| 研究生: |
林君燕 Lin, Chun-Yann |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
連續併購與技術績效:研發強度與公司規模的調節作用 The Technological Performance Implications of serial Acquisition: The Moderating Role of R&D Intensity and Firm Size |
| 指導教授: |
楊宗翰
Yang, Tsung-Han |
| 口試委員: |
蘇威傑
Su, Wei-Chieh 傅浚映 Fu, Jyun-Ying |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 Graduate Institute of Technology, Innovation and Intellectual Property Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 62 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 連續併購 、創新績效 、利用式創新 、組織學習 、吸收能力理論 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Serial Acquisitions, Innovation Performance, Absorptive Capacity, Organizational Learning, Exploitative Innovation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:254 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
連續併購(Serial M&A)是重要的企業成長策略,但其對創新的累積影響尚待探討。本研究基於知識基礎觀點與組織學習理論,將連續併購定義為一種利用型學習過程,旨在檢視其對企業創新成果的影響,並探究吸收能力(研發投入)與組織規模的調節作用。
本研究以 2009–2019 年 472 家美國上市高科技公司為樣本,採用負二項與分數羅吉斯迴歸模型進行實證分析。研究發現,連續併購顯著提升了企業的專利產出,並增加了技術重疊的「利用型創新」比例。此外,強大的研發基礎與較大的組織規模會產生縱效,共同放大這些創新效益。
研究結論指出,在高吸收能力與靈活組織結構的支持下,連續收購能系統性地增強既有技術軌跡上的創新表現。本研究透過引入專利重疊指標捕捉知識重新配置,並證實吸收能力與組織慣性是收購驅動創新的關鍵邊界條件,對併購與創新領域文獻具有理論貢獻。
Serial mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are a common growth strategy, yet their cumulative impact on innovation remains underexplored. Drawing on the knowledge-based view and organizational learning theory, we conceptualize serial acquisitions as an exploitative learning process that enables firms to redeploy knowledge for incremental innovation. We further posit that absorptive capacity (R&D intensity) and organizational size moderate these effects. Analyzing 472 U.S. high-tech firms (2009–2019) using negative binomial and fractional logit models, we find that serial M&A significantly increases patent output and the share of exploitative innovations. Specifically, both a robust R&D base and a larger organizational size synergistically amplify these innovation benefits. Our study contributes to M&A and innovation literature by introducing a refined patent-overlap metric and identifying absorptive capacity and structural inertia as critical boundary conditions for acquisition-driven innovation.
1 Introduction 1
2 Background Literature 7
2.1 Knowledge and Knowledge Recombination 7
2.2 Acquisitions and Knowledge Recombination 8
2.3 Serial Acquisitions and Organisational Learning 9
2.4 The Technological Performance of Serial Acquisitions 10
3 Hypothesis 12
3.1 Serial Acquisition and Inventive Quantity 12
3.2 Serial Acquisition and Inventive type 13
3.3 Key Boundary Conditions of Firm as Moderating Effect 16
3.3.1 R&D Intensity 16
3.3.2 Firm Size 18
4 Method 19
4.1 Empirical Context 19
4.2 Data Collection 20
4.2.1 Serial Acquisition Data 20
4.2.2 Technology Performance Data 20
4.2.3 Additional Data Sources 21
4.3 Dependent Variables 21
4.3.1 Innovation Quantity 22
4.3.2 Innovation Exploitation 22
4.4 Independent Variable 24
4.5 Control Variables 24
4.6 Moderators: R&D Intensity and Firm Size 26
4.7 Method of Analysis 27
5 Result 28
5.1 Descriptives 28
5.2 Main Results 34
5.2.1 Serial Acquisition and Inventive Quantity 34
5.2.2 Serial Acquisition and Inventive Exploitation 37
5.3 Robustness Checks 38
6 Discussion 48
6.1 Academic Contributions 48
6.2 Managerial Implications 51
6.3 Limitations and Future Research 53
7 Reference 55
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
Al Rahahleh, N., & Wei, P. P. (2012). The performance of frequent acquirers: Evidence from emerging markets. Global Finance Journal, 23(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2012.01.002
Anand, J., & Singh, H. (1997). Asset Redeployment, Acquisitions and Corporate Strategy in Declining Industries. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<99::Aid-smj928>3.0.Co;2-b
Argote, L. (2012). Organization learning: A theoretical framework. In Organizational learning: creating, Retaining and Transferring knowledge (pp. 31–56). Springer.
Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy, 23(5), 523–532.
Awan, U., Arnold, M. G., & Gölgeci, I. (2020). Enhancing green product and process innovation: Towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2684
Barkema, H. G., & Schijven, M. (2008). How Do Firms Learn to Make Acquisitions? A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 594–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316968
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Barney, J. B. (1988). Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 71–78.
Belderbos, R., Cassiman, B., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Van Looy, B. (2014). Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013
Belderbos, R., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Looy, B. V. (2010). Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00757.x
Bertschek, I., & Entorf, H. (1996). On nonparametric estimation of the Schumpeterian link between innovation and firm size: evidence from Belgium, France, and Germany. Empirical Economics, 21(3), 401–426.
Billett, M. T., & Qian, Y. (2008). Are Overconfident CEOs Born or Made? Evidence of Self-Attribution Bias from Frequent Acquirers. Management Science, 54(6), 1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0830
Bingham, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Furr, N. R. (2007). What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic entrepreneurship journal, 1(1‐2), 27–47.
Blonigen, B. A., & Taylor, C. T. (2003). R&D Intensity and Acquisitions in High‐Technology Industries: Evidence from the US Electronic and Electrical Equipment Industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00112
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87.
Cappa, F., Collevecchio, F., Oriani, R., & Peruffo, E. (2022). Banks responding to the digital surge through Open Innovation: Stock market performance effects of M&As with fintech firms. Journal of Economics and Business, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2022.106079
Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.
Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006). Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(5), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.007
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Cook, D. O., Kieschnick, R., & McCullough, B. D. (2008). Regression analysis of proportions in finance with self selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 15(5), 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2008.02.001
De Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & De La Potterie, B. V. P. (2013). The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy, 42(3), 720–737.
Duan, Y., & Jin, Y. (2018). Financial constraints and synergy gains from mergers and acquisitions. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 30(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12091
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::Aid-smj133>3.0.Co;2-e
Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022
Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. (2002). Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects. Organization Science, 13(1), 36–47.
Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., Shimizu, H., & Vezzulli, A. (2013). Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004. Research Policy, 42(10), 1780–1792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.014
Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), 425–440.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Pretence Hall.
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Administrative science quarterly, 44(1), 29–56.
Haleblian, J., Kim, J.-Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2006). The influence of acquisition experience and performance on acquisition behavior: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry. Academy of Management journal, 49(2), 357–370.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American sociological review, 149–164.
Hausman, J. A., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. In: National bureau of economic research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
Henningsson, S. (2015). Learning to acquire: how serial acquirers build organisational knowledge for information systems integration. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 121–144.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management journal, 39(5), 1084–1119.
Hossain, M. M., Pham, M. D., & Islam, N. (2021). The performance and motivation of serial acquisitions: Evidence from Australia. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101827
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323–329.
Karim, S., & Mitchell, W. (2000). Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the US medical sector, 1978–1995.
Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management journal, 24(4), 689–713.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of international business studies, 24(4), 625–645.
Laforet, S. (2013). Organizational innovation outcomes in SMEs: Effects of age, size, and sector. Journal of World business, 48(4), 490–502.
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of management review, 31(4), 833–863.
Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: A Case Survey of Synergy Realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.1
Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management journal, 49(4), 797–818.
Lecocq, C., Leten, B., Kusters, J., & van Looy, B. (2011). Do Firms Benefit from being Present in Multiple Technology Clusters? An Assessment of the Technological Performance of Biopharmaceutical Firms. Regional Studies, 46(9), 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.552494
Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2006). Organizational size and IT innovation adoption: A meta-analysis. Information & management, 43(8), 975–985.
Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Looy, B. V. (2016). Entry and Technological Performance in New Technology Domains: Technological Opportunities, Technology Competition and Technological Relatedness. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1257–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12215
Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological Diversification, Coherence, and Performance of Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00272.x
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, 14(1), 319–338.
Lukas, B. A., Hult, G. T. M., & Ferrell, O. (1996). A theoretical perspective of the antecedents and consequences of organizational learning in marketing channels. Journal of business research, 36(3), 233–244.
Makri, M., Hitt, M. A., & Lane, P. J. (2009). Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 602–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.829
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
McCarthy, K. J., & Aalbers, H. L. (2016). Technological acquisitions: The impact of geography on post-acquisition innovative performance. Research Policy, 45(9), 1818–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.012
McCarthy, K. J., & Aalbers, H. L. (2022). Alliance-to-acquisition transitions: The technological performance implications of acquiring one's alliance partners. Research Policy, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104512
Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2002). Exploring the practice of corporate venturing: Some common forms and their organizational implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 21–40.
Mishra, C. S. (2024). Serial Acquirers and Innovation Performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 14126–14144. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2024.3441818
Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.07.002
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1985). An evolutionary theory of economic change. harvard university press.
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2002). Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organization Science, 13(5), 547–566.
Papa, A., Dezi, L., Gregori, G. L., Mueller, J., & Miglietta, N. (2020). Improving innovation performance through knowledge acquisition: the moderating role of employee retention and human resource management practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(3), 589–605.
Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. Journal of applied econometrics, 11(6), 619–632.
Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145(1-2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.009
Phene, A., Tallman, S., & Almeida, P. (2010). When Do Acquisitions Facilitate Technological Exploration and Exploitation? Journal of Management, 38(3), 753–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369939
Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2011). The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410060
Puranam, P., & Srikanth, K. (2007). What they know vs. what they do: how acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.608
Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why do firms do basic research (with their own money). Research Policy, 19(2), 165–174.
Sabri, B., Pascal, N., & Wael, R. (2016). Multiple large shareholders and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from French family firms. European Financial Management, 22, 697–745.
Savino, T., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Albino, V. (2015). Search and Recombination Process to Innovate: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12081
Schildt, H. A., Maula, M. V., & Keil, T. (2005). Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 493–515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00095.x
Schumpeter, J. A. (1983). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers.
Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14(6), 650–669.
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.
Studenmund, A. H., & Cassidy, H. J. (1998). Using econometrics. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (2018). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. In Organizational innovation (pp. 345–372). Routledge.
Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management journal, 44(3), 457–476.
Villadsen, A. R., & Wulff, J. (2018). Fractional regression models in strategic management research. Academy of Management Proceedings,
Walsh, S. T., & Linton, J. D. (2011). The Strategy-Technology Firm Fit Audit: A guide to opportunity assessment and selection. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.023
Xu, W., Gao, X., Li, D., Zhuang, M., & Yang, S. (2022). Serial acquirers and stock price crash risk: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101538
Xue, H., Zeng, S., & Sun, D. (2024). Radical or Incremental? Impacts of Mergers and Acquisitions on Firms’ Innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 2698–2714. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3190319
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Zhao, X. (2009). Technological Innovation and Acquisitions. Management Science, 55(7), 1170–1183. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1018
Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2004). Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1233–1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.426
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
全文公開日期 2031/01/26