| 研究生: |
蔡依珊 Tsai, Yi-Shan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
資本弱化法規之嚴謹程度對於企業債務偏差改善的差異性分析 The Differential Analysis in the Strictness of Thin Capitalization Rules for Improving Corporate Debt Bias |
| 指導教授: | 陳香梅 |
| 口試委員: |
郭振雄
何怡澄 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 財政學系 Department of Public Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 53 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 資本弱化法規 、債務偏差 、固定比率法 、盈餘減除法 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Thin capitalization rules, Debt Bias, Fixed ratio approach, Earnings stripping rules |
| DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6814/THE.NCCU.PF.010.2018.F07 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:69 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
企業債務偏差的嚴重性,在近幾年被各界認定為財務不穩定的風險,此外增加的利息費用也造成國家稅基的侵蝕。為研究地主國資本弱化法規對於台灣跨國企業海外子公司債務偏差的影響,本文以縱橫資料(Panel Data)模型,研究2006至2015年間台灣上市櫃公司海外關係企業(排除金融保險業、F股及TDR)資料。相對於過去探討對於海外子公司資本弱化的文獻,僅著重於子公司負債的影響及其債務移轉行為,本文則研究海外關係企業的資本弱化,且首度加入衡量債務偏差嚴謹程度的指標變數,分別探討目前使用不同資本弱化法規(固定比率法和盈餘減除法)對於債務偏差的影響程度及企業的舉債行為。
本文建構三個固定效果模型以分析不平衡的追蹤資料,模型一單看是否使用資本弱化法規對海外關係企業債務偏差的影響,模型二檢視低於安全港比率之海外關係企業其債務偏差行為,模型三則將重點聚焦在資本弱化嚴謹程度差異對債務偏差之分析。實證結果顯示,目前大部分地主國資本弱化法規的限制無法有效抑制債務偏差的現象。在不同法規的嚴謹程度中,各別使用固定比率法或盈餘減除法的國家無法有效抑制企業的債務偏差;同時使用固定比率法與盈餘減除法時,嚴謹的資本弱化法規方能有效抑制企業債務偏差的效果。
Tax planning favoring corporate debt financing over equity financing (debt bias) are widely recognized as a risk of financial stability. This paper examines the impact of thin capitalization rules that limit the debt bias of the foreign affiliates of Taiwanese multinationals. This study uses a new data that set on thin capitalization rules in 85 countries from Taiwanese listed companies at stock exchange market and over-the-counter market for the period 2006-2015. Recently, more and more papers focus on debt shifting about internal leverage between parent companies and subsidiaries. However, this research focus on how thin capitalization rules impact debt bias in all affiliates. And designs the strictness index of thin capitalization rules to test the corporate debt ratio and debt behavior.
Three fixed-effect models in this paper are constructed by using unbalanced panel data. Model1 is to examine how thin capitalization rules affect debt bias of multinational affiliates. Model2 is to examine the corporate debt behavior that debt over equity ratio of multinational affiliates under the safe harbor ratio in host countries. And Model3 is to analyze how the strictness index of thin capitalization rules affect corporate debt bias. This paper finds that rules targeted at fixed ratio approach or earnings stripping rules can’t limit corporate debt bias effectively. But if the countries use fixed ratio approach and earnings stripping rules simultaneously, the thin capitalization rules have negative significant impact on corporate debt bias.
壹、前言 1
貳、資本弱化法規針對負債限制介紹 7
一、固定比率法和盈餘減除法比較 8
二、固定比率法和盈餘減除法針對利息限制的方式 11
(一)關係人負債和總負債 11
(二)超額利息費用的遞延(Carry forward)12
三、各國目前扣繳稅率及協定對於利息的限制 14
(一)扣繳稅率對於利息的限制 14
(二)租稅協定對於利息扣繳稅率的減免 15
四、債務偏差的現況 17
參、研究方法 19
一、研究範圍 19
二、實證模型設定 19
三、變數定義與來源 21
(一)被解釋變數-總負債/總權益(DebtBias) 22
(二)和資本弱化條款有關的主要解釋變數 22
(三)和公司特性有關的控制變數 26
(四)和地主國特性有關的控制變數 27
肆、實證結果與分析 34
一、敘述性統計分析 34
二、模型檢定 37
(一)變異數膨脹因子 37
(二)皮爾森相關係數 39
三、實證結果 41
(一)資本弱化法規對於海外關係企業債務偏差的影響 41
(二)安全港比率限制對於海外關係企業債務偏差的影響 44
(三)資本弱化法規嚴謹程度對海外關係企業債務偏差的影響 44
(四)公司特性對於海外關係企業債務偏差的影響 45
(五)地主國特性對於海外關係企業債務偏差的影響 45
伍、結論與建議 47
參考文獻 49
汪瑞芝(2013),「中國反資本弱化條款對台商融資決策之影響」,會計審計論叢,第3 卷第2 期: 81-125。
賴家琪(2014),「反資本弱化條款對台灣跨國公司資本結構的影響」,國立政治大學財政研究所學位論文。
Blouin, J., H. Huizinga, L. Laeven, and G. Nicodème (2014), “Thin Capitalization Rules and Multinational Firm Capital Structure,”IMF Working Paper, NO. 14/12.
Boadway, R. and J. Tremblay (2016), “Modernizing Business Taxation,” C.D. Howe Institute, Commentary 452.
Bokpin, G. A. (2009), “Macroeconomic Development and Capital Structure Decisions of Firms:Evidence from emerging market economies,” Studies in Economics and Finance, 26(2), 129-142.
Büttner, T., M. Overesch, U. Schreiber, and G. Wamser (2006), “The Impact of Thin Capitalization Rules on Multinationals' Financing and Investment Decisions,” CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 1817.
Buettner, T., M. Overesch, S. Ulrich, and G. Wamser (2012), “The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on the Capital Structure of Multinational Firms,” Journal of Public Economics, 96, 930-938.
Buettner, T., M. Overesch, G. Wamser (2017), “Anti profit-shifting rules and foreign direct investment,” International Tax and Public Finance, 25(3), 553-580
Cao, X., H. V. Milner, A. Prakash and H. Ward (2013), “Research frontiers in comparative and international environmental politics: An introduction,” Comparative Political Studies, 47 (3), 291–308.
Clausing K.A. (2016), “The effect of profit shifting on the corporate tax base in the United States and beyond,” National Tax Journal, 69(4), 905–934.
De Mooij, R. A. (2011), “Tax Biases to Debt Finance: Assessing the Problem, Finding Solutions,” International Social Science Journal, 33(4), 489-512.
De Mooij, R. A. and S. Hebous, (2017), “Curbing Corporate Debt Bias: Do Limitations to Interest Deductibility Work?” IMF Working Paper 2017/22, International Monetary Fund 2017.
Delcoure, N. (2006), “The determinants of capital structure in transitional economies,” International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, 16(3), 400-415.
Desai, M., F. Foley and J. Hines (2006), “A multinational perspective on capital struc-ture choice and internal capital markets,” Journal of Finance, 59, 2451-2487.
Egger, P., C. Keuschnigg, V. Merlo, and G. Wamser, (2014), “Corporate Taxes and Internal Borrowing Within Multinational Firms,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 54-93.
European Commission (2016), “The Effects of Tax Reforms to Address the Debt-Equity Bias on the Cost of Capital and on Effective Tax Rates,” Taxation Papers, Working Paper, No. 65.
Faria, A., and P. Mauro (2004), “Institutions and the External Capital Structure of Countries,” Journal of Internation Money and Finance, 28(3), 367-391.
Farrar, J., and A. Mawani (2008). ‘‘Debt-Equity Limitations in Thin Capitalization Rules: Canadian Evidence,’’ CAAA 2008 Annual Conference Paper.
Feld, L. P., J. H. Heckemeyer and M. Overesch (2013), “Capital Structure Choice and Company Taxation: A Meta-Study,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), 2850-2866.
Friend, I., J. Hasbrouck (1988), “Determinants of Capital Structure,” In: Chen, A. (ed.) : Research in Finance, 7, 1–19.
Friend, I., L. Lang (1988), “An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self-interest on Corporate Capital Structure,” Journal of Finance, 43, 271–281.
Gonedes, N. J., L. Lang and M. Chikaonda (1988), “Empirical Results on Managerial Incentives and Capital Structure,” The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Working Paper.
Haufler, A., and M. Runkel (2012), “Firms’ Financial Choices and Thin Capitalization Rules under Corporate Tax Competition,” European Economic Review, 56, 1087–103.
Hemmelgarn, T., and G. Nicodeme (2010), “The 2008 Financial Crisis and Taxation Policy,” Taxation Paper 20.
Hillenius, N. (2014), “Allowance for Corporate Equity A solution to the debt equity bias in Sweden,” LUNDS University Student Papers.
Huizinga, H., L. Laeven, and G. Nicodeme (2008), “Capital Structure and International Debt Shifting,” Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 80–118.
International Monetary Fund, (2009a), “Debt Bias and Other Distortions: Crisis- Related Issues in Tax Policy.”
International Monetary Fund (2016a), “Tax Policy, Leverage and Macroeconomic Stability,” IMF Policy Paper FO/Dis/16/151 (Washington).
—2016b, Fiscal Monitor: Debt: Use it Wisely, October (Washington).
Johansson, Å., Ø. Bieltvedt Skeie and S. Sorbe (2016), “Anti-avoidance rules against
international tax planning: A classification,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1356, OECD Publishing.
Keen, M., A. Klemm and V. Perry (2010), “Tax and the crisis,” Fiscal Studies, No 31, 43–79.
Kesternich, I., M. Schnitzer (2010), “Who is afraid of political risk ? : Multinational firms and their choice of capital structure,” Journal of International Economics,82, 208–218.
Klemm, A. (2006), “Allowances for corporate equity in practice,” CESifo Venice Summer Institute workshop on “The Future of Capital Income Taxation”.
Kumar, A. (2016), “What's BEPS got to do with it? Exploring the effectiveness of thin capitalization rules,” MPRA Paper 75741.
Lloyd, G. (2009), “Moving beyond the crisis: Using tax policy to support financial stability,” Mimeo, OECD.
Merlo, V., N. Riedel, and G. Wamser (2015), “The Impact of Thin Capitalization Rules on the Locationof Multinational Firms' Foreign Affiliates,” CESifo Working Paper Series 5449.
Mirrlees, J. A. (ed.) (2011), “Tax by Design,” The Mirrlees Review, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Myers, S.C. (1984), “The capital structure puzzle,” Journal of Finance, 39, 575-592.
Nicolay, K., H. Nusser, and O. Pfeiffer (2016), “On the interdependency of profit-shifting channels and the effectiveness of anti-avoidance legislation,” ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 17-066.
Nyor, T. and A. Yunusa (2016) , “Capital Structure and Operating Performance of Listed Conglomerate Firms in Nigeria,” International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 126-133.
OECD (2013),“Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting,” OECD publishing, Paris.
OECD (2015),“Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments,” Action 4 -2015 Final Report, OECD publishing, Paris.
OECD (2016), “Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments,” Action 4-2016 Update, OECD publishing, Paris.
Overesch, M. and G. Wamser (2010), “Corporate Tax Planning and Thin-Capitalization Rules: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment,” Applied Economics, 42(5), 563-573.
Reinstein, A. (2002), “Issues in building corporate money and bond markets in developing market economies,” IDB Bond Market Development Workshop, November.
Schindler, D. and G. Schjelderup (2012), “Debt Shifting and Ownership Structure, ” European Economic Review, 56, 635-47.
Serfling, M. (2016), “Firing costs and capital structure decisions,” Journal of Finance 71, 2239–2285.
Serghiescu, L., V.L. Vaidean (2013) ,“Determinant factors of the capital structure of a firm– an empirical analysis,” Working paper EMQFB Tg Mures 2013.
Shieh, W. S., J.N. Ou, and J.C. Wang (2014), “The Impact of Anti-Thin Capitalization Rules on Capital Structure in Taiwan,” International Management Review, 8(2), 51-62
Simintzi, E., V. Vig, and P. Volpin (2009), “Labor and capital: Is debt a bargaining tool?” working paper, London Business School.
Slemrod, J. (2009), “Lessons for tax policy in the Great Recession,” National Tax Journal, 62, 387-97.
Titman, S., and R. Wessels (1988), “The determinants of capital structure choice,” Journal of Finance, 43, 1–19.
Tomschik, D. (2015), “The impact of macroeconomic variables on capital structure: A comparison between companies in E7 and G7 countries,” 5th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference, July 2nd, 2015, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Viviani, J. (2008), “Capital structure determinants: an empirical study of French companies in the wine industry,” International Journal of Wine Business Research, 20(2), 171‐94.
Wamser, G. (2014), “The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on External Debt Usage – A Propensity Score Matching Approach,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(5), 764-78.
Weichenrieder, A., and H. Windischbauer (2008), “Thin-Capitalization Rules and Company Responses—Experience from German Legislation,” CESifo Working Paper, No. 2456.