跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳孝文
Chen, Hsiao-Wen
論文名稱: 台灣地區醫院經營之策略分析
Strategic analysis of district hospital management in Taiwan
指導教授: 巫立宇
Wu, Lei-Yu
郭曉玲
Guo, Shiau-Ling
口試委員: 王俊如
Wang, Chun-Ju
林智偉
Lin, Chih-Wei
林宜霓
Lin, Yi-Ni
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration(EMBA)
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 45
中文關鍵詞: 地區醫院經營策略波特五力分析策略行銷 4C
外文關鍵詞: District Hospital Management Strategy, Porter's Five Forces Analysis, Strategic Marketing 4C
相關次數: 點閱:18下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣目前的健保給付偏低,加上「分級醫療」與轉診制度未能確實落實,導致醫療院所持續擴張,使得醫療資源呈現「大者恆大」的局面,進而造成地區醫療分布不均、人力資源短缺及經營風險升高等問題。本研究以個案地區醫院為研究對象,透過深入分析,運用波特五力分析模型以強化競爭優勢,並以4C架構探討醫院在面對病患、競爭者及合作夥伴時,如何制定策略以有效降低交易成本。
    波特五力分析結果:強化既有競爭力:持續與大型醫療體系維持合作與良性競爭關係,發展具特色的專科,並導入智慧醫療以提升整體競爭力。弱化新進入者威脅:透過品牌經營與病患滿意度提升,結合診所及長照中心建立醫療聯盟,以鞏固市場地位。同時加速數位轉型,引入AI排程與遠距醫療,提升營運效率。降低替代品威脅:以急診與綜合醫療為核心,發展健康管理中心、預防醫學及居家護理等個人化服務,增進病患黏著度。降低顧客議價能力:提供24小時急診、縮短候診時間、推動數位化便利服務,以提升病患忠誠度與便利性,並藉由健康管理會員制度強化患者黏著,減少病患轉向大型醫學中心的情形。降低供應商議價能力:運用AI技術搜尋多元供應來源,採取與供應商合資經營高端醫療設備及區域聯盟集中採購等策略,以分散風險、提升談判能力並降低成本壓力。
    4C策略結果:(C1) 減少病患就醫的時間與金錢成本,以提升醫療效益並達到交易成本與效益的最適平衡;(C2) 協助病患更快速取得醫療資訊,提升就醫效率與滿意度;(C3) 降低醫療資訊不對稱所造成的風險,增進病患信任;(C4) 強化病患對醫院的依賴與忠誠,降低轉院可能性。藉由落實「降低就醫成本」、「優化資訊取得」、「提升醫療透明度」與「強化病患黏著度」等策略,能有效提升病患滿意度,進而促進醫院的整體經營績效。
    綜上所述,面對目前的醫療資源分配不均、人力資源短缺、經營風險日增的環境下,地區醫院可藉由這些策略擴大市場佔有率,吸引更多病患選擇在地就醫,並透過差異化服務建立忠誠客群,以持續強化競爭優勢。


    Taiwan currently faces challenges due to relatively low National Health Insurance reimbursement, coupled with the inadequate implementation of a tiered healthcare system and referral mechanism. This has led to the continuous expansion of medical institutions, resulting in a "survival of the fittest" scenario for healthcare resources. Consequently, issues such as unequal regional medical distribution, a shortage of human resources, and escalating operational risks have emerged. This study focuses on a specific regional hospital as a case study, employing in-depth analysis and utilizing Porter's Five Forces model to strengthen its competitive advantage. Furthermore, the 4C framework is applied to explore how the hospital can formulate strategies to effectively reduce transaction costs when engaging with patients, competitors, and partners.
    Strategic Analysis Results
    Porter's Five Forces Analysis Results
    • Strengthen Existing Competitive Position: Maintain collaborative and healthy competitive relationships with large-scale medical systems, develop distinctive specialty departments, and introduce smart healthcare to enhance overall competitiveness.
    • Weaken Threat of New Entrants: Consolidate market position through brand management, improving patient satisfaction, and forming a medical alliance by collaborating with clinics and long-term care facilities. Concurrently, accelerate digital transformation by introducing AI scheduling and telemedicine to improve operational efficiency.
    • Reduce Threat of Substitutes: Utilize emergency and comprehensive medical services as the core, develop personalized services such as health management centers, preventive medicine, and home care, thereby increasing patient stickiness.
    • Lower Customer Bargaining Power: Offer 24-hour emergency services, shorten waiting times, and promote convenient digital services to enhance patient loyalty and convenience. Furthermore, reinforce patient stickiness through a health management membership system to reduce the likelihood of patients transferring to large medical centers.
    Lower Supplier Bargaining Power: Employ AI technology to search for diverse supply sources, adopt strategies such as joint ventures with suppliers for high-end medical equipment, and regional alliance centralized procurement to diversify risks, enhance negotiation capabilities, and mitigate cost pressures.
    4C Strategy Results
    The 4C strategies aim to:
    • (C1) Reduce the time and monetary cost of patient care to optimize medical effectiveness and achieve the best balance between transaction cost and benefit.
    • (C2) Assist patients in more quickly obtaining medical information, enhancing the efficiency and satisfaction of the visit.
    • (C3) Reduce the risks caused by asymmetric medical information, thereby increasing patient trust.
    • (C4) Strengthen patient reliance and loyalty to the hospital, lowering the probability of transfer to another hospital.
    The implementation of strategies such as "reducing the cost of care," "optimizing information access," "enhancing medical transparency," and "strengthening patient stickiness" can effectively boost patient satisfaction and thus improve the hospital's overall operational performance.
    Conclusion
    In summary, facing the current environment of uneven medical resource distribution, human resource shortages, and increasing operational risks, regional hospitals can utilize these strategies to expand market share. They can attract more patients to seek local care and build a loyal customer base through differentiated services to continuously strengthen their competitive advantage.

    第一章 緖論 1
    第一節 研究背景 1
    第二節 研究動機 6
    第三節 硏究目的與流程 9
    第二章 文獻探討 11
    第一節 交易成本理論 11
    第二節 醫院產業五力分析 14
    第三節 策略行銷 4C 17
    第三章 醫院產業分析 23
    第一節 台灣醫院經營現況分 23
    第四章 地區醫院經營關鍵成功因素 26
    第一節 個案 26
    第二節 波特五力分析 27
    第三節 病患的4C架構分析 31
    第五章 結論與建議 40
    第一節 研究結論 40
    第二節 未來展望與建議 43
    參考文獻 44

    1. 111 年全民健康保險統計. https://www.mohw.gov.tw.
    2. 112 年全民健康保險統計. https://www.mohw.gov.tw.
    3. 中央健康保險署官網:https://www.nhi.gov.tw.
    4. 全民健康保險統計動向: 2021 年全民健康保險統計動向. https://www.mohw.gov.tw.
    5. 巫立宇、邱志聖(2021),銷售與顧客關係管理 第二版,新陸書局股份有限公司.
    6. 邱志聖 (2020),策略行銷分析-架構與實務應用 第五版,元照出版有限公司.
    7. 審慎核定113年健保總額成長率、調節健保點值 確保健保制度永續經營. https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/b28c8a8d-ff66-47d6-8051-c4a5bf626532.
    8. 醫療機構現況及醫院醫療服務量統計https://www.google.com/search?q=https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/np-1234-106.html.
    9. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3):488–500.
    10. Anderson, E. W. & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003). E-Satisfaction and E-Loyalty: A Contingency Framework. Marketing Science 2003, 22:236–245.
    11. Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2):109–126.
    12. Coase, R. (1937), The Nature of the Firm, Economica.
    13. Frank, A. and Chee-Ruey Hsieh. Health Economics. (2017). The MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262035118.
    14. Fuchs, V.R. (1996). Economics, Values, and Health Care Reform. American Economics Review 86(1):1-24.
    15. Geneva: World Health Organization. Primary Health care : Transforming Vision into Action. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HIS-SDS-2018.46.
    16. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.B,E., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(3): 223-248.
    17. Health expenditure and financing (2021) https://www.oecd.org.
    18. Kaiser Permanente官方網站:https://kptargetclinic.org/.
    19. Kenneth, J. Arrow. (1963), Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. The American Economic Review. 53:941–973.
    20. Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., Setiawan, I. (2016), Marketing 4.0: Moving from Traditional to Digital".
    21. Life expectancy at birthhttps://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/oecd-health-statistics.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
    22. Mark, V. Pauly. (1968).The Economics of Moral Hazard: Comment. The American Economic Review. 58:3(1): 31–537.
    23. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management review, 20(3):709-733.
    24. Medical cost trend: Behind the Numbers 2022. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/health-industries/library.html.
    25. Porter ME. (2008). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Riverside: Simon and Schuster.
    26. Thaler, R.H. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
    27. Williamson,O. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting.

    QR CODE
    :::