| 研究生: |
陳甫彥 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
傳播內容編排與受播者創造力對傳播效果影響之研究 無 |
| 指導教授: | 吳靜吉 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
傳播學院 - 新聞學系 Department of Journalism |
| 論文出版年: | 1980 |
| 畢業學年度: | 69 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 90 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 無 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:99 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究的主要目的在探討傳播內容編排方式與受播者創造力對傳播效果的影響。
所採用的實驗設計是3×3多因設計,自變項是傳播內容編排方式(分為前導架構導言組、問句型式前導架構導言組、一般導言組三組)及創造力(分為高、中、低三組),依變項是受試者在閱讀文章後的測驗成績(分為訊息囘憶量及訊息保存量)。
306名高中一年級男生,依創造力測驗之流暢力分數平均分為高、中、低三組,然後隨機分派接受不同內容編排之實驗處理(閱讀一篇介紹相機基本結構的文章),閱讀文章後,立卽以閱卷測其囘憶量,一個星期後,再測受試者之保存量。
資料經獨立樣本二因子變異數分析,結果發現:不同導言結構方式,對訊息囘憶量有顯著不同的影響〔F(2,297)=6.53,p<.01〕,對訊息保存量也有顯著不同的影響〔F(2,297)=7.78,p<.01〕;在訊息囘憶量上,前導架構組顯著擾於問句導言組及一般導言組,問句導言組及一般導言組沒有顯著差異;在訊息保存量上也是如此。不同創造力之受播者在訊息囘憶量的成績有顯著的不同〔F(2,297)=7.05,p<.01〕,在保存量的成績也有顯著的不同〔F(2,297)=7.61,p<.01〕;在訊息囘憶量上,高創造力組顯著優於低創造力組,高創造力組與中創造力組間及中創造力組與低創造力組間的差距未達顯著水準;在訊息保存量上也是如此。而導言結構及創造力對訊息囘憶量沒有交互作用〔F(4,297)=2.17,p>.05〕對保存量也沒有交互作用〔F(4,297)=1.42,p>.05〕。
這個發現的解釋是:前導架構式的導言,能幫助受播者對外在訊息的處理、增加訊息囘憶量及保存量;而創造力愈高的受播者,其處理訊息的能力也愈良好!
這篇論文的完成,固然是代表研究所課程已告一段落,但最大的感受還是在於體會到做學問應有的態度。
吳靜吉老師同意指導我論文的進行,令我受寵若驚,七年來,在老師的教誨下,不僅源源獲得新的觀念與學識,最重要的還是學得做人的態度、處世的胸襟及獨立思考的能力!
徐佳士老師,我傳播學的啟蒙老師,由於老師的鼓勵,才啟迪我走向傳播研究的領域!
林邦傑老師,我幾乎修遍了所有老師開的計量課程,但仍然是一個十分不成材的學生,這也就是在敬愛老師之外,猶覺得愧疚的原因!
求學過程中,幸運的能在心理系及新聞所的環境長大,師長的諄諄開導,同學的切磋互勉,令我永難忘懷!唯有在群體的互動下,個體才能獲得生存及成長!
研究進行中,謝謝中華語言方先生的關懷及同仁們的激勵,使我無後顧之憂;更感謝成功中學教學組張組長的鼎力支持,才使本研究能如期完成!
師長、朋友,謝謝你們,由於與你們相處的愉快經驗才令我更有信心的往前走!
第壹章 緒論1
一、研究動機
二、研究目的
三、研究問題
四、研究假設
五、操作定義
第貳章 有關文獻評論10
一、學習心理學在傳播學的應用
二、有關前導架構的研究理論
三、有關前導架構的研究
四、問句的效果
五、創造力與學習
第叁章 方法與步驟33
一、實驗設計
二、受試者
三、材料與工具
四、實驗過程
五、資料處理
第肆章 結果與討論45
一、自變項的檢驗
二、假設的驗證
第伍章 結論與建議53
附錄 參考書目
附件1〜6
〔中文參考書目〕
王克先:學習心理學 正中書局,民60.(三版)
王洪鈞:新聞採訪學 正中書局,民50.
石永貴:新聞學研究的趨勢 新聞學研究第三期,民58.
石永貴:傳播類型及其理論之研究 新聞學研究第六期,民59.
林清山:心理與教育統計學 東華書局,民67.
林美惠:文章標題對語文理解之影響 台大心研所論文,民65.
吳靜吉:語文創造力思考測驗乙式 遠流出版社,民64.
胡秉正:普通心理學 正中書局,民59(二版)
胡海國編譯:發展心理學 桂冠圖書公司,民65.
祝基瀅:大衆傳播學 學生書局,民62.
洪瑞雲:意像與獨創力的交互作用對學習與保存的影響 政大教研所論文,民65.
徐佳士:大衆傳播理論 新聞記者公會,民55.
徐佳士:大衆傳播理論之演進 政大學報19.期,民58.
席常安譯:現代心理學大綱 商務印書館,民58.
高覺敷譯:形勢心理學原理 正中書局,民41.
許水德:記憶與遺忘 於路君約等著心理學,中國行為科學社,民62.
陳石安:新聞編輯學 民64.(增五版)
陳世敏:中文可讀性公式試擬 嘉新論文274,民65.
陳慶文:學習心理學 台灣書店,民56.
程之行:新聞原論 政大新研所叢書,民57.
賀照禮:新聞學的理論與實際 民58.
張守秦:前導架構短文與認知型式對閱讀成績影響 政大教研所論文,民66.
張春興:楊國樞:心理學 三民書局,民61
張春興:心理學 東華書局,民66.(三版)
楊孝濚:傳播媒介的社會功能 聯經出版社,民67.
楊國樞等:社會及行為科學研究法 東華書局,民67.
鄭貞銘:大衆傳播學理 華欣文化中心,65.
劉英茂:實驗心理學 中國行為科學社,民61.
劉英茂:基本心理歷程 大洋出版社,民67.
歐陽教:認知結構與教學關係 國科會論文,民63.
Allotti, N. C. & Blanton, W. E. Cretative Thinking Ability, School Readiness, and Intelligence in First Grade Children: J. of Psych., 1973,84,137-143.
Arilvano, S. Creativity, The Magic Synthesis. Silvano Arieti, 1976.
Ausubel, D. P. The Use of advance organizers in learning and retention of meaningful material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960, 51, 267-272.
Ausubel, D. P. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Gruene and Stration, 1963.
Ausubel, D. P. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
Ausubel, D. P. In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 1978,48,251-257.
Ausubel, D. P. and Fitzgerald, D. The role of discriminability in meaningful verbal learning and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1961,52, 266-274.
Ausubel, D. P. and Fitzgerald, D. Organizer, general background and antecedent learning variables in sequential verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962, 53, 143-249.
Ausubel, D. P. and Youssef, M. Role of discriminability in meaningful parallel learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963, 54, 331-336.
Bartley, S. H. Perception in Everyday Life. Harper & Row, 1972.
Blan, P. M. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.
Bolen. J. M. Research Needed on Adoption Models. In Wilbur Schramm and Donald F. Reberts (1971)
Bransford J. D. & Frank, J. J. The Abstraction of Linguistic Ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 331-350.
Bransford, J. D. & Johnson, M. K. Contextual Prerequisitis for Understanding: Some Investigations of comprehension and recall. J. of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11,717-726.
Brown, A. S. An Empirical Verification of Mednick’s Associative Theory of Creativity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973, 216(B), 429-430.
Charms, R. D. Personal Caustion. Academic Press, 1968.
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge M.I.T. Press, 1965.
Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. Experiments on Semantic Memory and Language Comprehension. In W. Gregg(ed.) Cognition in Learning and Memory. New York: Wiley, 1970.
Deese, J. & Hulse, S. H. The Psychology of Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Dooling, D. J. & Lachman, R. Effects of comprehension on retention of prose. J.E.P., 1971, 88
Dooling, D. J. & Mullet, R. L. Locus of thematic effects on retention of prose. J.E.P., 1973,97
Festinger, L. A. A theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 1954,7, 117-140
Fitzgerald, & Ausubel, D. P. Cognitive versus affective factors in the learning and retention of controversial material. J.E.P., 1963, 54, 73-84
Franks, J. J. & Bransford, J. D. The acquisition of Abstract Ideas. J. of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11,311-315
Frnaks & Bransford A Brief Note on Linguistic Integration. J. of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1974,13
Fease, L. T. & Kreitzberg, V. S., Effects of Topical and Indirect Learning Directions on Prose Recall. J.E.P., 1975, 69
Gagné, R. M. Context, Isolation and Interference Effects on the Retention of Fact. J.E.P., 1969, 60
Gagné R. M. The Conditions of Learning (Third Ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970
Gangé, R. M. Essentials of Learning for Instruction. Hinsdalelll.: The Dryden Press, 1914.
Goor, A. & Sommerfeld, R. E. A Comparison of Problem-Solving Processes of Creative Students and Noncreative Students. J. Educ. Psychol., 1975, 67, 495-505.
Gould, J. D. and Ascher, R. N. Query by non-programmers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, 1974.
Grotelueschen, A. and Sjogren, D. D. Effects of differentially structured introductory materials and learning tasks on learning and transfer. American Educational Research Journal, 1968, 5.
Guilford, J. P. Creativity. American Psychologist, 1950, 5,444-454.
Guilford,J. P. The Nature of Human Intelligence. N.Y.: McGraw-hill, 1967.
Haviland, S. E. & Clark, H. H., What’s New? Acquiring New Information as a process in Comprehension, Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13.
Hilgard, E. R. & Atkinson, R. C. Introduction to Psychology, (5th,ed.) Harcourt Brace & World, 1967
Janis, I. L. & Hovland, C. I. “An over view of Persuasibility Research” In I. L Janis and C. I. Hovland Eds, Personality and Persuasibility, Yale University Press, 1959
Kelley, T. L. The Selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. J. Edu. Psych.1939, 30, 17-24.
Lachman, R., & Dooling, D. J., Effects of Comprehension on Retention of Prose. J.E.P., 1971, 88
Lake, III. A. E. & Tedford, Jt. W. H. Influence of Creativity on Formation of Subjective Units, J. of General Psych., 1970, 83, 227-237.
Marks, L. E. Sensory Processes: The New Psychophysics. Academic Press,1974
Marx, M. H. & Hillix, W. A. Systems and Theories in Psychology. (Second ed.).
Mayer, R. E. Information processing variables in learning to solve problems. Review of Educational Research, 1975, 45, 525-541. (a)
Mayer, R. E. Different problem solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 725-734.(b)
Mayer, R. E. Some conditions of meaningful learning of computer programming: Advance organizes and subject control of frame sequencing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 143- 150. (a)
Mayer, R. E. Integration of information during problem solving due to a meaningful context of learning. Memory & Cognition, 1976, 6,369-388. (b)
Mayer, R. E. Different rule systems for counting behavior acquired in meaningful and rote contexts of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971, 69, 537-546.
Mayer, R. E. Can advance organizers counter the effects of text organization? Paper presented at meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1978.
Mayer, R. E. and Bromage, B. Effects of advance organizers on the pattern of recall protocols. Paper presented at meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 1978.
Mayer, R. E. Can Advance Organizers Influence Meaningful Learning? Review of Educational Research, 1979, Vol.49, No. 2, pp. 371-383.
Mayer, R. E. Stiehl, C. C. and Greeno, J. G. Acquisition of understanding and skill in relation to subjects’ preparation and meaningfulness of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,667, 331 -350.
McGuire, W. J. Persuation. Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 14, 1974, pp. 123-124.
Mednick, S. A. The Associative Basis of the Creative Process. Psychological Review, 1962,69,220-232.
Mednick, M. T. et. at. Continual Association as a Function of Level of Creativity and Type of Verbal Stimulus. J. of Abnormal and Social Psych., 1964, 69, 511-515.
Mednick, S. A. at. al. Learning (2nd ed.). N. J.: Prince-Hall, Inc., 1973.
Meeeker, B. F. Decisions and Exchange. American Sociological Review, 1971,34,485-495.
Mendelsohn, G. A., & Grisowld, B. B. Differential Use of Incidental Stimuli in Problem-Solving as a Function of Creativity. J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68,431-436.
Mendelsohn, G. A. & Griswold, B. B. Assessed Creative Potential, Vocabulary Level and Sex as Predictors of the Uses of Incidental Cues in Verbal Problem Solving, J. of Personality and Social Psych.,1966,4,423-431.
Moeser, S. D. The Integration of Verbal Ideas. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1975, 29
Moeser, S. D. Effect of Questions on prose unitization. J.E.P. Human Learning and Memory, 1978, Vol. 4, 209 -303
Newton, J. M. & Hichey, A. E. Sequence effects in programmed learning of a verbal concept. J. educ. Psych., 1965, 56, 140-147.
Paivio, A. Imagery and Verbal Processes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
Rossi, B, Mediational Effects in Originality, Creativity, and Letter-Frequency Hierarchy. Psychological Report, 1975, 37, 279-283.
Scandura, J. M. and Wells, J. N. Advance organizers in learning abstract mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 1967,4, 295-301.
Schramm, W. Twenty Years of Journalism Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, Spring,1957
Schramm, W(Ed.) Mass Communication. (2nd ed.) 1960
Schramm, W. Introduction: Communication, Innovation, and Change. in Wilbur Schramm and Donald F. Roberts (Eds.) The Process and Effects of Mass Communication, Revised ed., University of Illinois Press, 1971, 751-758
Schwizgebel, R. K. & KoIb, D. A. Changing Human Behavior: Principles of Planned Intervention. Mcgraw-hill, 1974.
Sereno, K. K. & Mortensen, C. D. Foundation of Communication Theory. Harper & Row, 1970
Shimmerlik, S. M. Organization Theory and Memory for Prose: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 1978, Vol.48, No. 1, pp103-120
Stanely, J. C. & Hopkins, K. D. Educational and Psychological measurement and evaluation. N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972
Torrance, E. P. A New-Movement in Education: Creative Development. Ginn and Company, 1965.
Torrance, E. P. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Norms-technical Manual. Personnel Press, 1966.
Tulving, E. Subjective Organization in Free Recall of Unrelated Words. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 344-354.
Wittrock, M. C., Marks, C., & Doctorow, M. Reading as a generative process. J.E.P., 1975,67
此全文未授權公開