| 研究生: |
李路得 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
兒童英語與國中英語學習成果之關連研究報告 The relationships between English learning in childhood & English achievements in junior high school |
| 指導教授: | 楊懿麗 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
外國語文學院 - 英國語文學系 Department of English |
| 論文出版年: | 1991 |
| 畢業學年度: | 79 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 151 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:147 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
Abstract
In Taipei many elementary school students go to the socalled
child language centers to learn English. Many parents
prefer that their children start learning English earlier 1n
the hope that an early start will ensure the success of
English learning later on.
This study is a cross-sectional investigation of the
relationships between early start in English learning and the
achievement in English learning at junior high school using
grade 1 and grade 2 junior high school students as the
subjects. The language assessment 1S a test including
grammar, reading, and writing sections in written form. The
statistical methods employed are mean, percentage, standard
deviation, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, one-way ANOVA,
Scheffe multiple range tests, two-way ANOVA, two-tailed test
( t-test), and multiple stepwise regression. The major
findings are as follows:
1. Of both grades the ELC subjects surpassed the non-ELC
subjects on all the tests.
2. The impact of ELC decreased on the results of grade 2 test.
3. The length of ELC was the most important determining variable.
4. Of both grades, the correlations between the length of ELC and the grammar tests were less strong than those with the reading and writing tests.
5. Age of early start had no significant correlations with the grammar test for grade 2 subjects.
6. Compared with the other factors, age of early start showed no tangible effects on all the tests for each of the grades.
7. The ELC subjects of both grades could not gain advantage from the similarity of the teaching content of early English class to that in the English course at junior high school.
Table of Contents
List of Tables.iv
CHAPTER ONE Introduction………………..1
1.1 Introdution………………..1
1.2 The Purposes of the Study………………..1
1.3 The Research Hypotheses………………..7
1.4 The Limitations of the Study………………..9
1.5 Definition of Terms………………..10
CHAPTER TWO Review of Related Literature………………..13
2.1 Biological Considerations………………..14
2.2 Cognitive Factors………………..19
2.2.1 Monitoring………………..22
2.2.2 Field Independence\Dependence………………..24
2.2.3 Tolerance of Ambiguity………………..26
2.3 Language Environments………………..28
2.4 Experimental Reports………………..33
2.4.1 Formal Environments………………..34
2.4.1.1 Long-Term Studies………………..34
2.4.1.2 Short-Term Studies………………..35
2.4.2 Informal Environments………………..38
2.4.2.1 Long-Term Studies………………..39
2.4.2.2 Short-Term Studies………………..41
2.5 Domestic Studies………………..43
2.6 Conclusions………………..45
CHAPTER THREE Methods and Procedures………………..49
3.1 Subjects………………..49
3.2 Design and Materials………………..51
3.2.1 The Questionnaire………………..51
3.2.2 The Tests………………..52
3.2.2.1 Grammar Test………………..54
3.2.2.2 Reading Test………………..55
3.2.2.3 Writing Test………………..56
3.3 Procedures………………..57
3.4 Scoring………………..59
3.5 Statistical Methods………………..60
CHAPTER FOUR Results………………..64
4.1 General Language Backgrounds of the Subjects………………..64
4.2 Overall Performance………………..68
4.3 Correlations between the Language
Backgrounds of the Subjects and
the Scores on the Tests ………………..70
4.3.1 Correlations between the Characteristics
of Grade 1 Subjects
and the Testing Scores………………..71
4.3.1.1 Sex………………..73
4.3.1.2 Extracurricular English
Learning at Junior High
School Level (EEJS) ………………..73
4.3.1.3 Length of EEJS………………..74
4.3.1.4 English Learning in
Childhood (ELC) ………………..76
4.3.2 Correlations between the Characteristics
of Grade 2 Subjects
and the Testing Scores………………..83
4.3.2.1 Sex………………..84
4.3.2.2 Extracurricular English
Learning at Junior High
School Level (EEJS) ………………..85
4.3.2.3 Length of EEJS………………..86
4.3.2.4 English Learning in
Childhood (ELC) ………………..88
4.4 The Interactions between ELC and Length
of EEJS………………..95
4.5 The Predictability of the Scores in Terms of
the Language Backgrounds'? of the Subjects………………..100
CHAPTER FIVE Discussions and Conclusions………………..106
5.1 Summary of the Findings………………..107
5.2 Discussions………………..111
5.2.1 The Performance of ELC Subjects Versus
Non-ELC Subjects………………..113
5.2.2 The Influence of Age of Early Start
and Length of ELC………………..113
5.2.3 The Influence of the Content of
Instruction………………..114
5.2.4 The Comparison between Grade 1 and
Grade 2………………..116
5.3 Conclusions………………..119
5.3.1 Implications for Education………………..120
5.3.2 Recommendations of Further Research………………..121
Reference in English Language………………..123
Reference in Chinese Language………………..132
Appendix………………..134
References In English Language
Abraham, Roberta G. 1985. “ Field Independence-Dependence and the Teaching of Grammar." TESOL Quarterly, 19, 689-702.
Asher, J., and Price, B. 1961 . "The Learning Strategy of Total Physical Response: Some Age Differences." In Stephen D. Krashen, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H.
Long, eds. 1982. Child-Adult Differences In Second Language Acguisition. Rowley: Newbury House.
Ausubel, David A,. 1964. "Adults Versus Children in Second Language Learning: Psychological Considerations." Modern Language Journal, 48, 420-424.
Barroso, Felix. 1976. "Hemispheric Asymmetry of Function in Children." In Rieber, R. W'. The :Neuropsychology of Language.New York: Plenum.
Bialystok, Ellen. 1978. "A Theoretical Model of Second Language Learning." Language Learning, 28, 69-83.
Borich, Gary D., and Tom Kubiszyn. 1987. Educational Testing and Measurement: Classroom Application and Practice. 2nd ed. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.
Brega, E. and Newell, J. 1965. "Comparison of Performance by FLES Program Students and Regular French III Students on Hodern Language Association Tests." French Review ,39, 433-438.
Brown, H. Douglas. 1987. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall.
Budner, S. 1962. "Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Yariable. ,. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50, cited by
Carol Chapeele and Cheryl Roberts. 1986. "Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language.”Language Learning, 36, 27-45.
Chapelle, Carol A. and Roberts, Cheryl. 1986. "_Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. ,. Language Learning, 36, 25-45.
Cummins, James. 1980. " The Cross-Lingual Dimensions of Language Proficiency: Implications for bilingual Education and the Optimal Age Issue." TESOL Quarteriy , 14 ,175-187.
Dulay H., and Burt, M. 1973. " Should We Teach Children Syntax?Language Learning,24 245-58.
Dulay, Heidi, Marina Burt, and Stephen Krashen. 1982.Language Two. New York :oxford.
Ekstrand, L. 1978. "English without a book Revisited " The Effect of Age on Second Language Acquisition in Formal Setting." (Department of Educational and Psychological Research, School of Education, Malmo, Sweden J , no. 60 ,October 1978. Rpt. In Stephen D. krashen, Robin C.
Scarcella, and Michael H. Long, eds. 1982. Child-Adult Differences In Second Language Acquisition Rowley:Newbury House.
Fathman, Ann K. 1915. " The Relationship between Age and Second Language Productive Ability” Language Learning,25,245-253.
-------- 1976. "Variables Affecting the Successful Learning of English as a Second Language. "TESOL Quarterly, 10,433-443.
FIege , James E. 1981. "The Phonological Basis of foreign _Accent: A Hypothesis."TESOL Quarterly, 15, 443-455.
Ferguson, George A. 1959 . Statistical Analysis in Psychology & Education. .4th ed. New York:Mcgraw-Hill.
Genesee, Fred. 1982. "Experimental Neuropsychological Research on Second Language Processing." TESOL Quarterly 16, 315-322.
Hale, T. and E. Budar. 1970. “Are TESOL Classes the Only Answer?" Modern Language Journal, 5-1, ~81--192.
Hansen, Jacqueiline and Stansfield, Charles. 1981. "The Relationship of Field Dependent-Independent Cognitive Styles to Foreign Language Achievement. ,. Language Learning, 31,349- 367.
Heaton, J. B. 1986. Writing English Language Tests. New York: Longman. Hill, Jane. 1970. "Foreign Accents, Language Acquisition, and Cerebral dominance Revisited." Language Learning, 20,237-241.
Justman, Joseph, and Martin L. Nass. 1956. "The High School Achievement of Pupils who were and were Not Introduced to a Foreign Language in Elementary School." The Hodern Language Journal, 60, 120-123.
Kinsbourne, M. 1975. "The Ontogeny of Cerebral Dominance."
The Structure of Language. In D. Aaronson and R. Rieber,
eds. Developmental Psycholinguistics and Communication
Disorders. New 'York: New York Academy of Sciences,244-250
, cited by Neidi Dulay, Marine Burt, and Stephen
Krashen. Language Two. (New York:Onford,1982 ), 89 -90.
Krashen, Stephen. 1973. "Lateralization. Language Learning,
and the Critical Period: Some New- Evidence. Language
Learning, 63-74.
-------- 1976. "Formal and Informal Linguistic Environments
in Language Acquisition and Language Learning. ,. TESOL
Quarterly , 10, 157-168.
-------- 1979. "Accounting for Child-Adult Differences In
Second Language Rate and Attainment. " TESOL Quarterly,
1979, 43, 573-582.
-------- 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second
Language Learning. Oxford Pergamon.
Krashen, Stephen, Butler, J., Birnbaum, R., and Roberston, J.
1978. "Two Studies in Language Acquisition and Language
Learning. " ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics, 39-4-0: 73-
92, cited by Heidi Dulay, Marina Burt,and Stephen
Krashen. Language Two.New York: Oxford, 1982), 63.
Krashen, S., Michael A. Long, and Robin C.Scarcella. 1979.
"Age, Rate and Eventual Attainment in Second Language
Acquisition." TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573-582.
Krashen, Stephen, and Bon, P. 1975. "An Error Analysis of an
Advanced ESL Learner." Working Papers on Bilingualism,
7, 125-129, cited by Heidi Dulay, ~Marina Burt, and
Stephen Krashen. Language Two. (New York: Oxford:
1982), 65-66.
Krashen, Stephen, and Tracy D. Terrell. 1983. The Natural
Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford:
Pergamon.
Krashen, Stephen D, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H. Long,
eds. 1982. Child-adult Differences in Second Language
Acquisition. Rowley, ~Mass : Newbury House.
Krashen, Stephen, and Seliger ,H. 1975. "The Essential
Characterisitics of Formal Instruction. 'TESOL Quarterly,
9, 173-183.
Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological foundations of Language .
New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Macaulay, R.K. S. 1 9 7 8 . "The myth of Female Superiority in
Language. ,. Journal of Child Language,5, 353-37-4, cited
by Dan Isaac Slobin. Psycholinguistics. 2nd ed.
(Glenview, Ill. Scott, Foresman,1979),74.
Madsen, Harold S. 1983. Techniques in Testing. New York:
Oxford. Mclaughlim, Barry. 1985. Second-Language
Acquisition in childhood: Volume 2. School-Age Children.
2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norris, Beth S. K., and Louis J. Gerstman. 1986. "Age
Contrasts in the Learning of Language-Relevant Materials:
Some Challenges to Critical Period Hypothesis." Language
Learning, 36, 311-352.
Neufeld, Gerald G. 1980. "On the Adult' s Ability to Acquire
Phonology." TESOL Quarterl ,14, 185-198,
Norton, R ,W,1975. "Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance,"
Journal of Personality Assessment, 39,607-618, cited by
Carol Chapeele , and Cheryl Roberts. 1986, "Ambiguity
Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of
Proficiency in English as a Second Language,"Learning, 36, 27-45.
Oller, John W. Jr. and Naoko Nagato. 1974. "The Long-Term
Effect of FLES: An Experiment." The Modern Language
Journal, 58, 15-19.
01 son, L., and ? Samuels, S. J. 1973 . " The Re1ationship between
Age and Accuracy of Fore1gn Language Pronunciation. ,.
Journal of Educational Research I 66, 263-267, Rpt. in
Stephen D. Krashen, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H.
Long, eds. 1982. Child -),Adu1t Differences 1n Second
Language ,Acquisition .Rowley : Newbury House.
Oyama, S. 1976,”A Sensitive Period for the Acquisition of
A Nonnative Phonological System." Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research. 5, 261- 285 . Rpt. In Stephen D.
Krashen, Robin C. Scarcella, Michael H. Long I eds. 1982.
Child-Adult Differences in Second Lang1..1a~e Acquisition.
Rowley: Newbury House.
Patkowski. M,1980, The Sensitive Period for the Acquisition
of Syntax 1n a Second Language. Language Learning, 30,
449-472.
Phillips, John L. Jr. 1981. Piaget's Theor: A primer San
Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Rosansky, Ellen J. 1975), "The Critical Period for the
Acquisition of Language: Some cognitive Developmental
Consideration, " working Papers on Bilingualism 6. 92-
102, cited by H. Douglas Brown, Principles of Language
Learning and Teaching. 2nd Ed.(New Jersey:Prenticehall,1987)47
Scarceiia, R., and Higa, C . 1982. "Input and Age Differences
1n Second Language Acguisition .. , 1n Stephen D. Erashen,
Robin C- . Scarcella, and Michael H. Long ,eds . 1982.
Child-Adult Differences in Second Language Acquisition
Rowley: Newbury House.
Scovel, Thomas. 1969. Foreign Accents, Language Acquisition,
and Cerbra1 Dominance ." Language Learning,19,245-254
---------- 1982.” Questions Concerning the Application of
Neurolinguistic Research to Second Language Language Learning
Teaching," TESOL Quarterly' , 16, 323-331.
Seliger, Herbert W.1977. “Does Practice Made Perfect : Study of Interaction Patterns and 12 Comperence
Language Learning , 27, 263-278.
1982. "On the Possible Role of the Right Hemisphere in Second Language Acguisition." TESOL Quarterly ,16, 307-314.
Seliger, H., S. Krashen, and P. Ladefoged. 1975. "Maturational
Constraints in the –Acquisition of Second Languages.
Language Sciences, 38, 20-22. Rpt. in Stephen.
Krashen, Robin C.Scarcella , and Michael H. Long, eds.
1982. Child-Adult.. difierences in Second Language
Acquisition , Rowley: Newbury House.
Snow, C., and Ferguson, C. A, eds. 1977. Talking to Children:
Language Input and Acquistion. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Snow,C., and Hoefnagel - Hohle, M.1977”Age Differences in the
Pronunciation of Foreign Sound ” Language and Speech , 20,357-65.Rpt, in Stephen D, Krashen, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H. Long, eas,1982. Child
Adult Differences in Second Language Acquisition,
Rowley: Xewbury House.
-------- 1978. "The Critical Period for Language Acquisi tion:
Evidence from Second Language Learning." Child Development.
49, 1114-1128. Rpt. In Stephen D. Krashen, Robin
C. Scarcella , and Michael H. Long, eds,182. Child-
Adult Differences In Second Laneguage . Acquisition,
Rowley: Newbury House.
Sorenson, Arthus, 1967. "Multilingualism in the Northwest
Amazon. "American Anthropologist, 69, 670-684, cited by
Jane H. Hill. 1970. "Foreign Accents, Language Acquisition,
and Cerebral Dominapce Revisi ted ... Language, 20, 237-248.
Taylor, Barry. 1974. "Toward a Theory of Language Acquisition.
LanguaQ'e Learning, 24, 23-25.
Witelson, S, and Pallie,W.1973. “Left Hemisphere Specialization for Language in the Newborn ”Brain, 96, 621-646,
cited by Heidi Dulay, Marina burt, and Stephen Krashen, Language Two.(New York: Oxford, 1982), p. 89.
References in Chinese Language
中國時報(China Times Daily , 1987) 兒童學英語,到底好不好? 」 中國時報一週專題,民國七十六年四月二十二日。
王萬清(Wang , 1987)「兒童為何闖入英語世界? 」 師友月刊,民國七十六年元月,9-10。
周中天( Chou , 1988)「兒童提前學習英語對其日後英語能力影響之研究 」 國科會專題研究報告, (NSC-78-0301-H003-11) 民國七十八年七月。
林振春(Lin ,1987) 「 台北升大學補習班學生生活狀況調查研究」社教雙月刊,民國七十六年16期, 191-232。
柵美報導(Cha-Mei Report , 1989)「兒童英語風吹入柵美」民國七十八年十二月十六日, 792期,第三版。
秦夢群(Ch'in , 1987)「小學生該學ABC 嗎? 」 師友月刊,民國七十六年元月, 16-17。
陳玉婕(Chen, 1987)「先跑的孩子不一定贏一談兒童英語的功效 」, 師友月刊,民國七十六年元月, 6 – 8。
陳英豪&吳裕益(Ch'en and Wu , 1982)「測驗的編製與應用」,台北:信文圖書出版社有限公司,民國七十一年三月一版。
黃自來(Huang , 1989)「年齡、動機與學習第二語言一兼談小學是否應教英語 」 英語文教學論文集,中華民國第六屆英語文教學研討會,台北:文鶴出版公司,民國七十八年五月, 37-52。
教育文摘月刊(Educational Medium Digest , 1989) 「教育部認為不宜提早學英語 」 民國七十八年九月, 38-42。
楊懿麗(Yang , 1988) 「國小兒童學習英語之實驗研究報告 」 國科會專題研究報告, NSC-77-3301-H-004-03,民七十七年九月。
楊國樞等(Yang et al , 1985) 「社會及行為科學研究法 」 ,上下兩冊,台北:台灣東華書局股份有限公司,民國七十四年一版。
劉家寧(Lin, 1989) 「 台北市國小學童參加校外英語學習消費行為之研究 」 ,中原大學企管研究所碩士論文,民國七十八年七月。
謝效昭(Hsieh,1987)「大台北地區兒童才藝班之消費行為研究」政大企管研究所碩士論文,民國七十六年六月。
(限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)