跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 田易翰
Tien, Yi-Han
論文名稱: 檢定Mallows排序模型下的條件相依性
Testing conditional dependence in Mallows ranking models
指導教授: 翁久幸
Weng, Chiu-Hsing
口試委員: 翁久幸
Weng, Chiu-Hsing
黃子銘
Huang,Tzu-Ming
陳定立
Chen, Ting-Li
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 統計學系
Department of Statistics
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 115
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 33
中文關鍵詞: 條件獨立動態規劃Mallows 模型置換檢定
外文關鍵詞: conditional independence, dynamic programming, Mallows model, permutation test
相關次數: 點閱:10下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Mallows 模型廣泛應用於排名聚合問題。該模型由一個中心排名與一個離散參數組成。模型的參數估計通常仰賴於假設觀察到的排名資料在給定模型參數後彼此獨立。然而關於此條件相依性的檢測仍較少被研究。傳統的相關性衡量方法並不適用於此問題,因為來自同一 Mallows 模型的排名配對會因為共同接近中心排名而呈現相關性,例如 Kendall 相關係數與 Spearman 相關係數。本研究提出一個條件置換檢定,用以檢測兩個排名是否存在條件過度相關。本研究亦透過模擬研究與實際資料分析說明所提出方法的有效性。


    The Mallows model is widely used for rank aggregation. It is characterized by a central ranking and a dispersion parameter. The estimation of the model parameters often relies on the assumption that the observed ranking lists are mutually independent conditional on the model parameters. However, the detection of the conditional dependence is less studied. Traditional correlation measures such as the Kendall and Spearman correlation do not work here as each ranking pair from the Mallows model is correlated due to their similarity with the central ranking. In this paper, we propose a conditional permutation test to detect whether two rankings are conditionally overly correlated. Simulation studies and real data analyses are provided to illustrate the usefulness of the proposed method.

    致謝 i
    Acknowledgements iii
    摘要 v
    Abstract vi
    Contents vii
    List of Figures viii
    List of Tables ix
    1 Introduction 1
    2 Reviews 5
    2.1 Mallows model 5
    2.2 Related work 7
    3 Our method 10
    3.1 The framework 10
    3.2 Efficient sampling of inversion vectors for πq with dk(πq, π0) = d∗ 13
    4 Experiments 19
    4.1 Simulation studies 19
    4.2 Gene data 20
    4.3 Web search engine data 23
    5 Concluding remarks 28
    Reference 29

    Awasthi, P., Blum, A., Sheffet, O., and Vijayaraghavan, A. (2014). Learning mixtures of ranking models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27.

    Cayley, A. (1849). A note on the theory of permutations. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 34(232):527–529.

    Chen, J.-Y., Tien, Y.-H., and Weng, R. C.-H. (2026). Detecting over-correlation of rankings from mallows model. Technical report, Department of Statistics, National Chengchi University.

    Chierichetti, F., Dasgupta, A., Haddadan, S., Kumar, R., and Lattanzi, S. (2018). Mallows models for top-k lists. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31.

    Collas, F. and Irurozki, E. (2021). Concentric mixtures of mallows models for top-k rankings: sampling and identifiability. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2079–2088. PMLR.

    Critchlow, D. and Verducci, J. (1992). Detecting a trend in paired rankings. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 41(1):17–29.

    de Borda, J. C. (1781). M’emoire sur les’ Elections au Scrutin. Histoire de l’Acad’emie Royale des Sciences.

    DeConde, R. P., Hawley, S., Falcon, S., Clegg, N., Knudsen, B., and Etzioni, R. (2006). Combining results of microarray experiments: a rank aggregation approach. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 5(1).

    Désir, A., Goyal, V., Jagabathula, S., and Segev, D. (2016). Assortment optimization under the Mallows model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29.

    Dhanasekaran, S. M., Barrette, T. R., Ghosh, D., Shah, R., Varambally, S., Kurachi, K., Pienta, K. J., Rubin, M. A., and Chinnaiyan, A. M. (2001). Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature, 412(6849):822–826.

    Diaconis, P. (1988). Group representations in probability and statistics. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 11:i–192.

    Diaconis, P. and Graham, R. L. (1977). Spearman’s footrule as a measure of disarray. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 39(2):262–268.

    Doignon, J.-P., Pekeč, A., and Regenwetter, M. (2004). The repeated insertion model for rankings: Missing link between two subset choice models. Psychometrika, 69(1):33–54.

    Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Naor, M., and Sivakumar, D. (2001). Rank aggregation methods for the web. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 613–622.

    Fagin, R., Kumar, R., and Sivakumar, D. (2003). Comparing top k lists. SIAM Journal on discrete mathematics, 17(1):134–160.

    Fisher, R. A. (1935). The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the royal statistical society, 98(1):39–82.

    Fligner, M. A. and Verducci, J. S. (1988). Multistage ranking models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(403):892–901.

    Good, P. (2013). Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Hsu, D. F. and Taksa, I. (2005). Comparing rank and score combination methods for data fusion in information retrieval. Information Retrieval, 8(3):449–480.

    Kendall, M. G. (1970). Rank Correlation Methods. Hafner, New York, 4 edition.

    Li, H., Xu, M., Liu, J. S., and Fan, X. (2020). An extended Mallows model for ranked data aggregation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(530):730–746.

    Lin, S. and Ding, J. (2009). Integration of ranked lists via cross entropy Monte Carlo with applications to mRNA and microRNA studies. Biometrics, 65(1):9–18.

    Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

    Luo, J., Duggan, D. J., Chen, Y., Sauvageot, J., Ewing, C. M., Bittner, M. L., Trent, J. M., and Isaacs, W. B. (2001). Human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: molecular dissection by gene expression profiling. Cancer Research, 61(12):4683–4688.

    Mallows, C. L. (1957). Non-null ranking models. Biometrika, 44(1/2):114–130.

    Meila, M. and Chen, H. (2010). Dirichlet process mixtures of generalized mallows models. 26th Conference on Uncertainty in AI (UAI-10), pages 358–367.

    Meila, M., Phadnis, K., Patterson, A., and Bilmes, J. (2012). Consensus ranking under the exponential model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.5265.

    Mukherjee, S. (2016). Estimation in exponential families on permutations. Annals of Statistics, 44(2):853–875.

    Pitman, E. J. (1937a). Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 4(1):119–130.

    Pitman, E. J. G. (1937b). Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. ii. the correlation coefficient test. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 4(2):225–232.

    Plackett, R. L. (1975). The analysis of permutations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 24(2):193–202.

    Singh, D., Febbo, P. G., Ross, K., Jackson, D. G., Manola, J., Ladd, C., Tamayo, P., Renshaw, A. A., D’Amico, A. V., Richie, J. P., et al. (2002). Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. Cancer Cell, 1(2):203–209.

    Stanley, R. P. (2011). Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 edition.

    Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4):273–286.

    True, L., Coleman, I., Hawley, S., Huang, C.-Y., Gifford, D., Coleman, R., Beer, T. M., Gelmann, E., Datta, M., Mostaghel, E., et al. (2006). A molecular correlate to the gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(29):10991–10996.

    Welsh, J. B., Sapinoso, L. M., Su, A. I., Kern, S. G., Wang-Rodriguez, J., Moskaluk, C. A., Frierson Jr, H. F., and Hampton, G. M. (2001). Analysis of gene expression identifies candidate markers and pharmacological targets in prostate cancer. Cancer Research, 61(16):5974–5978.

    Ziegler, C.-N., McNee, S. M., Konstan, J. A., and Lausen, G. (2005). Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 22–32.

    QR CODE
    :::