跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖于翔
Liao, Yu-Shiang
論文名稱: 家族企業的市場評價、獲利、風險與創新:美國 上市公司實證研究
Market Valuation, Profitability, Risk, and Innovation in Family Firms: Evidence from U.S. Public Companies
指導教授: 徐政義
Shiu, Cheng-Yi
口試委員: 郭維裕
Kuo, Wei-Yu
徐政義
Shiu, Cheng-Yi
賴弘能
Lai, Hung-Neng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 國際經營與貿易學系
Department of International Business
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 家族企業公司治理市場評價創新
外文關鍵詞: Family firms, Corporate governance, Market valuation, Innovation
相關次數: 點閱:1下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文以 2010 年至 2024 年美國上市公司為樣本,結合 DEF 14A、BoardEx、COMPUSTAT、CRSP 與專利資料,建構動態家族企業辨識指標,系統性檢驗家族企業與非家族企業在會計績效、市場評價、代理成本、風險、創新成果及股票報酬上的差異。本文旨在釐清家族控制是否會在公司治理與企業經濟後果上產生具系統性的影響。
    研究結果顯示,家族企業在資本市場上享有較高評價,反映投資人平均而言給予其較高的市場價格;同時,家族企業在利潤率與營業利益率上也有較佳表現,顯示其銷售獲利能力較強,但在 ROA 指標上並未展現穩定優勢。在代理成本與財務政策方面,家族企業僅於部分費用控制指標上呈現較佳結果,並未在所有相關面向上皆出現一致差異。另一方面,家族企業之總風險與特有風險皆較高,且在專利數量與專利價值上表現較佳;在股票報酬方面,正向異常報酬(alpha)主要出現在價值加權投資組合。
    本文結果顯示,家族企業的優勢並非全面反映於所有短期財務績效指標,而是較多體現在市場評價、創新表現與部分長期價值面向。就整體圖像而言,家族企業較適合被理解為一種願意承擔較高風險,以換取長期價值創造與創新機會的治理型態。


    This study uses U.S. listed firms from 2010 to 2024 and combines DEF 14A proxy filings, BoardEx, COMPUSTAT, CRSP, and patent data to construct a dynamic family-firm indicator. It systematically examines whether family firms differ from non-family firms in accounting performance, market valuation, agency costs, risk, innovation outcomes, and stock returns. The purpose is to clarify whether family control generates systematic effects on corporate governance and economic outcomes.
    The results show that family firms receive higher market valuations, in-dicating that investors on average assign them higher market prices. Family firms also exhibit stronger profit and operating margins, suggesting better sales-based profitability, but they do not show a robust advantage in ROA. Evidence on agency costs and financial policy is limited, as family firms appear to be more efficient only in some expense-control measures rather than across all related dimensions. At the same time, family firms exhibit higher total and idiosyncratic risk, as well as stronger patent quantity and patent value. In the stock return analysis, positive alpha appears mainly in value- weighted portfolios.
    Overall, the findings suggest that the advantages of family firms are not uniformly reflected in all short-term accounting measures. Instead, they are more evident in market valuation, innovation, and selected long-term value dimensions. Family firms are therefore better understood as a governance form that accepts higher risk in exchange for long-term value creation and innovation opportunities.

    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 1
    第二節 研究問題 2
    第三節 研究目的 3
    第四節 研究範圍與對象 3
    第五節 研究流程 4
    第六節 論文架構 4
    第二章 文獻回顧與研究假說 6
    第一節 家族企業的定義與特性 6
    第二節 家族企業與經營績效 8
    第三節 家族企業與市場價值 9
    第四節 家族企業與代理成本及財務政策 9
    第五節 家族企業與企業風險特性 10
    第六節 家族企業與創新活動 11
    第七節 研究假說建立 12
    第三章 研究設計 15
    第一節 研究架構 15
    第二節 資料來源與樣本選取 15
    第三節 研究期間與樣本篩選程序 16
    第四節 變數定義 17
    4.1 依變數 17
    4.2 主要解釋變數 17
    4.3 控制變數 18
    第五節 實證模型設計 19
    第六節 估計方法與統計檢定 20
    第七節 研究流程說明 20
    第四章 實證結果分析 21
    第一節 敘述統計與單變量分析 21
    第二節 家族企業與會計績效之分析 22
    第三節 家族企業與市場價值之分析 23
    第四節 家族企業與代理成本及財務政策之分析 24
    第五節 家族企業與風險之分析 25
    第六節 家族企業與創新成果之分析 25
    第七節 家族企業與股票報酬之分析 26
    第八節 小結 27
    第五章 穩健性分析與討論 28
    第一節 排除金融業與公用事業樣本之穩健性檢定 28
    第二節 不同模型設定之穩健性檢驗 29
    第三節 等權重與價值加權投資組合結果比較 30
    第四節 各項結果之整合討論 30
    第五節 管理意涵與理論意涵 31
    第六章 結論與建議 33
    第一節 研究結論 33
    第二節 研究發現彙整 33
    第三節 研究貢獻 34
    第四節 實務建議 35
    第五節 研究限制 35
    第六節 後續研究建議 36
    參考文獻 46
    附錄 51
    附錄 A:變數定義 52
    附錄 B:補充表格 54

    Amit, R., & Villalonga, B. (2014). Financial performance of family firms. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, & P. Sharma (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of family business (pp. 157–177). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247556.n9
    Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00067-9
    Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
    Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00201
    Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x
    Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.647
    Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
    Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.003
    Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
    Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
    Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511
    Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
    De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., & Kammerlander, N. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12373
    De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512466258
    DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (2000). Controlling stockholders and the disciplinary role of corporate payout policy: A study of the Times Mirror Company. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(2), 153–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00039-8
    Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
    Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
    EY Global. (2025, March 13). Global 500 family business index 2025 [press release]. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/newsroom/2025/03/largest-500-family-businesses-amount-to-worlds-third-largest-economy
    Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2011). Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3601–3641. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr065
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
    Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1818789
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
    John, K., Litov, L., & Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk-taking. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1679–1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01372.x
    Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.22
    Klein, S. B., Astrachan, J. H., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00086.x
    Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw040
    La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
    Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. (2011). Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00495.x
    Madison, K., Holt, D. T., Kellermanns, F. W., & Ranft, A. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515594292
    Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.002
    Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2021). Family firms: A breed of extremes? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720964186
    Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7
    Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913610
    O’Boyle, E. H., Pollack, J. M., & Rutherford, M. W. (2012). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.09.002
    Pérez-González, F. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559–1588. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1559
    Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
    Pindado, J., Requejo, I., & de la Torre, C. (2011). Family control and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Empirical evidence from the Euro zone. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1389–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.07.003
    PwC. (2025, October 13). PwC 2025 global family business survey. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2025/pwc-global-family-business-survey.html
    Roger, P., & Schatt, A. (2016). Idiosyncratic risk, private benefits, and the value of family firms. Finance Research Letters, 17, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.03.015
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
    Singh, M., & Davidson, W. N. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 793–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00260-6
    UBS. (2024, May 22). UBS global family office report 2024: Balance is back. https://www.ubs.com/global/en/media/display-page-ndp/en-20240522-global-family-office-report-2024.html
    Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
    Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj012

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/05/27
    QR CODE
    :::