跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許晴雅
Hsu, Ching-Ya
論文名稱: ESG 績效和企業資本結構之關聯性—以台灣半導體上市櫃公司為例
The Relationship between ESG Performance and Corporate Capital Structure: An Example for Taiwan-Listed Semiconductor Firms
指導教授: 蕭明福
口試委員: 江彌修
高一誠
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 71
中文關鍵詞: ESG資本結構半導體公司規模財務穩健度
外文關鍵詞: ESG performance, capital structure, firm size, financial soundness, moderating effect, semiconductor industry
相關次數: 點閱:6下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著全球永續發展的意識興起,ESG績效(環境、社會與公司治理)逐漸成為企業財務決策的重要考量因素。現有研究多以全產業樣本進行分析,然而ESG績效對資本結構的影響可能因產業特性而存在異質性,全產業研究結論未必能直接套用於特定產業情境。半導體產業作為台灣最具代表性的核心產業,不僅資本密集程度高、研發投入龐大,更因其在全球供應鏈中的關鍵地位而受到國際投資人與政府法規的高度關注,使得ESG績效的融資信號效果可能與其他產業有所不同。
    因此,本研究聚焦於台灣半導體上市櫃公司,採用台灣經濟新報資料庫2017-2024年之永續績效指標與財務資料,探討ESG績效與企業資本結構之間的關聯性,並進一步檢驗公司規模與財務穩健度對此關聯性的調節效果。
    研究結果指出,在半導體產業中,ESG績效與負債比率及長期負債比率呈顯著正向關係,與多數全產業研究呈現的負向結果有所不同。此差異可能源於半導體產業資本密集、成長性高且受國際資本市場高度關注的產業特性,使得ESG聲譽的融資信號效果較其他產業更為顯著,因此ESG績效提升能有效擴大企業的舉債空間。此外,ESG績效與長期資金適合率呈顯著負向關係,顯示企業在擴大舉債的同時,亦積極將資金投入廠房與設備的擴張。上述結果也說明ESG與資本結構的關聯性因產業特性而存在異質性,單一產業的實證結果能為全產業研究提供更嚴謹的實證依據。


    As global awareness of sustainable development grows, ESG performance has increasingly become a critical factor in corporate financial decision-making. While most existing studies rely on all-industry samples, the impact of ESG on capital structure may vary across industries. As Taiwan's most representative core industry, the semiconductor sector is highly capital-intensive, R&D-driven, and subject to heightened scrutiny from international investors, suggesting that the financing signaling effect of ESG may differ from other industries.
    This study examines the relationship between ESG performance and capital structure among Taiwan's listed semiconductor companies using TEJ database data from 2017 to 2024, and further investigates the moderating roles of firm size and financial soundness.
    The results show that ESG performance is positively associated with both the debt ratio and long-term debt ratio, contrasting with the negative findings commonly reported in all-industry studies. This divergence likely reflects the industry's capital-intensive and high-growth nature, which amplifies ESG's financing signaling effect and expands firms' debt capacity. Additionally, ESG performance is negatively associated with the fixed assets to long-term capital ratio, indicating that firms actively channel borrowed funds into plant and equipment expansion. These findings highlight the industry-specific heterogeneity of the ESG–capital structure relationship, offering more nuanced insights to complement all-industry research.

    謝辭 I
    摘要 II
    ABSTRACT III
    表次 V
    圖次 VI
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景 1
    第二節 研究目的 2
    第三節 研究方法與發現 4
    第二章 文獻回顧 6
    第一節 資本結構相關理論 6
    第二節 資本結構之影響因素 9
    第三節 企業特性之調節效果 12
    第三章 研究方法 14
    第一節 研究樣本與期間 14
    第二節 變數定義 14
    第三節 研究模型及假說 21
    第四章 實證結果 27
    第一節 敘述統計學 27
    第二節 相關性分析 32
    第三節 內生性檢定 35
    第四節 前置檢定 36
    第五節 迴歸結果分析 41
    第五章 結論 56
    參考文獻 61

    中華中道領導文化總會秘書處、品質專案規劃委員會、ZDALC-CSQ ESG企業永續經營服務團隊(2021)。ESG上市上櫃公司的永續發展藍圖。品質月刊,57(1),10–17。
    吳冠臻(2024)。ESG表現對公司資本結構以及市場價值的影響,國立陽明交通大學。
    林公孚(2021)。認識ESG及其實施之道。品質月刊,57(8),4–7。
    林欣蒂(2025)。ESG 投入對資本結構的影響—以台灣上市櫃公司為例,國立中正大學。
    林純瓊(1994)。股權結構、資本結構與經營績效——Jensen、Meckling與Fama 理論之驗證。中國財務學刊,1(2),1–20。
    梁育慈(2024)。企業信用風險評等與ESG對債務資金成本之影響。中原大學。
    莊永丞(2023)。論我國ESG之揭露法制-從永續報告書揭開ESG面紗。東吳法律學報,35(2),1–65。
    陳俊霖(2025)。企業ESG績效與財務表現之關聯性—以2019~2023年之台灣IC設計業與IC製造業為例。國立政治大學。
    蔡裕明、張璟升、張芷瑜、林承宏、洪婉瑜(2024)。探究高污染行業中企業社會責任實踐之經濟影響:從ESG績效到公司價值。管理資訊計算,13(2),141–155。
    Adeneye, Y. B., Kammoun, I., and Ab Wahab, S. N. A. (2023). Capital structure and speed of adjustment: The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(5), 945–977.
    Al-Shaer, H., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., and Karaman, A. (2023)Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth.International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, Article 102672.
    Archie B. Carroll (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
    Asimakopoulos, P., Asimakopoulos, S., and Li, X. (2023). The role of environmental, social, and governance rating on corporate debt structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 83, 102488.
    Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., and Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 679-694.
    Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay , G., and Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value and Profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, Volume 22(Supplement 2), S119–S127.
    Baier, P., Berninger, M., and Kiesel, F. (2024). The influence of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on capital structure: An investigation of leverage and WACC. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(12), 570.
    Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., and Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.
    Berger, P. G., and Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39–65.
    Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., and Yermack, D. L. (1997). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1411–1438.
    Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R., and Do, H. X. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels. Economic Modelling, 121, 106203.
    Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital structures in developing countries. Journal of Finance, 56(1), 87–130.
    Bouchmel, I., Ftiti, Z., Louhichi, W., and Omri, A. (2024). Financing sources, green investment, and environmental performance: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Environmental Management, 353, 120230.
    Bradley, M., Jarrell, G.A. and Kim, E.H. (1984) On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 857-878.
    Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
    Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
    Chen, H. (2024). ESG and leverage adjustment: Based on stakeholder theory and signaling theory. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 72(1), 82–91.
    Chen, J. J. (2004). Determinants of capital structure of Chinese-listed companies. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 1341–1351.
    Chen, L.-J., Chen, S.-Y., and Lin, Y.-R. (2013). Panel data analyses of the pecking order theory and the market timing theory of capital structure in Taiwan. International Review of Economics and Finance, 27(C), 1–13.
    Chen, S., Song , Y., and Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Financial Outcomes: Analyzing the Impact of ESG on Financial Performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829.
    Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., and Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
    Cheng, Y., He, C., and Tang, C. (2025). The impact of ESG performance on corporate debt costs: A signaling perspective. Finance Research Letters, 76(C).
    Darsono, D., Ratmono, D., Tujori, A., and Clarisa, T. Y. (2025). The relationship between ESG, financial performance, and cost of debt: The role of independent assurance. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1), Article 2437137.
    De Jong, A., Kabir, R., and Nguyen, T. T. (2008). Capital structure around the world: The roles of firm- and country-specific determinants. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1954–1969.
    Deng, J., Zhang, J., and Li, Y. (2025). Exploring the heterogeneous effects of environmental, social, and governance performance on idiosyncratic risk. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–17.
    Duque-Grisales, E., and Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334.
    Durand, D. (1952). Costs of debt and equity funds for business: Trends and problems of measurement. In Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (Ed.), Conference on Research in Business Finance (pp. 215–262). NBER.
    Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., and Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.
    Febriani, C. (2026). The effect of ESG on capital structure and liquidity with company size as a moderating variable in energy companies in Indonesia from 2021 to 2024. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics, 9(1), 1462–1474.
    Flannery, M. J., and Rangan, K. P. (2006). Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(3), 469-506.
    Frank, M. Z., and Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 217–248.
    Frank, M. Z., and Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37.
    Gong, Q., Gu, J., Kong, Z., Shen, S., Dong, X., Li, Y., and Li, C. (2025). The impact of ESG ratings on corporate sustainability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Sustainability, 17(13), 5942.
    Goss, A., and Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
    Hall, B. H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.
    Hamrouni, A., Uyar, A., and Boussaada, R. (2020). Are corporate social responsibility disclosures relevant for lenders? Empirical evidence from France. Management Decision, 58(2), 267–279.
    Hao, Y., and Wu, W. (2024). Environment, social, and governance performance and corporate financing constraints. Finance Research Letters, 62, 105083.
    Huang, J., Guo, J., and Chen, Y. (2025). Environmental, social, and governance performance and leverage manipulation. Finance Research Letters, 74, 106736.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
    Jensen, M. C. (1988). Takeovers: Their causes and consequences. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 21–48.
    Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
    Khan, M. A., Hassan, M. K., Maraghini, M. P., Biancone, P., and Valentinuz, G. (2024). Valuation effect of ESG and its impact on capital structure: Evidence from Europe. International Review of Economics and Finance, 91, 19–35.
    Kotsantonis, S., and Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50–58.
    Kraus, A. and Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911–922.
    Lang, L. H. P., Stulz, R. M., and Walkling, R. A. (1991). A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The case of bidder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(2), 315–335.
    Lavin, J. F., and Montecinos-Pearce, A. A. (2022). Heterogeneous firms and benefits of ESG disclosure: Cost of debt financing in an emerging market. Sustainability, 14(23), Article 15760.
    Lee, H. A., and Lim, S. (2024). Exploring the relationship between environmental, social, and governance dimensions and tax avoidance. SAGE Open, 14(4).
    Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., and Zender, J. F. (2008). Back to the beginning: Persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1575–1608.
    Lev, B., and Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107–138.
    Li, W., Padmanabhan, P., and Huang, C.-H. (2024). ESG and debt structure: Is the nature of this relationship nonlinear? International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 103027.
    Liang, Y., and Wu, R. (2025). Do large companies have better environmental performance? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Sustainability, 6, 1559645.
    Long, M. S., and Malitz, I. B. (1985). The investment-financing nexus: Some empirical evidence. Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 3(3), 53–59.
    Malik, N., and Kashiramka, S. (2025). ESG disclosure and its impact on firm leverage: Moderating role of quality of financial reporting and financial constraints. Global Finance Journal, 65, 101099.
    Malik, N., Kashiramka, S., and Sharma, P. (2026). ESG disclosures and capital structure: An analysis of debt and equity dynamics in India. International Review of Economics and Finance, 105, 104890.
    Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
    Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443.
    Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175.
    Myers, S. C. (1984). Capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575-592.
    Myers, S. C. and Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economic, 13(2), 187-221.
    Oehler, A., and Neuss, C. (2025). ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value? International Review of Financial Analysis, 107, 104623.
    Oliver Sheldon (1924). The philosophy of management. Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons.
    Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.
    Rostamicheri, P., Popescu, V., Birau, R., and Bărbăcioru, I. C. (2026). ESG Score and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Nordic and European Companies, Sustainability 2026, 18(3), 1707
    Sanoran, K. (2026). Differential effects of ESG dimensions on firm leverage and capital structure amid COVID-19: Moderating role of firm size. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1–20.
    Sardo, F., Serrasqueiro, Z., and Armada, M. R. (2024). The effect of environment, social and governance on demand and supply of debt. Applied Economics, 56(35), 4246–4261.
    Scott, J. H. (1976). A theory of optimal capital structure. The Bell Journal of Economics, 7(1), 33–54.
    Sharfman, M. P., and Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental Risk Management and the Cost of Capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.
    Shi, Y., Zheng, S., Xiao, P., Zhen, H., and Wu, T. (2024). ESG performance and cost of debt. China Journal of Accounting Research, 17(4), 100390.
    Shyam-Sunder, L., and Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(2), 219-244.
    Soltanisehat, L., and Sibdari, S. (2026). Exploring the heterogeneous financial value of ESG adoption: A global study across industries and regions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(2), 2654–2674.
    Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. Accounting Review, 69(1), 44–68.
    Stulz, R. M. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1), 3–27.
    Tabur, M., and Bildik, R. (2022). The impact of ESG rating disagreement on the financial performance of environmentally sensitive industry companies worldwide. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), S119–S127.
    Titman, S., and Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19.
    United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. (2005). The principles for responsible investment. United Nations.
    United Nations, The Global Compact (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting the Financial Markets to a Changing World? United Nations.
    Wan, D., and Zhang, L. (2025). Carbon emissions trading and corporate green transformation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 391, 126602.
    Xiao, R., Hou, M., and Kong, D. (2026). When does ESG matter? Industry heterogeneity of the ESG–firm value relationship in Chinese market. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 7, 105–113.
    Yang, S., Zhu, Q., He, F., and Zou, Z. (2016). How does corporate social responsibility change capital structure? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(3–4), 352–387.
    Yu, Z., Farooq, U., Alam, M. M., and Dai, J. (2024). How does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance determine investment mix? New empirical evidence from BRICS. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(3), 520–529.
    Yuliyanti, L., Solikin, I., Disman, D., and Mulyana, D. (2025). The moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between environmental, social, and governance factors and firm value: Evidence from Asia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 12(1), 1–20.
    Zahid, R. M. A., Saleem, A., Maqsood, U. S., and Sági, J. (2023). ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: Empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 29067–29084.
    Zhao, X., and Zhang, L. (2024). How does ESG performance determine the level of specific financing in capital structure? New insights from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103440.
    Zou, M. (2025). Research on the relationship between ESG and corporate financial performance. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 186(1), 61–67.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/06/27
    QR CODE
    :::