2025年臺灣「大罷免」由公民團體發起，後續逐漸發展為牽動政黨競爭、國會權力結構與民主制度論辯的重大政治事件。本研究結合議題設定、新聞框架與議題正當化觀點，探討新聞媒體如何選擇報導主題、配置消息來源、建構框架與集體認同，並透過正當化及去正當化論述，界定罷免方、反罷免方及罷免制度／程序的合理性與可接受性。本研究以《聯合報》、《自由時報》、《NOWnews》及《風傳媒》為分析對象，研究期間為2025年1月1日至9月30日。首先分析四家媒體共4,446則新聞之報導量與時間趨勢，再由每家媒體各抽取300則，共1,200則新聞進行量化內容分析，比較其報導形式、主題、消息來源、立場、新聞框架、集體認同與正當性建構。研究結果顯示，大罷免新聞主要集中於投票前的政治動員階段，報導內容以政黨競爭與政治攻防為主，消息來源多為政黨及政治人物，新聞框架亦以政治鬥爭／競爭框架最為常見，顯示原由公民社會發起的罷免行動，進入新聞場域後逐漸轉化為政黨化、菁英化與中央化的政治敘事。在議題正當性方面，整體報導較常正當化反罷免方，並去正當化罷免方；其論述主要訴諸民主與道德價值，以及國家安全、治理效果與社會後果，制度／程序本身則較常透過法律與程序規範加以評價。媒體不僅報導政治行動，更藉由不同的正當性判準，界定何者代表民主與公共利益、何者應受質疑。比較結果亦發現，媒體類型主要影響新聞形式與報導節奏，各媒體的政治定位、編輯取向與消息來源配置，則更直接影響框架與正當性建構方向。

Taiwan’s 2025 “mass recall movement” was initiated by civic groups and subsequently developed into a major political event involving partisan competition, the distribution of power in the Legislative Yuan, and debates over democratic institutions. Drawing on agenda-setting theory, news framing, and issue legitimation, this study examines how news media selected topics, allocated news sources, constructed frames and collective identities, and employed legitimation and delegitimation discourses to define the reasonableness and acceptability of the pro-recall camp, the anti-recall camp, and the recall institution and procedures.
This study analyzes news coverage from United Daily News, Liberty Times, NOWnews, and The Storm Media between January 1 and September 30, 2025. It first examines the volume and temporal trends of 4,446 news reports published by the four media outlets. A total of 1,200 articles—300 from each outlet—were then selected for quantitative content analysis to compare reporting formats, topics, news sources, positions, news frames, collective identities, and constructions of legitimacy.
The findings show that coverage of the mass recall movement was concentrated in the political mobilization period preceding the votes. Most reports focused on partisan competition and political conflict, relied primarily on political parties and politicians as news sources, and employed the political conflict or competition frame most frequently. These results indicate that a recall movement originally initiated by civil society was gradually transformed in the news arena into a partisan, elite-centered, and nationally oriented political narrative. In terms of issue legitimacy, the overall coverage more frequently legitimized the anti-recall camp and delegitimized the pro-recall camp. These discourses primarily appealed to democratic and moral values, national security, governance effects, and social consequences, whereas evaluations of the recall institution and procedures relied more heavily on legal and procedural criteria. The media therefore did not merely report political actions, but also used different standards of legitimacy to define who represented democracy and the public interest and whose actions should be questioned. The comparison further indicates that media type mainly influenced reporting format and pace, while political orientation, editorial positioning, and the allocation of news sources more directly shaped framing and the direction of legitimacy construction.

王承中（2025年1月21日）。〈總預算刪減2075億創新高 傅崐萁：守護人民荷包〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202501210267.aspx
王揚宇（2024年5月28日）。〈立院職權修正案藍白人數優勢下三讀　場外青鳥行動多次集結抗議〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202405280432.aspx
申佳健（2023）。〈政黨選擇性暴露視角下大眾傳媒對臺灣民眾政治信任的意義探究〉。《行政暨政策學報》，(76)，101–130。https://doi.org/10.29865/PAP.202306_(76).0004
李立峯、蕭蘋、吳浩銘（2023）。〈媒體系統變遷下的中國新聞報導：美國、臺灣和香港的比較研究〉。《新聞學研究》，(156)，1–45。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202307.0012
吳俊緯、張晏榕（2020）。〈臺灣非典型僱傭議題於主流／大眾與非主流／獨立媒體之網路新聞框架比較分析〉。《人文社會科學研究》，14(4)，23–49。https://doi.org/10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.202012_14(4).2
吳哲豪（2025年5月13日）。〈南投議員罷免案二階送複審　陳玉鈴：將正面對決〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aloc/202505130351.aspx
呂佳蓉（2024年4月27日）。〈王滬寧會見傅崐萁　稱兩岸應常來常往〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202404270189.aspx
呂嘉鴻、李澄欣（2025年7月27日）。〈臺灣「大罷免」慘敗的五個啟示〉。《BBC中文》。取自：https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/articles/c9395g2l5yno/trad
林宇玲（2020）。〈使用者自製內容對報紙報導選舉新聞的影響：以2016年台灣總統大選為例〉。《資訊社會研究》，(39)，29–70。https://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.202007_(39).0003
林雨佑（2025年4月1日）。〈從醞釀、低潮到二階連署白熱化——大罷免潮觀察：為何核心志工30世代和女性居多？各方串聯策略有何不同？〉。《報導者》。取自：https://www.twreporter.org/a/recall-movement-analysis
林雨佑（2025年7月20日）。〈藍委「區域聯防」反罷免：組織戰、仇恨值、藍白合成關鍵〉。《報導者》。取自：https://www.twreporter.org/a/kmt-lawmakers-fight-against-recall
林思平（2014）。〈政治新聞與讀者政治立場的建構——以台灣三大本土報紙為例〉。《復興崗學報》，(104)，151–174。
社團法人臺灣匯流研究學會（2025）。《網路原生新聞媒體產業概況調查委託研究案期末報告》。國家通訊傳播委員會。
倪世傑（2025年8月4日）。〈一場罷免，兩種「真相」：臺灣「大罷免」運動中的輿論戰場〉。《端傳媒》。取自：https://theinitium.com/20250804-taiwan-recall-two-truths-media/
高華謙（2025年7月2日）。〈馬文君游顥罷免案8/23投票　連署份數後續時程一篇掌握〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202507020130.aspx
張嘉玲（2026）。〈2025台灣大罷免議題之形成與演變：基於議題發展週期模型分析〉。《科際整合月刊》，11(1)，90–109。
張鐙文、莊文忠（2012）。〈數位時代媒介使用行為與政治知識成因之析探：網路與非網路使用族群之比較分析〉。《競爭力評論》，(15)，65–90。
郭建伸（2025年7月2日）。〈黃國昌致函黨員　全力奧援反罷免籲7/26投不同意〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202507020195.aspx
陳政宇（2025年7月25日）。〈立院外民主守夜暴雨中嗨唱「島嶼天光」　吳思瑤：終結民主噩夢〉。《自由時報》。取自：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/5121084
陳薏云、趙雙傑（2025年7月25日）。〈藍反罷選前之夜破6萬人　管中閔：用不同意作為對賴清德的不信任投票〉。《中時新聞網》。取自：https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20250725004021-260407?chdtv
彭賢恩、張郁敏（2008）。〈政治置入性新聞對新聞可信度之影響〉。《新聞學研究》，(95)，55–110。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.200804_(95).0002
葉霈萱、謝其文、王龍韜（2025年7月13日）。〈南投綠議員陳玉鈴罷免案未通過　藍委游顥：綠營僅獲1成支持〉。《公視新聞網》。取自：https://news.pts.org.tw/article/760608
葉臻（2024年4月26日）。〈傅崐萁率16國民黨立委訪中：盼恢復兩岸交流降低仇恨〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202404260199.aspx
楊竣傑、蔡立勳（2025年7月26日）。〈大罷免失敗解析：藍營動員奏效，民進黨怎麼面對這場「民主測試」？〉。《天下雜誌》。取自：https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5136567
楊意菁（2021）。〈環境議題的媒體關注與框架分析：以臺灣及美國報紙報導空氣污染議題為例〉。《新聞學研究》，(147)，1–52。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202103.0007
溫貴香、葉素萍、賴于榛（2024年1月13日）。〈賴清德：國會未過半努力不夠　充分理解尊重新民意〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202401130317.aspx
溫貴香、葉素萍（2025年6月28日）。〈賴清德宣示與公民同行　民進黨全力投入支援罷團〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202506280150.aspx
溫貴香（2025年7月19日）。〈民進黨724與罷團凱道大會師　營造10萬人團結場景〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202507190203.aspx
臧國仁（1998）。〈新聞報導與真實建構：新聞框架理論的觀點〉。《傳播研究集刊》，(3)，1–102。https://doi.org/10.6334/CRM.1998.3
劉冠廷（2025年6月26日）。〈國民黨搶下7/25凱道路權反罷免　朱立倫：每週都有大活動〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202506260110.aspx
劉建邦（2024年5月21日）。〈國會職權法案續審　抗議人潮擠爆立院周邊〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202405210391.aspx
劉時君、蘇蘅（2017）。〈政治抗議事件中媒體的創新使用與實踐：以太陽花運動為例〉。《資訊社會研究》，(33)，147–188。https://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.201707_(33).0005
潘忠黨（2006）。〈架構分析：一個亟需理論澄清的領域〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，(1)，17–46。https://doi.org/10.30180/CS.200601_(1).0003
鄭安授（2019）。〈福島事件後台灣核能議題的媒體再現〉。《問題與研究》，58(2)，29–89。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201906_58(2).0002
蕭怡靖（2006）。〈臺灣閱報民眾的人口結構及政治態度之變遷——1992至2004年〉。《臺灣民主季刊》，3(4)，37–70。https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200612.0037
蕭怡靖（2026）。〈臺灣民眾在選舉期間與選後對政黨厭惡感的變動：2018年地方選舉及2020年總統選舉的比較〉。《行政暨政策學報》，(82)，63–96。https://doi.org/10.29865/PAP.202606_(82).0001
賴于榛（2025年2月13日）。〈行政院：總預算12項窒礙難行　難用追加減預算解決〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202502130143.aspx
賴于榛（2025年4月19日）。〈凱道拒絕統戰大會　高喊挺罷免、清除中共同路人〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202504190193.aspx
賴于榛（2025年6月20日）。〈24國民黨立委、高虹安罷免案成案7/26投開票〉。《中央通訊社》。取自：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202506200239.aspx
謝君蔚、徐美苓（2010）。〈基因改造食品的新聞框架分析〉。《科學傳播論文集2》，155–190。https://doi.org/10.6930/9789868556010.201005.0006
謝君蔚、徐美苓（2011）。〈媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變：以基因改造食品新聞為例〉。《中華傳播學刊》，(20)，140–176。
鍾智錦、李艶紅、曾繁旭（2014）。〈媒介對公民參與的作用：比較互聯網和傳統媒體〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，(28)，95–119。https://doi.org/10.30180/CS.201404_(28).0005
羅文輝、黃怡嘉（2010）。〈2008年電視總統選舉新聞的政黨偏差〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，(11)，165–189。https://doi.org/10.30180/CS.201001_(11).0008
譚躍、蘇靖雅（2023）。〈臺灣報紙中空污風險的新聞框架：跨時的演變及其內涵〉。《新聞學研究》，(154)，55–112。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202301.0002
譚躍、蕭蘋（2024）。〈臺灣新聞媒體對於第二波新冠肺炎之報導框架研究〉。《新聞學研究》，(160)，67–135。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202407.0014
譚躍（2025）。〈媒體使用對政治誤信、錯誤訊息和分享意願的影響及其調節因素〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，(73)，73–114。https://doi.org/10.30180/CS.202507_(73).0004
嚴文廷、林雨佑（2025年5月14日）。〈大罷免潮後續效應：從罷免立委、倒閣到罷免總統的憲政法治10問〉。《報導者》。取自：https://www.twreporter.org/a/recall-legislators-constitution-motion-of-no-confidence
BBC中文（2025年6月11日）。臺灣「大罷免潮」：朝小野大下的國會爭奪戰，藍綠惡鬥還是民主實現？《BBC中文》。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/articles/c87jvj1j538o/trad
Al Jazeera Staff. (2025, July 25). Why is Taiwan holding a “Great Recall” vote? Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/25/why-is-taiwan-holding-a-great-recall-vote
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press–state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
Berk, N. (2025). The impact of media framing in complex information environments. Political Communication, 42(5), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2025.2456519
Blanchard, B., & Hamacher, F. (2024, May 17). Taiwan lawmakers exchange blows in bitter dispute over parliament reforms. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/taiwan-lawmakers-exchange-blows-bitter-dispute-over-parliament-reforms-2024-05-17/
Breed, W. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces, 33(4), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573002
Brindle, A. (2016). A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of the Sunflower Student Movement in the English-language Taiwanese press. Discourse & Society, 27(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515605957
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
Chebrolu, T., Chowdhary, R., Vardhan, N. H., Kumaraguru, P., & Rajadesingan, A. (2025). Framing the fray: Conflict framing in Indian election news coverage. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Web Science Conference 2025 (pp. 294–305). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3717867.3717900
Cheng, Z., Marcos-Marne, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2024). Birds of a feather get angrier together: Social media news use and social media political homophily as antecedents of political anger. Political Behavior, 46, 1171–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09864-z
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Cornia, A., Sehl, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Comparing legacy media responses to the changing business of news: Cross-national similarities and differences across media types. International Communication Gazette, 81(6–8), 686–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518808641
Davidson, H. (2025, July 26). Attempt to unseat 24 “pro-China” opposition politicians in Taiwan fails. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/26/attempt-to-unseat-24-pro-china-opposition-politicians-in-taiwan-appears-to-fail
Deuze, M. (2008). The professional identity of journalists in the context of convergence culture. Observatorio (OBS), 2(4), 103–117.
Dimitrova, D. V., & Strömbäck, J. (2012). Election news in Sweden and the United States: A comparative study of sources and media frames. Journalism, 13(5), 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431546
Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281065
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Pantheon Books.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. University of California Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Guo L., Tien VuH., & McCombsM. (2019). An Expanded Perspective on Agenda-Setting Effects. Exploring the Third Level of Agenda Setting. Communications. Media. Design, 4(1), 62-83. https://doi.org/10.17323/cmd.2019.9921
Guzman, A. L. (2016). Evolution of news frames during the 2011 Egyptian Revolution: Critical discourse analysis of Fox News’s and CNN’s framing of protesters, Mubarak, and the Muslim Brotherhood. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606677
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state, and law and order. Macmillan.
Ho, M.-s. (2019). Challenging Beijing’s mandate of heaven: Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement and Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement. Temple University Press.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley.
Khawar, S., & Boukes, M. (2025). Analyzing sensationalism in news on Twitter (X): Clickbait journalism by legacy vs. online-native outlets and the consequences for user engagement. Digital Journalism, 13(8), 1482–1502. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2394764
Kim, Y., & Zhou, S. (2020). The effects of political conflict news frame on political polarization: A social identity approach. International Journal of Communication, 14, 937–958.
Krippendorff, K. (2004a). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Krippendorff, K. (2004b). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
Lee, Y., Hamacher, F., & Teo, A. (2024, May 24). Tens of thousands protest against contentious Taiwan parliament reforms. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/tens-of-thousands-protest-against-contentious-taiwan-parliament-reforms-2024-05-24/
Lee, Y., & Wu, S. (2024, January 13). Taiwan voters rebuff China, ruling party gets third presidential term. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/polls-open-taiwans-critical-elections-watched-closely-by-china-2024-01-13/
Lewis, J., Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Inthorn, S. (2004). Images of citizenship on television news: Constructing a passive public. Journalism Studies, 5(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000211140
Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace.
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the internet against democracy. The New Press.
McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
McCombs, M. E., & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–81). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787
Meese, J., & Hurcombe, E. (2021). Facebook, news media and platform dependency: The institutional impacts of news distribution on social platforms. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2367–2384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820926472
Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 41–63). University of Minnesota Press.
Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-p6es-hb13
Newman, N., Ross Arguedas, A., Robertson, C. T., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2025). Digital news report 2025. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-8qqf-jt36
Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2022). Concentration of online news traffic and publishers’ reliance on platform referrals: Evidence from passive tracking data in the UK. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 2. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2022.015
Paatelainen, L., Kannasto, E., & Isotalus, P. (2022). Functions of hybrid media: How parties and their leaders use traditional media in their social media campaign communication. Frontiers in Communication, 6, Article 817285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.817285
Pakvis, M., & Hendrickx, J. (2025). Media consolidation and news content diversity: A deductive framing analysis of Belgian refugee news coverage. Journalism Practice, 19(7), 1602–1618. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2263414
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283
Reuters. (2025, June 20). Taiwan to hold recall election for lawmakers that could reshape parliament. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/taiwan-hold-recall-election-lawmakers-that-could-reshape-parliament-2025-06-20/
Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F., & Watson, B. (2019). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429464287
Rodelo, F. V. (2020). Antecedents of strategic game and issue framing of local electoral campaigns in the Mexican context. Comunicación y Sociedad, 17, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2020.7643
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
Setiawan, D., Ananda, D., & Kartika, T. (2025). Media framing of Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory: A case study on international media. MEDIASI: Jurnal Kajian dan Terapan Media, Bahasa, Komunikasi, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.46961/mediasi.v6i1.1539
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters and officials: The organization and politics of newsmaking. D. C. Heath.
Similarweb. (n.d.). Similarweb. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://www.similarweb.com/
Singer, J. B. (2005). The political j-blogger: “Normalizing” a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism, 6(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905051009
Steffan, D., Grabe, M. E., & Famulari, U. (2026). Multinational and multimodal character framing of political candidates in online news: Do political and media system classifications matter? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 31(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241285665
Stroud, N. J., Peacock, C., & Curry, A. L. (2020). The effects of mobile push notifications on news consumption and learning. Digital Journalism, 8(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1655462
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Sweetser, K. D., Golan, G. J., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia agenda setting in the blogosphere. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500202
Tedards, B. (2025, July 17). “Great Recall”: Taiwan’s democratic experiment. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2025/07/great-recall-taiwans-democratic-experiment/
Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1086/225193
van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
Vandamme, P.-E. (2020). Can the recall improve electoral representation? Frontiers in Political Science, 2, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00006
Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L. (2017). Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda-setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679976
Vujnovic, M., Singer, J. B., Paulussen, S., Heinonen, A., Reich, Z., Quandt, T., & Domingo, D. (2010). Exploring the political-economic factors of participatory journalism: Views of online journalists in 10 countries. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640588
Wang, H. (2024). Linguistic analysis of news title strategies in media frame—A case study of “The Mueller Investigation” in the news titles of The New York Times and Fox News. Journalism and Media, 5(1), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5010023
Wang, S. (2025, July 26). Taiwan move to recall opposition lawmakers fails. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/taiwan-move-to-recall-opposition-lawmakers-fails-2025-07-26/
Wanta, W., & Ghanem, S. (2007). Effects of agenda setting. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 37–51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wu, H. (2025, July 26). Voters in Taiwan reject bid to oust China-friendly lawmakers in closely watched poll. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/e81a7dc977ff5f0d1924c930fce6ac06
Wu, J.-M. (2019). Taiwan’s Sunflower Occupy Movement as a transformative resistance to the “China factor.” In C. K. Lee & M. Sing (Eds.), Take back our future: An eventful sociology of the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement (pp. 215–240). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740930-011