| 研究生: |
吳培美 Wu, Pei-Mei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
不完全競爭下的國際貿易理論 無 |
| 指導教授: | 周宜魁 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 國際經營與貿易學系 Department of International Business |
| 論文出版年: | 1977 |
| 畢業學年度: | 66 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 106 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 無 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:107 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文的目的主要是根據Batro的模型,檢討如果放棄了完全競爭的假設後,由Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson模型得來的若干定理是否仍然成立,同時證明自由貿易政策是否為最佳政策。
首先在第二章中,假設生產因素市場為不完全競爭市場時,探討上述三個定理是否仍然成立的問題。Batro的模型就兩產業間發生工資差異的情形予以討論,本文是假設兩產業間資本報酬發生差異時,針對上述三個定理予以探討,並證明在此情況下自由貿易政策不再是最佳政策了。第三章中假設商品市場為獨佔市場時,討論上述三個定理是否然然成立及貿易利益的問題,並更進一步探討貿易政策問題,對Batro所述予以延伸補充。而在第四章裡對於所探討的結果提出結論。
不完全競爭下的國際貿易理論
目錄
第一章 導論1
第二章 生產因素市場不完全競爭下的國際貿易理論8
第一節 前提假設與基本模型5
第二節 探討Stopler-Samuelson定理22
第三節 探討Rybczynski定理27
第四節 探討Heckscher-Ohlin定理32
第五節 生產因素市場不完全競爭下的國際貿易政策39
第三章 商品市場不完全競爭下的國際貿易理論55
第一節 前提假設與基本模型55
第二節 再探討Stopler-Samuelson定理73
第三節 再探討Rybczynski定理79
第四節 再探討Hekscher-Ohlin定理81
第五節 商品市場不完全競爭下的國際貿易理論84
第四章 結論95
主要參考書目99
英文部份;
(1) Batra, Raveendra N., Studies in the Pure Theory of International Trade, Macmillan, 1973.
(2) Batra, R. N., “ Monopoly Theory in General Equilibrium and the Two-Sector Medel of Economic Growth, “ Journal of Economic Theory, 4(June 1972), pp. 355-371.
(3) Batra, R., and Pattanaik, P. K., “ Domestic Distortions and the Gains from Trade,” Economic Journal, CO ( September 1970), pp. 633-649.
(4) Batra, R., and Pattanaik, P. K., “ Factor Market Imperfections and Gains from Trade, “ Oxford economic Papers, ( July 1971), pp. 182-183.
(5) Bhagwati, Jagdish, “ The Generalized Theory of Distortions and welfare, “ in
Trade,Balance of Payment and Growth ( J. Bhagwati et al., eds.), Papers in International Economics in Honor of Charles P. Kindleberger. Amsterdam : North Holland, 1971, pp. 69-90.
(6) Bhagwati, J., and Ramaswami, V. K,, “ Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy, “ Journal of Political Economy, 71 ( February 1963), pp. 45-50.
(7) Bhagwati, J., Ramaswami, V. K., and Srinivasan, T. N., “Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy : Some Further Results, “ Journal of Political Economy, 77(September 1969), pp. 1005-1010.
(8) Bhagwati, J., and Srinivasan, T. N., “ The Theory of Wage Differentials a Production Response and Factor Price Equalization, “ Journal of International Economics, 1 (
February 1971), pp. 19-35.
(9) Bo Södersten, “ Tariffs, Subsidies, and Distortions in Commodity and Factor Markets, “ in International Economics, pp. 375-387.
(10) Haberler, Gottfried, “Some Problems in the Pure Theory of international Trade, “ Economic Journal, 60(June, 1950), pp. 223-240.
(11) Johnson, Harry G., “ Optimal Trade Intervention in the presence of Domestic Distortions, “ in R. Baldwin et al., Prade Growth and the Balance of Payments ( Richard E. Caves, Harry G. Johnson and Peter B. Kenen, eds. ). Amsterdam: North Holland, 1965, pp. 3-34.
(12) Johnson, Parry G., “ Factor Market Distortions and the Shape of Transformation Curve, “Econometrica, 34(July 1966), pp. 686-698.
(13) Kemp, Murray C., arid Negishi, T., “ Domestic Distortions, Tariff and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy, “ Journal of Political Economy, 77(November, 1969), pp. 1011-1013.
(14) Krauss, Melvyn B., and Johnson, Harry G., “The Theory of Distortions,” in General Equilibrium Analysis: A Micro-Economic Text, pp. 251-282.
(15) Magee, Stephen P., “ Factor Market Distortions, Production, Distribution and the Pure Theory of International Trade,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(November, 1971), pp.
623-643.
(16) Stigler, George J., “ Imperfections in the Capital market,” Journal of Political Economy,
75(June 1967), pp. 287-292.
日文部份;
(1)柴田裕着,國際經濟政策の理論,東洋經濟新報社,第一七一頁至第一九三頁。
(2)山本繁綽著,貿易政策の理論,東洋經濟新報社,第五五至第七○頁。
(3)小田正雄着,國際貿易と直接投資,現代經濟學叢書27,第六五至第一一六頁。
此全文未授權公開