech, P. (2014). Managing knowledge in IT projects: a framework for enterprise system implementation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 551-573.
20. Mathur, G., Jugdev, K., & Shing Fung, T. (2013). Project management assets and project management performance outcomes: Exploratory factor analysis. Management Research Review, 36(2), 112-135.
21. Mathur, G., Jugdev, K., & Shing Fung, T. (2014). The relationship between project management process characteristics and performance outcomes. Management Research Review, 37(11), 990-1015.
22. Munns, A. K., & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International journal of project management, 14(2), 81-87.
23. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1987). Critical factors in successful Project implementation. IEEE transactions on engineering management, (1), 22-27.
24. Guide, A. (2001). Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®GUIDE). In Project Management Institute.
25. Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization Theory: Structures, Designs, And Applications, 3/e. Pearson Education India.
26. Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1996). What separates Japanese new product winners from losers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(5), 422-439.
27. Souder, W. E., & Song, X. M. (1997). Contingent product design and marketing strategies influencing new product success and failure in US and Japanese electronics firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(1), 21-34.
28. Szilagyi, A. D. (1981). Management and performance. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing Company
29. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of management review, 11(4), 801-814.
30. Whitten, J. L. & Bentley, L. D. (1998), Project Manage Dictionary of Terms, International Journal of Project Management, 38, 56-78.