隨著生產內容的殊異及分工的日趨細密，當代的經濟活動，已走入一個市場高度分化而生產部門化的階段，我們已無法再以單一的「國家--市場」的模式，來探究政治與經濟的關係。在現實世界中，國家對經濟的管制，是透過政府與市場中各個權力與利益殊異產業部門的互動而完成的，每一個產業部門，基於不同的生產特性、行銷策略、產業結構乃至市場地位，都會形成一個獨特的政策範疇，來規限(或強化)國家機關權力的行使，或對政策工具造成不同程度的扭曲(或擴大)，從而使得政府在面對該產業時，扮演特定的角色及功能。然而在政治經濟學的研究中，我們卻仍傾向從宏觀的角度，以「國家--市場」的二元結構，來試圖賦予政府在整體產業活動中一個一致性的描述，也此造成在解釋及預測上的侷限。在這樣的觀

點下，本研究乃試圖運用「產業管治機制」的概念，來針對台灣的電子工業中的電子零件業、家電業、個人電腦業及積體電路業，進行一跨部門的分析，希望能透過對不同產業部門與政府間互動關係檢視，來對既有的研究途徑進行檢證，並釐清府在產業活動中的實際角色。

Mordern economic activity is highly differentiation in producing and marketing processes by sectors.We can no longer take an unique "state-market" mode to observe and interpretation the complex relationship between state andmarket.In the real world, any government restrictions on economic activityis in

fact an interaction between power of the state and businesses' interest incemtives.In diffenent industry sectors,as they have differentprocuct elements,marketing strategies,industy structures and market status,every industry sectors will have its own significant governance mechanismand policy content.It will restrict (or reinforce) the autonomy and capacityof state and make the government play a specific role in industry activity.Takeing that point of view, in this paper the author take Taiwan's electronicindusty as a subject to proceed a sectoral analysis.After a careful examnation we find that even

a strong state as KMT regime in Taiwan,the state didn't always have a highly autonomy and capacity to discipline the businesses.Most of time, state's power is not only restrict by some internal structuralfactors and outside enviorment like some statists have disserted,the nature of different goverance mechanisms have is also an important factor on that.

英文部分
Amsden, Alice H.
1979, “ Taiwan's economic history: a case of etatisme and a challenge to dependency
theory," Mordern China, Vo1.5(3),pp _341-80.
1985, liThe state and Taiwan's economic development. “ in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich
Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York:
Cambridge Univ Press. pp. 78-106.
Alt,James E. & Alec Chrystal
1983, Political Economics.Berkely,C.A.: Univ of California Press.
Atkinson Michael M. & William D. Coleman.
1989," Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks In Advanced
Capitalist Economies," British Journal oj Political Science .(19),pp.47-67.
Balassa,Bela.
1981, The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Ecoonomy .New
York:Pergamon.
Balassa, Bela.,et aI.
1982, Developmant Strategies in Semi-industrial Economies. Bartimore : The John
Hopkins Univ Press.
Barrett, Richard E.
1990, "Autonomy and diversity in the American tstate on Taiwan." in Ediwn A.
Winckler and Susan Greenhalgh ed. Contending Approaches to the Political
Rconomy of Taiwan. London:M.E. Sharpe,Inc.
Barrett, Richard E & Martin K. Whyte.
1982, “Depedency theory and Taiwan: analysis of a deviant case, "American Journal
of Soiology, VoI.87(5), pp.l064-89.
Bhagwati, J.
1988, "Export-promoting trade strategy: Issue and evidence," World Bank
Research Obersever, Vo1.3(l), pp27-57.
Caporaso, James A. & David P. Levine
1992, Theories of Political Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ Press.
Cardoso,Fernando H.
1972, "Dependent and Development in Latin America. "New Left Review.
Vol. 74(Aug).pp.83-95.
1973," Associated-Dependent Development:Theoritical and Practical Implications. "in Alfred Stepan ed. Authoritarain Brazil.New Haven: Yale Univ Press.pp.142-76.
1977, "The Consumption of Depnedency Theory in the United States." Latin American Research Review. Vol. 12(3).pp.7-24.
1979, "On the Characterlizaion of Authoritarian Regime in Latin America" in David
Collier ed., The New Authoritarianism in Latin America,Princeton:Princeton Univ
Press.pp.33-57.
Cardoso, Fernando H. & Enzo Faletto.
1979, Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: Univ.of California
Press.
Chang,Chung-Chau.
1992, "The development of Taiwan's personal computer industry." in N. T. Wang ed.
Taiwan's Enterprises in Gobal Perspective. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc.
Chen, E. K.
1979, Hyper-growth in Asian Economies: A Comparative Study of Hong
Kong,Singarpore and Taiwan. London: Macmillian.
Chilcote, Ronald H.
1981 ,Theories of Comparative Politics: The Search for a Paradigm.
Boulder,Colorado: Westview.
Chu,Yun-han.
1989," State Structure and Economic Adjustment of the East Asian Newly
Industrilizing Countries," International Organization vol.43( 4) ,pp. 647-72.
Chou,Yu-Jen
1994,”The political underpinnings of economic development in “法商學報,
No.29.pp459-507.
Cumings, Bruce.
1984, “ The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy :
industrial sectors, product cycles and political consequences," International
Organization, Vo1.38(1),pp,1-40.
Deyo,Frederic C.
1987, “ Coalition, Institutions, and Linkage Sequenceing: T oward a Strateagic
Capacity Model of East Asian. “ in Frederic C.Deyo,ed The Political Economy of
New Asian Indusrtrailism.Ithca & Lodon:Cornell Univ Press,pp227-47.
Evnas,Peter B.
1979, Depedent Development: The Alliance of Multinational,State and Local Capital
in Brazil. Princeton Univ Press.
1987, “ Classs, State and Dependence in East Asia: Lesson for Latin Americanist," in
Frederic C. Deyo, ed. The Political Economy of New Asian Industrialism. Ithca
and London: Cornell Univ Press.pp.203-26.
Evans,Peter B. & Dietrich Rueschmeyer.
1985,”The State and Economic Transformation: Toward an Analysis of the
Conditions Underlying Effective Intervention. “ in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich
Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York:
Cambridge Univ Press.
Evans,Peter B. & John D. Stephen.
1988, “ Studying Development since the Sixities: The Emergence of Comparative
Political EconomY,1I Theory and Society, Vol. 17,pp. 713-45 .
Frank,Andre Gunder.
1969, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York: Monthly Review
Press.
1973,The Development of Underdevelopment. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Gilpin,Robert.
1987,The Political Economy of International Relations.New York: Princeton Univ
Press.
Gold, Thomas B.
1986, State and Society in the Tahyan Miracle. Armonk, New York: M.E. Shrape.
1990, "Entrepreurs,Multinationals,and the State," in Edwin Winkler & Susan
Greenhalgh. ed., Contending Approaches to the Political Economy oj TahYan.
New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
Haggard,S tephan.
1990'pathway from the Periphery:the Politics oj Growth in theNewly Industrialing
Countries . !thea & London: Cornell Univ Press.
Haggard,Stephan & Chung-In Moon.
1990, "Institution and Economic Policy: Theory and Korean Case Study." World
Polictcs. Vo1.42(2). pp.20 1-3 3.
Hall,Peter.
1986, Governing the Economy.New York Oxford Univ Press.
Hamilton,Nora.
1981, " State autonomy and depedent capitalism in Latin America, "British Journal of
Sociology. Vo1.32(3),pp305-29.
Harris, Nigel.
1983,The End of the Thrid World: Newly Industrializing Countries and the Decline of
An Ideology.New York:Pengiun Book,Inc.
Johnson, Chalmers.
1982, MITI and Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford Univ Press.
1987, "Political Insititution and Economic Performanee:The Government-Business
Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan." in Frederic C. Deyo, ed.The
Political Economy oj New Asian Industrialism. Ithea and London: Cornell Univ
Press.pp.136-164.
Katzenstein,Peter.
1985,Smal! States in world markets.Ithca: Cornell Univ Press.
Kitschelt,Herbert.
1991," Industrial Goverance Structure, innovation strategies, and the case of Japan:
sector or cross-national comparative analysis?" International Organization,
Vo1.45( 4),pp.453-93.
Koo, Hagen.
1987, “ The Interplay of State, Social Class and World System in East Asian
Development: The Case of South Korea and Taiwan." in Frederic Deyo ed.The
Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism" pp.165-81.
Krasner,Stephan D.
1984, “ Approach to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. “
Comparative Politics. Vol. 16(1 ),pp.223-46.
Lehmbruch, Gerhard.
1984,”Concertation and the structure of corporatist network “ ,in John H. Goldthrope.
ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford Univ
Press. pp. 66-80.
Li, K. T.
1976, The Experience of Dynamic Growth on Taiwan. Taipei: Meiya.
Lindblom, Charles E.
1977, Politics and Markets: the World's Political-Economic System. NewYork:Basic
Book,Inc.
IvleaneY,Constance S.
1989,”State policy and the development of Taiwan's semi-cnoductor industry. “ paper
present at conference on State Policy and Eonomic Development in Taiwan,
R.O.c., Co-sponsor by 'Soochow Univ and Univ of California at Los
Angles.Taipei,Dec 4-5.
Nester, William.
1991,Japanese Industrial Trageting : The Neomercantilist Path to Economic
Superpower.London: Macmilliam Press.
Nordlinger,Eric A.
1981, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press.
Nurkes, P.
1953,Problems of Capital Formation in Uderdevelopment Cuntries.New
York: Oxford Univ press.
O'connor, David C.
1985, "The computer industry in the third world: policy option and constraints." World Development. Vo1.13(3),pp.311-322.
Onis,Ziya.
1991,"The logic of the developmnetal states."Comparative Politics, (Oct).pp.109-
126.
Pang,Chien-Kuo.
1992,The State and Economic Transformation: The Taiwan Case. New York: Garland
Plubshing Inc.
Patrick,Hughes.
1977,"The future of the Japanese economy: output and productivity. " Journal of
Japanese Studies,vo1.3(2). pp147-54.
Poter,Michael E
1990, The Competetive Advantage of Nations. Lodon:MacmilIan Press.
Ranis, Gustiva.
1988," The evolution of policy in comparative perspectives." in K. T. Li,ed.an
evolution of Policy Behind Taiwan1s Development Sucess. New York: Yale Univ
Press. I 988 .
Rostow,W.W.
1971,Politics and the Stage of Growth.New York:Cambridge Univ Press.
Saxonhouse, G.
1983, "What is all this about' industrial targetting' in Japan? " World Economy,
vo1.6(3), pp.253-73.
Santos Dos, Theotonio.
1970, " The structure of dependence," American Economic Review.
Vo1.60(2).pp.231-6.
Schmitter, Philippe C.
1974," Still the century of corporatism?" Review of Politics. Vo1.36(1). pp . 85- 131.
Simon,Dennis F.
1990, "Techology transfer and national autonomy." in Edwin Winkler & Susan
Greenhalgh. ed., Contending Approaches to the Political Economy of Taiwan.
New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc.
Singer, Hans.
1950,tlThe distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. "American
Economic Review.No.40.pp.73-85.
Singer, Hans. & P. Gray
1988, " Trade policy and growth of developing countries: some new data ," World
Development, Vol. 16(3),pp.395-403.0
Skocpol, Theda.
1979,State and Social Revolutions: A Comparativer Analysis of France ,Russia, and
China. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
1985," Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research," in
Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the
State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ Press.
Spainer,John.
1984,Games Nations Play : Analyzing International Politics.New York: Holt ,Reinhart
and Winston.
Stepan,A1fred
1978,The State and Societ.· Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton:Princeton
Univ Press.
Stiglitz, Joseph E.
1988, Economics of the Public Sector. New York:W.W. Norton & Company ,2nd
edtion.
Thirlwall, A.P.
1989, Growth and Development: With Special Referance to Developing Economies.
London: Macmillan Education Ltd. 4th,edtion.
Todaro, M.P.
1989,Economic Development in the Third World.New York:Longman.
Wade, Robert.
1988,"State Interventions in Outward-Looking Development: Neo-Classical Theory
and Taiwan's Practice." in G.White ed. Developmental State in East Asia.London:
Macmillian.
1990, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Governmant in East
Asian Industrialization. New Jersey: Princeton Univ Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel.
1979, The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ Press.
Wang, Vicent Wei-cheng
1994, "High-Tech Paths and Economic Development Comparing NICs
Accommodative and Assertive Strategies. “ 政治學報, Vo1.22 ,June ,
1994,pp.141-180.
World Bank.
1993,The East Asian Miracle:Econmic Growthand Public PolicyNew York:Oxford
Univ Press.
Wikes,Stephen. & Maurice Wright.
1987, Comparative Government-Indllstrial Relations.Oxford:Clarendo Press.
Wincklet,Edwin A.
1984, "Institutionalization and particIpation on Taiwan: from hard to soft
authoritarianism?"China Quater/y,No.99. pp.481-499.
Wright,Maurice.
1988," Policy Community, Policy Network and Comparative Industrial Policies,"
Political Studies. Vo1.19,pp.593-612.
Wu,Se-Hwa.
1992, "The dynamic cooperation between government and enterprise: the
development of Taiwan's integrate circuit industry." in N.T. ed.Taiwan's
Enterprises in Gobal Perspective. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc.
Z ysman,J ohn.
1986, Government ,Markets and Growth: Finanxial System and the Politics of
Industrial Change. Oxford: Martin Robertson.