| 研究生: |
蔡承軒 Tsai, Cheng-Hsuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以 t 分配的隨機誤差項與隱藏馬可夫鏈建構選擇權定價模型 - 以台股指數市場為例 Construct an Option Pricing Model with Student-t Random Error and Hidden Markov Chain - TXO Stock Market |
| 指導教授: | 劉惠美 |
| 口試委員: |
劉家頤
洪明欽 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 統計學系 Department of Statistics |
| 論文出版年: | 2020 |
| 畢業學年度: | 108 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 77 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 選擇權 、定價模型 、資產報酬率 、波動率 、隱藏馬可夫鏈 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | B-S, ODMM, ODMMTD |
| DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202000823 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:60 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文以修正 Black & Scholes ( B-S model )定價模型為研究方向,主要探討的面向有二, 分別為 B-S 模型資產變動常態假設修正以及修正波動率恆定的假設。本文首先利用台股指數選擇權日資料驗證 B-S 模型的假設在台股指數市場的缺陷,再將 B-S 模型的隨機誤差項由常態分配假設修改為學生 t 分配,在學生 t 分配的基礎之下建立新的定價模型稱為 TDB-S 模型;接著修正波動率的恆定值假設,考慮波動率為有兩種隱藏狀態的馬可夫鍊,利用 Baum-Welch 法 (1970, Ann. Math. Statist) 迭代出隱藏馬可夫鏈的各項係數後,結合佔據時間的機率分配與 TDB-S 模型的架構建構出另一個新的模型 ODMMTD 模型。
文末分析台股指數選擇權 2019/4/1 至 2020/4/1 的收盤價日資料,分別利用本文建構的模型以及 B-S 模型四者不同模型搭配歷史估計量、 動差估計法(MME) 與 最大概似估計法 ( MLE ) 三種不同的參數估計方法進行選擇權定價,並比較在深度價外、價外、價平、價內、深度價內與交割時間距離長短來做績效評估。而績效評估的標準分別使用平均絕對誤差、平均比例誤差與均方根誤差三指標來比較模型的優劣。比較結果顯示:當權證處於價平與價外時,利用 TDB-S 搭配 MLE 估計量的定價績效最佳;而當權證處於深度價外、價內與深度價內時,利用 ODMMTD 模型搭配波動率的 MME 估計量的定價績效最佳。當權證距離交割日的交易日小於 20 天時,由學生 t 分配配飾隨機誤差項的模型並沒有顯著的績效提升,然而,當距離交割日大於 20 天時,學生 t 分配配飾的模型優點便明顯的展現出來,即 TDB-S 模型明顯優於 B-S 模型,且 ODMMTD 模型明顯優於 ODMM 模型。
The main purpose of this article is to modify the Black & Scholes model (B-S)(1973). The assumptions of B-S model are constant volatility and Gaussian distribution of asset returns which had been shown that violate the market phenomenon. Thus we try to use Student-t distribution to replace the error term of B-S model to capture the fat tail of distribution of asset returns and assume that the market volatility is a hidden Markov chain to grasp the market trend. Then we construct two new option pricing model which called TDB-S model and ODMMTD model based on the new assumptions. After that, we find the parameters of HMM such as transition matrix, initial states probability matrix by Baum-Welch method.
At the end of this paper, we compared B-S model, ODMM model, TDB-S model and ODMMTD model these four models with TXO market data from 2019/04/01 to 2020/04/01. The result is that the advantage of student-t distribution is weak if the maturity date is less than 20 days. However, when maturity date is over 20 days, TDB-S model and ODMMTD model have significant improvement on their pricing performance. Moreover, ODMMTD give the most accurate price when option is deep-in-price or deep-out-price and TDB-S model have minimal model error when pricing in-price, at-price and out-price options. Our research also found that over three method of estimating parameters (maximum likelihood estimate, method of moment estimate and historical estimate) (MLE, MME, HE), TDB-S model have the best performance when using MLEs and ODMMTD model match MMEs have the best performance.
摘要 II
Abstract III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
圖目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與方法 3
第三節 研究架構與流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 資產報酬率分配 7
第二節 波動率性質 10
第三節 定價模型 16
第三章 TDB-S模型建立 19
第一節 B-S模型假設驗證 20
第二節 常態假設修正 26
第三節 無風險投資組合 𝜋 29
第四節 風險中立市場下的r與 μ 31
第五節 建立TDB-S定價模型 34
第四章 ODMMTD模型建立 38
第一節 隱藏馬可夫模型 39
第二節 ODMMTD模型建構 43
第三節 轉移速率矩陣 47
第五章 定價模型績效評估 52
第一節 參數估計 52
第二節 績效評估方式 57
第三節 績效評估 58
第四節 結論與未來方向 72
參考文獻 74
一、 中文文獻
林宜嫻 (2012)。馬可夫狀態轉換模型與Black-Scholes 模型之比較: 黃金選擇權的實證研究。國立高雄第一科技大學金融研究所碩士論文。
林敦舜 (2002)。台灣認購權證評價之研究-探討二項式及三項式樹狀模型之 評價差異。交通大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林楚雄、吳欽杉、劉維琪 (2000)。台灣股票店頭市場股價報酬與波動之分析。中興企業管理學報,44,165-192。
曹金泉 (1999)。隨機波動度下選擇權評價理論的應用---以台灣認購權證為例。國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。
張慧蓮、汪紅駒 (2006)。Scaled t 分佈、槓桿效應和上證綜指的 VaR 風險。南方經濟,3,46-58。
黃德龍、楊曉光 (2008)。中國證券市場股指收益分佈的實證分析。管理科學學報,11(1),68-77。
單應翔 (1999)。台灣認購權證訂價模型選擇之研究。私立長庚大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
楊玉菁 (2001)。台灣個股型認購權證評價之研究。彰化師範大學商業教育研 究所未出版碩士論文。
趙其琳 (1999)。波動性預測模型能力之比較 ─ 臺灣認購權證之實證研究。私立淡江大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
關旭東 (2004)。隨機波動度下選擇權評價之實証-以台灣股價指數選擇權為例。輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
二、 英文文獻
Aparicio, F. M. & Estrada, J. (2001). ‘‘Empirical distributions of stock returns : European securities markets: 1990-95,’’ The European Journal of Finance, 7(1), 1-21.
Baum, L. E. and T. Petrie, (1966), “Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains, ”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37, 1554-1563.
Bakshi, G., Cao, C., and Chen, Z., (1997), ‘‘Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models,’’ Journal of Finance, Dec, pp2003-2049.
Black, F. and M. Scholes, (1973), “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , ”Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-659.
Blattberg, R. C., & Gonedes, N. J. (1974). ‘‘A comparison of the stable and student
distributions as statistical models for stock prices.’’ Journal of Business,47(2), 244-280.
Bollerslev, T., (1986), “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity, ”Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.
Chen, R., & Yu, L. (2013). ‘‘A novel nonlinear value-at-risk method for modeling risk of option portfolio with multivariate mixture of normal distributions.’’ Economic
Modelling, 35, 796-804.
Cox, J.C. & Ross S.A. (1976). ‘‘The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes’’ Journal of financial economics, 3 , 145-166.
Corrado, Charles and Tie Su (1998), “An Empirical Test of the Hull-White Option Pricing Model,” The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 18, No 4, pp.363-378.
David E. Upton and Donald S. Shannon ( 1979 ) ‘‘The Stable Paretian Distribution, Subordinated Stochastic Processes, and Asymptotic Lognormality: An Empirical Investigation’’ The Journal of Finance Vol. 34, No. 4 (Sep., 1979), pp. 1031-1039
Engle, Robert, F., (1982), “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,” Econometrics, 50,
Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. Journal of business,38(1), 34-105.
Gray, J. B., & French, D. W. (1990). ‘‘Empirical comparisons of distributional models for stock index returns.’’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(3), 451-459.
Hamilton, James H., (1989), “A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle,” Econometrics, 57, 357-384.
Heston, Steven L. (1993). , “A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, ”Review of Financial Studies, 6, 327-43.
Hull, J. and A. White, (1987), “The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities ,”Journal of Finance, 42, 281-300.
Hu Wenbo and Alec N. Kercheval, (2010). , ‘‘Portfolio optimization for student t and skewed t returns’’ Journal of Quantitative Finance, 10, 91-105.
Ishijima Hiroshi and Masaki Uchida, (2002), “Regime Switching Portfolios Proceedings of Quantitative Methods in Finance, Sydney, Australia.’’
Jarrow, R. , Rudd, A. (1982), ‘‘Approximate option valuation for arbitrary stochastic processes’’ Journal of financial Economics, 10 , 347-369.
Lu, F. Y. (2005). ‘‘Analysis on fat tail characteristics of stock market returns in China.’’ Systems Engineering–Theory Methodology Applications, 14, 350-352.
Liew, C. C. & Siu, T. K. (2010) ‘‘A hidden Markov regime-switching model for option valuation.’’ Insurance: Mathematics and Economics , 47 , 374-384.
Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. The Journal of Business, 36(4), 394-419.
Merton, Robert, C., (1973), “Theory of Rational Option Pricing, ”Bell Journal of Economics, 4, 141-18
Nandi, S. (1998), “How important is the correlation between returns and volatility in a stochastic volatility model? Empirical evidence from pricing and hedging in the S&P500 index options market,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 22, pp.589–610.
Praetz, P. D. (1972). ‘’The distribution of share price changes.’’ Journal of business, 45, 49-55.
Scott, L. (1987), “Option pricing when the variance changes randomly: theory, estimation and testing,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22, .419-438.
Chen, S. N., Hsu, P. P. & Liang, K. Y. (2019), ‘‘Option pricing and hedging in different cyclical structures: a two-dimensional Markov-modulated model.’’ The European Journal of Finance , 25, 762-779
Wiggins, J. B. (1987), “Option Values under Stochastic Volatility: Theory and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 351-372.
XU, X. S., & HOU, C. Q. (2006). ‘‘A Portfolio Selection Model Conditional on Non-normal Stable Distributions: Mean-scale Parameter Model.’’ Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 9, 1-9.