| 研究生: |
劉子玄 Liu, Tzu-Hsuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
IPO 完成對企業經營績效之影響:來自台灣成功掛牌與撤回申請企業之證據 The Effect of IPO Completion on Firm Operating Performance: Evidence from Successful Listings and Withdrawn Applications in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
盧敬植
Lu, Ching-Chih |
| 口試委員: |
邱建嘉
Chiu,Chien-Chia 盧建霖 Lu,Chien-Lin |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 財務管理學系 Department of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 51 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 初次公開發行 、IPO 、經營績效 、工具變數 、兩階段最小平方法 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | IPO, operating performance, instrumental variables, two-stage least squares |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:23 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討台灣企業完成初次公開發行(Initial Public Offering, IPO)後,是否影響其經營績效與營運規模。由於企業是否成功掛牌並非隨機事件,若僅比較上市企業前後績效,可能無法區分 IPO 本身效果與企業原有體質、上市意圖及市場時機因素。因此,本文以 2005 年至 2022 年間曾實際提出 IPO 申請之企業為樣本,並依最終結果區分為成功掛牌企業與撤件企業,以提高處理組與對照組在上市意圖上的可比性。
本文以營業資產報酬率(OROA)衡量企業經營績效,並以營收規模(Log Sales)衡量企業營運規模。實證方法上,本文參考 Larrain et al. (2025) 之研究設計,以企業上市或撤件前之市場累積報酬率與事件後期間虛擬變數之交互項作為工具變數,透過兩階段最小平方法(2SLS)處理 IPO 完成決策之內生性問題。本文並比較不同固定效果設定,且以同產業同年度研發費用率中位數重新定義高研發企業,以檢視模型設定與企業研發特徵對估計結果之影響。
實證結果顯示,成功掛牌企業與撤件企業在 IPO 申請前即存在事前差異,表示 IPO 完成決策具有選擇性。不同固定效果規格下,2SLS 估計方向大致為正,但係數大小與統計顯著性對模型設定具有一定敏感性;在完整固定效果設定下,IPO 對 OROA 與 Log Sales 之估計均未達統計顯著水準。改以產業年度中位數定義高研發企業後,高研發企業與事件後期間之交互項亦未達顯著。整體而言,本文結果提供 IPO 完成可能影響企業後續發展之方向性證據,但仍應依市場制度與模型設定審慎解讀。
This study examines whether the completion of an initial public offering (IPO) affects firms’ operating performance and operating scale in Taiwan. Because IPO completion is not a random event, simple before-and-after comparisons may confound the effect of going public with firms’ pre-existing characteristics, listing intentions, and market timing. To mitigate this concern, this study focuses on firms that applied for IPOs between 2005 and 2022 and compares successfully listed firms with withdrawn applicants.
Operating return on assets (OROA) and Log Sales are used to measure firms’ operating performance and operating scale. To address endogeneity concerns, this study follows the identification strategy of Larrain et al. (2025) and employs cumulative market returns prior to listing or withdrawal, interacted with the post-event period indicator, as an instrumental variable in a two-stage least squares (2SLS) framework. The analysis compares alternative fixed-effect specifications and redefines high-R&D firms using the industry-year median of pre-application R&D intensity.
The results show that successfully listed firms differ from withdrawn applicants before the IPO application stage, indicating the presence of selection effects. Across alternative fixed-effect specifications, the 2SLS estimates are generally positive, although their magnitude and statistical significance are sensitive to model specification. Under the full fixed-effect specification, the estimated effects on OROA and Log Sales are not statistically significant. The interaction between the industry-year high-R&D indicator and the post-event period is also insignificant. Overall, the findings provide suggestive rather than conclusive evidence and highlight the importance of institutional context and empirical specification.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 預期貢獻 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 IPO 後企業績效之相關研究 5
第二節 IPO 決策之內生性與市場時機 7
第三節 台灣 IPO 制度與市場背景 9
第四節 文獻缺口與本文研究延伸 13
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 資料來源與樣本處理 16
第二節 變數定義與衡量 17
第三節 研究方法與實證模型 20
第四章 實證結果 24
第一節 樣本與敘述統計 24
第二節 原始迴歸結果與內生性診斷 31
第三節 兩階段最小平方法之因果效應分析 34
第五章 穩健性測試 39
第一節 Placebo Test:事件後市場報酬檢驗 39
第二節 工具變數視窗之穩健性 40
第三節 樣本篩選之穩健性 42
第六章 結論 45
第一節 研究結論 45
第二節 研究貢獻 47
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 48
參考文獻 50
Brau, J. C., & Fawcett, S. E. (2006). Initial public offerings: An analysis of theory and practice. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 399–436.
Chemmanur, T. J., He, S., & Nandy, D. K. (2010). The going-public decision and the product market. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1855–1908.
Chemmanur, T. J., & He, J. (2011). IPO waves, product market competition, and the going public decision: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 382–412.
Gao, X., Ritter, J. R., & Zhu, Z. (2013). Where have all the IPOs gone? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(6), 1663–1692.
Jain, B. A., & Kini, O. (1994). The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1699–1726.
Larrain, B., Phillips, G. M., Sertsios, G., & Urzúa, F. (2025). The effects of going public on firm profitability and strategy. The Review of Financial Studies, 38(8), 2467–2514.
Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23–51.
Lowry, M. (2003). Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much? Journal of Financial Economics, 67(1), 3–40.
Mikkelson, W. H., Partch, M. M., & Shah, K. (1997). Ownership and operating performance of companies that go public. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(3), 281–307.
Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27–64.
Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3–27.
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. The Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795–1828.
Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 187–212.
Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1935–1974.
全文公開日期 2031/08/18