跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃梓晴
Huang, Tzu-Ching
論文名稱: 企業ESG表現與財報重編之關聯性-以台灣上市櫃公司為例
The Relationship Between Corporate ESG Performance and Financial Restatements: Evidence from Taiwanese Listed Firms
指導教授: 徐愛恩
口試委員: 羅光達
張景宏
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accounting
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 59
中文關鍵詞: ESG表現財報重編社會構面財務報導品質
外文關鍵詞: ESG Performance, Financial Restatements, Social Pillar, Financial Reporting Quality
相關次數: 點閱:104下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討台灣上市櫃公司之永續發展(ESG)表現,以及環境(E)、社會(S)與公司治理(G)三大子構面,是否與財務報表重編風險存在顯著關聯,並評估ESG指標作為財報重編預警資訊之可行性。本研究以 2015 年至 2023 年台灣上市櫃公司為研究樣本,採用 Logistic 迴歸模型進行分析,最終取得 11,216 筆公司年(firm-year)有效觀察值。
    實證結果顯示,企業落後一期之 ESG 綜合表現與當期財報重編機率呈顯著負向關聯。進一步將ESG拆解為三大子構面後,發現社會構面(S)在降低財報重編風險上具有顯著且穩健之預警能力,而環境構面(E)與公司治理構面(G)則未達統計顯著水準。本研究推論,此結果可能與台灣資本市場公司治理制度高度法規化有關,使治理揭露較易呈現形式性合規,相較之下,社會責任投入通常伴隨較高之專屬成本與組織文化建構,因此較能反映企業之組織倫理與內部監督環境。
    此外,本研究之主要結果於替換計量模型、產業調整及時間遞延等多項穩健性測試後,仍維持一致。整體而言,本研究補充了 ESG 與財務報導品質相關文獻,並可作為投資人評估企業下行風險、審計人員執行風險導向查核,以及主管機關推動永續揭露政策之實務參考。


    This study examines whether corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance is associated with the risk of financial restatements and evaluates the feasibility of ESG indicators as predictors of financial reporting risk. Using 11,216 firm-year observations of Taiwanese listed companies from 2015 to 2023, this study employs logistic regression models to analyze the relationship between ESG performance and the likelihood of financial restatements.
    The empirical results indicate that lagged overall ESG performance is significantly and negatively associated with the probability of financial restatements. Further analyses reveal that the Social (S) pillar exhibits the strongest and most robust predictive power, whereas the Environmental (E) and Governance (G) pillars do not reach conventional levels of statistical significance. These findings suggest that, under Taiwan’s highly regulated corporate governance environment, governance-related disclosures may partially reflect symbolic compliance. In contrast, investments in the Social pillar often involve higher proprietary costs and are more difficult to imitate or manipulate, thereby serving as a more credible proxy for corporate integrity and internal monitoring culture.
    The results remain consistent across multiple robustness tests, including alternative model specifications, industry-adjusted ESG measures, and extended lag structures. Overall, this study contributes to the literature on ESG and financial reporting quality by providing evidence that ESG performance contains incremental information about financial reporting risk. The findings also offer practical implications for investors assessing downside risks, auditors conducting risk-based audits, and regulators refining sustainability disclosure policies.

    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 1
    壹、 研究背景 1
    貳、 研究動機 1
    第二節 研究目的與問題 3
    壹、 研究目的 3
    貳、 研究問題 3
    第三節 研究貢獻 4
    第四節 研究架構 5
    第二章 文獻探討與假說推演 7
    第一節 財報重編之意涵與經濟後果 7
    壹、 IAS 8 國際會計準則之規範核心 7
    貳、 TEJ 重編定義之認定標準 8
    第二節 理論基礎 10
    壹、 代理理論(Agency Theory) 10
    貳、 訊號理論(Signaling Theory) 10
    參、 專屬成本(Proprietary Costs) 11
    第三節 研究假說推演 13
    壹、 整體 ESG 表現與財報重編之關聯 13
    貳、 ESG 各構面與財報重編之相對影響 14
    第三章 研究方法 16
    第一節 樣本選取與資料來源 16
    第二節 實證模型 18
    第三節 變數定義與衡量 21
    壹、 因變數 21
    貳、 自變數 21
    參、 控制變數 22
    肆、 極端值處理 25
    第四章 實證結果分析 27
    第一節 樣本篩選 27
    第二節 敘述性統計分析 28
    第三節 相關係數與共線性檢定 31
    壹、 Pearson 相關係數分析 31
    貳、 多重共線性(Multicollinearity)檢測 31
    第四節 迴歸結果分析 35
    壹、 ESG 綜合表現與財報重編之關聯性 35
    貳、 ESG 各構面與財報重編之關聯性 35
    參、 為何在台灣市場中 S 構面較 G 構面更能預測財報重編? 36
    第五節 穩健性測試與內生性處理 43
    壹、 替換計量迴歸模型(Probit Model) 43
    貳、 產業調整後分數(Industry-Adjusted Scores) 43
    參、 遞延效應與反向因果防範(Two-Period Lag) 44
    肆、 穩健性測試小結 45
    第五章 結論與建議 48
    第一節 研究結論 48
    壹、 整體 ESG 表現與財報重編風險呈顯著負向關聯 48
    貳、 社會構面(S)相較 E 與 G 更具財報重編預警能力 48
    第二節 管理意涵與實務貢獻 50
    壹、 投資人可將 S 構面納入下行風險評估指標 50
    貳、 非財務資訊之風險導向審計之補充判斷依據 50
    參、 企業應重視永續投入之實質效果,避免流於形式合規 50
    肆、 主管機關可深化社會構面揭露並推動永續資訊鑑證制度 51
    第三節 研究限制與未來建議 52
    壹、 樣本範圍與資料可得性限制 52
    貳、 財報重編事件嚴重性之異質性未能區分 52
    參、 社會構面(S)之細項指標仍待進一步解構 52
    參考文獻 54

    一、 中文文獻
    王元章、張椿柏(2012)。核心代理問題對盈餘管理之影響。會計與審計論叢,2(2),69-113。
    吳鍵智(2014)。會計師公費、公司治理與財務報表重編關係之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺中科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6826/NUTC.2014.00127
    李建然、林秀鳳(2013)。大型會計師事務所之審計品質真的比非大型會計師事務所好嗎?從抑制盈餘管理的角度探討—控制自我選擇偏誤的重要性。中華會計學刊,9(1),77-110。
    官月緞、張玲玲(2018)。女性董事與財務報表重編。會計與公司治理,13(2),1-29。
    林嬋娟、張哲嘉(2009)。董監事異常異動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性。會計評論,48,1-33。
    金融監督管理委員會(2014)。強制上市(櫃)特定公司編製企業社會責任報告書。取自:https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=201409180005&toolsflag=Y&dtable=News
    金融監督管理委員會(2023)。金管會發布「上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案(2023年)」。取自:https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202303280001&dtable=News
    姜家訓、楊雅雯(2005)。會計師事務所之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係。當代會計,6(1),23-60。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會(2025)。國際會計準則第八號:會計政策、會計估計變動及錯誤。台北:財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。
    陳宜伶、陳文英(2019)。企業社會責任與公司治理對財務報表重編之影響。商略學報,11(4),271-292。
    陳香蘭、楊盈芊(2008)。股權結構與負債之關聯性。臺灣企業績效學刊,2(1),55-71。
    彭晟瑞(2025)。ESG績效與財報可比性之關聯性分析。﹝碩士論文。中原大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s99nuw。
    曾祺伶(2014)。審計委員會與財務報表重編之關聯性〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400245
    曾筱雯(2024)。ESG、盈餘管理及公司價值之相關性。﹝碩士論文。國立暨南國際大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5z6h3r。
    楊于諠(2026)。ETF 持股與實質盈餘管理:來自 ESG 與公司特徵之分析〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立陽明交通大學。
    駱秉寬(2022)。公司治理-獨立董事對財報不實與ESG揭露不實責任的評析。經濟前瞻,(203),34-39。
    薛敏正、林嬋娟、林秀鳳(2008)。董事會特性與財務報告重編。交大管理學報,28(2),73-103。

    二、 英文文獻
    Abbott, L., Parker, S., & Peters, G. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69-87.
    Ahn, S., & Choi, W. (2009). The role of bank monitoring in corporate governance: Evidence from borrowers' earnings management behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 425-434.
    Assadi, O., Chouaibi, J., & Marzouki, A. (2025). The effect of ESG reporting on the likelihood of accounting restatements: the moderating role of national culture. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
    Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465.
    Becker, C., DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24.
    Chen, X., Yuan, C., & Chen, J. (2023). Study on the effect of ESG ratings of companies on financial restatement. Journal of Innovation and Development, 2(1), 77-81.
    Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability  reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26, 1176-1248.
    Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.
    Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm SIZE in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159-176.
    DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor SIZE and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
    Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, 17-82.
    Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36.
    Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 344-401.
    Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007). Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 193-223.
    Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud?. The Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2213-2253.
    Gormley, T. A., & Matsa, D. A. (2014). Common errors: How to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(2), 617-661.
    Hennes, K., Leone, A., & Miller, B. (2008). The Importance of Distinguishing Errors from Irregularities in Restatement Research: The Case of Restatements and CEO/CFO Turnover. The Accounting Review, 83, 1487-1519.
    Hill, T. D., Davis, A. P., Roos, J. M., & French, M. T. (2020). Limitations of fixed-effects models for panel data. Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 357-369.
    Hribar, P., & Jenkins, N. (2003). The Effect of Accounting Restatements on Earnings Revisions and the Estimated Cost of Capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 337-356.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
    Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796.
    Lindenberg. E. & S. Ross (1981). Tobin’s q Ratio and Industrial Organization, Journal of Business, 1-32.
    Palmrose, Z., Richardson, V., & Scholz, S. (2004). Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 59-89.
    Pan, Q., & Jia, H. (2026). Does ESG Rating Divergence Undermine the Insurance-like Effect of ESG? Evidence from Financial Restatements in China. Sustainability.
    Peterson, K. (2012). Accounting complexity, misreporting, and the consequences of misreporting. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(1), 72-95.
    Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 160-177.
    Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
    Sweeney, A. P. (1994). Debt-covenant violations and managers' accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(3), 281-308.
    Teoh, S. H., & Wong, T. J. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 346–366.
    Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.
    Verrecchia, R. E. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179-194.
    Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2(1-2), 21-48.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/06/08
    QR CODE
    :::