| 研究生: |
林光偉 Lin, Kuang-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
桃園市國民中學校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能關係之研究 A Study on the Relationships among Principals’ Leadership for Learning, Teachers’ Psychological Resilience, and School Effectiveness of Junior High Schools in Taoyuan City |
| 指導教授: |
秦夢群
Chin, Meng-Chun |
| 口試委員: |
林新發
Lin, Hsin-Fa 李逢堅 Lee, Feng-Chien 林信志 Lin, Hsin-Chih 陳建志 Chen, Chien-Chih |
| 學位類別: |
博士
Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
教育學院 - 教育學系 Department of Education |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 248 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 心理韌性 、國民中學 、學校效能 、學習領導 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Psychological Resilience, Junior High Schools, School Effectiveness, Leadership for Learning |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:8 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討桃園市國民中學教師知覺校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能之現況及其關係,並建構三者之結構關係模型,以分析教師心理韌性於校長學習領導與學校效能之間的中介作用。本研究採量化研究取向,透過問卷調查法蒐集資料,研究對象為桃園市公立國民中學教師,採分層比例隨機抽樣方式進行抽樣,共發出597份問卷,回收有效問卷550份,有效回收率為92.13%。所得資料運用描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析及結構方程模式(SEM)進行統計分析。
研究主要結果如下:
一、教師知覺校長學習領導現況屬於中上程度,其中以「形塑學習願景」構面平均分數最高。
二、教師知覺心理韌性現況屬於中上程度,其中以「對改變的正向接納與安全的人際關係」構面平均分數最高。
三、教師知覺學校效能現況屬於中上程度,其中以「環境設施規劃」構面平均分數最高。
四、不同背景變項(包括性別、年齡、現任職務、服務年資、學校規模及校長相關背景)在三變項之知覺上呈現部分顯著差異。
五、校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能三者之間均呈現顯著正相關。
六、校長學習領導與教師心理韌性對學校效能具有顯著正向預測力。
七、結構方程模式分析結果顯示,校長學習領導對教師心理韌性具有正向影響,教師心理韌性亦對學校效能具有正向影響,且校長學習領導除直接影響學校效能外,亦透過教師心理韌性產生部分中介效果,整體模型具良好適配度。
最後依據實證結果提出相關建議,作為教育行政機關、學校校長、教師及未來研究之參考。
This study aimed to investigate the current status and relationships among teachers’ perceptions of principals’ leadership for learning, teachers’ psychological resilience, and school effectiveness of public junior high schools in Taoyuan City. In addition, a structural model was constructed to examine the mediating role of teachers’ psychological resilience in the relationship between principals’ leadership for learning and school effectiveness. A quantitative research approach was adopted, and data were collected through a questionnaire survey. The participants were teachers from public junior high schools in Taoyuan City, selected using stratified proportional random sampling. A total of 597 questionnaires were distributed, and 550 valid responses were obtained, yielding a valid response rate of 92.13%. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson product–moment correlation, stepwise multiple regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM).
The major findings are summarized as follows:
1.Teachers’ perceptions of principals’ leadership for learning were at a moderately high level, with “shaping a learning vision” obtaining the highest mean score among the dimensions.
2.Teachers’ psychological resilience was at a moderately high level, with “positive acceptance of change and secure interpersonal relationships” scoring the highest.
3.Teachers’ perceptions of school effectiveness were at a moderately high level, with “environmental facilities planning” having the highest mean score.
4.Significant differences were found in the three variables across certain background variables, including gender, age, current position, years of service, school size, and principals’ background characteristics.
5.Principals’ leadership for learning, teachers’ psychological resilience, and school effectiveness were all significantly and positively correlated.
6.Both principals’ leadership for learning and teachers’ psychological resilience significantly and positively predicted school effectiveness.
7.Structural equation modeling results indicated that principals’ leadership for learning had a positive effect on teachers’ psychological resilience, which in turn positively influenced school effectiveness. Moreover, principals’ leadership for learning exerted both direct and indirect effects on school effectiveness through teachers’ psychological resilience, indicating a partial mediating effect, and the overall model demonstrated a good fit.
Based on the empirical findings, this study proposes several suggestions for educational administrative agencies, school principals, teachers, and future research.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 待答問題 11
第三節 名詞釋義 12
第四節 研究方法與步驟 13
第五節 研究範圍與限制 17
第二章 文獻探討 19
第一節 學習領導理論與相關研究 19
第二節 心理韌性理論與相關研究 41
第三節 學校效能理論與相關研究 59
第四節 學習領導、心理韌性與學校效能相關研究 83
第三章 研究設計與實施 93
第一節 研究架構與變項 93
第二節 研究對象 96
第三節 研究工具 102
第四節 實施程序 106
第五節 資料處理 109
第六節 研究倫理 111
第四章 研究結果分析與討論 113
第一節 桃園市公立國中校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能之現況分析 113
第二節 不同背景變項教師知覺校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能之差異分析 124
第三節 桃園市公立國中校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能之相關分析 177
第四節 桃園市公立國中校長學習領導與教師心理韌性對學校效能的預測力 186
第五節 桃園市公立國中校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能的結構方程模型之檢驗 189
第五章 研究結論與建議 199
第一節 研究結論 199
第二節 對教育行政機關之建議 207
第三節 對桃園市公立國民中學校長與教師之建議 208
第四節 對未來研究之建議 211
參考文獻 213
中文部分 213
英文部分 225
附 錄 241
附錄一 問卷授權書 241
附錄二 國民中學校長學習領導、教師心理韌性與學校效能調查問卷 244
中文部分
王玉麟(2004)。研究倫理的相關議題。教師之友,45(3),85–93。https://doi.org/10.7053/TF.200406.0085。
王孝維(2022)。國小校長韌性領導指標建構之研究〔博士論文,臺北市立大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u648n6
王松輝(2015)。中文版 Connor-Davidson 復原力量表之信效度分析〔碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3sy9n6
王美美(2023)。公立高中教師知覺校長課程領導、教師素養導向教學與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dgch7m
王韋傑(2022)。國小初任教師復原力、工作壓力與教學效能之關係〔碩士論文,東海大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3spf3v
王紹穎(2007)。自我感、復原力與創傷後症狀之關聯性研究:以燒傷病人為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。
王琡棻、盧台華、吳裕益(2010)。國小學生復原力量表之信效度及測量恆等性檢定。測驗統計年刊,18,23–45。https://doi.org/10.6773/JRMS.201006.0023
王韻涵(2024)。工作家庭邊境強度、心理韌性與生活品質關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uygv79
朱經明(2022)。教育及心理統計學(三版)。五南。
何秀玉、李雅玲、胡文郁(2012)。老人復原力之概念分析。護理雜誌,59(2),88–92。https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.59.2.87
何湘菱(2014)。嘉南地區國中教師幽默感、自我復原力與教學效能之相關研究〔碩士論文,國立臺南大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/77g88x
何筱晴(2019)。新北市國小教師復原力與教學效能關係之研究〔碩士論文,臺北市立大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/92pr36
何瑾璇(2024)。偏遠地區高級中等學校校長韌性領導與教師工作士氣關係之研究:以關係品質與教師心理資本為中介〔博士論文,國立臺南大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cq5t3z
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS 的應用。高等教育。
余民寧、陳柏霖、湯雅芬(2012)。大學生心理資本量表編製及其相關因素之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,8(4),19–52。
吳竹鈞(2023)。陰陽共存觀點之正向心理學課程對於大學生心理韌性的影響:以自我效能為調節變項〔碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/86dafy
吳宗立(1998)。國民中學組織衝突、外在壓力、行政決策與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wxgj48
吳宗立(2005)。學校行政決策。麗文文化。
吳明隆、張毓仁(2018)。SPSS 問卷統計分析快速上手秘笈。五南。
吳明雄(2010)。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺中教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5pfek4
吳政達、徐宗盛(2013)。學校效能實證研究方法之探析。教育研究月刊,232,18–34。
吳清山(1992)。學校效能研究。五南。
吳清山(2002)。學校效能研究(2版)。五南。
吳清山(2005)。學校效能研究的價值。教育研究集刊,51(2),133–139。
吳清山(2021)。韌性領導。教育研究月刊,331,115–116。
吳清山、林天祐(2012)。學習領導。教育研究月刊,217,139–140。
吳清山、高家斌(2009)。臺灣近二十年學校效能研究論文取向分析。教育研究月刊,188,5–23。
吳叡淳(2025)。探討心理韌性在憂鬱症患者生活瑣事、壓力知覺與症狀嚴重程度之作用機制〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u4tn38
巫孟蓁(2019)。國民小學校務發展計畫、績效目標管理與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ywmkx4
巫苓雯(2021)。國民小學校長學習領導與教師領導關係之研究:以桃園市為例〔碩士論文,銘傳大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kq5yg2
李文欽(2020)。國民中學組織文化、校長魅力領導、教師領導與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立高雄師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8k3r25
李安明(2007)。我國國小校長教學領導、教師文化與教師專業承諾之研究(行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告 NSC 94-2413-H-134-006)。行政院國家科學委員會。
李昆憲(2022)。國民小學校長數位科技領導與學校效能關係之研究:以學校競爭優勢與教師組織承諾為中介變項〔博士論文,國立高雄師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v87826
李高財(2017)。新北市國民小學校長學習領導與學生學業樂觀關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6dzt24
李敏蕙(2020)。技術型高中校長學習領導、教師工作投入與教師教學效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立彰化師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j59pxq
李菁菁(2014)。高級中學校長正向領導、教師職場希望感與學校效能之相關研究〔博士論文,國立臺南大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m475am
李靜雯(2023)。探討 COVID-19 疫情下韌性領導與主管健康意識對旅館團隊凝聚力之機制〔碩士論文,輔仁大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2hfh94
周竹一(2023)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7e37x3
周彥箴(2022)。樂觀與社會支持對乳癌倖存者心理社會衝擊之影響:以心理韌性為中介〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/sm8ncj
周倩(2021)。再談抄襲與自我抄襲。取自 https://ethics.moe.edu.tw/files/resource/lecture/20210730/aree_speech_20210730.pdf
林天祐(2006)。認識研究倫理。教育資料與研究,79,57–63。
林秀琦(2019)。正念教養與青少年幸福感之研究:心理韌性的中介效果檢驗〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/b525va
林明地(2013)。學習領導:理念與實際初探。教育研究月刊,229,18–31。
林奕成(2018)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x67v4q
林詩猛(2024)。國民小學教師知覺校長智慧領導與學校效能關係之研究:以學校組織文化為中介變項〔博士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tc9xtx
侯世昌(2002)。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wqqpbq
姚麗英(2019)。高中校長道德領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w6bk2y
柯玫綾(2024)。國民中學教師學習領導與教學效能關係之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k79fzn
柳敦仁、李茂能、吳培源(2006)。雲嘉南五縣市國小初任校長行政表現與學校效能關係之研究。嘉義大學通識學報,4,75–139。
洪幼齡(2018)。國中校長課程領導對學校效能之影響:以教師領導為中介變項〔博士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qhne9t
徐易男(2009)。國民小學公共關係、組織創新經營與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wqp53p
徐莉婷(2023)。COVID-19 疫情下中小學教師的工作與家庭衝突及其影響:心理韌性的調節效果〔碩士論文,輔仁大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/b9f448
徐歆閔(2020)。人格特質和心理韌性可利用生理和言語訊號預測〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t9ks3s
秦夢群(2005)。校長轉型領導、學校組織氣候與教師組織承諾關係之研究(行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 93-2413-H-004-004)。行政院國家科學委員會。
秦夢群(2017)。國中校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與學生學習表現關係之研究(科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告,MOST 104-2410-H-004-033-SS2)。科技部。
秦夢群(2019)。教育領導理論與應用(三版)。五南。
秦夢群、黃敏榮(2016)。高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究,39(2),1–25。
馬世潔(2019)。桃園市國中自然領域教師復原力與正負向情感和教學效能之調查研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣海洋大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gz3n38
張伯瑲(2021)。國民小學學校學習領導、學校進步力與學生學習成效關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4hsgg9
張明文、吳清明、蔡聖賢(2009)。從個別化、本土化與全球化分析桃園縣中等教育之創新作為。教育資料集刊,42,12–16。
張奕華、張敏章(2010)。臺北縣國民小學校長科技領導對學校效能影響之研究。學校行政,66,30–50。
張國保(2003)。私立大學董事會組織運作與職權效能之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/22w6hd
張媛甯(2017)。國小實施學習共同體關鍵因素之關係研究:以校長學習領導、教師教學實踐與家長認同支持對學生學習表現之多層次分析為主(科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告,MOST 105-2410-H-218-017)。
張媛甯、郭維哲(2018)。國小實施學習共同體品質評估量表之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(2),63–94。
張德銳(2015)。學習領導在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。市北教育學刊,52,1–20。
張德銳(2020)。我國校長學習領導研究結果綜合性分析。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(11),162–184。
張慶勳(2000)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。復文。
張瓊友(2025)。國民小學兼任行政教師科技壓力與學校效能關係之研究:以教師專業承諾為中介變項〔博士論文,中原大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n693ux
莊育琳(2025)。臺中市教保服務人員知覺復原力與教學效能之研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5w77fs
許燦祥(2011)。臺中市國民小學教師復原力與教學效能相關之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rjw34b
郭穎臻(2020)。幼兒園園長學習領導與學校效能關係之研究:以桃園市為例〔碩士論文,銘傳大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2d3797
陳巧芬、蔡文榮(2011)。臺灣近年來有關校長轉型領導與學校效能博碩士論文實徵研究之分析。教育科學期刊,10(1),125–150。
陳怡潔(2019)。國民中學校長文化領導、教師心理契約、教師社群互動與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立高雄師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qujqjv
陳怡儒(2019)。高中優質化輔助方案優質化動能和學校效能關係研究:以北三區(桃竹苗)為例〔碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/63qx24
陳俊鴻(2018)。新北市國民中學校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與學校創新經營關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2xne55
陳建志(2013)。國民小學組織內部行銷、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r85mb2
陳建志(2019)。國民小學校長學習領導與學生學習成效關係之研究:以個性化學習為中介變項〔博士論文,臺北市立大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y6p374
陳春宇(2019)。中庸思維在社會自我效能、人際情緒、心理韌性及積極富能關聯性之調節中介模式〔碩士論文,輔仁大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n5keg2
陳柏青(2020)。應用理性行為理論探究運動員感恩行為對教練選手關係及心理韌性之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺南大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dcc7jp
陳添丁(2018)。國民小學校長學習領導、學校組織學習與教師教學效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v8e534
陳復(2020)。自性的曼陀羅模型:解決黃光國難題的工夫論。中華輔導與諮商學報,58,47–84。
陳繁興、蔡吉郎、翁福元(2017)。技術型高中校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與教學效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇,20(4),63–106。
曾若玫(2017)。國民小學校長正向領導、教師學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8d2ssk
程煒庭(2021)。校長轉型領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能之關係研究:後設分析與結構方程模式之應用〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3759xu
黃士傑(2023)。國民小學校長韌性領導與學校效能關係之研究:以教師信任為中介變項〔碩士論文,臺北市立大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k89j8d
黃光國(2011)。論「含攝文化的心理學」。本土心理學研究,36,79–110。https://doi.org/10.6254/2011.36.79
黃宏文(2020)。完全中學校長領導風格與學校效能關係之研究:以中階領導雙歧與教師心理契約為中介變項〔博士論文,國立高雄師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w655na
黃坤謨(2008)。國民小學校長多元智能領導、教師工作投入與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dzcef8
黃居正(2018)。高中校長創新領導核心能力、藍海策略與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺北教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bhj7te
黃哲彬(2011)。國民中學校長賦權增能領導行為、組織創新經營與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2ga68k
黃偌晴(2023年3月3日)。從論文抄襲到 ChatGPT:大學學倫規範為何仍停在 5 年前?遠見。https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/100288
黃舒亭(2023)。青少年心理韌性與情緒調節策略對校園受凌經驗導致憂鬱之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xcz236
楊念湘(2011)。國民小學校長混合教練、師傅教導與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p393f3
楊長鉿(2024)。國立技術型高中校務經營策略與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立彰化師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k5w4rf
楊詠翔(2022)。中等學校校長學習領導、教師專業資本與學生深層學習關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wjjjq3
楊雅婷(2020)。高級中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/79d4tk
葉子超(2005)。地方勢力介入學校事務、校長因應策略與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立高雄師範大學〕。
詹昀陞(2023)。臺北市立國民中學校長韌性領導與學校組織氣氛關係之研究〔碩士論文,臺北市立大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u2gj2x
詹雨臻、葉玉珠、彭月茵、葉碧玲(2009)。青少年復原力量表之發展。測驗學刊,56,491–518。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200912.0491
廖建銘(2022)。成人童年逆境經驗者人格特質、心理韌性與生涯自我效能之相關研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p3359x
劉于涵(2024)。從自我關懷促進職場幸福感:以心理韌性為中介變項〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/64mf8v
劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。
潘慧玲(2006)。教育效能與教育革新。載於謝文全(主編),教育行政學:理論與案例(471–495頁)。五南。
潘慧玲、陳文彥(2018)。校長促進教師專業學習的槓桿:校長學習領導對教師課堂教學研究影響之中介模式分析。教育研究集刊,64(3),79–121。
蔡尚欽(2020)。新北市公立國民中學校長學習領導、教師自我導向學習與教師教學效能關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wh7mt3
蔡玲玲(2014)。私立高中職學校校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9n6b8m
蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。
盧怡任、劉淑慧(2014)。受苦轉變經驗之存在現象學探究:存在現象學和諮商與心理治療理論的對話。教育心理學報,45(3),413–433。
謝佩珊(2023)。女大學生之正向生活事件、注意力轉移在負向生活事件透過自我心理韌性影響憂鬱、幸福感之調節中介角色研究〔碩士論文,輔仁大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/789g8g
謝金青(1996)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。
謝傳崇、陳愛玲(2015)。國民小學校長學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,98,1–22。
謝傳崇、黃秋萍、余惠瑄(2020)。國民小學正向教育、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究,43(1),33–62。
謝傳崇(2023)。「疫」起向前走:後疫情時代的校長意義、正向與韌性領導新思維。中等教育,74(2),29–45。
鍾德馨(2020)。臺北市國民小學校長正向領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立政治大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3wrv67
顏國樑、任育騰(2013)。透過組織公平與組織信任提升學校效能。教育研究月刊,232,48–64。
蘇傳桔(2024)。國民中學教師知覺校長學習領導、教師專業素養與學校效能關係之研究〔博士論文,國立屏東大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/brwh29
龔祐祿(2018)。國小校長學習領導、教師專業發展與學習型學校關係之研究〔博士論文,臺北市立大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3h68kf
英文部分
Adams, D., & Md Yusoff, N. N. (2019). The rise of leadership for learning: Conceptualization and practices. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 3(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.22452/iojel.vol3no1.1
Ali, N. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of the relationship between principals’ instructional leadership, school culture, and school effectiveness in secondary schools in Pakistan. Education and Science, 42(192), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.7088
Bagdžiūnienė, D., Kazlauskienė, A., Nasvytienė, D., & Sakadolskis, E. (2022). Linking supportive school leadership and teacher resilience: The mediating role of job resources. Frontiers in Education, 7, 999086. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.999086
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Barberio, M. (1990). Organizational effectiveness, student alienation, and the high school teacher’s perceived sense of academic freedom [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey–New Brunswick].
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431
Beltman, S., Mansfield, C., & Price, A. (2011). Thriving not just surviving: A review of research on teacher resilience. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.09.001
Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–101). Erlbaum.
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002004
Bowers, A. J. (2020). Examining a congruency-typology model of leadership for learning using two-level latent class analysis with TALIS 2018 (OECD Education Working Papers No. 219). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c963073b-en
Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2018a). Different levels of leadership for learning: Investigating differences between teachers individually and collectively using multilevel factor analysis of the 2011–12 Schools and Staffing Survey. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1194746
Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2018b). Towards an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: A meta-narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2016-0073
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Brown, L. I. (2002). Issues in school leadership and school effectiveness: A focus on Trinidad and Tobago (ED479291). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED479291
Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(6), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271
Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Optimism. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. López (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 231–243). Oxford University Press.
Chapman, J. (1993). Leadership, management, and the effectiveness of schooling: A response to Mr. Gradgrind. Journal of Educational Administration, 31(4), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239310041870
Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Falmer Press.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003
Dartey-Baah, K. (2015). Resilient leadership: A transformational-transactional leadership mix. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-07-2014-0026
Delgado-Alban, D. V., Jones, D., Wattam, D., & Thompson, R. (2021). Perspectives of Colombian higher education deans and faculty directors on transformational leadership. Research in Higher Education Journal, 40, 1–16.
Dempster, N. (2009). Leadership for learning: A framework synthesising recent research. EdVentures, 1(13), 1–11.
Dempster, N., Johnson, G., & Flückiger, B. (2019). Leadership for learning: A review of school leadership literature. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
Dempster, N., Townsend, T., Johnson, G., Bayetto, A., Lovett, S., & Stevens, E. (2017). Leadership and literacy: Principals, partnerships and pathways to improvement. Springer.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Duggan, B., & Theurer, B. (2017). Resilient leadership 2.0: Leading with calm, clarity, and conviction in anxious times. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Earvolino-Ramirez, M. (2007). Resilience: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 42(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00070.x
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–24.
Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
Freud, S. (1958). Remembering, repeating, and working through. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 145–156). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1914)
Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Martinussen, M. (2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.143
García-Carreño, I. V. (2021). Distributed leadership: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus database (1981–2020). European Educational Researcher, 4(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.425
Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (4th ed.). Merrill.
Girtler, N., Casari, E.-F., Brugnolo, A., Cutolo, M., Dessi, B., Guasco, S., Olmi, C., & De Carli, F. (2010). Italian validation of the Wagnild and Young resilience scale: A perspective to rheumatic diseases. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 28(5), 669–678.
Glickman, C. D. (2002). Leadership for learning: How to help teachers succeed. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gray, J. (2016). Investigating the role of collective trust, collective efficacy, and enabling school structures on overall school effectiveness. Educational Leadership Review, 17(1), 114–128.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2013). Challenges to teacher resilience: Conditions count. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.623152
Hallinger, P. (2009). Leadership for 21st century schools: From instructional leadership to leadership for learning. Hong Kong Institute of Education, Asia Pacific Centre for Leadership and Change.
Hallinger, P. (2010). Developing instructional leadership. In B. Davies & M. Brundrett (Eds.), Developing successful leadership (pp. 61–76). Sage.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010a). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379060
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2010b). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 226–252. https://doi.org/10.1086/656299
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010c). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445
Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2017). Leading learning in Asia: Emerging empirical insights from five societies. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2017-0015
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The knowledge capital of nations: Education and the economics of growth. MIT Press.
Hargreaves, D. H. (2001). A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071429
Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G., & Chang, M. X.-L. (2016). Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health. Journal of Affective Disorders, 194, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010
Hatler, C., & Sturgeon, P. (2013). Resilience building: A necessary leadership competence. Nurse Leader, 11(4), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2013.05.007
Herrman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. L., Jackson, B., & Yuen, T. (2011). What is resilience? The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(5), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600504
Hjemdal, O., Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2001). Preliminary results from the development and validation of a Norwegian scale for measuring adult resilience. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 38, 310–317.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2006). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kelley, C., & Halverson, R. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of leadership for learning: A next generation formative evaluation and feedback system. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 3(2), 1–22.
Kgail, A., & Morrison, K. (2006). Measuring and targeting internal conditions for school effectiveness in the Free State of South Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143206059535
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802047873
Lahtero, T. J., Ahtiainen, R. S., & Lång, N. (2019). Finnish principals: Leadership training and views on distributed leadership. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(10), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3733
Lee, J. H., Nam, S. K., Kim, A. R., Kim, B., Lee, M. Y., & Lee, S. M. (2013). Resilience: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00095.x
Lei, M., Li, C., Xiao, X., Qiu, J., Dai, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2012). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the resilience scale in Wenchuan earthquake survivors. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(5), 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.09.001
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Lingam, G. I., Lingam, N., & Singh, S. K. (2021). Instructional leadership practices: Teachers’ perceptions of a rural school principal in Fiji. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(6), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n6.2
Liu, J. J., Reed, M., & Girard, T. A. (2017). Advancing resilience: An integrative, multi-system model of resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.007
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
Lovell, C. W. (2009). Principal efficacy: An investigation of school principals’ sense of efficacy and indicators of school effectiveness [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi].
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
Madaus, G. F., Airasian, P. W., & Kellaghan, T. (1980). School effectiveness: A reassessment of the evidence. McGraw-Hill.
Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623–626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
Martin, V. M. (2009). The role of early college high school in P–16 success: A case study of students' perceptions of Mission Early College High School effectiveness [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin].
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. Guilford Press.
Maureira-Cabrera, Ó. J. (2018). Educational leadership practices: An evolutive and illustrative view from its main approaches, dimensions and more representative indicators. Revista Educación, 42(1), 1–19.
Mayer, D. P., Mullens, J. E., & Moore, M. T. (2001). Monitoring school quality: An indicators report. Education Statistics Quarterly, 3(1), 38–44.
Menon, M. E. (2021). Transformational leadership at times of crisis: The case of school leaders in Greece. European Journal of Educational Management, 4(1), 1–11.
Murphy, J., Elliott, S., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership & Management, 27(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701237420
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Mesa, R. P. (1985). School effectiveness: Checking progress and assumptions and developing a role for state and federal government. Teachers College Record, 86(4), 615–641.
Murray, C. (2003). Risk factors, protective factors, vulnerability, and resilience: A framework for understanding and supporting the adult transitions of youth with high-incidence disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250302400102
OECD. (2016). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2013. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258341-en
Peterson, K. D. (2005). School cultures, school effectiveness, and school leadership. Chung Cheng Educational Studies, 4(s), 63–103.
Pines, M. (1975). In praise of “invulnerables.” APA Monitor, 7, 3–16.
Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427–452.
Reid, K., Hopkins, D., & Holly, P. (1987). Towards the effective school. Basil Blackwell.
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Rowan, B. (1985). The assessment of school effectiveness. In R. Kyle (Ed.), Reaching for excellence: An effective schools sourcebook (pp. 99–116). U.S. Government Printing Office.
Rutter, M. (1993). Resilience: Some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 14(8), 626–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/1054-139X(93)90196-V
Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. OFSTED.
Saunders, L., & Wong, M. A. (2020). Instruction in libraries and information centers: An introduction. Windsor & Downs Press.
Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 61–80.
Singh, R., Sihag, P., & Dhoopar, A. (2023). Role of resilient leadership and psychological capital in employee engagement with special reference to COVID-19. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(1), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2021-2975
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, J., Langelle, C., & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570
Southwick, S. M., Bonanno, G. A., Masten, A. S., Panter-Brick, C., & Yehuda, R. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5, 25338. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1992). Effecting school change: The Halton approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345920030103
Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2012). Transformational school leadership effects on students’ achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 418–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2012.681001
Supovitz, J., D’Auria, J., & Spillane, J. (2019). Meaningful and sustainable school improvement with distributed leadership. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Swaffield, S., & MacBeath, J. (2009). Leadership for learning. In J. MacBeath & N. Dempster (Eds.), Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice (pp. 32–52). Routledge.
Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610021969173
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. Falmer Press.
Timar, D. B., & Moraru, R. (2011). Learning theories: A psychological overview. Agora Psycho-Pragmatica, 5(1), 70–95.
Timperley, H. (2011). Knowledge and the leadership of learning. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2011.557519
Townsend, T., & MacBeath, J. (Eds.). (2011). International handbook of leadership for learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
Vaishnavi, S., Connor, K., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2007). An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: Psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials. Psychiatry Research, 152(2–3), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.006
Van de Grift, W. J. C., & Houtveen, A. A. M. (2006). Underperformance in primary school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600697252
Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1990). Resilience among older women. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22(4), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00224.x
Werner, E. E. (1995). Resilience in development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(3), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772327
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. McGraw-Hill.
Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of learning and teaching: What do they mean for educators? National Education Association.
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8
Yamamoto, Y., & Yamaguchi, S. (2019). Relationships between ICT implementation at schools and factors related to transformational leadership: A case of primary school in Mongolia. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(2), 45–61.
Yu, X., & Zhang, J. (2007). Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor–Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.19