跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 葉雪梅
論文名稱: 國小兒童對「比較」類應用問題的解題行為
指導教授: 顏乃欣
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學院 - 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 1990
畢業學年度: 78
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 122
相關次數: 點閱:228下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討國小兒童對「比較」類應用問題的解題行為。過去研究顯示,「比較」類應用問題中的「參照量未知」題要此「被比較量未知」題困難。

    Nesher等人( 1982) 認為:能夠正確解答「被比較量未知」題,而無法解答「參照量未知」題者,是為「第三層次」兒童,由於其限於「非逆轉性比較基模」只能對「比較」類問題形成「單一方向不對稱性」的問題表徵,未能進行「逆轉推論」,因此尚無法解答「參照量未知」題,要到「第四層次」兒童,擁有「可逆轉性比較基模」能夠「逆轉推論」,方能夠正確解題。

    本研究的主要目的即是(1) 被驗Nesher等人(1982) 所提有關「逆轉推論」之假設。(2) 以增加「逆轉問句」等方式來改寫題目,探討其對兒童解答「參照量未知」題的影響。

    本研究採實驗法,以篩選測驗來挑選實驗的受試者:能夠解答「被比較量未知」題,而無法解「參照量未知」題的「第三層次」兒童;與能夠解答兩類題目的「第四層次」兒童。在實驗操作上,是以增加「逆轉問句」的相關處理方式,將受試者分為五組:控制組、非逆轉組、逆轉組、綜合組(此四組皆屬第三層次兒童)與第四層次組,分別給予附加不同問句的「被比較量未知」題及「參照量未知」題。實驗的目的在探討各組學童在「被比較量未知」與「參照量未知」題中,對「增加問句」及「原問句」的答題情形。

    本研究的主要發現如下: (1)「非逆轉組」、「綜合組」、與「第四層次組」學童在「增加問句」上之得分均顯著高於「逆轉組」。 (2)「逆轉組」學童能否正

    確回答「逆轉問句」,與其能否正確回答「參照量未知問句」,二者之間確有密切的正向關係。(3)「非逆轉組」學童在「非逆轉問句」上答題之正確率為90% ;「逆轉組」學童在「逆轉問句」上答題之正確率為74 克;「綜合組」學童中,在「非逆轉」及「逆轉」之「增加問句」上答題之正確率高達94% 0 (4) !「第四層次組」、「綜合組」、「逆轉組」與「非逆轉組」學童在「原參照量未知問句」上之得分,均顯著高於「控制組」。

    研究結果顯示:(1) Nesher等人(1982) 雖提出有關「逆轉推論」之假設,但並未能充份解釋為何兒童能夠正確解答「被比較量未知」題,郤無法解答「參照量未知」題;部份原因可由Flavell (1970~ 1977) 等人所提有關監控認知( metacognition) 的論點加以闡釋。(2)以增加「逆轉問句」等方式來改寫題目,確可引導兒童,進行「逆轉推論」的思考,建構完整的問題表徵,進而正確解答「參照量未知」題。


    第二章:文獻探討......................... 6
    第一節:文字應用問題的解題模式----Nesher等人(1982) 模式......................... 6
    第二節:鄭昭明與翁家英(民78) 的實驗研究......................... 19
    第三節:監控認知......................... 27
    第四節:改寫題目對兒童解題行為的影響......................... 33
    第五節:研究目的與研究假設......................... 36
    第三章:研究方法......................... 43
    第一節:篩選測驗..................................................43
    第二節:實驗處理......................... 45
    第四章:研究結果......................... 52
    第一節:實驗組學童在「增加問旬」上的答題結果......................... 52
    第二節:實驗組學童在「增加問旬」上答題結果之正確率......................... 58
    第三節:改寫題目對兒童解「參照量未知」題的影響......................... 60
    第五章:討論與建議......................... 64
    第一節:討論......................... 64
    第二節:建議......................... 74
    參考書目......................... 78
    附錄1篩選測驗之應用問題.........................91
    附錄2篩選測驗之指導語.........................93
    附錄3篩選測驗結果.........................94
    附錄4預試.........................97
    附錄5預試所用之試題.........................103
    附錄6實驗所用之試題.........................112
    附錄7實驗所用之指導語.........................121
    【圖目錄】
    圖2-1 部份-部份一整體基模(P-P-W).........................13
    圖2-2 非逆轉性出較基模.........................15
    圖2-3 比較基模......................... 17
    圖2-4: Moely, Olson, Halwes & Flavell(1969) 實驗用圖案......................... 30

    【中文部份】
    唐淑華(民78) 。「語文理解課程」對增進國一學生數學理解能力與解答應用問題能力之實驗研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    張春興(民77) 。知之歷程與教之歷程:認知心理學的發展及其在教育上的應用。行政院國家科學委員會認知與學習第二次研討會專集論文。
    鄭昭明(民76) 。知識的傳遞與理解歷程。行政院國家科學委員會認知與學習第一次研討會專集論文。
    鄭昭明、翁家英(民78) 。國小兒童解數學應用問題的認知歷程。行政院國家科學委員會認知與學習第三次研討會專集論文。
    劉錫麒(民77) 。統合認知與數學問題解決教學。台灣省立師範學院76學年度教學研究學術研討會論文集。

    【央文部份】
    Andre,T.(1986).Problem solving and education. In G.D.Phye,& J.Andre(Eds.). Cognitive classroom learning: understanding, thinking and problem solving (pp.169-204). Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc.
    Anderson,J.R.(1983); The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    Bilsky,L., Blachman,S., Chi,C., Mui,A.,& Winter,P. (1986). Comprehension strategies in math problem and story contexts. Cognition and Instructi on, 3., 109-126.
    Briars,D.J. & Larkin,J.H. (1984).An integrated model of skill in solving elementrary word problems.Cognition and Instruction.1(3), 245-296.
    Brown,A.L.(1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R.Glaser (Ed.). Advance in instructional psychology. (Vol.1) (pp.77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Brown,A.L.(1982).Learing and development: The problems of compatibility,access and induction. Human Development, 25,89-115.
    Brown,A.L.,Bransford,J.D.,Ferrara,R.A.& Campione, J.C.(1983).Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P.H.Mussen (Ed.). Handbook of child psychology (4th ed.) :vol.3 Cognitive development (pp.77-166). New York: Wiley.
    Carpenter,T.P.(1985). Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem solving. In E.A.Silver(Ed.). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving Multiple research perspectives (pp.17-40).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Carpenter,T.P.,Hiebert,J.& Moser,J.M.(1981). First-grade children's initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12., 27-39.
    Carpenter,T.P.,Hiebert,J. & Moser,J.M.(1983). The effect of instrucion on children's solutions of addition and subtraction word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics,14, 55-72.
    Carpenter,T.P. & Moser,J.M.(1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skill. In T.P.Carpenter, J.M.Moser, & T.A.Romberg (Eds.).Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective(pp. 9-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Carpenter,T.P. & Moser,J.M.(1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts . in grades one through three. Journal for Research . In Mathematics Education, 15, 179-202.
    Carpenter,T.P. & Moser,J.M. & Romberg,T.A.(Eds.). (1982).Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective.Hillsdale,N.J.: Erlbaum.
    Chiang,C.P.(1988).Third and fifth graders' learning of word problems through help messages and their metalearning knowledge.行政院國家科學委員會認知與學習第三次研討會專集論文。
    Cohen, S.A. & Stover, G. (1981). Effects of teaching six-grades students to modify format variables of math word problems. Reading Research Quarterly,~ 175-200.
    DeCorte,E.,& Verschaffel,L. (1981). Children's solution processes in elementary arithematic problems: Analysis and improvement. Journal of Educational Psychology,73, 765-779.
    DeCorte,E.,& Verschaffel,L.(1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders' strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,18, 363-381.
    DeCorte,E.,& Verschaffel,L.,& DeWin,L. (1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children's problerm representations and solutions. Journal of Educational psychology, 77,460-4713.
    Flavell,J.H. (19713).Developmental studies of mediated memory. In H. W.Reese & L. P. Lipsitt(Eds.). Advances in child development and behaviorCVol.52.New York: Academic Press.
    Flavell,J. H.(1976).Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick(Ed.).The Nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    Flavell,J. H.(1979).Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist,34,906-911.
    Flavell,J.H.(1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W.P.DicksonCEd.).Children's oral communication skills.Cpp.35-60).New York: Academic Press.
    Flave l l,J.H., Speer,J.R., Green,F.L.,& August,D.L. (1981).The development of comprehension Monitoring and knowledge about communication. Monographs of the Society for Reaserch in Child Development,4fi(5,Serial No.192).
    Flavell, J. H. & Wellman,H. M.(1977).Metamemory. In R.V.Kail, & J.W.Hagen (Eds.).Perspectives on the development research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    Hiebert, J. (1986) ? Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Hudson,T. (1983).Correspondences and numerical differences between disjoint sets. Child Development, 54:, 84-98.
    Huttenlocher,J., & Weiner,S. L.(1971). Comprehension of instructions in varying contexts. Cognitive psychology,2, 369-385.
    Kintsch,W. & Greeno,J.G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithematic problems. Psychological Review, 92, 109-129.
    Mayer,R.E.(1987).Educational psychology: A Cognitive Approach. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
    Moely, B.E., Olson,F.A., Halwes,T.G.& Flavell, J.H. (1969).Production deficiency in young children's clustered recall. Developmental Psychology, 1, 26-34.
    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980).An agenda for action: Recommendation for school mathematics of the 1980s. Reston, VA: NCTM.
    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1987).Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston ,VA:NCTM.
    Nesher,p.(1976). Three determinants of difficult in verbal arithematic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 369-388.
    Nesher,P.(1982). Levels of description in the analysis of addition and subtraction .In T.P.Carpenter, J.M.Moser, & T.A.Romberg(Eds.).
    Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp.25-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Nesher,P., Greeno,J.G.,& Riley,M.S. (1982). The development of semantic categories for addition and subtraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics.13., 373-394.
    Riley,M.S., Greeno,J.G.,& Heller,J.I. (1982). Development of Children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H.P. Ginsburg (Ed.). The development mathematical thinking (pp.153-196). New York: Academic Press.
    Rosenthal,D.J.A. & Resnick,L.B. (1974). Children's solution processes in arithematic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 817 -825.
    Schoenfeld, A.H. & Herrmann,D.J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition,8, 484-494.
    Searle,B.W., Lorton,JR.P.,& Suppes,P. (1974), Structural variables affecting computer assisted instruction performance on arithmetic word problems of disadvantaged and deaf students. Educational Studies in Mathematics,5, 371-384.
    Shuell,T.J.(1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research,56, 411-436.
    Vergnaud,G.(1982). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems. In T.P.Carpenter, J.M.Moser, & T.A.Romberg(Eds.). Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp.39-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Wolters,M.A.(1983). The part-whole schema and arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2, 127-138.

    無法下載圖示 (限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)
    QR CODE
    :::