| 研究生: |
李璦如 Lee, Ai Ru |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以由上而下與由下而上注意力運作探討高齡者對於情緒臉孔的反應 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention in Visual Search of Emotional Faces in Aging |
| 指導教授: |
黃淑麗
Huang, Shwu Lih |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 心理學系 Department of Psychology |
| 論文出版年: | 2012 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 64 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 年齡 、內因線索 、外因線索 、由上而下注意力運作 、由下而上注意力運作 、視覺搜尋 、情緒臉孔 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | age, endogenous cue, exogenous cue, top-down attention, bottom-up attention, visual search, emotional faces |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:261 下載:20 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討高齡者在視覺搜尋作業中,其由上而下(Top-down)與由下而上(Bottom-up)的注意力運作對於情緒刺激的反應,是否會因為注意力功能退化而與年輕成人的表現不同。過去研究指出,雖然高齡者注意力功能衰退,但是高齡者的由上而下注意力運作,仍可以幫助高齡者的表現。為了解由上而下注意力運作是否對於高齡者的反應有所幫助,本研究以兩個實驗分別探討內因與外因線索以及操弄訊息量所造成的影響。
實驗一包括80%有效的內因線索與25%有效的外因線索兩階段,外因線索階段為由下而上注意力運作,內因線索階段則為由上而下注意力運作,獨變項為年齡(高齡者、年輕成人)、情緒(生氣、快樂)以及線索有效情況(有效線索、中性線索、無效線索),記錄反應時間與正確率。實驗二的兩階段使用不同訊息量的外因線索(80%有效比例為高訊息量、25%有效比例為低訊息量),其餘操弄都與實驗一相同,低訊息量為單純的由下而上注意力運作,而高訊息量兼具由下而上與由上而下注意力運作。
研究結果發現,兩實驗高齡者與年輕成人都對於生氣情緒反應較快,符合威脅優勢。高齡者較年輕人更需要借助由上而下的注意力運作幫助反應,高訊息量的線索對於高齡者幫助也較年輕成人大。另外,實驗一增益效果的結果顯示,有效線索在高齡者搜尋生氣臉孔幫助較大,在年輕成人則搜尋快樂臉孔幫助較大,但是實驗二結果則顯示,有效線索在高齡者與年輕成人搜尋快樂臉孔的幫助都較生氣臉孔大,兩實驗的年齡與情緒的交互作用結果不同可能與高齡者異質性有關。由研究結果可知,由上而下注意力運作對於高齡者在情緒臉孔反應有幫助,在未來實務上,可以多運用由上而下注意力運作的線索幫助高齡者反應。
This research is aim to understand attention in visual search of emotional faces in aging. Two types of attention process, that is top-down and bottom-up attention, were concerned in this study. In past researches, there are empirical evidences showing age-related declination in attention function, especially in bottom-up attention. But top-down attention is still playing an important role in doing task for the older adults. In order to understand the effect of top-down attention in aging, two experiments using endogenous or exogenous spatial cues were designed. Participants have to respond whether there is a different emotional face or not in a visual search task. The independent variables are age(aging and young), emotional face(happy and angry), and cue(valid, neutral, and invalid). Dependent variables are reaction times and accuracy. In Experiment 1, there are two stages: 80% valid endogenous cues and 25% valid exogenous cues. The endogenous cues stage and exogenous cues stage were designed to probe top-down attention and bottom-up attention, respectively. In Experiment 2, there are two stages: 80% valid exogenous cues(highly informative cues)and 25% valid exogenous cues(non-informative cues). Using highly informative exogenous cues involve both top-down and bottom-up attention. In contrast, non-informative exogenous cues only trigger bottom-up attention. The major results of this study support threat advantage hypothesis that both older and young adults respond to angry face target quicker than happy face. Benefit from top-down attention was larger in older adults than young adults. Highly informative cues help older adults more in searching emotional faces than young adults. The cuing effects in two emotional face conditions were different between Experiment 1 and 2. This inconsistent result maybe relates to aging heterogeneity. In conclusion, top-down attention can help older adults search for emotional faces.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 高齡者相關研究 2
一、高齡化社會 2
二、高齡者的生理與心理功能 3
三、高齡者經驗的效果 5
第二節 高齡者情緒與注意力相關研究 6
第三節 基礎的注意力研究 7
一、注意力的運作 7
二、注意力的內因與外因線索 8
三、視覺搜尋相關研究 8
四、高齡者與年輕成人的注意力表現 9
第四節 情緒相關的注意力研究 11
一、演化與情緒 11
二、情緒臉孔刺激 12
三、情緒與年齡 13
第二章 研究目的與假設 17
第三章 研究方法 20
第一節 實驗一 20
第二節 實驗二 38
第四章 綜合討論 53
第一節 情緒與年齡的效果 54
第二節 內因與外因線索的影響 56
第三節 研究限制與建議 57
第四節 研究貢獻 57
第五章 結論 58
參考文獻 59
中文部分
內政部統計處(2010)。現住人口按三段、六歲年齡組分【原始數據】。內政統計月報。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/m1-05.xls
李傳房(2006)。高齡使用者產品設計之探討。設計學報,11(3),65-80。
林克能(2009)。失智症臨床評估工具簡短智能測驗(MMSE)的介紹。台北市醫師公會會刊,53(1),50-52。
張隆順(譯)(1993)。老人心理學。(原作者:Richard A. Kalish)。臺北市:桂冠。
彭駕騂(1999)。老人學。臺北市:揚智文化。
黃富順(1995)。老化與健康。臺北市:師大書苑有限公司。
英文部分
Berger, A., Henik, A., & Rafal, R. (2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 207-221.
Costello, M. C., Madden, D. J., Mitroff, S. R., & Whiting, W. L. (2010). Age-related decline of visual processing components in change detection. Psychology and Aging 25(2), 356-368
Connor, C. E., Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (2004). Visual attention: bottom-up vs. top-down. Current Biology, 14, 850-852.
Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/ disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58B(6), 327-337.
Devaney, K. O., & Johnson, H. A. (1980). Neuron loss in the aging visual cortex of man. Journal of Gerontol, 35, 836-841.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129.
Engardio, P., & Matlack, C. (2005, January 31). Global aging. Business Week,
Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_05/b3918011.htm
Foss, M. P., Formigheri, P., & Speciali, J. G. (2009). Heterogeneity of cognitive aging in Brazilian normal elders. Dement Neuropsychol, 3, 344-351.
Fraser, S. A., Li, K. Z. H., DeMont, R. G., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). Effects of balance status and age on muscle activation while walking under divided attention. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B(3), 171-178.
Goh, J. O., Suzuki, A., & Park, D. C. (2010). Reduced neural selectivity increases fMRI adaptation with age during face discrimination. Neuroimage, 51, 336-344.
Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of exogenous and endogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1039-1054.
Hahn, S., Carlson, C., Singer, S., & Gronlund, S. D. (2006). Aging and visual search: Automatic and controlled attentional bias to threat faces. Acta Psychologica, 123, 312-336.
Henderickx, D., Maetens, K., Geerinck, T., & Soetens, E. (2009). Modeling the interactions of bottom-up and top-down guidance in visual attention. In L. Paletta & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Attention in cognitive systems (pp. 197–211). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Huang, S.-L., Chang, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-J. (2011). Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources. Emotion, 11(3), 544-552.
Inzitari, M., Baldereschi, M., Di Carlo, A., Di Bari, M., Marchionni, N., Scafato, E., Farchi, G., & Inzitari, D.(2007a). Impaired attention predicts motor performance decline in older community-dwellers with normal baseline mobility: results from the Italian Longitudinal Study On Aging (ILSA). The Journals of Gerontology, 62A(8), 837-843.
Inzitari, M., Newman, A. B., Yaffe, K., Boudreau, R., de Rekeneire, N., Shorr, R., Harris, T. B., & Rosano, C. (2007b). Gait speed predicts decline in attention and psychomotor speed in older adults: the health aging and body composition study. Neuroepidemiology, 29, 156-162.
Knight, M., Seymour, T. L., Gaunt, J. T., Baker, C., Nesmith, K., & Mather, M. (2007). Aging and goal-directed emotional attention: Distraction reverses emotional biases. Emotion, 7(4), 705-714.
Leclerc, C. M., & Kensinger, E. A. (2008). Effects of age on detection of emotional information. Psychology and Aging, 23, 209-215.
Li, S.-C., Lindenberger, U., & Sikström, S. (2001). Aging cognition: From neuromodulation to representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 479-486.
Madden, D. J. (2007). Aging and Visual Attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 70-74.
Madden, D. J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2010). Aging and top-down attentional control in visual search. Institute for Homeland Security Solutions Research Brief. Retrieved from https://www.ihssnc.org
Madden, D. J., Spaniol, J., Bucur, B., & Whiting, W. L. (2007). Age-related increase in top-down activation of visual features. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(5), 644-651.
Madden, D. J., Whiting, W. L., Cabeza, R., & Huettel, S. A. (2004). Age-related preservation in top-down attentional guidance during visual search. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 304-309.
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496-502.
Mather, M., & Knight, M. R. (2006). Angry faces get noticed quickly: Threat detection is not impaired among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences. 61B(1), 54-57.
McDowd, J. M., & Craik,F. I. (1988). Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(2), 267-280.
McGaughy, J., & Eichenbaum, H. (2002). It's time to pay attention to attention in aging. Learning and Memory, 9, 51-152.
Moriya, J., & Tanno, Y. (2009). Competition between endogenous and exogenous attention to nonemotional stimuli in social anxiety. Emotion, 9, 739-743.
Murphy, N.A., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2008). Preferences for emotional information in older and younger adults: A meta-analysis of memory and attention tasks. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 263- 286.
Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466-478.
Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381-396.
Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3-25.
de Ribaupierre, A., & Ludwig, C. (2003). Age difference and divided attention: Is there not a general deficit? Experimental Aging Research, 29(1), 79-105.
Purkis, H. M., & Lipp, O. V. (2009). Are snakes and spiders special? Acquisition of characteristics of fear relevant stimuli by non fear relevant stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 430-452.
Ruffman, T., Henry, J. D., Livingstone, V., & Phillips, L. H. (2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 863-881.
Ruffman, T., Ng, M., & Jenkin, T. (2009). Older adults respond quickly to angry faces despite labeling difficulty. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64B(2), 171-179.
Ruys, K. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2008). Emotion elicitor or emotion messenger?: Subliminal priming reveals two faces of facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19, 593-600.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 49(1), 83-90.
Trick, L., & Enns, J. T. (1998). Lifespan changes in attention: The visual search task. Cognitive Development, 13(3), 369-386.
United Nations Development Programme (2010). Human Development Report 2010 [Data file and code book], Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/
Vanneste, S., & Pouthas, V. (1999). Timing in aging: the role of attention. Experimental Aging Research, 25(1), 49-67.
Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 849-857.
Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(12), 585-594.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.
van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2004). Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search. Perception, 33, 927-937.
Waszak, F., Li, S.-C., & Hommel, B. (2010). The development of attentional networks: cross-sectional findings from a life span sample. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 337-349.