近年臺北市建築老化問題日益明顯，政府為加速老舊建築重建，於 2017 年施行《都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建條例》（簡稱危老條例），透過容積獎勵、稅賦減免及簡化行政程序等方式，提高民間參與重建之誘因。相較於都市更新制度，危老重建具有核准程序快速、小基地開發及制度確定性較高等特性，因此危老核准可能影響市場對區域更新之預期，進而反映於周邊住宅價格。
本研究以臺北市危老重建核准案件為研究對象，結合 2017 年至 2025 年第三季之實價登錄資料，探討危老重建核准對周邊住宅價格之影響。研究方法上，採用近距離差異中的差異法（local difference-in-differences, local DID），綜合相關文獻與多重空間距離測試結果後，本文以危老基地周邊 100 公尺內住宅作為處理組，100 至 300 公尺內住宅作為對照組，比較核准前後之住宅價格變化。此外，本文結合事件研究法（event study），檢驗平行趨勢假設，並執行多項穩健性檢定。在空間資料處理方面，透過 QGIS 建立危老基地多邊形圖資，有助於降低距離測量誤差，並更精確反映危老重建基地與周邊住宅之實際空間關係。
研究結果指出，危老重建核准後，距離危老重建基地較近之住宅，其價格相對於對照組呈現顯著正向反應，顯示市場將危老重建核准視為區域更新與環境改善之正向訊號。進一步發現，危老重建核准之效果可能受到容積獎勵、建物屋齡特性等因素影響。同時，行政區異質性分析結果反映，不同區域因都市發展條件、交通負荷與建物結構差異，危老重建核准之效果有所不同。
整體而言，本研究結果顯示危老重建核准與周邊住宅價格間具有顯著正向關聯。相較於既有文獻多以都市更新為研究對象，本文聚焦於危老重建核准政策，並透過 local DID 與建構危老重建基地多邊形圖資，提升空間距離衡量之精確性。研究結果除補充危老重建核准與價格之相關文獻外，亦可作為未來危老重建政策、容積獎勵制度與都市更新規劃之參考。

In recent years, building aging and deterioration have become increasingly serious in Taipei City. To accelerate the reconstruction of aging buildings, the Taiwanese government enacted the Statute for Expediting Reconstruction of Urban Unsafe and Old Buildings in 2017. Compared with conventional urban renewal programs, reconstruction of unsafe and old buildings features faster approval procedures and greater institutional certainty, which may affect nearby housing prices.
This study investigates the impact of reconstruction approvals on nearby housing prices in Taipei City using housing transaction data from 2017 to the third quarter of 2025. A local DID approach is employed to compare residences within 100 meters of reconstruction sites with those located between 100 and 300 meters. An event study approach and several robustness checks are also conducted. QGIS is used to construct polygon-based spatial data for reconstruction sites, improving measurement accuracy.
The results indicate that residences located closer to reconstruction sites experience significant positive price effects after project approval, suggesting that the market interprets reconstruction approvals as signals of neighborhood renewal and environmental improvement. Moreover, these effects may vary with floor area ratio bonus rates, building age, and regional conditions.
Overall, reconstruction approvals are significantly associated with nearby housing prices. Compared with previous studies focusing on urban renewal, this study focuses on reconstruction projects for unsafe and old buildings and combines a local DID design with polygon-based spatial data. The findings contribute to the literature on housing prices and urban redevelopment, and provide implications for urban renewal planning.

一、 中文參考文獻
（一）書籍
1. 馬毓駿，（2023）。近期臺灣高房價因素探討。台北市：經濟前瞻。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/10190376-N202309230008-00010
2. 蘇南，（2021）。危老條例小基地帶來的都市景觀衝擊–以容積獎勵及建築物高度比為核心。台北市：全國律師。https://www.twba.org.tw/upload/article/20221229/5274121e5eee4f3c95bbfb80bd7f44d1/5274121e5eee4f3c95bbfb80bd7f44d1.pdf
（二）期刊論文
3. 王武聰，（2020）。從危老到都更－中央都市更新政策規劃歷程。《土木水利》，47卷5期，13-16。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.202010_47(5).0003
4. 朱芳妮、劉祉岑、陳明吉，（2025）。房市恐慌購買與缺稀心理：新冠肺炎疫情期間之研究。住宅學報，34(1)，21-55。https://www.housing.org.tw/journal-articles/thesis-529
5. 李春長、梁志民、林豐文，（2017）。捷運系統對鄰近住宅價格之影響–以差異中之差異法估計。台灣土地研究，20(2)，31-58。https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.2017.20.02.031-058
6. 林祖嘉、林素菁，（1993）。台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析。住宅學報，1，21-45。https://doi.org/10.6375/JHS.199301.0021
7. 陳佳甫、張金鶚、謝博明，（2012）。知人知面不知心：購屋者房價預期之分析。都市與計劃，39(4)，349-373。 https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.39.4.349
8. 莊孟翰，（2020）。檢視當前都市更新與危老重建政策之利弊得失。《土木水利》，47(5)，42-49。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.202010_47(5).0009
9. 陳晏筑、林雅亭、劉千菱、吳佳洟、張雅嵐、林左裕，（2022）。鄰避設施對鄰近房價的影響－以臺北市為例。土地問題研究季刊，21(4)，32-53。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000011-202212-202212290015-202212290015-32-53
10. 張育端、陳錚漢、湯國榮，（2023）。都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建條例獎勵措施對台中市不動產開發之影響。中華行政學報，32，25-40。https://doi.org/10.6712/JCPA.202306_(32).0002
11. 曾鵬光、陳佳欣，（2012）。建蔽率與容積率管制誘發開發商建築違建現象之探討–台南市新建透天住宅之實證分析。住宅學報，21(1)，19-36。https://www.housing.org.tw/journal-articles/thesis-106
12. 楊宗憲、蘇倖慧，（2011）。迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究。住宅學報，20(2)，61-80。https://doi.org/10.6375/JHS.201112.0062
13. 彭建文、馮靖博、丁玟甄，（2011）。待更新不動產之實質選擇權價值分析。住宅學報，20(2)，1-26。https://doi.org/10.6375/JHS.201112.0002
14. 彭建文、林秋瑾、楊雅婷，（2004）。房價結構性改變影響因素分析－以台北市、台北縣房價為例。台灣土地研究，7(2)，27-46。https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.200411_7(2).0002
15. 蔡怡純、陳明吉，（2007）。台北地區不動產價格波動與蛛網理論。台灣土地研究，10(2)，1-22。https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.200711_10(2).0001
16. 韓恩之、蔡瑄文、賴淑芳，（2016）。捷運交通對房價之影響以台北市為例。地理資訊系統季刊，10(4)，24-28。https://doi.org/10.6628/GIS.2016.10(4).5
17. 應韻仙、陳振誠，（2021）。探討危險老舊房屋重建政策，加速城市再造之效應－以台北市為例。《物業管理學會論文集》，14屆，199-204。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/P20130903002-202106-202109220006-202109220006-199-204
（三）研究計畫
18. 法制局 吳淑青，（2024）。《都更與危老容積獎勵公益性之研究》。台北市：立法院法制局。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6586&pid=245067
（四）博碩士學位論文
19. 沈欣潔，（2024）。都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建政策之探討－以臺北市為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學，地政學系，台北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pm5f9p
20. 汪鎮武，（2019）。危老建築容積獎勵之初步探討。明新科技大學，土木工程與環境資源管理系，新竹縣。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3jjtbp
21. 林孝恩，（2016）。臺北市住宅基地規模與開發強度之影響因素。國立政治大學，地政學系，台北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/42y7a5
22. 邵仕強，（2022）。都市危險及老舊建物重建條例之研究－台灣及日本經驗之比較。國立政治大學，經營管理碩士學程（EMBA），台北市。http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202200076
23. 洪翎嘉，（2018）。網際網路地圖上之量測精度探討。國立臺灣師範大學，地理學系，台北市。https://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DG.021.2018.A05
24. 張宇蕙，（2024）。影響危老重建因素之探討－以臺北市危老核准案件為例。國立政治大學，行政管理碩士學程，台北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8wuvw8
25. 張家綺，（2021）。都市更新計畫對周邊房價影響之外溢效果：臺灣的實證研究。國立中央大學，財務金融學系，桃園市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hz7235
26. 梁晴，（2019）。都市危險及老舊建築物加速重建條例案例研究。國立臺北大學，不動產與城鄉環境學系，新北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/756au8
27. 陳家妤，（2014）。都市更新對鄰近住宅價格影響之研究－以台北市為例。國立屏東商業技術學院，不動產經營系，屏東市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/za5w2p
28. 陳幸宜，（2003）。都市房價變動影響因素之系統動態模擬－台北市之實證研究。國立成功大學，都市計畫學系，台南市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xh9947
29. 劉昌煥，（2025）。危老自主重建財務可行性評估及分析－以臺北市重建計畫為例。國立臺灣大學，土木工程學系，台北市。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202502922
30. 劉昱辰，（2019）。都市更新對於住宅價格影響之研究。國立政治大學，地政學系，台北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ega4mp
31. 劉智偉，（2021）。都市更新與都市危險及老舊建物重建對於周邊住宅價格影響之比較研究－以新北市為例。國立政治大學，地政學系，台北市。http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202100984
32. 蕭瑋彤，（2022）。都市更新對高雄市房地產市場的時空影響效果。國立中山大學，經濟學研究所，高雄市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/62vpg8
（五）網際網路
33. 內政部不動產交易實價查詢服務網（無日期）。實價登錄資料查詢，檢索於 2025 年 10 月 2 日，自https://lvr.land.moi.gov.tw
34. 內政部不動產資訊平台（無日期）。檢索於 2025 年 10 月 2 日，自https://pip.moi.gov.tw/Publicize/Info/Index
35. 內政部國土測繪中心（無日期）。國土測繪與空間資訊期刊，檢索於 2025 年 10 月 10 日，自https://www.nlsc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=1533
36. 內政部國土測繪中心（無日期）。檢索於 2025 年 10 月 10 日，自https://maps.nlsc.gov.tw/T09/mobilemap.action
37. 內政部全球資訊網（無日期）。都更及危老政策比較表，檢索於 2025 年 10 月 10 日，自https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/OldFile/news_file/都更及危老政策比較表.pdf
38. 內政部地籍圖資網路便民服務系統（無日期）。地籍圖資查詢，檢索於 2025 年 10 月 10 日，自https://easymap.land.moi.gov.tw/R02/Index
39. 台北市屋齡地圖（無日期）。台北市屋齡空間分佈，檢索於 2025 年 10 月 7 日，自https://imdataman.github.io/taipei-house-age-map/
40. 立法院法律系統（無日期）。檢索於 2025 年 9 月 29 日，自https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lglawkm
41. 永慶房產集團（2026）。2025 年臺北市行政區購屋屋齡佔比統計，檢索於 2026 年 4 月 15 日，自https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/台北市六成住宅屋齡超過40年-這四區占交易一半-104214820.html
42. 全國法規資料庫（無日期）。檢索於 2025 年 9 月 29 日，自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070249
43. 住展房屋網（2021）。臺北市老屋重建所需時間推估表，檢索於 2026 年 4 月15 日，自https://urbanrenewal.wealth.com.tw/news-detail/268
44. 臺北市建築管理工程處（無日期）。危老重建計畫核准案件一覽表，檢索於 2025 年 10 月 7 日，自https://cmo.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=BD86021F233DC407
45. 臺北市都市更新處（無日期）。檢索於 2025 年 10 月 7 日，自https://uro.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=5E79553CBBAE8DFB&sms=87415A8B9CE81B16&s=0245995C5DF74EF8
46. 遠見雜誌（2022）。臺北市內湖區各路段尖峰路段示意圖，檢索於 2026 年 4 月 13 日，自https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/93193?srsltid=AfmBOopLBOTitNz459gTh9Y1cicGlBy7HHrVJs5LtKm8u94Az4hKo9ZC
47. 臺北市政府交通局（2025）。臺北市易壅塞路段施工時段表，檢索於 2026 年 4 月 13 日，自https://dot.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=DCB6EDF0DF768B3A&sms=87B95E0E4DB42666&s=EA8A39DA4815CEC8
二、英文參考文獻
（一）書籍
48. Fujita, Masahisa, (1989). Urban economic theory : land use and city size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625862
（二）專書論文
49. Kuchler, Theresa, Monika Piazzesi & Johannes Stroebel, (2023). Housing market expectations, Handbook of Economic Expectations, 6, 163-191. https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.39.4.349
（三）期刊
50. Abadie, Alberto, (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators, The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00321
51. Armona, Luis, Andreas Fuster & Basit Zafar, (2018). Home price expectations and behaviour: evidence from a randomized information experiment, The Review of Economic Studies, 86(4), 1371-1410. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy038
52. Ball, Michael J., (1973). Recent empirical work on the determinants of relative house prices, Urban Studies, 10(2), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987320080311
53. Barr, Jason & Jeffrey P. Cohen, (2014). The floor area ratio gradient: new york city, 1890–2009, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.03.004
54. Bertaud, Alain & Jan K. Brueckner, (2005). Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.02.004
55. Boyle, Melissa A. & Katherine A. Kiel, (2001). A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 9(2), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2001.12090098
56. Cameron, A. C. & Douglas Miller, (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference, The Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317-372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
57. Campbell, John Y., Stefano Giglio & Parag Pathak, (2011). Forced sales and house prices, American Economic Review, 101(5), 2108–2131. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.2108
58. Chagas, André L. S., Carlos R. Azzoni & Alexandre N. Almeida, (2016). A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 59, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.04.002
59. Chay, Kenneth Y. & Michael Greenstone, (2005). Does air quality matter? evidence from the housing market, Journal of Political Economy, 113(2), 376-424. https://doi.org/10.1086/427462
60. Clapp, John M., Piet Eichholtz & Thies Lindenthal, (2013). Real option value over a housing market cycle, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(6), 862-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.07.005
61. Clapp, John M., Jyh-Bang Jou & Tan Charlene Lee, (2012). Hedonic models with redevelopment options under uncertainty, Real Estate Economics, 40(2), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00323.x
62. Connelly, Brian L., S. Trevis Certo & Yi Shi Zhou, (2025). Signaling theory: state of the theory and its future, Journal of Management, 51(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241268459
63. Cropper, Maureen L., Leland B. Deck & Kenenth E. McConnell, (1988). On the choice of funtional form for hedonic price functions, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(4), 668-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935831
64. Delgado, Michael S. & Raymond J.G.M. Florax, (2015). Difference-in-differences techniques for spatial data: local autocorrelation and spatial interaction, Economics Letters, 137, 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.10.035
65. Diao, Mi, Delon Leonard & Tien Foo Sing, (2017). Spatial-difference-in-differences models for impact of new mass rapid transit line on private housing values, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 67, 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.08.006
66. Dubé, Jean, Diègo Legros, Marius Thériault & François Des Rosiers, (2014). A spatial difference-in-differences estimator to evaluate the effect of change in public mass transit systems on house prices, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 64, 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.02.007
67. Epple, Dennis, (1987). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products, Journal of Political Economy, 95(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1086/261441
68. Freeman, A. Myrick, III, (1979). Hedonic prices, property values and measuring environmental benefits: a survey of the issues, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81(2), 154-173. https://doi.org/10.2307/3439957
69. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing, Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
70. González-Pampillón, Nicolás, (2022). Spillover effects from new housing supply, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 92, 103746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2021.103759
71. Hausman, Jerry, (2001). Mismeasured variables in econometric analysis: problems from the right and problems from the left, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.57
72. Hilber, Christian A. L., (2015). The economic implications of house price capitalization: a synthesis, Real Estate Economics, 45(2), 301-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12129
73. Hsu, Jinn-yuh & Yen-hsing Hsu, (2013). State transformation, policy learning, and exclusive displacement in the process of urban redevelopment in taiwan, Urban Studies, 50(4), 677-698. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778581
74. Joshi, Kirti Kusum & Tatsuhito Kono, (2009). Optimization of floor area ratio regulation in a growing city, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(4), 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.02.001
75. Kain, John F. & John M. Quigley, (1970). Measuring the value of housing quality, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 532-548. https://doi.org/10.2307/2284565
76. Kane, Thomas J., Stephanie K. Riegg & Douglas O. Staiger, (2006). School quality, neighborhoods, and housing prices, American Law and Economics Review, 8(2), 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahl007
77. Karampour, Katayoun, (2021). Implications of density bonus tool for urban planning: relaxing floor area ratio (far) regulations in tehran, International Planning Studies, 26(3), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2020.1802235
78. Knight, John R., C. F. Sirmans & Geoffrey K. Turnbull, (1994). List price signaling and buyer behavior in the housing market, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9, 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099271
79. Lai, Shih-Kung, Hsiao-Lei Liu & I.-Chih Lan, (2020). Planning for urban redevelopment: a transaction cost approach, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1850323
80. Lee, Chun-chang, Chih-Min Liang & Chia-Yu Chen, (2017). The impact of urban renewal on neighborhood housing prices in taipei: an application of the difference-in-difference method, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32, 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-016-9518-1
81. Li, Jiayu, Bohong Zheng, Komi Bernard Bedra, Zhe Li & Xiao Chen, (2022). Effects of residential building height, density, and floor area ratios on indoor thermal environment in singapore, Journal of Environmental Management, 313, 115003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114976
82. Li, Mingche M. & H. James Brown, (1980). Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices, Land Economics, 56(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.2307/3145857
83. Lucius, Dominik I., (2001). Real options in real estate development, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 19(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780110365370
84. Malpezzi, Stephen, (1996). Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in u.s. metropolitan areas, Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), 209-241. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24832860
85. Moon, Byunggeor, (2019). The effect of far (floor area ratio) regulations on land values: the case of new york, Papers in Regional Science, 98(6), 2343-2354. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12421
86. Munneke, Henry J. & Kiplan S. Womack, (2016). Valuing the redevelopment option component of urban land values, Real Estate Economics, 48(1), 294-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12192
87. Oates, Wallace E., (1969). The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: an empirical study of tax capitalization and the tiebout hypothesis, Journal of Political Economy, 77(6), 957-971. https://doi.org/10.1086/259584
88. Rosen, Sherwin, (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169
89. Rossi‐Hansberg, Esteban, Pierre‐Daniel Sarte & Raymond Owens, (2010). Housing externalities, Journal of Political Economy, 118(3), 485–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/653138
90. Schennach, Susanne M., (2016). Recent advances in the measurement error literature, Annual Review of Economics, 8, 341-377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015058
91. Spence, Michael, (1973). Job market signaling, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
92. Steele, Brian M., J. Chris Winne & Roland L. Redmond, (1998). Estimation and mapping of misclassification probabilities for thematic land cover maps, Remote Sensing of Environment, 66(2), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00061-3
93. Sun, Shanxia & Michael S. Delgado, (2024). Local spatial difference-in-differences models: treatment correlations, response interactions, and expanded local models, Empirical Economics, 67, 2077-2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02610-2
94. Tang, Bo-sin & Chung Yim Yiu, (2010). Space and scale: a study of development intensity and housing price in hong kong, Landscape and Urban Planning, 96(3), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.005
95. Teaford, Jon C., (2000). Urban renewal and its aftermath, Housing Policy Debate, 11(2), 443-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2000.9521373
96. Tong, De, Yue Shen, Xiaoguang Wang, Yiyu Sun, Ian MacLachlan & Xin Li, (2023). From proximity to quality: the capitalization of public facilities into housing prices, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(10), 2435-2455. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2023.2227683
97. Wen, Haizhen, Yue Xiao, Eddie C.M. Hui & Ling Zhang, (2018). Education quality, accessibility, and housing price: does spatial heterogeneity exist in education capitalization?, Habitat International, 78, 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.012
98. Wu, Si-Min & Yu Deng, (2024). Typological differentiation and time-series effects of urban renewal on housing prices, Cities, 145, 104668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104668
99. Yinger, John, (1982). Capitalization and the theory of local public finance, Journal of Political Economy, 90(5), 917-943. https://doi.org/10.1086/261101
（四）網際網路
100. QGIS Development Team, (n.d.). QGIS geographic information system, Retrieved October 14, 2025, from https://www.qgis.org