| 研究生: |
洪郁雯 Hung, Yu-Wen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
系統性永續發展教育課程規劃模式之研究 — 以學前教育為例 A Systematic Curriculum Framework of Education for Sustainable Development in Early Childhood Education |
| 指導教授: |
顏敏仁
Yan, Min-Ren |
| 口試委員: |
張朝清
Chang, Chao-Ching 林進山 Lin, Chin-Shan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
教育學院 - 幼兒教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Early Childhood Education |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 128 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 永續發展教育(ESD) 、系統思考 、課程設計 、教師專業發展 、學前教育 、幼兒教育 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:62 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
永續發展是全球趨勢,也是全人類共同面臨的挑戰,而教育則是實現永續發展的關鍵途徑。聯合國提出跨領域學科「永續發展教育」(Education for Sustainable Development, ESD),旨在培養年輕世代解決問題的能力與勇氣。本研究旨在探討系統性的永續發展教育課程規劃模式,幫助學前教育現場教學者系統化的設計ESD課程,以提升ESD教案設計的品質,進而增加學生接觸到ESD的機會。本研究以探索性研究的性質設計課程規劃模式,並舉辦工作坊引導教學者實際參與課程開發歷程,以回應研究目的與問題。
本課程規劃模式綜合永續發展教育理念與系統思考方法論,設計出包含課程基本資料、因果環路圖繪製與課程模組展開的課程架構,並搭配五步驟設計流程,引導教學者從場域觀察到課程實踐,循序發展具永續內涵之課程內容。研究資料來源包含教學者工作坊歷程紀錄、課程產出之架構與訪談內容,並採質性資料分析進行歸納與詮釋。
研究結果顯示,本課程規劃模式具備良好的可行性,能促進教學者系統性地建構永續發展課程。系統思考與因果環路圖的運用,能有效提升教學者對議題脈絡的理解與課程整合能力。同時,課程規劃歷程亦促進教學者對ESD核心價值的認同,強化教學實踐的主動性與持續性。本研究建構之系統性課程規劃模式,提供了一條可行路徑,建議未來實務推廣應加強永續發展教育課程發展相關專業知能之培養,促進永續發展教育於學前教育場域的實踐與深化。
This study presents a structured curriculum framework for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) to support early childhood educators in designing high-quality sustainability curricula. By strengthening curriculum design practices, the model aims to increase young learners’ opportunities to meaningfully engage with sustainability education in Taiwan.
Grounded in a curriculum application perspective, the framework integrates key ESD principles with systems thinking tools, especially causal loop diagrams. It outlines essential course elements, curriculum modules, and a five-step design process guiding educators from field observation to classroom implementation. A series of educator workshops were held to support practical application and collect research data.
Drawing on qualitative analysis of workshop records, interviews, and curriculum artifacts, the findings demonstrate the model’s feasibility and usefulness in helping educators systematically construct coherent ESD curricula. The integration of systems thinking deepens educators’ understanding of contextual issues and enhances curriculum coherence. The process also fosters stronger identification with ESD values, promoting proactive and sustained teaching practices.This framework offers a practical and replicable approach for advancing ESD in early childhood education and contributes to ongoing professional development efforts.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 4
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第四節 研究限制 9
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 永續發展教育(ESD)的理論基礎 11
第二節 永續發展課程設計的建構 15
第三節 系統思考在ESD課程中的運用 23
第三章 研究方法 32
第一節 研究設計與流程 32
第二節 研究對象與場域 38
第三節 資料蒐集與研究工具 40
第四節 資料處理與分析 42
第五節 研究倫理 45
第四章 研究結果與討論 46
第一節 系統性永續發展教育課程規劃模式設計歷程 46
第二節 ESD課程規劃模式在教學現場的應用與分析 59
第五章 結論與建議 98
第一節 研究結論 98
第二節 管理意涵 100
第三節 後續研究 104
參考文獻 106
附錄 110
教育部。(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。教育部。
教育部。(2016a)。中華民國教師專業標準指引。教育部。
https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2600/News.aspx?n=E3A9C8CCBC9C5204&page=6&PageSize=20
教育部。(2016b)。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。教育部國民及學前教育署。 https://www.edu.tw/
教育部。(2018)。幼兒園教保活動課程手冊。教育部國民及學前教育署。 https://www.edu.tw/
教育部。(2022)。「新世代環境教育發展」政策中長程計畫(111-114年)。教育部。
國家教育研究院。(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程發展建議書。國家教育研究院。
國家教育研究院。(2016)。十二年國民基本教育普通高中課程規劃及行政準備手冊。教育部。
高廣孚。(1988)。教學原理。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
蔡清田。(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
黄光雄、蔡清田。(1999)。課程設計:理論與實際。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
張素貞。(2023)。幼教師資培育者實踐幼兒園教保活動課程大綱之臨床教學研究:理論與實務連結。臺北市立大學學報(教育類), 54,47-74。
邱品寧、胡鈺宣、孫良誠。(2020)。聯合國永續發展目標於幼教之啟示與建議。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(9),78-82。
簡楚瑛、張淑敏、王儷蓁、王令彥(2022)。幼兒園課程發展:理論與實務(第三版)。心理出版社。
Peter M. Senge(1995)。第五項修練 Ⅱ 實踐篇(齊若蘭譯)。天下文化。(原著出版於1994年)
Ahmad, N., Toro-Troconis, M., Ibahrine, M., Armour, R., Tait, V., Reedy, K., Malevicius, R., Dale, V., Tasler, N., & Inzolia, Y. (2023). Codesigns education for sustainable development: A framework for embedding education for sustainable development in curriculum design. Sustainability, 15(23), 16460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316460
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia computer science, 44, 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. F. (2018). Assessing teachers’ systems thinking skills during a professional development program in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4348–4356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.210
Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development. Sustainability, 11(3), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030719
Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616–622.
Betley, E., Sterling, E., Akabas, S., Paxton, A., & Frost, L. (2021). Introduction to systems and systems thinking. Lessons in Conservation, 11(1), 9–25.
Britto, P. (2015). Why early childhood development is the foundation of sustainable development. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.cn/en/stories/why-early-childhooddevelopment-foundation-sustainable-development
Buckler, C., & Creech, H. (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development; final report. Unesco.
Collins, S., & Garrity, S. (2023). Early childhood educators’ understanding of education for sustainable development. Irish Educational Studies, 1(19). https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2168891
Dyment, J. E., Davis, J. M., Nailon, D., Emery, S., Getenet, S., McCrea, N., & Hill, A. (2014). The impact of professional development on early childhood educators’ confidence, understanding and knowledge of education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833591
Elliott, S., & Davis, J. (2009). Exploring the resistance: An Australian perspective on educating for sustainability in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168880
ENSI. (2008). CSCT Handbook: Curriculum, sustainable development, competences, teacher training (W. E. Sleurs, Ed.). Environment and School Initiatives (ENSI). http://www.csct-project.org
Forrester, J. W. (2016). Learning through system dynamics as preparation for the 21st century. System Dynamics Review, 32(3–4), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1571
Frisk, E., & Larson, K. (2011). Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. Journal of Sustainability Education, 2.
Hedefalk, M., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2015). Education for sustainable development in early childhood education: A review of the research literature. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.971716
Hiller Connell, K. Y., Remington, S. M., & Armstrong, C. M. (2012). Assessing systems thinking skills in two undergraduate sustainability courses: a comparison of teaching strategies. Journal of Sustainability Education, 3.
Keeble, B. R. (1988). The Brundtland report: ‘Our common future’. Medicine and War, 4(1), 17–25.
Maidou, A., Plakitsi, K., & Polatoglou, H. (2019). Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes on education for sustainable development of pre-service early childhood teachers in Greece. World Journal of Education, 9(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n5p1
Martin, S., Brannigan, J., & Hall, A. (2005). Sustainability, systems thinking and professional practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(1), 79–89.
Minarik, M. M., Thornton, B., & Perreault, G. (2003). Systems thinking can improve teacher retention. The Clearing House, 76(5), 230–234.
Noffke, S. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, 6–23.
Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Kaga, Y. (2008). The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society. The Role of Early Childhood Education for a Sustainable Society.
Quinn, F., Castéra, J., & Clément, P. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of the environment: Anthropocentrism, non-anthropocentrism, anthropomorphism and the place of nature. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1076767
Senge, P. M. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. The Spieler Agency.
Shulla, K., Filho, W. L., Lardjane, S., Sommer, J. H., & Borgemeister, C. (2020). Sustainable development education in the context of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(5), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1721378
Ssossé, Q., Wagner, J., & Hopper, C. (2021). Assessing the impact of ESD: Methods, challenges, results. Sustainability, 13(5), 2854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052854
Sterman, J. D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4), 8–25.
UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002325/232555e
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153
UNESCO, L. A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. In: Unesco Paris, France.
UNESCO. (2021). Education for sustainable development for 2030 toolbox.
全文公開日期 2028/07/06