簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
張國雄 Dennis Zhang, Guo Xiong |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
闡釋臺灣國會「中斷質詢」的社會政治因素 Sociopolitical Determinants in Interpreting Taiwan's Parliamentary Interruption |
| 指導教授： |
陳振寬
Chen, Zhen Kuan |
| 學位類別： |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱： |
外國語文學院 - 英國語文學系 Department of English |
| 論文出版年： | 1994 |
| 畢業學年度： | 82 |
| 語文別： | 英文 |
| 論文頁數： | 113 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 中斷言談 、質詢 、權力 、黨派 、種族 、官階 |
| 外文關鍵詞： | interruption, question, power, party, ethnicity, ranking |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：110 下載：0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
基於憲法的保障以及選民的負託，立法委員得以在會期內，就政府施政得失要求官員答詢解釋。而立委由於來自不同的社會、政治背景，自然各有其獨特的質詢方式。因此，國會實為「中斷言談」(Interruption)之研究提供一適切領域。
雖然「中斷言談」之分析業已引起廣泛興趣，但甚少有關於政治人物之研究。本論文之目的，即旨在基於社會語言學的架構中，由「中斷言談」的行為，以瞭解權力運作與政黨、種族，官階差異之間的關係。
With a mandate by the Constitution and the electorate, lawmakers can inquire the government officials' explanations for policies within the parliamentary sessions, tt is only natural that lawmakers coming from diverse social and political realms may show distinct styles of questioning. Thus, parliament does offer a fit province for interruption analysis.
Despite the increasing interest in studies of interruption, few have been dovoted to this territory in a political light. It is then the purpose of this thesis to develop an analysis grounded within sociolinguistic framework, seeing how the exercise of power relates to some variables such as party identity, ethnic origin, and official ranking through the interruptive behaviors.
Acknowledgements-----iii
Chinese Abstract-----vii
English Abstract-----viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS-----iv
Chapter
1. Introduction-----1
The Problem and Purpose-----1
Review of Previous Researches-----3
Turn-Taking System-----3
Definition of Interruption-----8
Significance of Interruption-----17
2. Background-----25
Taiwan's Recent History of Political Development-----25
Ethnic Differences-----29
Aborigine-----30
Taiwanese-----30
Hakka-----31
Mainland Chinese-----32
Party Politics-----32
The Nationalist Party (Kuomintang)-----33
Democratic Progressive Party-----34
Chinese New Party-----36
Official Ranking-----37
3. Methodology-----41
The Power Semantics-----42
Legislature: The Legislative Yuan-----43
Organization of the Legislature-----44
The Questioning System-----45
Party Identity-----49
Official Ranking-----51
Ethnic Identity-----52
The Data-----54
The Procedures-----55
The Hypotheses-----57
4. Results and Discussion-----60
General Discussion-----60
The Effects of Party Identity-----62
The Effects of Ethnic Differences-----65
The Effects of Official Ranking-----70
5. Conclusion-----79
The Status of CPI-----80
The Validity of the Data-----81
The Selection of the Variables-----83
Further Directions-----85
Appendixes
A. Transcription Symbols-----86
B. Name List of the Officials-----87
C. Exchanges of Interruptions Between Lawmakers and Officials in Each Dyad-----89
Works Cited----100
(限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)