| 研究生: |
胡晉瑋 Hu, Chin-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
全校式治理視角下公立幼兒園推動永續發展教育之研究 : ESD-SOQ 學校組織實證分析 A Whole School Approach to Education for Sustainable Development in Public Preschools : An Empirical Analysis of ESD-SOQ Organizational Characteristics |
| 指導教授: |
顏敏仁
Yan, Min-Ren |
| 口試委員: |
朱子君
Chu, Zi-Chun 莊俊儒 Ching, Gregory S |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
教育學院 - 學校行政碩士在職專班 Master of Education in School Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 181 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 全校式治理 、組織支持 、永續發展教育 、永續發展教育-學校組織支持量表 、公立幼兒園 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Whole School Approach (WSA), Organizational support, Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), ESD-SOQ, Public preschools |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:18 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
幼兒教育是扎根永續發展教育(ESD)的關鍵階段,然公立幼兒園於推動時常面臨組織支持與外部網絡連結之挑戰。因此,本研究以「全校式治理(WSA)」為視角,探討教保人員知覺組織支持之現況、差異、相關情形及外部網絡分佈。採橫斷式量化設計,以新北市公立幼兒園教保人員為對象,透過分層叢集抽樣施測永續發展教育–學校組織支持量表(ESD-SOQ),回收有效樣本 332 份。資料採描述性統計、t 檢定、單因子變異數分析(含 Welch 與Games-Howell 檢定)、皮爾森相關及卡方與費雪精確檢定進行分析。
實證分析結果顯示:一、組織支持整體屬中上水準,以「多元溝通」表現最佳;二、組織支持知覺具顯著之「職務差異」,外部網絡多集中於校長與園長階層;三、外部網絡具顯著「體制差異」,附設幼兒園之外部合作比例較高;四、支持構面皆呈顯著正相關,尤以「團隊支持」與「專業結構」、「適應性」之關聯最深,顯示各項支持結構在運作上相輔相成。
根據研究結果顯示,公立幼兒園推動永續發展教育之成效,與不同職務間之知覺落差及學校體制差異密切相關。本研究亦探討相關可促進永續發展教育之政策與管理建議,以作為相關單位參考。
Early childhood education is a critical stage for building the foundation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). However, public preschools often encounter challenges related to organizational support and external network connections when implementing ESD. This study therefore adopts the "Whole School Approach (WSA)" as a framework to examine preschool teachers' perceived organizational support—its current status, differences across groups, associations among dimensions, and the distribution of external networks.
A cross-sectional quantitative research design was employed, with public preschool teachers in New Taipei City as the study sample. The ESD School Organization Questionnaire (ESD-SOQ) was administered through stratified cluster sampling, yielding 332 valid responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA (with Welch's test and Games-Howell post hoc comparisons), Pearson correlation, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.
The findings from empirical analysis are as follows: First, overall organizational support was at a moderately high level, while "Diverse Communication" is the highest rated factor. Second, perceived organizational support differed significantly by job position, and external networks were concentrated mainly among principals and preschool directors. Third, external networks differed significantly by institutional type, with school-affiliated preschools showing a higher proportion of external collaboration. Fourth, all support dimensions were significantly and positively correlated with one another, with "Team Support" showing the strongest associations with "Professional Structure" and "Adaptability," suggesting that these support structures operate in a mutually reinforcing manner.
The research results suggest that the effectiveness of ESD implementation in public preschools is closely associated to perceptual gaps across job positions and differences in school institutional type. Based on these results, this study further discusses policy and management recommendations for advancing ESD, offering a reference for relevant authorities.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目次 iv
表次 vi
圖次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第三節 待答問題 8
第四節 研究流程 9
第五節 名詞釋義 10
第六節 研究範圍 12
第二章 文獻回顧 14
第一節 永續發展教育 14
第二節 公立幼兒園現況與組織結構特徵 35
第三節 全校式治理(Whole School Approach, WSA) 50
第四節 永續發展教育學校組織問卷之理論基礎 57
第五節 全校式治理與組織支持之概念整合 62
第三章 研究設計 68
第一節 研究架構 68
第二節 研究對象與抽樣方法 70
第三節 研究工具 76
第四節 資料蒐集程序 83
第五節 分析方法 85
第四章 研究結果與討論 89
第一節 樣本結構 90
第二節 永續發展教育學校組織支持之現況分析 101
第三節 不同背景變項在組織支持上之差異分析 105
第四節 組織支持各構面之相關分析 132
第五節 推動永續發展教育之「外部夥伴合作對象」差異分析 138
第六節 研究假設檢定 147
第七節 綜合討論 149
第五章 結論與建議 154
第一節 主要研究發現與結論 154
第二節 推動永續發展教育之實務建議 157
第三節 研究限制 161
第四節 後續研究建議 161
參考文獻 163
附錄 176
一、中文文獻
王品慈(2025)。幼教師對幼兒環境教育融入SDGs觀點之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所。
幼兒教育及照顧法(2022年6月29日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0070031
幼兒園行政組織及員額編制標準(2025年7月31日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0070046
幼兒園及其分班基本設施設備標準(2019年7月10日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0070034
行政院國家永續發展委員會(2009)。永續發展政策綱領。作者。https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/_ofu/download/about/%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%B6%B1%E9%A0%98.pdf
何昕家(2020)。永續發展目標(SDGs)教育手冊—臺灣指南。教育部。
林明地(2002)。學校領導:理念與校長專業生涯。高等教育出版社。
張菁芝(2024)。應用IPA模式於教保服務人員SDGs融入幼兒教育之重要度與實踐度〔未出版之碩士論文〕。華梵大學智慧生活科技學系大數據與管理碩士班。
教育部(2016年12月1日)。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。行政院公報。
教育部(2021)。教育部「新世代環境教育發展」政策中長程計畫(111–114年)。作者。
教育部補助直轄市縣(市)政府增設公立幼稚園(班)及改善幼稚園教學環境設備作業要點(2009年12月21日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0070025
教育部國民及學前教育署補助直轄市縣(市)政府充實及改善幼兒園教學環境設施設備作業要點(2024年4月18日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0070025
教保服務人員條例(2022年6月29日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0070039
陳羿潔(2024)。探討SDGs導入幼兒教育課程對幼兒園教保活動課程大綱影響之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。實踐大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班。
陳漢倫(2024)。幼兒園落實SDGs之個案研究:以桃園市FS幼兒園為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班。
新北市政府(2025年11月)。2021新北市地方自願檢視報告。作者。https://sdgs.ntpc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=45f19ec62af5557f
環境教育法(2011年6月5日)。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=O0100001
簡又新(主編)(2021)。永續發展教育。財團法人中鼎教育基金會。
二、英文文獻
Agbedahin, A. V. (2019). Sustainable development, education for sustainable development, and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development, 27(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1931
Akinsemolu, A. A., & Ogunkoya, A. O. (2021). Early childhood education for sustainable development in sub-Sahara Africa [Paper presentation]. 4th International Conference on Advanced Research in Education, Budapest, Hungary. https://www.dpublication.com/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/053-712.pdf
Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk‐taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Björkman, C. (2008). Internal capacities for school improvement: Principals' views in Swedish secondary schools [Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University]. DiVA.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). Wiley.
Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040039
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collins, S., & Garrity, S. (2023). Early childhood educators’ understanding of education for sustainable development. Irish Educational Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2266688
Council of the European Union. (2022, June 16). Council Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on learning for the green transition and sustainable development. Official Journal of the European Union, 65(C 243), 1–9. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022H0627%2801%29
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300304
Davis, J., Engdahl, I., Otieno, L., Pramling Samuelsson, I., Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Valladh, P. (2008). The Gothenburg recommendations on education for sustainable development. OMEP.
Dean, S. N., & Elliott, S. (2022). Urgency, equity, and agency: An assemblage of global concerns and interests in early childhood education for sustainability. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 9(2), 56–68. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1350521
Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.54675/ssp.2025.09.003
Division for Sustainable Development. (2013). Global sustainable development report – Executive summary: Building the common future we want. United Nations. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/globalsdreport/
Elliott, S. (2010). Essential, not optional: Education for sustainability in early childhood centres. Exchange, 32(4), 18–22.
Engdahl, I. (2015). Early childhood education for sustainability: The OMEP world project. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-015-0149-7
Engdahl, I., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. (2021). Swedish teachers in the process of implementing education for sustainability in early childhood education. New Ideas in Child and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 35–50.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Fulghum, R. (1989). All i really need to know i learned in kindergarten. Ivy Books.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gericke, N., & Torbjörnsson, T. (2022). Identifying capital for school improvement: Recommendations for a whole school approach to ESD implementation. Environmental Education Research, 28(6), 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2024194
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
Gibson, C. B., Cooper, C., & Conger, J. A. (2009). Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013073
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole-school approaches to sustainability: An international review of sustainable school programs. Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES).
Ho, D., Lee, M., & Teng, Y. (2016). Size matters: The link between staff size and perceived organizational support in early childhood education. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 1104–1122. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1111654
Holst, J., Grund, J., & Brock, A. (2024). Whole Institution Approach: Measurable and highly effective in empowering learners and educators for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 19(5), 1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01506-5
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Isac, M. M., Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J., De Maeyer, S., Schelfhout, W., Van Petegem, P., & Claes, E. (2022). Differences in teachers’ professional action competence in education for sustainable development: The importance of teacher co-learning. Sustainability, 14(2), Article 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020767
Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
Karaarslan-Semiz, G., & Sund, P. (2025). Whole-school approach to sustainability: An in-depth study of six green schools in Sweden and Türkiye. Journal of Biological Education, 60(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2435777
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Koh, G. A., & Askell-Williams, H. (2021). Sustainable school-improvement in complex adaptive systems: A scoping review. Review of Educationexport, 9(1), 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3246
Lee, Y. L., & Yang, S. W. (2020). The inspiration via Japan of promoting ESD on education policies for Taiwan. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 101–105..
Leo, U., & Wickenberg, P. (2013). Professional norms in school leadership: Change efforts in implementation of education for sustainable development. Journal of Educational Change, 14(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9207-8
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Manitoba Education and Training. (2017). Safe and caring schools: A whole-school approach to planning for safety and belonging.
Manni, A., Knekta, E., & Åberg, E. (2024). Critical events in the systematic work at an organizational level towards a whole school approach to sustainability in a Swedish municipality. In A. E. J. Wals, B. Bjønness, A. Sinnes, & I. Eikeland (Eds.), Whole school approaches to sustainability: Education renewal in times of distress (pp. 201–214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56172-6_14
Mathie, R. G., & Wals, A. E. J. (2022). Whole school approaches to sustainability: Exemplary practices from around the world. Wageningen University. https://doi.org/10.18174/572267
Mims, S. U., Scott-Little, C., Lower, J. K., Cassidy, D. J., & Hestenes, L. L. (2008). Education level and stability as it relates to early childhood classroom quality: A survey of early childhood program directors and teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540809594657
Mogren, A., Gericke, N., & Scherp, H.-A. (2019). Whole school approaches to education for sustainable development: A model that links to school improvement. Environmental Education Research, 25(4), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1455074
Mote, J., Jordan, G., Hage, J., Hadden, W., & Clark, A. (2016). Too big to innovate? Exploring organizational size and innovation processes in scientific research. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv045
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
Newmann, F., King, B., & Youngs, P. (2000, April). Professional development that addresses school capacity [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Norðdahl, K., Pálmadóttir, H., Heggen, M. P., Jørgensen, N. J., Furu, A.-C., & Thulin, S. (2024). Early childhood education for sustainable development in the Nordic national curricula: Status and content. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(5), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2389945
Norðdahl, K. (2021). National policy guidelines and early childhood sustainability education: An analysis of match and gaps in preschool curricula plans. Environmental Education Research, 27(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1866400
Park, S. H. K. Y. (2016). Perceptions and attitudes of early childhood teachers in Korea about education for sustainable development. International Journal of Early Childhood, 48(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-016-0176-y
Pearson, E., & Degotardi, S. (2009). Education for sustainable development in early childhood education: A global solution to local concerns? International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168878
Poje, M., Marinić, I., Stanisavljević, A., & Rechner Dika, I. (2024). Environmental Education on Sustainable Principles in Kindergartens—A Foundation or an Option? Sustainability, 16(7), Article 2707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072707
Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Kaga, Y. (Eds.). (2008). The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000159355
Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2011). Why we should begin early with ESD: The role of early childhood education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-011-0034-x
Rikkerink, M. R. H., Vermunt, J. D., & Swennenhuis, H. (2015). A new model of educational innovation: Exploring the nexus of organizational learning, distributed leadership, and digital technologies. Journal of Educational Change, 16(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9253-5
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
Sasaki, O., Yonehara, A., & Kitamura, Y. (2024). The influence of the whole school approach on implementing education for sustainable development in Japan. Prospects, 54(1), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-023-09667-4
Slate, J. R., & Jones, C. H. (2005). Effects of school size: A review of the literature with recommendations. Essays in Education, 13(1), Article 12. https://openriver.winona.edu/eie/vol13/iss1/12/
Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
Sonter, L. J., & Kemp, S. (2021). Connecting the UNESCO Sustainable Development Goals with Australian early childhood education policy to transform practice. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 9(1), 11–24.
Tsekos, P., Vretakou, V., & Christidou, V. (2022). Teachers’ ESD self-efficacy and practices: A longitudinal study on the impact of teacher professional development. Environmental Education Research, 28(6), 868–888.
UNESCO. (2005). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014).
UNESCO. (2008). The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society.
UNESCO. (2012). Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development, DESD monitoring and evaluation.
UNESCO. (2019). UNESCO 2019 forum on education for sustainable development and global citizenship (p. 33).
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448
UNESCO. (2022). Berlin declaration on education for sustainable development.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child.
United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
Verhelst, D. (2021). Sustainable schools for sustainable education: Characteristics of an ESD-effective school [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ghent University.
Verhelst, D., Vanhoof, J., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2020). Building a conceptual framework for an ESD-effective school organization. Journal of Environmental Education, 51(6), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1797615
Verhelst, D., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). Development and validation of the education for sustainable development school organisation questionnaire. Environmental Education Research, 28(6), 830–850.
Verhelst, D., Vanhoof, J., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2024). Enabling effective education for sustainable development: Investigating the connection between the school organization and students’ action competence. Environmental Education Research, 30(4), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2234608
Verhelst, D., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2023). School effectiveness for education for sustainable development (ESD): What characterizes an ESD-effective school organization? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 502–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143221996213
Wals, A. E. J., & Mathie, R. G. (2022). Whole school approaches to sustainability: Exemplary practices from around the world. Wageningen University.
WHO. (1996). Regional guidelines: Development of health-promoting schools—A framework for action.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. United Nations.
Wyn, J., Cahill, H., Holdsworth, R., Rowling, L., & Carson, S. (2000). MindMatters, a whole-school approach promoting mental health and wellbeing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34(4), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2000.00748.x
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.
Zhou, W., Taylor, L., Boyle, L., Funk, S., DeBorst, L., & De Neve, J.-E. (2025). Whole school approach to wellbeing in childhood and adolescence: Literature review. International Baccalaureate Organization.
全文公開日期 2028/07/15