跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 康心妤
Kang, Hsin-Yu
論文名稱: 多元減碳活動與路徑之會計處理研究
Accounting for the Pathways of Diverse Carbon Mitigation Activities
指導教授: 戚務君
Chi, Wu-Chun
口試委員: 張祐慈
Chang, Yu-Tzu
葉淑玲
Yeh, Shu-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accounting
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 56
中文關鍵詞: 碳會計減碳活動減碳流向去碳化中和化
外文關鍵詞: carbon accounting, carbon mitigation activity, carbon mitigation pathway, decarbonization, neutralization
相關次數: 點閱:11下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著國際氣候治理機構與揭露框架日益強調企業減碳績效的實現機制,而非僅關注最終減排成果,本研究藉由精煉既有碳會計框架,以反映企業多元的減碳活動 (carbon mitigation activity),包括碳避免、碳捕捉、碳移除與碳抵換,及其減碳產出(carbon mitigation outcome) 後續實現的路徑,包括保留、使用、移轉與抵換等。本研究區分「減碳活動」與「減碳流向」,並分別揭露源自「去碳化 (decarbonization)」與「碳中和化 (neutralization)」之減碳績效(carbon mitigation performance),藉此更真實反映不同減碳流向(carbon mitigation pathways)背後不同的經濟實質。本研究提出之框架具有三項貢獻:第一,掌握不同減碳流向之不同經濟實質與會計意涵,同時區分企業自身去碳化努力與透過碳中和化達成之績效;第二,提供一套有系統的會計基礎,將減碳產出與碳減碳義務之清償相連結,明確規範其產生、控制、處分及生命週期中之認列、衡量、清償與除列;第三,區分碳產出的產生與績效實現,具體而言,碳產出僅於實際用於清償排放負債時始認列績效。本研究為碳減碳產出之生命週期建立一致的會計基礎,有助於提升減碳績效揭露之透明度與決策攸關性。


    As climate governance bodies and disclosure frameworks increasingly emphasize the mechanisms underlying carbon mitigation performance rather than final outcomes alone, this study extends the carbon accounting literature by distinguishing diverse carbon mitigation activities, carbon avoidance, capture, removal, and credits, from the pathways through which their outcomes are realized, including retention, utilization, transfer, and offsetting, and by separately reporting performance arising from decarbonization and neutralization. This framework makes three contributions. First, it captures the heterogeneous economic substance of different mitigation pathways while distinguishing firms' own decarbonization performance from that achieved through neutralization. Second, it links mitigation outcomes systematically to the settlement of mitigation obligations, specifying their generation, control, disposition, and life-cycle recognition, measurement, settlement, and derecognition. Third, it distinguishes acquisition from realization of performance, recognizing performance only when mitigation outcomes are used to settle emission liabilities. Overall, this study provides a consistent accounting basis for carbon mitigation outcomes throughout their life cycle, enhancing the transparency and decision-usefulness of carbon mitigation performance disclosure.

    1. Introduction 1
    2. Literature Review 4
    2.1 Stakeholder Demand for Carbon and Carbon Mitigation Performance Information 4
    2.2 The Need to Distinguish Decarbonization and Neutralization Information 5
    2.3 The Need to Distinguish Carbon Mitigation Pathways 7
    2.4 Limitations of the GHG Protocol as a Measurement Framework 8
    2.4 Transaction-based Carbon Accounting 10
    3. An Integrated Transaction-based Carbon Accounting Framework 13
    3.1 Conceptual Foundation 14
    3.2 Further Conceptual Elaboration 17
    3.3 Accounting Recognition of Different Mitigation Pathways 21
    3.4 System Integration and Stock-Flow Articulation 22
    4. Conclusion 24
    References 26
    Appendix A: Bookkeeping Structure and Transaction-based Mechanics of the Carbon-Accounting System 32
    Appendix B: Definitions for Carbon Statement Components 53

    Asam, D., J. Ernstberger, and G. Friedl. 2025. How carbon accounting supports corporate decarbonization. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting 19 (3-4): 46-77. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000080-3
    Becker, T. 2025. Automotive Supply Chain decarbonization as a driver for carbon accounting and vice versa. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting 19 (3-4): 78-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1400000080-4
    Berg, F. J. O. Huidobro, and R. Rigobon. 2024. On the Importance of Assurance in  Carbon Accounting. Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Clarity AI Europe S.L., and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4734240
    Bolton, P. and M. Kacperczyk. 2021. Do Investors Care About Carbon Risk? Journal of Financial Economics 142 (2): 517-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
    Bolton, P. and M. Kacperczyk. 2023. Global Pricing of Carbon-Transition Risk. The Journal of Finance 78 (6): 3677-3754.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13272
    Carrión, E., C. Larrinaga, and D. R. Gallagher. 2025. Carbon accounting for the translation of net-zero targets into business operations. The British Accounting Review 57 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101456
    CDP. 2023.CDP Climate Change 2023 Reporting Guidance: Climate change. Available at: https://guidance.cdp.net/en/guidance?cid=46&ctype=theme&idtype=ThemeID&incchild=1&microsite=0&otype=Guidance&tags=TAG-13071,TAG-605,TAG-599
    Cohen, S., I. Kadach, and G. Ormazabal. 2023. Institutional investors, climate disclosure, and carbon emissions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 76(2-3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101640
    Delis, M. D., K. de Greiff,  M. Iosifidi, and S. Ongena. 2024. Being stranded with fossil fuel reserves? Climate policy risk and the pricing of bank loans. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 33: 239-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12189
    Depoers, F., T. Jeanjean, and T. Jérôme. 2016. Voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Contrasting the carbon disclosure project and corporate reports. Journal of Business Ethics 134 (3): 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2432-0
    Geissdoerfer, M., P. Savaget, N. M. P. Bocken, and E. J., Hultink. 2017. The Circular Economy - A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
    Gipper, B., F. Sequeira, and X. S. Shi. 2024. ESG assurance in the United States. Review of Accounting Studies 30: 1753-1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-024-09856-2
    Gipper, B., F. Sequeira, and S. Shi. 2026. Carbon accounting quality: Measurement and the role of assurance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 81 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101849
    Glenk, G. 2024. Decision-useful carbon information. Unpublished working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4444037
    Glenk, G. 2025. Corporate carbon accounting: current practices and opportunities for research. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting 19 (3-4): 96-126. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000080-5
    High-Level Expert Group on the Net Zero Emissions Commitments of Non-State Entities (HLEG, United Nations). 2022. Integrity matters: Net zero commitments by businesses, financial institutions, cities and regions. Available at: https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/high-level_expert_group_n7b.pdf
    International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). 2023. IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/ - standard
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2005. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/srccs_wholereport-1.pdf
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Annex I: Glossary. In Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. 541-562. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.008
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022:
    Mitigation of Climate Change. 12475-1354. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2023. ISO 14068-1:2023 Climate change management-Transition to net zero-Part 1: Carbon neutrality. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/43279.html
    Jia, J., N. Ranger, and A. Chaudhury. 2023. Designing for comparability: A foundational principle of analysis missing in climate reporting systems. Unpublished working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4258460
    Kaplan, R. S., K. Ramanna. 2021. Accounting for climate change. Harvard Business Review 99 (6): 120-131. https://hbr.org/2021/11/accounting-for-climate-change
    Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
    Kirchherr, J., N. N. Yang, F. Schulze-Spüntrup, M. J. Heerink, K. Hartley. 2023. Conceptualizing the Circular Economy (Revisited): An Analysis of 221 Definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001
    Khan, K., C. W. Su., and A. Khurshid. 2022. Circular economy: The silver bullet for emissions?. Journal of Cleaner Production 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134819
    Klaaßen, L. and C. Stoll. 2021. Harmonizing corporate carbon footprints. Nature Communications 12 (1): 6149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26349-x
    Krueger, P., Z. Sautner, L. T. Starks. 2020. The importance of climate risks for
    institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies 33 (3): 1067-1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137
    Mahieux, L., H. Sapra, and G. Zhang. 2025. Measuring greenhouse gas emissions: What are the costs and benefits? Journal of Accounting Research 63 (3): 1063-1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12613
    Matsumura, E. M., R. Prakash, S. C. Vera-Muñoz. 2014. Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review 89 (2): 695-724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629
    Nagireddi, S., J. R. Agarwal, and D.Vedapuri. 2024. Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects for Global Decarbonization. ACS Eng. Au 4: 22-48. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00049
    OECD. 2024. Monitoring Progress towards a Resource-Efficient and Circular Economy. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/3b644b83-en
    Penman, S. H. 2025. Accounting design: Carbon accounting with financial accounting principles. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting 19 (3-4): 158-178. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000080-7
    Penman, S. H. 2026. Accounting for carbon. Unpublished working paper. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4721974
    Reichelstein, S. 2024. Corporate carbon accounting: balance sheets and flow statements. Review of Accounting Studies 29: 2125-2156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-024-09830-y
    Reichelstein, S. 2025. Innovations in corporate carbon accounting. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting (19)3-4: 9-45. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000080-2
    Saling, P., A. Pistillo, and J. Kurtz. 2025. Automated product carbon footprint calculation in the chemical industry to steer decarbonization along the value chain. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting 19 (3-4): 127-157.  https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000080-6
    Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). 2024. SBTi Above and Beyond: An SBTi report on the design and implementation of beyond value chain mitigation (BVCM). Available at: https://sciencebasedtargets.org/beyond-value-chain-mitigation
    Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). 2026. SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard Version 1.31. Available at: https://sciencebasedtargets.org/corporate-net-zero-v1
    Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). 2026. SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard Version 2.0. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/corporate-net-zero-standard-v2
    Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). 2026. SBTi GLOSSARY Version 1.5. Available at: https://files.sciencebasedtargets.org/production/files/SBTi-Glossary.pdf?dm=1781165377
    Seltzer, L., L. Starks, and Q. Zhu. 2019. Climate regulatory risk and corporate bonds. Working Paper, University of Texas at Austin.
    Xue, H. 2025. ESG disclosure, market forces, and firm investment. The Accounting Review 100 (5): 439-467. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2023-0707

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/07/13
    QR CODE
    :::