簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
曾文昕 Tseng, Wen-Hsin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
從價補貼與從量補貼之比較—多家國內廠商的情況 Specific versus Ad Valorem Subsidies.The Case of Multiple Domestic Firms |
| 指導教授： | 翁堃嵐 |
| 學位類別： |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱： |
社會科學學院 - 財政學系 Department of Public Finance |
| 論文出版年： | 2007 |
| 畢業學年度： | 96 |
| 語文別： | 中文 |
| 論文頁數： | 21 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 最適出口貿易政策 、成本差異 、廠商家數 |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：133 下載：83 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
從價與從量此二種出口政策之福利比較的文獻，並沒有將本國廠商間成本的差異納入考量。因而本文延伸楊雅博 (2005) 一文之假設，將該模型擴展至本國廠商的家數不只一家的情況。本論文的主要發現是，不管有沒有考慮出口政策造成的社會成本問題，在本國廠商的生產成本存在差異的情況下，若本國的出口政策為對出口品補貼時，則從量補貼政策下的福利水準會較高，反之，若本國的出口政策為對出口品課稅時，則從價補貼政策下的福利水準會較高。值得一提的是，當本國廠商的家數等於1，抑或是本國廠商的成本相同時，本文的結論將退化為楊雅博 (2005)與Hwang et. al (1997) 的結果；因而該二文可視為本論文的一個特例。
第一章緒論..............................1
第二章最適出口貿易政策....................5
第一節基本模型...........................5
第二節最適從量貿易政策....................6
第三節最適從價貿易政策....................9
第三章福利比較..........................13
第一節忽略融通政策之社會成本的情況.........13
第二節存在融通政策之社會成本的情況.........15
第四章總結..............................18
參考文獻..................................20
楊雅博 (2005),“最適策略性出口政策:從量補貼或從價補貼？”, 經濟論文叢刊, 33(3), 287-307。
Anderson, S. P. , Andre de Palma and Brent Kreider (2001),“The efficiency of indirect taxes under imperfect competition,”Journal of Public Economics, 81, 231-251.
Brander, J.A. and B. J. Spencer (1985),“Export subsidies and international market rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.
Delipalla, S., Keen, M. (1992), “The comparison between ad valorem and specific taxation under imperfect competition,” Journal of Public Economics, 49, 351-361.
Dixit,A.(1984),“International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,”Economic Journal, 94, 1-16.
Gaudet, G. and S.W. Salant (1991), “Increasing the profits of a subset of firms in oligopoly models with strategic substitutes,” American Economic Review, 81, 658-665.
Hwang, H., K. Miyagiwa and K. Y. Wong (1997),“Strategic export subsidies under a budget constraint: ad valorem versus specific,” Journal of Economic Integration, 37, 198-218.
Krishna, K. and M. Thursby (1991), “Optimal policies with strategic distortions,” Journal of International Economics, 31, 291-308.
Long, N. V. and Antoine Soubeyran(1997),“Cost heterogeneity, industry concentration and strategic trade polocies,” Journal of International Economics, 43, 207-220.
Myles, G.D. (1996), “Imperfect Competition and the Optimal Combination of ad valorem and Specific Taxation,” International Tax and Public Finance, 3, 29-44.
Neary, J. P. (1994),“Cost asymmetries in international subsidy games; Should government help winners or losers?”Journal of International Economics, 37, 197-218.
Salant,S.(1984),“Export Subsidies as Instruments of Economic and Foreign Policies,”mimeo,Development of Economics, University of Michigan.
Skeath, S.E., and G.A. Trandel (1994), “A Pareto Comparison of Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes in Noncompetitive Environments.” Journal of Public Economics, 53,53-71.
Suits, D.B., Musgrave, R.A.(1953),“Ad valorem and unit taxes compared,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 67, 598-604.
Wicksell, K. (1896), Finanztheoretische Untersuchunfen, nebst Darstellung und Kritik des Steuerwesens Scwedens. Jena: Gustav Fisher. (translated as “Taxation in the monopoly case,” in R.A. Musgrave and C.S. Shoup (eds.)), Readings in the Economics of taxation (London: Allen and Unwin, 1959).