跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 范尉哲
Fan, Wei-Che
論文名稱: 產品過時恐懼與象徵意義對電動車採用意願之研究
The Impact of Fear of Product Obsolescence and Symbolic Meaning on Consumers’ Intention to Adopt Electric Vehicles
指導教授: 陳建維
Chen, Chien-Wei
口試委員: 江明憲
Chiang, Min-Hsien
練乃華
Lien, Nai-Hwa
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 國際經營與貿易學系
Department of International Business
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 77
中文關鍵詞: 產品過時恐懼象徵意義採用意願
相關次數: 點閱:13下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著電動車技術日新月異,產品更新速度加快亦帶來「過時恐懼」,進而影響消費者的信心與品牌忠誠度。現代消費者除追求產品性能外,更將電動車視為展現個人品味與社會地位的象徵;當產品能傳遞個人價值與社會意義時,將有效提升其購買動機。

    本研究旨在探討產品過時恐懼及象徵意義如何影響消費者對電動車採用意願之影響,並進一步分析象徵意義、智能功能與充電基礎設施等因素對電動車採用意願的影響。在技術快速進步與市場持續成長的背景下,消費者行為受到兩股心理動力交織影響:一為對產品迅速被淘汰的焦慮感,二為對電動車所承載象徵意義的期待與認同。當電動車被賦予展現個人形象與社會地位的功能時,其象徵意義可能在過時風險中發揮不同的作用。

    本研究透過文獻探討與問卷調查進行,並透過迴歸分析驗證各構面變數之間的關聯性,進一步釐清產品過時恐懼對消費者採用意願的影響機制。研究結果顯示,產品過時恐懼對地位象徵、環保象徵、創新象徵及貨幣價值皆具有顯著正向影響;其中地位象徵與貨幣價值在產品過時恐懼與採用意願之間具完全中介效果。此外,地位象徵、貨幣價值、智能功能與充電基礎設施皆對電動車採用意願產生顯著正向影響。


    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 1
    第二節 研究目的 2
    第三節 研究流程 3

    第二章 文獻探討 4
    第一節 電動車採用行為 4
    第二節 產品過時恐懼 6
    第三節 象徵意義 8
    第四節 貨幣價值 12
    第五節 智能功能 13
    第六節 充電基礎設施 15

    第三章 研究方法 18
    第一節 研究架構 18
    第二節 研究假說 19
    第三節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 23
    第四節 研究設計 27
    第五節 資料分析方法 28

    第四章 研究結果 30
    第一節 填答者背景及資料 30
    第二節 研究變數因素之萃取 33
    第三節 問卷之信度與效度 45
    第四節 迴歸分析 47

    第五章 研究結論及建議 56
    第一節 研究結論與發現 56
    第二節 管理意涵 59
    第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 61

    參考文獻 62

    研究問卷 70

    一、中文文獻
    鄭綦成 (2015)。產品過時恐懼與購買間隔對智慧型手機置換決策之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學國際經營與貿易研究所。

    二、英文文獻
    Acikgoz, F., Borulu, B., & Bölen, M. C. (2024). How does obsolescence risk influence consumer resistance to smartwatches?. Information Technology & People.
    Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Rahman, I., Vasant, P. M., & Noor, A. (2017). A comprehensive review on theoretical framework‐based electric vehicle consumer adoption research. International Journal of Energy Research, 41(3), 317-335.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
    Ashmore, D. P., Pojani, D., Thoreau, R., Christie, N., & Tyler, N. A. (2018). The symbolism of ‘eco cars’ across national cultures: Potential implications for policy formulation and transfer. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 560-575.
    Bachtiar, A. G., Rabbani, M. A., Putra, R. S., & Syahchari, D. H. (2024, July). Market adoption of electric vehicles in Indonesia: The role of government incentives and charging infrastructure. In 2024 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
    Barbarossa, C., De Pelsmacker, P., & Moons, I. (2017). Personal values, green self-identity and electric car adoption. Ecological Economics, 140, 190-200.
    Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, 39-45.
    Chen, C. W., & Lien, N. H. (2020). Fear of Product Obsolescence and Intention to Upgrade. 中山管理評論, 28(2), 217-249.
    Chen, T., Zhang, X. P., Wang, J., Li, J., Wu, C., Hu, M., & Bian, H. (2020). A review on electric vehicle charging infrastructure development in the UK. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 8(2), 193-205.
    Cherchi, E. (2017). A stated choice experiment to measure the effect of informational and normative conformity in the preference for electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 88-104.
    Cooper, T. (2004). Inadequate life? Evidence of consumer attitudes to product obsolescence. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(4), 421-449.
    Cripps, J. D., & Meyer, R. J. (1994). Heuristics and biases in timing the replacement of durable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 304-318.
    De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of environmental psychology, 42, 128-138.
    Echegaray, F. (2016). Consumers' reactions to product obsolescence in emerging markets: the case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 191-203.
    Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy policy, 48, 717-729.
    Emanović, M., Jakara, M., & Barić, D. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for future BEVs adoption in Croatia. Sustainability, 14(13), 8080.
    Funke, S. Á., Sprei, F., Gnann, T., & Plötz, P. (2019). How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 77, 224-242.
    Giansoldati, M., Monte, A., & Scorrano, M. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of electric cars: Evidence from an Italian survey. Energy Policy, 146, 111812.
    Graham-Rowe, E., Skippon, S., Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2011). Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(5), 401-418.
    Gravier, M. J., & Swartz, S. M. (2009). The dark side of innovation: Exploring obsolescence and supply chain evolution for sustainment-dominated systems. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20(2), 87-102.
    Hahnel, U. J., Ortmann, C., Korcaj, L., & Spada, H. (2014). What is green worth to you? Activating environmental values lowers price sensitivity towards electric vehicles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 306-319.
    Han, L., Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Li, J. (2017). The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 185-197.
    Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., Axsen, J., Beard, G., Daina, N., ... & Witkamp, B. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 508-523.
    Heffner, R. R., Kurani, K. S., & Turrentine, T. S. (2007). Symbolism in California’s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12(6), 396-413.
    Holm-Nielsen, N. P. A. K., & Bo, B. S. P. J. (2021). Electric Vehicles: Modern Technologies and Trends (Green Energy and Technology).
    Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2011). Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco‐innovation using value‐belief‐norm theory. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(1), 51-60.
    Javadnejad, F., Jahanbakh, M., Pinto, C. A., & Saeidi, A. (2024). Analyzing incentives and barriers to electric vehicle adoption in the United States. Environment Systems and Decisions, 44(3), 575-606.
    Joshi, N., Malhotra, M., & Singh, J. (2022). Assessing adoption intention of electric vehicles in India: The mediating role of government policies. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 22(1), 1-16.
    Kim, M. K., Oh, J., Park, J. H., & Joo, C. (2018). Perceived value and adoption intention for electric vehicles in Korea: Moderating effects of environmental traits and government supports. Energy, 159, 799-809.
    Krupa, J. S., Rizzo, D. M., Eppstein, M. J., Lanute, D. B., Gaalema, D. E., Lakkaraju, K., & Warrender, C. E. (2014). Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 64, 14-31.
    Kuppelwieser, V. G., Klaus, P., Manthiou, A., & Boujena, O. (2019). Consumer responses to planned obsolescence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 157-165.
    Lane, B., & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude–action gap. Journal of cleaner production, 15(11-12), 1085-1092.
    Langbroek, J. H., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2016). The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 94, 94-103.
    Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.
    Liu, R., Ding, Z., Wang, Y., Jiang, X., Jiang, X., Sun, W., ... & Liu, M. (2021). The relationship between symbolic meanings and adoption intention of electric vehicles in China: The moderating effects of consumer self-identity and face consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125116.
    Mellal, M. A. (2020). Obsolescence–A review of the literature. Technology in Society, 63, 101347.
    Morrissey, P., Weldon, P., & O’Mahony, M. (2016). Future standard and fast charging infrastructure planning: An analysis of electric vehicle charging behaviour. Energy policy, 89, 257-270.
    Morton, C., Anable, J., & Nelson, J. D. (2016). Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in transportation business & management, 18, 18-28.
    Noel, L., De Rubens, G. Z., Sovacool, B. K., & Kester, J. (2019). Fear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety. Energy research & social science, 48, 96-107.
    Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25, 52-62.
    Noppers, E., Keizer, K., Milovanovic, M., & Steg, L. (2019). The role of adoption norms and perceived product attributes in the adoption of Dutch electric vehicles and smart energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, 101237.
    Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy policy, 39(5), 2217-2227.
    Rahman, M. M., & Thill, J. C. (2024). A Comprehensive Survey of the Key Determinants of Electric Vehicle Adoption: Challenges and Opportunities in the Smart City Context. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(12), 588.
    Rai, R., & Terpenny, J. (2008). Principles for managing technological product obsolescence. IEEE Transactions on components and packaging technologies, 31(4), 880-889.
    Rauh, N., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2017). First-time experience of critical range situations in BEV use and the positive effect of coping information. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 44, 30-41.
    Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 34, 122-136.
    Rietmann, N., & Lieven, T. (2019). How policy measures succeeded to promote electric mobility–Worldwide review and outlook. Journal of cleaner production, 206, 66-75.
    Robert, C. B., Byung, D. K., & Scott, A. N. (2008). Database Marketing: Analyzing and Managing Customers.
    Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.
    Salah, K., & Kama, N. (2017). Inter-service provider charging protocol: a solution to address range anxiety of electric vehicle owners. Energy Procedia, 136, 157-162.
    Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute.
    Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39-49.
    Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22(2), 159-170.
    Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & Van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy policy, 68, 183-194.
    Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of consumer research, 9(3), 287-300.
    Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer research, 10(3), 319-329.
    Spinney, J., Burningham, K., Cooper, G., Green, N., & Uzzell, D. (2012). ‘What I’ve found is that your related experiences tend to make you dissatisfied’: psychological obsolescence, consumer demand and the dynamics and environmental implications of de-stabilization in the laptop sector. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(3), 347-370.
    Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2-3), 147-162.
    Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.
    Tsouros, I., & Polydoropoulou, A. (2020). Who will buy alternative fueled or automated vehicles: A modular, behavioral modeling approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 214-225.
    Wang, J., Huang, C., He, D., & Tu, R. (2023, September). Range anxiety among battery electric vehicle users: Both distance and waiting time matter. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 1309-1315). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
    Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43, 123-143.
    White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of marketing, 83(3), 22-49.
    White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94-113.
    Wolf, I., Schroeder, T., Neumann, J., & de Haan, G. (2015). Changing minds about electric cars: An empirically grounded agent-based modeling approach. Technological forecasting and social change, 94, 269-285.
    Wu, J., Liao, H., & Wang, J. W. (2020). Analysis of consumer attitudes towards autonomous, connected, and electric vehicles: A survey in China. Research in transportation economics, 80, 100828.
    Xia, Z., Wu, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Economic, functional, and social factors influencing electric vehicles’ adoption: An empirical study based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Sustainability, 14(10), 6283.
    Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256-269.
    Yong, T., & Park, C. (2017). A qualitative comparative analysis on factors affecting the deployment of electric vehicles. Energy Procedia, 128, 497-503.
    Zhao, H., Furuoka, F., Rasiah, R. A. L., & Shen, E. (2024). Consumers’ purchase intention toward electric vehicles from the perspective of perceived green value: An empirical survey from china. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(6), 267.

    三、其他資料
    莊文嘉(2025年1月20日)。2024年國內車市穩定發展,電動車市占創新高。財團法人車輛研究測試中心。https://www.artc.org.tw/tw/knowledge/articles/13789
    邱冠慈(2025年2月13日)。臺灣2024年電動車市場現況及發展趨勢。財團法人車輛研究測試中心。https://www.artc.org.tw/tw/knowledge/articles/13790
    莊文嘉(2025年4月17日)。2024年全球車市概況。財團法人車輛研究測試中心。https://www.artc.org.tw/tw/knowledge/articles/13798

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/02/08
    QR CODE
    :::