跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林逸豪
Lin, Yi-Hao
論文名稱: 國合會架構下台灣-尼加拉瓜農業夥伴關係之援助效能評估:技術依賴與機構韌性的啟示
Evaluating Aid Effectiveness in the Taiwan-Nicaragua Agricultural Partnership Under TaiwanICDF: Lessons on Dependency and Institutional Resilience
指導教授: 李栢浡
Lee, Pai-Po
口試委員: 劉曉鵬
Philip Hsiaopong Liu
鍾惠雯
Rebecca H. Chung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
International Master's Program in Asia-Pacific Studies(IMAS)
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 115
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 夥伴關係合作關係國合會台灣-尼加拉瓜援助依賴機構韌性
外文關鍵詞: partnership, cooperation, TaiwanICDF, Taiwan-Nicaragua, aid dependency, institutional resilience
相關次數: 點閱:4下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採用質化個案研究途徑,透過文獻分析與半結構式訪談,探討在國際合作發展基金會(國合會)架構下,台灣與尼加拉瓜間的農業夥伴關係。本論文追溯此合作關係的發展歷程,確認其主要的技術與制度貢獻,並分析兩國於 2021 年 12 月驟然斷交所造成的影響。本研究並非僅透過短期產出來評估援助效能,而是將重點放在永續性、在地所有權,以及計畫結束後的延續性。研究結果顯示,在雙方積極合作期間,台灣的農業援助確實有助於提升生產力、促進技術採用,以及擴展技術知識。然而,資金、人員與技術支援的驟然撤退,也同時暴露出重要的結構性弱點,特別是退場計畫的不完善、在地所有權發展不均,以及對外部支援系統的過度依賴。本研究亦發現,內部組織較完善且機構量能較佳的農業合作社,在斷交後展現出較好的適應能力。整體而言,尼加拉瓜的案例表明,雙邊農業援助的長期效能不僅取決於技術上的成功,更取決於在地機構鑲嵌的深度、營運量能的移轉,以及是否具備可靠的過渡策略 。


    This study adopts a qualitative case study approach, using document analysis and semi-structured interviews to examine the agricultural partnership between Taiwan and Nicaragua under the International Cooperation and Development Fund (TaiwanICDF). The thesis traces the development of this cooperation, identifies its main technical and institutional contributions, and analyzes the effects of the abrupt diplomatic rupture between the two countries in December 2021. Rather than evaluating aid only through short-term outputs, the study focuses on sustainability, local ownership, and post-project continuity. The findings indicate that Taiwan’s agricultural assistance contributed to productivity gains, technology adoption, and expanded technical knowledge during the period of active cooperation. At the same time, the sudden withdrawal of funding, personnel, and technical support exposed important structural weaknesses, particularly limited exit planning, uneven local ownership, and dependence on externally supported systems. The study also finds that agricultural cooperatives with stronger internal organization and greater institutional capacity were better able to adapt after the rupture. Overall, the Nicaragua case suggests that the long-term effectiveness of bilateral agricultural aid depends not only on technical success, but also on the depth of local institutional embedding, the transfer of operational capacity, and the existence of credible transition strategies.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
    ABSTRACT iv
    摘要 v
    List of Tables viii
    List of Figures ix
    Chapter 1: Introduction 1
    1.1 Background of the Study 1
    1.2 Research Purposes 15
    1.3 Research Questions 17
    Chapter 2: Literature Review 18
    2.1 The Evolution and Geopolitics of Taiwan’s Foreign Aid 19
    2.1.1 From Dollar Diplomacy to Technical Cooperation: TaiwanICDF Model 20
    2.1.2 The Vulnerability of Bilateral Aid in LATAM’s Diplomatic Tug-of-War 22
    2.2 Evaluating TaiwanICDF Agricultural Projects in Nicaragua: A Project-Level Analysis 26
    2.2.1 The Scope and Objectives of Taiwan-Nicaragua Agricultural Cooperation 26
    2.2.2 Project Summary and Implementation Outcomes 27
    2.2.3 The Missing Metrics: Evaluating Short-Term Outputs vs. Long-Term Sustainability 31
    2.3 The Trap of Aid Dependency in Agricultural Development 33
    2.3.1 Conceptualizing Aid Dependency: Technology, Supply Chains, and Financial Reliance 34
    2.3.2 The Impact of Sudden Aid Withdrawal: Loss of Trust and Institutional Collapse 36
    2.4 Post-Project Implications: Exit Strategies and Institutional Capacity 39
    2.4.1 The Role of Local Cooperatives and Capacity Building in Mitigating Aid Shocks 40
    2.4.2 Designing Effective Exit Strategies for Bilateral Aid 43
    Chapter 3: Methodology 47
    3.1 Research Procedure 47
    3.2 Research Design 48
    3.3 Theoretical Framework 49
    3.4 Data collection 50
    3.5 Data Analysis: Use of ATLAS.ti 53
    Chapter 4: Finding and discussion 55
    4.1 Perceived Effectiveness of TaiwanICDF Programs and the Conditions Shaping It 55
    4.2 Aid Dependency, Exit Gaps, and Cooperative Resilience After the Rupture 60
    4.3 Discussion 64
    Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations 66
    5.1 Conclusion 67
    5.2 Recommendations 69
    5.3 Limitations of the Study 71
    5.4 Suggestions for Further Study 72
    REFERENCES 73
    Appendix A: Interview Invitation and Consent Form 79
    Appendix B: Interview Questions for TaiwanICDF Beneficiaries: 80

    Aguilera Peralta, G. (2006). De espaldas al dragón: Las relaciones de Centroamérica con Taiwán. Nueva Sociedad, (203), 171–179.
    Anríquez, G., Foster, W., Ortega, J., Falconí, C., & De Salvo, C. P. (2016). Public expenditures and the performance of Latin American and Caribbean agriculture (IDB Working Paper No. IDB-WP-722). Inter-American Development Bank.
    Avendaño, B. L. (2008). The effect of food safety standards on small-scale producers' access to high-value markets. World Bank.
    Babeiya, E. (2012). In search of aid-free Africa: An eye on Tandon's exit strategy. Journal of African Studies and Development, 4(1), 14–24.
    Bacon, C. M., Sundstrom, W. A., Gómez, M. E., Méndez, V. E., Santos, R., Goldoftas, B., & Dougherty, I. (2014). Explaining resilient livelihoods and food security in Central America: A case for fostering food sovereignty and participatory action research. World Development, 45, 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.008
    BCN (Banco Central de Nicaragua). (2022). Informe de cooperación oficial externa 2021. Banco Central de Nicaragua.
    Senders, A., Laub, R., Safa, A., & Scarpocchi, C. (2018). Developing gender-sensitive value chains: Guidelines for practitioners. Food and Agriculture Organization.
    Bodenstein, T., & Faust, J. (2017). Who cares? European public opinion on foreign aid and political conditionality. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(5), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12539
    Booth, D., Grigsby, A., & Toranzo, C. (2006). Politics and poverty reduction strategies: Lessons from Latin American HIPCs. Overseas Development Institute.
    Bräutigam, D. (2010). The dragon's gift: The real story of China in Africa. Oxford University Press.
    Bräutigam, D., & Knack, S. (2004). Foreign aid, institutions, and governance in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(2), 255–285.
    Brumby, S., & Smith, A. (2009). 'Train the Trainer' model: Implications for health professionals and farm family health in Australia. Journal of Agromedicine, 14(1), 112–118.
    Caswell, M., Méndez, V. E., Hayden, J., Anderzén, J., Cruz, A., Merritt, P., Izzo, V., Castro, S., & Fernandez, M. (2017). Resilience in coffee communities: Evaluating the impacts of the coffee rust crisis. University of Vermont Agroecology and Livelihoods Collaborative.
    CMI (Chr. Michelsen Institute). (2008). Managing aid exit and transformation: Summary of a joint donor evaluation. Evaluation Report.
    Cochrane, W. W. (1958). Farm prices: Myth and reality. University of Minnesota Press.
    Cochrane, W. W. (1979). The development of American agriculture: A historical analysis. University of Minnesota Press.
    Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 423-435.
    Convergence Blended Finance. (2024). State of blended finance 2024: Climate edition. https://www.convergence.finance/resource/state-of-blended-finance-2024-climate-edition/view
    Deere, C. D. (1981). Nicaraguan agricultural policy: 1979-81. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 5(4), 285–288.
    Dileepkumar, G., & Balaji, V. (2007). Integration of ICT in agriculture extension. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 11, 14–25.
    ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). (2011). Statistical yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. United Nations.
    ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). (2020). The economic impact of COVID-19 and climate shocks in Central America. United Nations.
    Egas, J. J., & De Salvo, C. P. (2018). Agricultural support policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: 2018 review. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).
    Elbadawi, I. A., & Mwega, F. M. (2000). Can Africa's saving collapse be reversed? The World Bank Economic Review, 14(3), 415–443.
    Ellis, R. E. (2021). Nicaragua’s flip from Taiwan to China has yet to pay off. Americas Quarterly. https://americasquarterly.org/article/nicaraguas-flip-from-taiwan-to-china-has-yet-to-pay-off/
    Evenson, R. E., & Gollin, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science, 300(5620), 758–762. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078710
    FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2018). Agricultural cooperatives and gender equality. FAO.
    FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2021). Evaluation of FAO's contributions to Sustainable Development Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. FAO.
    FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2022a). Agricultural transformation: Trends in farm size, crop diversification and mechanization in Nicaragua and Peru. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Technical Studies, No. 18. FAO.
    FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2022b). Central American Dry Corridor: Building resilience. FAO.
    Fee, D. (2012). How to manage an aid exit strategy: The future of development aid. Zed Books.
    Fitzgerald, V., & Chamorro, A. (1987). Las cooperativas en el proyecto de transición en Nicaragua. Encuentro, (30), 21–45.
    Franz, N. K., Piercy, F., Donaldson, J., Richard, R., & Westbrook, J. (2014). Farmer, agent, and specialist perspectives on preferences for learning among today's farmers. Journal of Extension, 52(2), Article 3.
    Gardner, A., Greenblat, A., & Joubert, A. (2014). What we know about exit strategies: Practical guidance for developing exit strategies in the context of local capacity development. CDA Collaborative Learning Projects.
    Goldstein, K. (2002). Getting in the door: Sampling and completing elite interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 669-672.
    Grigsby Vado, A., & Pérez, F. J. (2007). Structural implications of economic liberalization on agriculture and rural development in Nicaragua: First phase: National synthesis (RuralStruc Program). Nitlapán, Universidad Centroamericana.
    Howard, P. H. (2016). Concentration and power in the food system: Who controls what we eat? Bloomsbury Publishing.
    Hsu, J. (2018). Taiwan shifts El Salvador aid programs to Nicaragua. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2018/10/24/2003702937
    ILO (International Labour Organization). (2023). Employment in agriculture (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate) - Nicaragua. ILOSTAT Database.
    Johnston, S. D. (2020). Good intentions, mixed results: Why aid in Uganda is fragmented. Willamette University.
    Kastner, S. L., Pearson, M. M., & Rector, C. (2019). China’s strategic multilateralism: Investing in global governance. Cambridge University Press.
    Levinger, B., & McLeod, J. (2002). Hello, I must be going: Ensuring quality services and sustainable benefits through well-designed exit strategies. Education Development Center.
    Lin, T.-C., & Lin, J. Y.-C. (2017). Taiwan's foreign aid in transition: From ODA to civil society approaches. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 18(4), 469–490.
    Llambí, L., & Pérez, E. (2007). Nuevas ruralidades y viejos campesinismos. Agenda para una nueva sociología rural latinoamericana. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 4(59), 37–61.
    Maggiorelli, L. (2019). Taiwan's development aid to Latin America and the Caribbean and the One China policy. Revista Razón Crítica, 7, 186–200.
    Makate, C., Wang, R., Makate, M., & Mango, N. (2016). Crop diversification and livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe: Adaptive management for environmental change. SpringerPlus, 5(1), Article 1135
    Maxted, N., & Kell, S. P. (2009). Establishment of a global network for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives: Status and needs. FAO.
    Metoyer, C. C. (2000). Women and the state in post-Sandinista Nicaragua. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan)). (2021, December 10). The R.O.C. (Taiwan) government has terminated diplomatic relations with the Republic of Nicaragua with immediate effect to uphold national dignity. Official Press Release.
    Nielsen, R. A., Findley, M. G., Davis, Z. S., Candland, T., & Nielson, D. L. (2011). Foreign aid shocks as a cause of violent armed conflict. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 219–232.
    North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
    OCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs). (2020, November 26). Central America & Mexico: 2020 hurricane season – Situation report no. 5. UN OCHA. https://reliefweb.int/report/honduras/central-america-mexico-2020-hurricane-season-situation-report-no-5
    Pelaggi, S. (2019). Taiwan's diplomacy and its international isolation. Asian Affairs, 50(4), 552–568.
    Rabinowitz, G., & Prizzon, A. (2015). Exit strategies in international development. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
    Rawnsley, G. D. (2014). Taiwan’s soft power and public diplomacy. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 43(3), 161–174.
    Regalia, F., & Castro, L. (2007). Performance-based incentives for health: Demand and supply-side incentives in the Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social. Center for Global Development.
    Rich, T. S. (2016). Checkbook diplomacy and Taiwan’s quest for international space. Asian Security, 12(3), 133–148.
    Rogers, B. L., & Coates, J. C. (2015). Sustaining development: A synthesis of results from a four-country study of sustainability and exit strategies among development food assistance projects. FHI 360/FANTA.
    Roseth, B., Reyes, A., & Santiso, C. (2018). Wait no more: Citizens, red tape, and digital government. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001337
    Rueda Estrada, V. (2013). El campesinado migrante: Políticas agrarias, colonizaciones internas y movimientos de frontera agrícola en Nicaragua, 1960-2012. Tzintzun. Revista de Estudios Históricos, (57), 155–198.
    Schiller, K., Klerkx, L., Poortvliet, P. M., & Godek, W. (2019). Exploring barriers to agroecological transition in Nicaragua: A technological innovation systems approach. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44(1), 88–122.
    Sida (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency). (2006). Apoyo de Asdi al desarrollo de la agricultura en Nicaragua. Sida.
    Sida (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency). (2010). When development projects go orphan - Lessons from 20 years of Swedish forestry support to Nicaragua. Sida.
    Stone, G. D. (2022). The agricultural dilemma: How-to and how-not-to feed the world. Routledge.
    TaiwanICDF (International Cooperation and Development Fund) (2018). 2018 TaiwanICDF Annual Report. TaiwanICDF.
    TaiwanICDF (International Cooperation and Development Fund). (2019). 2019 Annual Report. TaiwanICDF.
    TaiwanICDF (International Cooperation and Development Fund). (2020). Annual Report: Partnerships for Progress and Sustainable Development. TaiwanICDF.
    Tandon, Y. (2008). Ending aid dependence. Fahamu/Pambazuka.
    Tezanos, S. (2010). América Latina y el Caribe. Mapa estratégico para la cooperación del siglo XXI. Thomson Reuters.
    Tubilewicz, C. (2016a). Taiwan's diplomacy and the Pacific: The limits of financial statecraft. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(4), 416–433.
    Tubilewicz, C. (2016b). State transformation and the domestic politics of foreign aid in Taiwan. The Pacific Review, 29(1), 45–66.
    United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly Resolution 70/1.
    UNDP. (2006). Capacity development: A UNDP primer. UNDP.
    Wang, T. Y. (2011). Foreign aid in Taiwan's diplomatic strategy, 2000–8. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 65(3), 322–339.
    WFP (World Food Programme). (2021). Annual Country Report: Nicaragua 2021. WFP.
    World Bank. (2003a). Nicaragua Economic Recovery Credit and Second Economic Recovery Credit. Project Performance Assessment Report. World Bank.
    World Bank. (2003b). Nicaragua Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper. World Bank.
    World Bank. (2012). Investing in resilience: Focus on agriculture in Nicaragua. World Bank Group.
    World Bank. (2016). Linking farmers to markets through productive alliances. World Bank.
    World Bank. (2021). Poverty and equity brief: Nicaragua. World Bank.
    World Bank. (2023). Macro poverty outlook: Nicaragua. World Bank.
    World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators: Nicaragua. World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/

    無法下載圖示 此全文未授權公開
    QR CODE
    :::