跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 傅之瀚
Struan Freeborn
論文名稱: 服從與主動之間:臺灣國軍軍事文化與戰鬥意志
Between Obedience and Initiative: Military Culture and the Will to Fight in Taiwan's Armed Forces
指導教授: 袁力強
Li-Chiang Yuan
口試委員: 姚宏旻
Yao, Hong-Min
甯方璽
Ning, Fang-Shii
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
International Master's Program in Asia-Pacific Studies(IMAS)
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 104
中文關鍵詞: 軍事文化戰鬥意志服從與主動任務式指揮臺灣國軍
外文關鍵詞: military culture, will to fight, obedience and initiative, mission command, Taiwan's armed forces
相關次數: 點閱:29下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 臺灣面臨持續的外部壓力、兩岸日益擴大的軍力失衡,以及爆發高強度衝突的風險。關於臺灣防衛的 論多聚焦於有形戰力與嚇阻,然而軍事效能同時取決於人員與組織因素,其中尤以「戰鬥意志」為核心,即人員在極端壓力下行動並持續作戰的意向。本研究探討軍事文化如何形塑臺灣國軍的戰鬥意志,並特別關注服從與主動之間的張力。研究並未將二者視為對立的特質,而是視為組織控制的兩種相互競逐的邏輯,其平衡受到文化的中介,並將此一平衡置於戰鬥力之精神要素中加以理解。本研究採用質性、單一個案、詮釋主義的研究設計,透過對十五位現役與甫退役之臺灣軍事人員的半結構式訪談蒐集資料,受訪者涵蓋四個月役期之義務役士兵至資深退役軍官,並橫跨陸軍、海軍陸戰隊、海軍與空軍;另以一位英國軍官之訪談作為詮釋性的參照點。訪談資料以反身性主題分析法分析,並以 Schein 的組織文化模型為依據。研究發展出四項主題:服從的安全感、主動性僅存於非正式行政事務之中、訓練淪為戰備式的展演,高層改革理想與基層執行實務間的落差。研究發現,軍事文化在個人與單位層次削弱了戰鬥意志,而較為持久的意志來源則在於認同與社會連結;本研究並主張,對於日益仰賴去中心化、不對稱抵抗的防衛而言,此種服從文化構成了一項戰略上的矛盾。本研究為臺灣戰鬥意志之文化基礎提供了具經驗依據的分析,並對軍事文化、任務式指揮與國防改革等議題的討論有所貢獻。


    Taiwan faces sustained external pressure, a widening military imbalance across the Strait, and the risk of high-intensity conflict. Debate on its defence has centred on material capabilities and deterrence. Yet, military effectiveness also rests on human and organisational factors, chief among them the will to fight: the disposition of personnel to act and persevere under extreme stress. This study examined how military culture shapes the will to fight in Taiwan’s armed forces, with particular attention to the tension between obedience and initiative. Rather than treating these as opposing traits, it conceptualised them as competing logics of organisational control, whose balance is culturally mediated, and located that balance within the moral component of fighting power. Adopting a qualitative, single-case, interpretivist design, the study drew on fifteen semi-structured interviews with serving and recently retired Taiwanese personnel, ranging from four-month conscripts to senior retired officers. The interviews spanned the Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force, with one interview with a British officer used as an interpretive reference point. The interviews were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis, informed by Schein's model of organisational culture. Four themes were developed: the safety of obedience, in which compliance becomes the rational, self-protective choice; the confinement of initiative to informal, administrative life; the experience of training as a performance of readiness; and a rank-stratified gap between a senior narrative of reform and a conscript reality of largely unchanged control. The study found that this culture appears to weaken the will to fight at the individual and unit levels. At the same time, the more durable sources of resolve lie in identity and social attachment. The paper argued that the obedience culture amounts to a strategic contradiction for a defence increasingly reliant on decentralised, asymmetric resistance. The findings contribute an empirically grounded account of the cultural foundations of the will to fight in Taiwan and speak to debates on military culture, mission command and defence reform.

    Chapter 1 1.1 Introduction 9
    Chapter 2 2.1 Literature Review 14
    2.2 Evolution of Warfare 20
    2.3 Transformative Domains of Modern Warfare 20
    2.4 Taiwan Military History 23
    2.5 The People's Liberation Army and the Threat to Command 24
    2.6 Command and Control 31
    2.7 Theoretical Framework 36
    2.8 Key Assumptions 43
    Chapter 3 3.1 Research Methodology 45
    Research Design and Epistemological Positioning 45
    3.2 Justification of Semi-structured Interviews 45
    3.3 Case Selection: Taiwan’s Armed Forces 46
    3.4 Sampling Strategy and Participant Recruitment 46
    3.5 Interview Process and Data Collection 47
    3.6 Data Analysis and Thematic Coding 48
    3.7 Researcher Positionality and Reflexivity 49
    3.8 Validity and Trustworthiness 50
    3.9 Ethical Considerations 50
    3.10 Limitations 51
    Chapter 4 4.1 Findings 52
    Overview 52
    4.2 Theme One - Obedience as the Rational Default 55
    4.3 Theme Two - The Confinement of Initiative 58
    4.4 Theme Three - The Ritualisation of Readiness 60
    4.5 Theme Four - Cultural Stratification by Rank 64
    4.6 The Will to Fight 67
    4.7 Chapter Summary 70
    Chapter 5 71
    5.1 Discussion 71
    5.2 A Culture of Control Beneath the Language of Initiative 71
    5.3 A Culture in Transition, Unevenly: Resolving the Two Militaries 73
    5.4 Military Culture and the Will to Fight 75
    5.5 Counter-Evidence: The Artefacts Begin to Change 78
    5.6 An Alternative Reading: Are the Reforms Already Working? 79
    5.7 An Interpretive Reference Point – Western-Trained (British) Perspective 80
    5.8 Trustworthiness and Reflexivity 82
    5.9 Summary 83
    Chapter 6 6.1 Conclusion 84
    6.2 Summary of Findings 84
    6.3 Theoretical Contributions 86
    6.4 Implications and Recommendations 87
    6.5 Limitations 89
    6.6 Directions for Future Research 90
    6.7 Concluding Remarks 90
    Bibliography 91
    Appendix A. Indicative theme prevalence across participants 99
    Appendix B. Interview Guide 100
    Appendix C. Participant Information and Consent 101
    Appendix D. Coding Framework 102
    Appendix E. Sample Coded Transcript Extract 104

    Armed Forces Reserve Command. (2026). Mobilization Management. Retrieved from Armed Forces Reserve Command, All-Out Mobilization Agency, M.N.D.: https://afrc.mnd.gov.tw/afrcweb/index_en.aspx
    Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. (2023). Taiwan Extends Mandatory Conscription, Modernizes Defence as Threats from Beijing Escalate. Vancouver: Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/taiwan-extends-mandatory-conscription-modernizes-defence
    Atran, S., Sheikh, H., & Gomez, A. (2014). For Cause and Comrade: Devoted Actors and Willingness to Fight. Cliodynamics : The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21237/C7CLIO5124900
    Australian Army Research Centre. (2025, August 24). To what extent has the theory and practice of military command changed in the 21st century? 21(2). Retrieved from Australian Army Research Centre: https://researchcentre.army.gov.au/library/australian-army-journal-aaj/what-extent-has-theory-and-practice-military-command-changed-21st-century
    Axe, D. (2025). To take Taiwan, China needs its ports. Mines can protect them. Retrieved May 7, 2026, from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/china-needs-taiwanese-ports-to-take-the-island-mines-are-the-key-to-protecting-them/
    Barker, W. C. (2003). Information Security. NIST Special Publication. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-59.pdf
    Ben-Ari, E. (2021). Taiwan’s Changing Military Covenant and the Armed Forces’ Institutional Autonomy. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 48(2), 174–197. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48683203
    Berrier, S. D. (2022, March 10). Statement for the record: Worldwide threats [Testimony before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee]. Retrieved from U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/2022/03/04/hearings-open-hearing-worldwide-threats-2/
    Biden, J. R. (2021, August 16). Remarks by President Biden on Afghanistan. Retrieved from U.S. Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation: https://nato.usmission.gov/remarks-by-president-biden-on-afghanistan/
    Brezenski, C. (2024, September 11). Pivotal lessons from the war in Ukraine: The value of decentralised command and control. Retrieved from Institute for Future Conflict: https://ifc.usafa.edu/articles/pivotal-lessons-from-the-war-in-ukraine
    Brooks, R. (2007). Creating Military Power: The Source of Military Effectiveness. In E. A. Stanley (Ed.). Stanford University Press.
    Bungay, S. (2011). The Art of Action: How Leaders Close the Gaps between Plans, Actions and Results. London: Nicholas Brealey.
    Burke, E. J., Gunness, K., Cooper III, C. A., & Cozad, M. (2020, September 29). People's Liberation Army operation concepts. Retrieved from RAND: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA394-1.html
    Burns, W. J. (2023, 02 09). Remarks on China and Taiwan, Trainer Award Ceremony, Georgetown University. Washington, D.C. Retrieved June 30, 2026, from https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/transcript-of-trainor-award-ceremony-in-honor-of-william-j-burns/
    Clapper, J. R. (2014). James Clapper: We underestimated the Islamic State’s ‘will to fight’. Retrieved from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/david-ignatius-we-underestimated-the-islamic-state-james-clapper-says/2014/09/18/f0f17072-3f6f-11e4-9587-5dafd96295f0_story.html
    Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
    Clausewitz, C. V. (1976). On War (M. Howard & P. Paret, Eds. & Trans.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press (Original work published 1832).
    Connable, B., McNerney, M. J., Marcellino, W., Frank, A., Hargrove, H., Posard, M. S., . . . Sladden, J. (2018). Will to Fight: Analyzing, Modeling, and Simulating the Will to Fight of Military Units. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
    Czerwinski, T. J. (1996). Command and Control at the Crossroads. The US Army College Quarterly: Parameters, 26(3), 1-10.
    Davidson, P. S. (2021). Statement of Admiral Philip S. Davidson, U.S. Navy, Commander, United States Indo-Pacific Command, before the Senate Armed Service Committee on U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Posture. Washington, D.C.: United States Senate.
    Dorsey, J., Grieco, K. A., & Kavanagh, J. (2024). Delay, Disrupt, Degrade: Mine Warfare in Taiwan's Porcupine Defense. War On The Rocks.
    Dotson, J. (2023, February 8). Taiwan's "Military Force Restructuring Plan" and the Extension of Conscripted Military Service. Global Taiwan Brief.
    Dotson, J. (2024). The 2024 Han Kuang Exercise - a Small Step Towards More Decentralized Operations for Taiwan's Military? Washington, DC: Global Taiwan Brief.
    Dotson, J. (2024a). Taiwan initiates its one-year military conscription program. Global Taiwan Institute.
    Dotson, J. (2025). Taiwan's defense policies in evolution. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 8(1), 1-24. https://media.defense.gov/2025/Apr/24/2003696549/-1/-1/1/FEAT-JIPA-DOTSON.PDF/FEAT-JIPA-DOTSON.PDF
    Editorial Committee, 2025 National Defense Report, Republic of China. (2025). ROC National Defense Report 2025. Taipei City: Ministry of National Defense.
    Finkelstein, D. M. (2021). The PLA's new joint doctrine: The capstone of the new era operations regulations system. Retrieved from Center for Naval Analyses: https://www.cna.org/reports/2021/09/The-PLAs-New-Joint-Doctrine.pdf
    Fowler, E. S. (2016). Culture and military effectiveness: How societal traits influence battle outcomes. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://nccu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/886NCCU_INST/1ps94te/cdi_proquest_journals_1800548425
    Gibbs, N. H. (1975). CLAUSEWITZ ON THE MORAL FORCES IN WAR. Naval War College Review, 27(4), 15-22. https://nccu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/886NCCU_INST/1ps94te/cdi_jstor_primary_44641558
    Global Taiwan Institute. (2023). Porcupine or Honey Badger? The Overall Defense Concept and Asymmetry in Taiwan's Defense Strategy. Washington, DC.
    Gomez, A., Vazquez, A., & Atran, S. (2023). Transcultural pathways to the will to fight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.230361412
    Gray, C. S. (1981). National Style in Strategy: The American Example. International Security, 6(2), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538645
    Gray, A. (2026). Schumacher Center for a New Economics. War Strategy: Decentralization of command to succeed in battle. Retrieved from https://centerforneweconomics.org/publications/war-strategy-decentralization-of-command-to-succeed-in-battle/
    Grieco, K. A., & Slingbaum, H. (2026). Runway Trap: How Chinese Missiles and Rockets Could Neutralise Taiwan's Air Force. Stimson.
    Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & MacQueen, K. M. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
    Harman, J. (2024). Taiwan's Missile Production Program: A Success Two Years Ahead of Schedule. Global Taiwan Institute, 9(20), 1-16.
    Heath, T. R., Lilly, S., & Han, E. (2023). Can Taiwan resist a large-scale military attack by China? Assessing strengths and vulnerabilities in a potential conflict. Retrieved from RAND Corporation: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1658-1.html
    Hunzeker, M. A., Wu, E., & Marom, K. (2024). The boiling moat: Urgent steps to defend Taiwan. In A new military culture for Taiwan (pp. 61-82). Hoover Institution Press.
    Inglehart, R. F., Puranen, B., & Welzel, C. (2015). Declining willingness to fight for one’s country: The individual-level basis of the long peace. Journal of Peace Research, 52(4), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314565756
    Kilmann, R. H., Saxton, M. J., Serpa, R., & University of Pittsburgh. Program in Corporate Culture. (1985). Gaining control of the corporate culture /. https://nccu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/886NCCU_INST/1fo7ms3/alma991002808489705721
    Kirke, C. (2010). Organisational Culture and Defence Acquisition: A Key Internal Factor for MoD. RUSI Defence Systems, 13(1), 97-99.
    Lee, H.-m., & Lee, E. (2020). Taiwan's Overall Defense Concept, Explained. Arlington: Project 2049 Institute. Retrieved June 18, 2026, from https://project2049.net/2020/11/03/taiwans-overall-defense-concept-explained/
    Lin, A. (2024). An Assessment of the PRC Fifth Column Network Within Taiwan. Global Taiwan Institute, 9(10), 1-14. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://globaltaiwan.org/2024/05/an-assessment-of-the-prc-fifth-column-network-within-taiwan/
    Livieratos, C., & Skidmore, T. (2022). Preparing Army Leaders For Future War. Retrieved April 17, 2026, from https://mwi.westpoint.edu/preparing-army-leaders-for-future-war/
    Mandhana, N., Kiss, D., & Churchill, C. (2025, December 6). The Wall Street Journal: See How a Chinese Invasion of Taiwan Could Unfold. Retrieved May 7, 2026, from https://www.wsj.com/world/china/how-china-chinese-invasion-taiwan-ba7e3916
    Mazza, M. (2024). A Threat Made Manifest: Trump, Taiwan, and the Davidson Window. Global Taiwan Institute, 9(22).
    McManus, J. (2003). The deadly brotherhood: The American combat soldier in World War II. New York: Presido Press.
    McNerney, M. J., Connable, B., Zimmerman, R. S., Lander, N., Posard, M. N., Castillo, J. J., . . . Fernandes, B. J. (2019). National Will to Fight: Why Some States Keep Fighting and Others Don't. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
    McPherson, J. M. (1997). For cause and comrades: Why men fought in the Civil War (p. 16). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Milley, M. A. (2021). Testimony before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee on the conclusion of military operations in Afghanistan [Testimony]. Retrieved from U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services: https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/21-73_09-28-2021.pdf
    Mingus, J., Kriegler, S., & Burton, R. J. (2026). Mobility, The Combat Power Multiplier. Modern War Institute. Retrieved May, 2026
    https://mwi.westpoint.edu/mobility-the-combat-power-multiplier/
    Monahan, F. (2023). Military Culture and Fighting Power. Freeman Air & Space Insitute, 1-15. Retrieved May, 11, 2026 from https://www.kcl.ac.uk/warstudies/assets/paper-17-fin-monahan-military-culture-and-fighting-power-v2.pdf
    Murray, W. S. (2008). Revisiting Taiwan's Defense Strategy. Naval War College Review, 61(3), 13-38. Retrieved May, 10, 2025 from https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1814&context=nwc-review
    Office of the President, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2022, December 27). President Tsai announces military force realignment plan. Retrieved from https://english.president.gov.tw/News/6417
    Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The Interpretivist Research Paradigm: A Subjective Notion of a Social Context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428.
    Petraeus, D., & Kaluderovic, C. (2026, July 8). The Ukraine lesson Taiwan keeps missing. Retrieved from Foreign Affairs: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/ukraine-lesson-taiwan-keeps-missing
    Poita, Y. (2023). Some Lessons From Command And Control (C2) In The Russian-Ukrainian War. Institute for National Defense and Security Research(32). Retrieved May, 2026, from https://indsr.org.tw/uploads/indsr/files/202311/7eba0534-512b-4275-a2f5-9d7b3ef20e1d.pdf
    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2017). Organizational Behaviour (17th ed.). Pearson. Retrieved December, 20, 2025 from https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=4008166
    Rosen, S. P. (1995). Military effectiveness: Why society matters. International Security, 19(4), 5-31.
    Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership 4th Edition. San Francisco.
    Schein, E. H. (1968). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Schein, E. H. (1983). Organizational culture: A dynamic model.
    Schein, E. H. (2009). The corporate culture survival guide (Vol. 158). John Wiley & Sons.
    Shamir, E. (2012). Transforming Command: The Pursuit of Mission Command in the U.S., British, and Israeli Armies. Stanford University Press, 39(4). Retrieved May, 2026, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0095327X12464688
    Sigg, M. (2014). Der Unterführer als Feldherr im Taschenformat. Theorie und Praxis der Auftragstaktik im deutschen Heer 1869 bis 1945, 504. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783657780860
    Slusher, M. N. (2025). Lessons from the Ukraine Conflict: Modern Warfare in the Age of Autonomy, Information, and Resilience. CSIS. Retrieved December 15, 2025, from https://www.csis.org/analysis/lessons-ukraine-conflict-modern-warfare-age-autonomy-information-and-resilience
    Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2008). Culturally speaking second edition: Culture, communication and politeness theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    Stewart F. (2002). Root causes of violent conflict in developing countries. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 324(7333), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7333.342
    Symanski, M. (2017). Any Fool Can Obey an Order. West Point, New York: Modern War Institute. Retrieved January 10, 2026, from https://mwi.westpoint.edu/fool-can-obey-order/
    Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology , 2((17-37)), 25.
    US Army. (2019). ADP 6-0: Mission Command - Command and Control of Army Forces. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://www.scribd.com/document/525120793/ADP-6-0-Mission-Command

    Vandergriff, D. E. (2019). Adopting Mission Command: Developing Leaders for a Superior Command Culture. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/MR-Book-Reviews/January-2020/Book-Review-001/
    Wade, N. M. (2020). Plan, Prepare, Execute, & Assess Military Operations, (BSS6) the Battle Staff SMARTbook (6th Edition ed.). The Lightning Press. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://www.scribd.com/document/655355067/BSS6-the-Battle-Staff-SMARTbook-6th-Ed
    Wu, C.-S., & Hwang, J.-J. (2024). Reforming military organisational culture: an empirical study of the Army in Taiwan. Defence Studies, 24(4), 641-665.
    Yauch, C., & Steudal, H. (2003). Complementary Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Cultural Assessment Methods. Organizational Research Methods, 6(4), 465-481.
    Yu, Y., & Hunzeker, M. A. (2025). War on the Rocks; Taiwan's biggest problem in steeling itself for war with China is cultural. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://warontherocks.com/taiwans-biggest-problem-in-steeling-itself-for-war-with-china-is-cultural/

    QR CODE
    :::