| 研究生: |
陳軒磊 Chen, Hsuan-Lei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
我國企業併購後績效及其影響因子之探討 Determinants of Post-Merger Performance: Evidence from Taiwan |
| 指導教授: | 宋皇志 |
| 口試委員: |
戚務君
陳美惠 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 Graduate Institute of Technology, Innovation and Intellectual Property Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 73 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 企業併購 、併購績效 、無形資產 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Mergers and Acquisitions, Post-merger performance, Intangible asset |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:113 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以2016年1月8日至2021年12月31日間我國公開發行公司(含上市、上櫃、興櫃)完成之99件有效併購案為樣本,採財務績效研究法,以產業調整後總資產報酬率變動與每股自由現金流量變動作為雙重衡量指標,系統性檢驗公司治理機制、資源整合效率對主併公司併購後長期績效之影響。
就產業調整後總資產報酬率而言,主併公司於併購完成後三年內之產業調整後獲利能力呈統計顯著衰退。多元迴歸分析顯示,獨立董事比例對長期獲利能力具顯著正向影響,三大法人合計持股比例則呈顯著負向效果,兩者影響方向相反。資源整合面向中,無形資產佔比之變動與營運表現之改善,均於迴歸模型中與長期獲利能力呈現顯著且穩健之正向關聯。
就每股自由現金流量而言,主併公司於併購後三年內之每股自由現金流量雖呈上升傾向,但未達統計顯著水準。迴歸模型整體解釋力亦極為有限,本研究所採之自變數均對每股自由現金流量之變動不具有效解釋力。
綜合兩迴歸模型之結果,產業調整後總資產報酬率與每股自由現金流量於併購後呈現分歧走勢;在獲利能力模型中,獨立董事比例與三大法人持股比例之影響方向相反,營運改善為最穩健之長期獲利驅動因子,無形資產變動則於迴歸模型中具顯著正向影響。
This study examines the long-term post-merger performance of Taiwanese publicly held companies using a sample of 99 completed acquisitions over the period January 8, 2016 to December 31, 2021. Employing a financial performance approach with changes in industry-adjusted return on assets and changes in free cash flow per share as dual performance measures, the study systematically examines the effects of corporate governance mechanisms and resource integration efficiency on acquirer long-term performance.
With respect to industry-adjusted return on assets, acquiring firms experience a statistically significant decline in industry-adjusted profitability within three years of deal completion. Multiple regression analysis reveals that board independence exerts a significant positive effect on long-term profitability, while aggregate institutional investor ownership produces a significant negative effect, with the two exerting opposite influences. With regard to resource integration, both changes in intangible asset intensity and improvements in operating performance exhibit significant and robust positive associations with long-term profitability in the regression model.
With respect to free cash flow per share, acquiring firms display an upward tendency following deal completion, but the change does not reach statistical significance. The regression model for this outcome likewise exhibits limited overall explanatory power, and none of the independent variables employed in this study account for meaningful variation in free cash flow per share.
Taken together, the results of the two regression models indicate that industry-adjusted return on assets and free cash flow per share follow divergent post-merger trajectories. Within the profitability model, board independence and institutional investor ownership exert effects in opposite directions, while operating improvement is the most robust driver of long-term profitability, and changes in intangible assets exhibit a significant positive effect in the regression model.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究問題 4
第四節 研究範圍 5
第五節 研究架構 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 併購之定義 8
第二節 併購動機之理論研究 9
第三節 併購績效之理論研究 11
第四節 公司治理對併購績效之影響 15
第五節 無形資產對併購績效之影響 17
第三章 研究方法 19
第一節 研究架構 19
第二節 樣本與資料蒐集 21
第三節 研究假說 22
第四節 變數定義與實證模型 24
第四章 實證結果分析 33
第一節 樣本篩選分析 33
第二節 產業調整後總資產報酬率實證結果分析 36
第三節 每股自由現金流量實證結果分析 50
第五章 結論與建議 63
第一節 實證結論 63
第二節 研究貢獻 68
第三節 研究限制與未來建議 69
參考文獻 71
中文部分
吳安妮(1992)。台灣企業併購動機之實證研究。管理評論,11,1–27。https://doi.org/10.6656/MR.1992.11.CHI.1
張紹基、楊勝淵(2001)。台灣企業購併實質效益之研究。管理學報,18(1),1–21。
陳佳煇、謝博采、林香岑(2023)。併購之無形資產對併購後集團經營績效之影響。會計學報,9(1),41–68。
黃裳吟(2008)。企業併購所取得之無形資產與併購公司績效關聯性研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
黃馨瑩(2014)。企業併購之經營績效研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
英文部分
Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.103
Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 359–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(96)84701-5
Bena, J., & Li, K. (2014). Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 1923–1960. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12059
Berkovitch, E., & Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331418
Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305–333. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248542
Chen, X., Harford, J., & Li, K. (2007). Monitoring: Which institutions matter? Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.005
DePamphilis, D. M. (2022). Mergers, acquisitions, and other restructuring activities: An integrated approach to process, tools, cases, and solutions (11th ed.). Academic Press.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Ghosh, A. (2001). Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2), 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00018-9
Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. (1992). Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(92)90002-F
Heron, R., & Lie, E. (2002). Operating performance and the method of payment in takeovers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594998
Hitt, M. A., Harrison, J. S., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Mergers and acquisitions: A guide to creating value for stakeholders. Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.371
Lawrence, E. R., Nguyen, T. D., & Upadhyay, A. (2024). Independence of board leadership of acquirers and the success of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 86, Article 102581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102581
Masulis, R. W., Reza, S. W., & Guo, R. (2023). The sources of value creation in acquisitions of intangible assets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 154, Article 106879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106879
Park, Y. S., & Na, J. (2024). The relationship between heterogeneous institutional investors and operational performance: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Heliyon, 10(20), Article e39365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39365
Renneboog, L., & Vansteenkiste, C. (2019). Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 650–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.010
Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. The Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/296325
Seth, A. (1990). Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110203
Trautwein, F. (1990). Merger motives and merger prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110404