跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃天輿
Huang, Tien-Yu
論文名稱: 經濟平等與免於屈從之自由:論洛克財產權理論中的慈善與勞動
Economic Equality and the Freedom From Subjection: The Concepts of Charity and Labor in Locke's Theory of Property Rights
指導教授: 周家瑜
Chou, Chia-Yu
口試委員: 陳建綱
Chen, Chien-Kang
劉佳昊
Liu, Jia-Hau
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 政治學系
Department of Political Science
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 83
中文關鍵詞: 約翰.洛克財產權經濟平等免於屈從之自由
外文關鍵詞: John Locke, Property Rights, Economic Equality, Freedom From Subjection
相關次數: 點閱:564下載:34
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文分析約翰.洛克的財產權理論,並從洛克《政府論》的整體關懷出發,主張一種新的觀點:對於免於屈從之自由保障有其必要性。傳統詮釋認為洛克式的政府應是盡量減少干預的小政府(minimalist government)才能保障財產權,與之相反的是,本文主張在政治社會中政府有必要適當的透過政治權力介入經濟的安排,以緩解貨幣化後的經濟不平等與隨之而來對人們免於屈從之自由及自我保存的威脅,本文所提出經濟不平等的政治解方,即是政府應藉由慈善義務的履行與勞動制度的改革促進經濟平等,以更全面的在政治社會中保障免於屈從之自由。


    In this thesis, I analyze Locke's theory of property rights, and the whole concern in John Locke's Two Treatises of Government. I argue for a new perspective: the need for protection of freedom from subjection. Contrary to the traditional interpretation that Lockean government should be a minimalist government in order to protect property rights, I argue that in a Lockean political society, the government is obliged to intervene in economic arrangements through political power in order to alleviate the economic inequality after monetization to avoid the consequent threat to the freedom from subjection and self-preservation. To comprehensively protect the freedom from subjection in the political society, I argue that Locke proposes political solutions to economic inequality: the government should facilitate economic equality by fulfilling the obligation of charity and reforming the labor system.

    第一章 導論 1
    第一節 問題意識及研究問題 1
    第二節 文獻檢閱 3
    第三節 章節安排 12
    第二章 貨幣:自然法限制與政治社會 14
    第一節 貨幣化與自然法限制的兩種論點 14
    一、 Macpherson的重商主義資本累積詮釋 14
    二、 Waldron的平等主義神學詮釋 17
    第二節 貨幣化與政治社會的關聯 23
    一、 自由市場論證 24
    二、 約習性論證 27
    三、 小結:經濟不平等是否得以透過政府改善? 31
    第三章 免於屈從之自由與經濟不平等 33
    第一節 自然狀態中免於屈從之自由 33
    第二節 貨幣化下免於屈從之自由 39
    第四章 政治社會下經濟不平等的政治解方 46
    第一節 政治社會中免於屈從之自由與政府的義務 46
    第二節 慈善義務 52
    第三節 洛克對勞動的促進 62
    一、 勞動模式與性質的轉變 63
    二、 政府的積極義務:勞動制度的設計 66
    第五章 結論 76
    參考文獻 78
    一、中文參考文獻 78
    二、外文參考文獻 78

    一、中文參考文獻
    周家瑜
    2021 〈自由主義陰影下的洛克:洛克論財產的道德問題〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》75期,頁1-53。(Chou, Chia-Yu, 2021, “In the Shadow of Liberalism: Locke on the Moral Problem of Property Right,” A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs, 75:1-53.)
    陳禹仲
    2022 〈洛克:反奴隸的政治社會〉,見曾國祥、劉佳昊(編),《帝國與文明:政治思想的全球轉向》,頁125-152。新北:聯經。
    二、外文參考文獻
    Appleby, Joyce Oldham
    1976 “Locke, Liberalism and the Natural Law of Money,” Past & Present, 71: 43–69.
    Benjamin,Walter
    1996 Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913-1926. Marcus Bullock& Michael W. Jennings (eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Buckle, Stephen
    1987 “Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Australian National University.
    Caffentzis, George
    2021 Clipped Coins, Abused Words, and Civil Government: John Locke’s Philosophy of Money. P. Rekret (ed.). London: Pluto Press.
    Dunn, John
    1968 “Justice and the Interpretation of Locke’s Political Theory,” Political Studies, 16(1): 68–87.
    1996 The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fagiani, Francesco
    1983 “Natural law and history in Locke's theory of distributive justice,” Topoi, 2: 163–185.
    Friedman, Milton
    2002 Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Guest, Chris
    2016 “The Role of Government in the Political Economy of John Locke,” History of Economics Review, 18(1): 19-33.
    Halldenius, Lena
    2003 “Locke and the Non-Arbitrary,” European Journal of Political Theory, 2(3): 261–279.
    Hayek, Friedrich
    1960 The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    1982 Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy: The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge.
    Holmes, Stephen
    1995 Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago :University of Chicago Press.
    Hume, David
    1985 Essays: Moral, Political, Literary. Eugene F. Miller (ed.). Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Fund.
    Hundert, E. J.
    1972 “The Making of Homo Faber: John Locke between Ideology and History,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 33(1): 3–22.
    1977 “Market Society and Meaning in Locke's Political Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15(1): 33-44.
    Ince, Onur Ulas
    2011 “Enclosing in God’s Name, Accumulating for Mankind: Money, Morality, and Accumulation in John Locke’s Theory of Property,” The Review of Politics, 73(1): 29-54.
    Kelly, Patrick Hyde
    1991 “General Introduction: Locke on Money,” pp. 1-109 in Parick H. Kelly (ed.), Locke on Money. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
    Lamb, Robert and Thompson, Benjamin
    2009 “The Meaning of Charity in Locke’s Political Thought,” European Journal of Political Theory, 8(2): 229–252.
    Locke, John
    1823 The Works of John Locke, vol. 10. London: Thomas Tegg.
    1824 The Works of John Locke, vol. 4. London: Rivington.
    1988 Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    1963 A Letter Concerning Toleration. Latin and English texts, Mario Montuori (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Niijhoff.
    1997 Locke: Political Essays. Mark Goldie (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    2010 A Letter Concerning Toleration and Other Writings. Mark Goldie & David Womersley (eds.). Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Fund.
    Mack, Eric
    2009 John Locke. New York: Continuum.
    MacPherson, C.B.
    1962 The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    2012 Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
    Nozick, Robert
    1974 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
    Olivecrona, Karl
    1974 “Appropriation in the State of Nature: Locke on the Origin of Property,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 35(2): 211-230.
    Pettit, Philip
    1997 Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Rawls, John.
    1999 A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    Ryan, Alan.
    1965 “Locke and the Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie,” Political Studies, 13(2): 219–30.
    Scanlon, Thomas
    1976 “Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(1): 3-25.
    Seagrave, S. Adam
    2016 “Locke on the Law of Nature and Natural Rights,” pp. 371-393 in Matthew Stuart (ed.), A companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK : Wiley Blackwell.
    Sharon, Assaf
    2022 “Locke, liberty, and law: Legalism and extra-legal powers in the Second Treatise,” European Journal of Political Theory, 21(2): 230–252.
    Skinner, Quentin
    1998 Liberty Before Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Strauss, Leo
    1965 Natural Right and History. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
    Theobald, Paul and Ronald S. Rochon
    2006 “Enclosure Then and Now: Rural Schools and Communities in the Wake of Market-Driven Agriculture,” Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(12): 1-8.
    Tully, James
    1980 A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    1993 An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Uberti, Luca J.
    2013 “By “fancy or agreement”: Locke’s theory of money and the justice of the global monetary system,” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 6(1): 49-81.
    Waldron, Jeremy
    1979 “Enough and as Good Left for Others,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 29(117): 319-328.
    1988 The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    2002 God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ward, Lee
    2009 “A Note on a Note on Locke’s ‘Great Art of Government’,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(2): 521–523.

    QR CODE
    :::