本研究為了解企業會議進行過程中會議流程產生的無效率，造成會議溝通協調上之問題與障礙。首先針對會議流程相關影響因素分析，大致歸納出影響會議溝通協調以及會議進行效率的因素為何。再以個案分析的研究方法，透過對一間台灣營建產業的中小型企業長達半年會議實際參與觀察及訪談，進一步探究企業會議進行流程中影響會議溝通協調因素為何。歸納實際上影響個案公司會議溝通與效率的因素，並以增進會議溝通協調與效率為目標，針對個案公司會議流程進行改善與建議。

影響會議溝通協調及效率的會議流程因素包含以下三部分:第一部分為會議規劃設計、參與會議人員、會議人員準備與投入、會議人員角色定義、會議議程簡介等會議進行前影響因素。第二部分為專案進度說明、專案會議決策、專案進度追蹤、成員投入程度、目前溝通模式、衝突化解方式等會議進行中的因素。第三部分為會議流程外的影響因素: 任務型態、團隊組成與規模、組織因素。進一步以個案分析研究方法，將個案公司實際跨部門會議進行方式套入會議流程中的影響因素檢視，得出相關之研究結論有以下四點:
一、會議進行前的角色定義與權責分配流程，影響會議成員責任歸屬，對會議的溝通與決策流程影響高。
二、會議流程中的衝突來自於對責任範疇以及權責分配不明確，造成部門認知差異形成會議溝通上的障礙。
三、會議的組成包含組織部門及會議成員的選擇，影響組織會議溝通流程。
四、利潤中心制有助於提升成員對會議投入與貢獻，影響會議溝通流程。

文末針對個案公司會議流程改善給與建議，透過會議流程設計及相關配套措施設計改善會議溝通協調與效率。提供給其他企業進行會議流程改善作為參考。
關鍵字:會議、會議流程、會議效率、溝通、協調

English abstract
The research is trying to understand and find out factors cause ineffectiveness in meeting process and obstacle in communication and coordination. First, the research analysis factors related with meeting process, and generalize the factors which affect meeting process communication and coordination. The research is conducted through case analysis by surveying a Taiwan’s constriction company’s cross-functional meeting process, and attended cross-functional meeting from June 2011 to December 2011, also interviewed the company’s senior managers. Then use the result of the observation to generalize factors which affect cross-functional meeting process communication and efficiency, and try to find out solutions to improve the constriction company’s communication and coordination.
The research conclude the factors affects cross-functional meeting process communication and coordination as three part: First part includes: meeting process design, meeting staff, group member’s involvement before meeting, role in the meeting, introduction of meeting process. Second part includes: Introduction of project schedule, decision process, tracking process, group member’s involvement in the meeting, communication model, conflict management. Third part includes: Task type, composition of the group, and organizational factors. This research use those factors to examine the cross-functional meeting process in the company, and conclude the research propositions as follows:
1.The process of definition of role in the meeting and division of responsibilities will affect meeting member’s responsibility, and also will affect decision and communication process.
2.Meeting process’s conflict comes from vague responsibility scope and division, which cause cross-function cognitive differences and communication obstacle.
3.The composition of meeting ,includes people attend the meeting and size of meeting, has great effect to meeting process communication and coordination.
4.If the company use profit center as a system will increase member’s involvement and contribution.

This research make some suggestion for the construction company, through improve the meeting process and process design.

英文部分

1.3M Meeting Management Team, and Drew, J. “Mastering meetings :discovering the hidden potential of effective business meetings.” New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

2.Albanese, R. A. “Managing: Toward accountability for performance.” 3rd. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1981

3.Amason, A. C. and Sapienza, H.J., ”The effect of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict.” Journal of Management, Vol.23, No.4, pp.495-516., 1997

4.Amason, A. C. and Schweiger, D.M., “Resolving the paradox of conflict: Strategic decision making and organizational performance.” International Jornal of Conflict Management, Vol.5, pp.239-253., 1994

5.Anton Nijholt and Toyoaki Nishida (Eds.), ”Conversational Knowledge Process for Social Intelligence Design” Springer International Publisher, pp159-165., 2004

6.Auger, B.Y., “How to run better business meetings a reference guide for managers the 3M Meeting Management Team.” New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987

7.Blake, R. R., Shepherd, H. and Mouton, J. S. “Managing infergroup conjhct in industry.” Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1964

8.Brown, D. L., “Managing conflict at organizational interfaces. ”Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978

9.Daft, R. L and Lengel, R. H. “Information Richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design.” Cummings, L.L. and B.M. Straw(Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior 6. Homewood.IL: JAI Press., 1984

10.David Carson, Audrey Gilmore, Chad Perry, and Kjell Gronhaug, ”Qualitative Marketing Research” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001

11.De Dreu, Carsten and Van De Vliert, Evert , ”Using Conflict in Organizations” Sage publication Ltd , 1997

12.Deutsch, M. “The resolution of conflict. ” New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973

13.Donald R. Cooper and Pamela S. Schindler. “Business Research Methods (7th ed.)” McGraw Hill International Edition, 2003

14.Doyle, M., and Straus, D. “How to make meeting work: the new interaction method” New York, NY: Jove Books, 1982

15.Drucker, P. “The Effective Executive.” New York: Harper & Row, 1967

16.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., ”Building Theories From Case Study Research” The Academy of Management Review, Stanford University, 1989

17.Flaviu Roman, CRAFT, I&C, EPFL, “Improving Meetings Effectiveness using Interactive Artifacts” Edicresearch Proposal, 2009

18.Goffman, E. ” Encounters.” Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961

19.Green, W.A., and Lazarus, H. “Are today's executives meeting with success?” Journal of management development, 1991

20.Guetzkow, H., and Gyr, J. “An analysis of conflict in decision-making groups.” Human Relations, 1954

21.Hildreth, R.A. “The essentials of meeting management” Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990
22. Hill, G.W. “Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? “ Psychological Bulletin, Vol.91, No.3, pp.517-539, 1982

23.Hodgetts, R. “Management: Theory, process, and practice. 3rd ed.” Chicago: Dryden Press, 1982

24.Hy Mariampolski, ”Qualitative Market Research: A Comprehensive Guide” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001

25.Janssen, O., De Vliert, E.V., and Veenstra, C.,”How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interference in management teams” Journal of Management, Vol.25, No.2, pp.117-142., 1999

26.Jehn, K.A. ”A qualitative analysis of conflict type and dimensions in organizational groups.“ Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.42, pp.530-557., 1997

27.Jehn, K.A. and Mannix, E.A, ”The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, No.2, pp.238-251., 2001

28.Jones, G.R., George, J.M., and Hill, C.W.L.”Contemporary Management 2e.”,US: The Mcgraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2001

29.Judith Langer, ”The Mirrored Window: Focus Group from a Moderator’s Points of View” Ithaca, NY: Paramount Market Publishing, 2011

30.Kahn and E. Boulding (Eds), “ Power and conflict in organization.” New York: Bosie, 1963

31.Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. “The social psychology of organizing(2nd ed.)” New York: Wiley, 1978.

32.Kayser, T.A. “Mining group gold: how to cash in on the collaborative brain power of a group. 1st ed., El” Segundo, CA: Serif Publishing, 1990

33.Kreitner, R. “Management: A problem-solving process.” Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1980
34.Lee, Shirley Fine “How should team meeting flow-RARA approach as a meeting process.” Booksurge Publishing LLC, 2008

35.March, J. and Simon, H.”Organizations.” New York: Wiley, 1973

36.Mary Anne C. Ashworth, ”A study of the conflict management styles of principals and superintendents in the public schools of Ohio” Bowling Green State University, 1989

37.McGrath J. E. and Holingshead, A. “Interacting With technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues and an Agenda.“ Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1994

38.McKenzie, R.A.” The time trap.” New York: NY: McGraw Hill, 1972

39.Mintzberg, H. “The nature of managerial work.” New York: Harper & Row, 1973

40.Monge, P.R., McSween, C., and Wyer, J. A “profile of meetings in corporate America: results of the 3M meeting effectiveness study” University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 1989

41.Mosvick, R., and Nelson, R. “We've got to start meeting like this! A guide to successful business meeting management.” Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1987

42.Mosvick, R.K. “Communication practices of managers and technicalprofessionals in four large scale high technology industries” Proceedings of Proceedings of Speech Communication Association National Convention, Louisville, KY, 1982.

43.Muzafer Sherif, “Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict” American journal of Sociology, No.63, pp.155-156.,1958

44.Newman, W. Warren, E., and Schnee, J. “The process of management. 5th ed.” Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1982

45.Nicholas C. Romano, Jr and Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr., "Meeting Analysis: Findings from Research and Practice" System Sciences, Annual Hawaii International Conference, 2001

46.Nunamaker, J.F., Jr., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R.,and George, J. F. “Electronic meeting systems to support group work:theory and practice” Communications of the ACM, Vol.34, No.7, pp.40-61.,1991

47.Pondy, L.R. ”Organizational conflict: Concepts and models.” Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.296-320. ,1967

48.Priem, R.L and Price, K.H, ”Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry and devil’s advocacy, and consensus technique of strategic decision making,” Group and Organizational Studies, Vol.16, No.2,pp.206-225. ,1991

49.Rahim (Ed.), “Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach.” New York: Praeger., 1983

50.Rahim, M.A., ”Empirical studies on managing conflict.” International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol.11, No.1, pp.5-8, 2000

51.Rice, P.L. “Making minutes count.” Business Horizons, pp18-20, 1973

52.Richard Wynn. ”Intra-Organizational Conflict in Schools” American Association of School Administrators Convention,1977

53.Robbins, S.P., “Managing organizational conflict: A non-traditional approach.” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1974

54.Robbins, S.P., ”Organizational Behavior(10th)” US: Pearson Education Internal., 2003

55.Robert Davison, ”An instrument for measuring meeting success.” Information & Management 32 , pp163-176, , 1997

56.Rue, L., and Byars, L. “Management: Theory and application.” Rev. ed. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1980

57.Schwartzman, H.B. “The meeting : gatherings in organizations and communities.” New York: Plenum Press, 1989

58.Scott, W. G. and Mitchell, T. R.”Organization theory: A structural and behavioral analysis.” Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin Publisher, 1976

59.Sheppard, B.H., ”The third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework,” Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.6, pp.141-190., 1984

60.Sheridan, J.H. “A $37 billion waste” Industry Week, Vol. 238, No.17, pp.11-12. 1989

61.Simon, H. A. “ Administrative behavior” N.Y.：The free Press, 1976

62.Simons, T. L., and Peteson , R.S. ”Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of interagroup trust.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.85, No.1, pp.102-111., 2000

63.Sisk, H., and Williams, J. “Management & organization.” 4th ed. Cincinnati: Southwestern, 1981

64.Stephen R. Axley, “Managerial and Organizational Communication in Terms of the Conduit Metaphor” The Academy of Management Review , Vol.9, No.3, pp.428-37., 1984

65.Taylor, D.W., and Faust, W. L. “Twenty questions: Efficiency in problem solving as a function of group size.” Journal of experimental psychology, Vol.44, pp.360-368., 1952

66.Taylor, F.W. “Group Management.” Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, No.24, pp.337-352., 1903

67.Thomas, K.W. “Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol13, Issue 3, pp.265–274, 1992

68.Thomas, K.W. and Schmidt, W.H., “A survey of managerial interests with respect to conflict,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.19, No.2 , pp.315-318. ,1976

69.Tillman, R. “Problems in review: committees on trial.” Harvard Business Review, 47, May-June, pp.162-172., 1960

70.Trewatha, R., and Newport, M. ”Management: functions and behavior,3rd ed. Plano” Texas: Business Publications, 1982.

71.Tropman, J.E., and Morningstar, G. “Meetings: how to make them work for you.“ New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold company, 1985

72.Tubbs, S.L. “A systems approach to small group interaction.3rd ed.” New York: Random House, 1984

73.Wall, James A., Jr. and Ronda Roberts Callister “Conflict and Its Management” Journal of Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 515-558., 1995

74.Wilfried M. Post, Anita H.M. Cremers, and Olivier Blanson Henkemans, ”A research environment for meeting behavior” 3rd Workshop on Social Intelligence Design, pp.159–165., 2004

75.Van de Ven, A.H. “An applied experimental text of alternative decision making process.” Kent, OH: Center for business and economic research press, 1973.

76.Yin, R. K. “Case study research: Design and methods.” Washington. DC: COSMOS Corporation., 1994

中文部分

1.尤俊傑 (2010) 《臺灣北部地區建設公司經營策略之研究-策略矩陣之應用》。國立政治大學，企業管理研究所，碩士論文

2.古永嘉，楊雪蘭(譯)(2010)。企業研究方法。台北市:華泰文化。(Donald R Cooper‧Pamela S. Schindler)

3.李南賢 (1991)。《企業管理》。台北市：華泰書局

4.吳清山 (1992)。《學校行政》。台北市：心理出版社

5.林英峰 (2005)。企業個案研究(第二版)，台北市，台北市空中大學

6.尚榮安(譯) (2001)。《企業個案研究》。台北市:弘智文化。(Yin, R. K.，1994)

7.胡幼慧 (1996)。《質性研究: 理論,方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北市:巨流圖書有限公司

8.胡偉良(1998)。《營建勝經(上),(下) 》。台北市:詹氏書局

9.陳向明(2002)《社会科學質的硏究》。台北市:五南文化事業

10.張明輝(1991) 《巴納德組織理論與教育行政》。 台北市: 五南文化事業

11.劉孟華(譯) (2004)《James P Lewis-專案管理聖經》。台北市:臉譜出版社