| 研究生: |
余念庭 Yu, Nien-Ting |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
二手奢侈品平台生態系統中的競合動態演化 A Case Study on the Competitive Dynamics in the Pre-owned Luxury Platform Ecosystems |
| 指導教授: |
邱奕嘉
Chiu, Yi-Chia |
| 口試委員: |
巫立宇
Wu, Lei-Yu 李岱砡 Lee, Tai-Yu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) Master of Business Administration Program(MBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 106 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 二手奢侈品平台生態系統 、競合動態 、官方認證轉售(CPO) 、分層式競合 、分層共存 、生態系統競合動態分析架構(ECDAF) |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Pre-owned luxury platform ecosystem, Coopetition dynamics, Certified pre-owned (CPO), Stratified coopetition, Stratified coexistence, Ecosystem coopetition dynamics analysis framework (ECDAF) |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:18 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年二手奢侈品市場持續快速成長,奢侈品牌陸續透過官方認證轉售計畫(certified pre-owned, CPO)、策略合作、資本投資與法律訴訟等方式主動介入市場,改變原本由第三方認證平台主導的市場結構。既有文獻多聚焦於平台擁有者進入互補者市場的情境,較少探討當生態系統中僅提供無形價值支撐的「間接參與者」轉為直接進入者時,平台與品牌關係如何演化以及這一轉變如何牽動整體生態系統結構變遷。
本研究以二手奢侈品平台生態系統為單一個案,採用縱向嵌入式個案研究設計,將 The RealReal 作為焦點企業。透過本研究建構的「生態系統競合動態分析架構(ecosystem coopetition dynamics analysis framework, ECDAF)」,從結構條件、關係動態、進入威脅與回應策略及演化方向四個維度,追蹤 2017 至 2024 年間品牌從觀望、試探到制度化介入的策略轉變過程。
三項研究結論:(1)當品牌從試探轉向制度化介入後,平台與不同品牌的關係由早期觀望與合作,演變為合作、競爭與對抗並存的「分層式競合(stratified coopetition)」結構;(2)面對品牌透過官方 CPO 計畫選擇性進入高價經典款品類的威脅,平台並非全面退出,而是沿「威脅梯度(threat gradient)」戰略性地將資源轉向強化跨品牌多品類聚合一站式服務等單一品牌無法複製的結構性優勢;(3)「以單一品牌為單位、逐一品類進入」所構成的「漸進式選擇外部衝擊(gradual selective external shock)」,使整體生態系統由平台中心化走向「分層共存(stratified coexistence)」,平台角色從認證中心演化為跨品牌多品類商品聚合樞紐。
在研究貢獻方面,不僅將平台進入理論延伸至「間接參與者跨界進入」情境,所建構的 ECDAF 架構亦可擴展應用於汽車或消費性電子等具備實體修復門檻特徵的產業,為理解複雜生態系統中的多邊競合關係提供一套系統性分析工具。
The pre-owned luxury market has experienced sustained rapid growth in recent years. Luxury brands have actively intervened through official certified pre-owned (CPO) programs, strategic partnerships, capital investments, and legal actions, altering the market structure previously dominated by third-party authentication platforms. Existing research primarily focuses on platform expansion or competition among third-party platforms, with limited exploration of how platform-brand relationships evolve when indirect participants shift from providing intangible value support to direct market intervention, and how this evolution drives overall ecosystem structural transformation.
This study examines The RealReal as the focal firm, defining the pre-owned luxury platform ecosystem centered on it. The study develops a conceptual analytical framework across four dimensions: structural conditions, relationship dynamics, entry threats and responses, and evolutionary directions. The research tracks the strategic transitions of luxury brands—as indirect participants—from observation through experimentation to institutionalized intervention during 2017–2024, observing how the platform reconfigures its operational network in response to the structural transformation triggered by brand entry.
Based on the analysis, this study constructs the ecosystem coopetition dynamics analysis framework (ECDAF) and yields three key conclusions:
(1) The pre-owned luxury platform ecosystem was originally established on an asymmetric interdependent structure among brand reputation, consignor supply, and buyer demand. As brands transitioned from experimentation to institutionalized intervention, platform-brand relationships evolved from early observation and cooperation into a“stratified coopetition”structure encompassing cooperation, competition, and confrontation.
(2) Facing selective competitive threats from brands entering high-value heritage categories through official CPO programs, the platform did not completely exit the competition for these goods. Instead, it strategically redirected resources along a“threat gradient”to strengthen structural advantages inimitable by individual brands, such as cross-brand integration, multi-category offerings, and one-stop services.
(3) An explicit division of labor has emerged between official brand channels and third-party platforms, shifting the overall ecosystem from platform-centricity toward “stratified coexistence,”with the platform's role evolving from an authentication center into a cross-brand product aggregation hub.
In terms of research contributions, this study not only extends platform entry theory to the context of cross-boundary entry by indirect participants, but the constructed ECDAF can also be broadly applied to other industries with physical repair thresholds, such as automobiles or consumer electronics, providing a systematic analytical tool for understanding multilateral coopetition relationships within complex ecosystems.
第一章 緒論 7
第一節 研究背景 7
第二節 研究動機 9
第三節 研究問題 11
第四節 研究流程 12
第二章 文獻回顧 13
第一節 生態系統理論發展與核心概念 13
第二節 生態系統中的競合動態 17
第三節 平台進入策略與互補者回應 20
第四節 二手奢侈品產業脈絡與研究缺口 25
第三章 研究方法 29
第一節 研究方法 29
第二節 研究架構 36
第四章 個案介紹 42
第一節 二手奢侈品市場簡介 42
第二節 The RealReal 與奢侈品牌的競合關係演化 50
第五章 研究分析 63
第一節 概念性分析維度 63
第二節 研究發現 80
第三節 ECDAF 架構與研究命題 84
第六章 研究結論與建議 89
第一節 研究結論 89
第二節 研究貢獻 92
第三節 研究限制與建議 97
參考文獻 100
一、 學術期刊文獻
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for“lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burford, N., Shipilov, A. V., & Furr, N. R. (2022). How ecosystem structure affects firm performance in response to a negative shock to interdependencies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3318
Chu, H., & Liao, S. (2007). Exploring consumer resale behavior in C2C online auctions: Taxonomy and influences on consumer decisions. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11(3), 1–27.
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466–498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0869
Dushnitsky, G., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2022). Investigating the mix of strategic choices and performance of transaction platforms: Evidence from the crowdfunding setting. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 563-598. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3163
Einav, L., Farronato, C., & Levin, J. (2016). Peer-to-peer markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334
Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882643
Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2750
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Kapacinskaite, A., & Mostajabi, A. (2024). Competing with the platform: Complementor positioning and cross-platform response to entry. Strategic Management Journal, 45(2), 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3643
Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A., Schilling, M., & Vasudeva, G. (2022). Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3250
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
Lingens, B., Miehé, L., & Gassmann, O. (2021). The ecosystem blueprint: How firms shape the design of an ecosystem according to the surrounding conditions. Long Range Planning, 54(5), 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102043
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
O'Mahony, S., & Karp, R. (2022). From proprietary to collective governance: How do platform participation strategies evolve? Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 530–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3150
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Stonig, J., Schmid, T., & Müller-Stewens, G. (2022). From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition. Strategic Management Journal, 43(9), 1927–1957. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3390
Taeuscher, K., & Rothe, H. (2021). Optimal distinctiveness in platform markets: Leveraging complementors as legitimacy buffers. Strategic Management Journal, 42(3), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3229
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Wang, R. D., & Miller, C. D. (2020). Complementors' engagement in an ecosystem: A study of publishers' e-book offerings on Amazon Kindle. Strategic Management Journal, 41(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3076
Wen, W., & Zhu, F. (2019). Threat of platform-owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9), 1336–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3031
Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Tong, T. W. (2022). Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3191
Zhu, F., & Liu, Q. (2018). Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management Journal, 39(10), 2618–2642. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2932
二、 專書
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.
Som, A., & Blanckaert, C. (2021). The road to luxury: The new frontiers in luxury brand management (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
三、 產業報告與企業法定文件
Brain, E. (2023, February 16). Gucci Vault's“made-to-treasure”drop is filled with reconditioned archival grails. Hypebeast. https://hypebeast.com/2023/2/gucci-vault-made-to-treasure-reconditioned-vintage-bags-clothes-jackie-bamboo
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA. (2024). Annual report and accounts 2024. https://www.richemont.com/news-media/press-releases-news/richemont-publishes-fy24-annual-report-and-non-financial-report/
D'Arpizio, C., Levato, F., Prete, F., & de Montgolfier, J. (2022). Renaissance in uncertainty: Luxury builds on its rebound. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/renaissance-in-uncertainty-luxury-builds-on-its-rebound/
D'Arpizio, C., Levato, F., Steiner, A., & de Montgolfier, J. (2023). Long live luxury: Converge to expand through turbulence. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/long-live-luxury-converge-to-expand-through-turbulence/
D'Arpizio, C., Levato, F., Steiner, A., & de Montgolfier, J. (2024). Luxury in transition: Securing future growth. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/luxury-in-transition-securing-future-growth/
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. (2023). Global powers of luxury goods 2023. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-shared/docs/industries/consumer/2024/gx-global-powers-of-luxury-goods-2023.pdf
Gatzer, S., Helmcke, S., & Roos, D. (2022). Playing offense on circularity can net European consumer goods companies €500 billion. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/playing-offense-on-circularity-can-net-european-consumer-goods-companies-500-billion-euros
Kering. (2021, March 1). Kering and Tiger Global Management invest in Vestiaire Collective [Press release]. https://www.kering.com/api/download-file/?path=Press_Release_Vestiaire_Collective_Kering_EN_2021_03_01_716f325353.pdf
Kering. (2022, November 23). Alessandro Michele stepping down as Gucci's creative director [Press release]. https://www.kering.com/en/news/alessandro-michele-stepping-down-as-gucci-s-creative-director/
Kering. (2024). 2023 universal registration document: Annual financial report — Integrated report. https://www.kering.com/en/finance/publications
Le Fouest, L., & Morton, M. (2024). Customer-centric growth: A playbook for scaling repair and resale in fashion. Clarasys; British Fashion Council. https://instituteofpositivefashion.com/uploads/files/1//A-Playbook-for-Scaling-Repair---Resale-in-Fashion_Final.pdf
LVMH. (2025). Financial documents: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. https://www.lvmh.com/en/financial-calendar/2024-full-year-results
McKinsey & Company. (2021). The state of fashion: Watches and jewellery. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/state%20of%20fashion%20watches%20and%20jewellery/state-of-fashion-watches-and-jewellery.pdf
Rolex. (2022). Rolex Certified Pre-Owned. Retrieved March 27, 2026, from https://www.rolex.com/buying-a-rolex/rolex-certified-pre-owned
Silbert, J. (2024). Gucci vintage begins where Gucci Vault ends. Highsnobiety. https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/gucci-vintage-interview-launch/
The RealReal, Inc. (2019a). Form S-1 registration statement. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1573221/000119312519163007/d720814ds1.htm
The RealReal, Inc. (2019b). Q3 2019 earnings call transcript. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/quarterly-results
The RealReal, Inc. (2020). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/annual-reports
The RealReal, Inc. (2021). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/annual-reports
The RealReal, Inc. (2022). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/annual-reports
The RealReal, Inc. (2023a). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/annual-reports
The RealReal, Inc. (2023b). Q4 2022 earnings call transcript. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/quarterly-results
The RealReal, Inc. (2024). Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/annual-reports
The RealReal, Inc. (2025). Q4 2024 prepared remarks. https://investor.therealreal.com/financial-information/quarterly-results
Valentino. (2023). Valentino Group sustainability report 2023. https://wikirate-production-storage.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/files/22258428/52031105.pdf
Valentino. (2024). Valentino Group sustainability report 2024. https://valentino-cdn.thron.com/static/AGA74M_SustainabilityReport_
Valentino_2024_N4F41D.pdf?xseo=&response-content-disposition=inline%3Bfilename%3D%22sustainabilityreport_valentino_2024.pdf%22
Vogue Business. (2024, April 19). Immortalising luxury: How brands can own the resale revolution. Vogue. https://www.vogue.com/article/immortalising-luxury-how-brands-can-own-the-resale-revolution
四、 法院文件
Chanel, Inc. v. The RealReal, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-10626 (S.D.N.Y. 2018).
全文公開日期 2031/07/14