跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許涴筑
Hsu, Wan-Chu
論文名稱: 情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及個人社會認知能力對語句處理的影響
The Influence of Emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and Individual Social Cognitive Ability on Sentence Processing
指導教授: 賴瑶鍈
Lai, Yao-Ying
口試委員: 張瑜芸
Chang, Yu-Yun
李佳霖
Lee, Chia-Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 外國語文學院 - 語言學研究所
Graduate Institute of Linguistics
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 語句處理情緒詞類人稱指涉社會認知能力語言即時理解
外文關鍵詞: Sentence processing, Emotional word type, Personal reference, Social cognitive ability, Real-time language comprehension
相關次數: 點閱:38下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討語句的處理是否會因不同的情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及社會認知能力的個體差異而產生影響。過去有諸多探討情緒語言的心理與神經語言學實驗,但大多是在單詞層級。本研究針對句子層級,檢視語言理解者如何處理文句語境中的情緒詞。情緒詞彙可分二類:情緒標籤詞 (emotion-label words),詞彙語意直接指涉特定情緒,像是「快樂的」、「悲傷的」;情緒負載詞 (emotion-laden words) ,在詞語字面意義之上隱含情緒意涵,像是「光明的」、「灰暗的」。而情緒與他人或自身相關,在語言中透過與之搭配的人稱指涉詞來表述 (self- vs.
    other-relevant);以不同人稱觀點來表述是否會影響情緒語言的處理仍未知。此外,過去文獻指出社會認知能力會影響個人情緒訊息的接收及語句內容的處理,故此研究也檢視此個體差異因素如何左右情緒語言的處理歷程。

    本研究包含兩項前測實驗及一項主要實驗。前測一為線上問卷,請臺灣華語母語者將形容詞歸類至情緒標籤或情緒負載詞,用來建構主實驗的刺激材料句。前測二為自然通順程度的評分問卷,確保各條件語句對母語者來說皆自然通順且無顯著差異。主實驗為自訂步調閱讀任務,以閱讀時長 (reading times, RTs) 推測理解歷程、並以自閉症量表指數衡量個人社會認知能力。實驗結果顯示,情緒詞類及社會認知能力的個體差異對句子的即時處理皆產生顯著影響。語句中情緒標籤詞的閱讀時間長於情緒負載詞,可能是由於閱讀文句語境中的情緒標籤詞時,理解者除了建構整體句意表徵,還須處理額外的情緒意涵,因此引起較長的閱讀時間;反之,人們在文句語境中可能較容易忽略情緒負載詞隱含的情緒意涵,僅處理字面層次的意義。此外,社會認知能力較低者閱讀語句時的時間較長(與社會認知能力較高者相比),顯示了情緒語句處理上的困難;推測與整合語句內容(包含情緒詞及人稱指涉)的速度較慢、及忖度他人/自身心理狀態的能力較弱有關。或者,也可能是由於社會認知能力較低者閱讀態度較為謹慎造成。另一方面,人稱指涉的效果在實驗檢視的關鍵情緒詞區未達顯著,顯示了此因素對情緒語句的處理歷程沒有影響。

    本研究將情緒詞帶入語句中,觀察在不同人稱指涉下、不同社會認知能力者的閱讀理解歷程,補充了在語句層次處理情緒語言的實驗結果,同時揭示社會認知個體差異的影響,予現有之理論提供實證回饋。未來研究或許可進一步探討情緒語言與人稱指涉的交互作用,以及多方探討語句中情緒訊息的處理。


    The present study aims to investigate the real-time comprehension of emotional sentences, by manipulating emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and social
    cognitive ability (SCA). While previous experimental studies have demonstrated an effect of emotional word type on processing at the lexical level, the current study targets
    the processing of emotional word type at the sentential level. Emotional words can be categorized into two types: emotion-label words that refer to emotional states (e.g.,
    happy, sad), and emotion-laden words that imply certain emotion alongside their semantic denotation (e.g., bright, dark). Meanwhile, emotional words typically predicate individuals, related to others or ourselves. It remains unclear if taking different perspectives to comprehend emotional word types would factor into processing. Additionally, previous work has suggested that individual SCA affects the perception of emotional words and sentence processing. I therefore examine if the processing of emotional sentences modulated by emotional word types would vary with this individual difference.

    The present thesis comprises two norming studies and the main self-paced reading experiment. Norming Study 1 was an online questionnaire that asked native speakers of Taiwanese Mandarin to categorize adjectives into different Word Types. The categorized words were then used to construct experimental sentences. Norming Study 2 assessed the naturalness of experimental sentences in an online questionnaire to ensure the feasible stimuli. The ensuing main experiment adopted a self-paced reading task with a moving-window paradigm to measure reading times (RTs) to probe real￾time processing; the participants took the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) as a measurement of individual SCA. Results showed a significant effect of emotional Word
    Type, such that sentences with emotion-laden words had shorter RTs than the counterparts with emotion-label words. I posited that in comprehending sentences containing emotion-label words, participants were tasked not only with constructing semantic representations but also with integrating emotional properties into the sentences. On the contrary, in sentences containing emotion-laden words, people may overlook the underlying emotional properties and focus solely on processing the literal meanings. Additionally, the effect of individual SCA was also significant, indicating longer RTs for those with lower SCA. This phenomenon is potentially influenced by Personal Reference and emotional Word Type. More crucially, the weaker ability to integrate sentence contents and empathize with or reflect on others’ and one’s own mind states may also contribute to this effect. Alternatively, it could be because people with lower SCA are more careful readers. However, the main effect of Personal Reference did not reach significance in the target emotion-word region examined in the experiment, indicating that Personal Reference does not influence the processing of emotional sentences.

    This research integrates emotional words into sentences to observe the processes of reading comprehension from different perspectives and with different levels of SCA,
    advancing our understanding of emotion language processing. Future study could further clarify the interaction between emotional expressions and personal reference, delving deeper into the processing of sentences containing emotional information.

    誌謝 i
    摘要 ii
    Abstract iv
    Abbreviation List x
    Chapter 1 Introduction 1
    1.1 Motivation and Purpose 1
    1.2 Research Questions 5
    1.3 Structure of This Thesis 5
    Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
    2.1 Emotional vs. Neutral (Non-emotional) Information 6
    2.2 Effects of Valence in Emotion 8
    2.2.1 Negativity Bias 8
    2.2.2 Positivity Bias 10
    2.3 Effects of Arousal in Emotion 12
    2.4 Emotional Word Type: Emotion-label vs. Emotion-laden 14
    2.5 Emotional Effects in Sentence Processing 18
    2.6 The Processing of Personal Reference and Emotion 21
    2.7 The Processing of Emotion and Individual Differences in Social Cognitive Ability 24
    2.7.1 Atypical Processing of Emotion 25
    2.7.2 Explicit and Implicit processing of emotion 26
    2.7.3 Processing of Self-Relevant Personal Reference 28
    Chapter 3 The Current Study: Hypotheses and Predictions 31
    Chapter 4 Norming Studies 37
    4.1 Norming Study 1—Word Type Categorization 37
    4.1.1 Method 37
    4.1.2 Results 43
    4.1.3 Discussion 47
    4.2 Norming Study 2—Naturalness-Rating Questionnaire for Sentences 48
    4.2.1 Method 48
    4.2.2 Results 53
    Chapter 5 Self-Paced Reading Experiment 55
    5.1 Method 55
    5.1.1 Materials 55
    5.1.2 Participants 56
    5.1.3 Procedure 57
    5.1.4 Data Analysis 59
    5.2 Results 60
    5.3 Discussion 64
    Chapter 6 Discussion & Conclusion 67
    References 73
    Appendix 87
    A. Norming Study 1: Properties of the critical adjectives
    87
    Negative Label Words 87
    Negative Laden Words 88
    Positive Label Words 89
    Positive Laden Words 90
    Neutral Words 91
    B. Self-Paced Reading Experiment: Descriptive statistics of RTs (ms) for each condition in Window3 (Personal Reference), 4 (Personal Reference + 1), 5 (Word Type), and 8 (sentence-final position) 92
    Window3 (Personal Reference) 92
    Window4 (Personal Reference + 1) 93
    Window5 (Word Type) 94
    Window8 (sentence-final position) 95

    Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). The dual process theory of autism. Thinking, Reasoning, and Decision Making in Autism, p. 13-38. Routledge.

    Au-Yeung, S., Kaakinen, J. K., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2015). Processing of written irony in autism spectrum disorder: an eye-movement study. Autism Research, 8, 749-760. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1490

    Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(00)80010-5

    Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34(1), 74-183.

    Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471

    Barzy, M., Filik, R., Williams, D., & Ferguson, H. J. (2020). Emotional processing of ironic versus literal criticism in autistic and nonautistic adults: evidence from eye-tracking. Autism Research, 13, 563-578. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2272

    Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., &Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

    Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323

    Berlingeri, M., Crepaldi, D., Roberti, R., Scialfa, G., Luzzatti, C., & Paulesu, E. (2008). Nouns and verbs in the brain: Grammatical class and task specific effects as
    revealed by fMRI. Cognitive neuropsychology, 25(4), 528-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701674943

    Bouranta, N., Chitiris, L., & Paravantis, J. (2009). The relationship between internal and external service quality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110910948297

    Bromberek-Dyzman, K., Vasileanu, M., & BąK, H. (2021). Cross-linguistic differences affect emotion and emotion-laden word processing: Evidence from Polish-English and Romanian-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(5), 1161-1182. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920987306

    Brosnan, M., & Ashwin, C. (2023). Thinking, fast and slow on the autism spectrum. Autism, 27(5), 1245-1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221132437

    Brosnan, M., Lewton, M., & Ashwin, C. (2016). Reasoning on the autism spectrum: A dual process theory account. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2115-2125. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2742-4

    Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspective: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Association for Psychological Science, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02249.x

    Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one, 5(6), e10729.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729

    Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41 (1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00195-1

    Chen, Y., Zhong, Y. P., Zhou, H. B., Zhang, S. M., Tan, Q. B., & Fan, W. (2014). Evidence for implicit self‑positivity bias: an event‑related brain potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 232. 985-994. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3810-z

    Child, S., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2019). Remember they were emotional - Effects of emotional qualifiers during sentence processing. Open Psychology, 1(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0009

    Cho, S. L., Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (2013). Taiwan corpora of Chinese emotions and relevant psychophysiological data-a study on the norm of Chinese emotional words. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 493-523. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00774-9

    Chou, L. C., Pan, Y. L., & Lee, C. L. (2020). Emotion anticipation induces emotion effects in neutral words during sentence reading: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20, 1294-1308. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00835-z

    Courchesne, E., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Press, G. A., Hesselink, J. R., & Jernigan, T. L. (2013). Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism. Autism (pp. 197-202). Routledge.

    Davis, M. & Whalen, P. J. (2001). The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry, 6, 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4000812

    de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858-1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006

    Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Waldron, E., & Binder, J. R. (2006). FMRI of past tense processing: the effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. Journal of
    Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 278-297. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.278

    Fields, E. C. & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It’s all about you: an ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. NeuroImage, 62(1), 562-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.003

    Gaigg, S. B., & Bowler, D. M. (2008). Free recall and forgetting of emotionally arousing words in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2336-2343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.008

    Gaigg, S. B. & Bowler, D. M. (2009). Brief report: attenuated emotional suppression of the attentional blink in autism spectrum disorder: another non-social abnormality? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 39, 1211-1217.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0719-2

    Hampson, D. R., & Blatt, G. J. (2015). Autism spectrum disorders and neuropathology of the cerebellum. Frontiers in neuroscience, 9, 420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00420

    Happé, F. (2003). Theory of mind and the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.008

    Hardie, A (2012) CQPweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17 (3), 380–409. https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2014-0004

    Herbert, C., Herbert, B. M., Ethofer, T., & Pauli, P. (2011a). His or mine? The time course of self-other discrimination in emotion processing. Social Neuroscience.
    6(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.523543

    Herbert, C., Junghofer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45(3), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x

    Herbert, C., Pauli, P., & Herbert, B. M. (2011b). Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), 653-661.https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq082

    Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré P. (2020). Affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 813-839. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1620957

    Ho, S. M., Mak, C. W., Yeung, D., Duan, W., Tang, S., Yeung, J. C., & Ching, R. (2015). Emotional valence, arousal, and threat ratings of 160 Chinese words among adolescents. PloS one, 10(7), e0132294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132294

    Hsu, S. H., & Huang, K. C. (2001). Effects of minimal legible size characters on Chinese word recognition. Visible language, 35(2).

    Icht, M., Zukerman, G., Ben‐Itzchak, E., & Ben‐David, B. M. (2021). Keep it simple: Identification of basic versus complex emotions in spoken language in individuals with autism spectrum disorder without intellectual disability: A meta‐analysis study. Autism Research, 14(9), 1948-1964. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2551

    Jay, T., Caldwell-Harris, C., & King, K. (2008). Recalling taboo and nontaboo words. The American journal of psychology, 121(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.2307/20445445

    Jiang, Z. Q., Li, W. H., Liu, Y., Luo, Y. J., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2014). When affective word valence meets linguistic polarity: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 28, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.11.001

    Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228

    Kana, R. K., Patriquin, M. A., Black, B. S., Channell, M. M., & Wicker, B. (2016). Altered medial frontal and superior temporal response to implicit processing of emotions in autism. Autism Research, 9, 55-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1496

    Kana, R. K., Sartin, E. B., Stevens Jr., C., Deshpande, H. D., Klein, C., Klinger, M. R., & Klinger, L. G. (2017). Neural networks underlying language and social cognition during self-other processing in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia. 102, 116-123.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.008

    Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2015). The automatic activation of emotion and emotion-laden words: evidence from a masked and unmasked priming paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology. 128 (3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0323

    Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2016). Emotion word processing: effects of word type and valence in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 45, 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9357-3

    Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & cognition, 31(8), 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800

    Knickerbocker, F., Johnson, R. L., Starr, E. L., Hall, A. M., Preti, D. M., Slate, S. R., & Altarriba, J. (2019). The time course of processing emotion-laden words during sentence reading: evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica. 192, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.008

    Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123

    Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657

    Lai, V. T., Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Feel between the lines: implied emotion in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 27 (8). https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00798

    Lai, Y. Y., & Lai, H. L. (2023). Impact of social cognitive propensity on the processing of nontransparent sentential meaning. Journal of Pragmatics. 205, 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.014

    Lai, Y. Y., Sakai, H., & Makuuchi, M. (2023). Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style. Cerebral Cortex, 33(18), 10013-10027. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad261

    Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: importance of word arousal.Emotion. 8 (4), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445

    Lartseva, A., Dijkstra, T., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2015). Emotional language processing in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00991

    Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920-933. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532

    Lau, Y. P., Gau, S. F., Chiu, Y. N., Wu, Y. Y., Chou, W. J., Liu, S. K., & Chou, M. C. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Research in Developmental Disabilities. 34(1), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.005

    Lee S. Y. M. (2015). A linguistic analysis of implicit emotions. In Lu, Q. & Gao, H. H. (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 185–194). Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27194-1_19

    Lee, Y. U., Yang, M. J., Lai, T. J., Chiu, N. M., & Chau, T. T. (2000). Development of the Taiwanese depression questionnaire. Chang Gung Medical Journal, 23, 688-694.

    Lenth, R. (2024). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.10.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.

    Lewton, M., Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). Syllogistic reasoning reveals reduced bias in people with higher autistic-like traits from the general population. Autism, 23 (5), 1311e1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318808779

    Liu, J., Fan, L., Tian, L., Li, C., & Feng, W. (2022). The neural mechanisms of Explicit and implicit processing of Chinese emotion-label and emotion-laden words: evidence from emotional categorisation and emotional Stroop tasks. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2093389

    Lombardo, M. V., Barnes, J. L., Wheelwright, S. J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Self referential cognition and empathy in autism. PLoS ONE, 2, e883. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000883

    Lüdtke, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137

    Lundström, S., Chang, Z., Råstam, M., Gillberg, C., Larsson, H., Anckarsäter, H., & Lichtenstein, P. (2012). Autism spectrum disorders and autistic like traits: similar etiology in the extreme end and the normal variation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(1), 46-52. http://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.144

    Miri Ashtiani, S. N., & Daliri, M. R. (2023). Identification of cognitive load-dependent activation patterns using working memory task-based fMRI at various levels of difficulty. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16476. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43837-w

    Mizuno, A., Liu, Y., Williams, D. L., Keller, T. A., Minshew, N. J., & Just, M. A. (2011). The neural basis of deictic shifting in linguistic perspective-taking in high functioning autism. Brain, 134(8), 2422-2435. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr151

    Nieuwland, M. S., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 324-346.

    Pavlenko, A. (2008). Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003283

    Pessoa, L. (2023). The entangled brain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 35(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01908

    Pratto, F., & John, O. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61, 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380

    Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5

    R Core Team (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

    Rosling, H., Rosling, O., & Rönnlund, A. R. (2018). Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong about the World--And Why Things Are Better Than You Think. Flatiron Books.

    Rozin, P., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition and Emotion, 24(3), 536-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902793462

    Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714

    Ruzich, E., Allison, C., Smith, P., Watson, P., Auyeung, B., Ring, H., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females. Molecular Autism, 6, 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-6-2

    Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.28

    Schmahmann, J. D., & Sherman, J. C. (1998). The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain: a journal of neurology, 121(4), 561-579. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.4.561

    Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. Research Methods in Linguistics, 27-50.

    Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027209

    Shi, H., Li, Y., & Sui, X. (2022). Effects of emotional word types: behavioral and neural evidence for discrimination between emotion-label and emotion-laden words. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(12), 2696-2707. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02696

    Siciliano L., & Clausi, S. (2020). Implicit vs. explicit emotion processing in autism spectrum disorders: an opinion on the role of the cerebellum. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (96). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00096

    Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. (2023). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package version 1.3-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex.

    Skowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1),131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131

    Soares, A. P., Macedo, J., Oliveira, H. M., Lages, A., Hernández-Cabrera, J., & Pinheiro,A. P. (2019). Self-reference is a fast-acting automatic mechanism on emotional word processing: evidence from a masked priming affective categorisation task.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1599003

    Song, D., Wen, H., & Dong, Y. (2023). Affective Norms for Chinese Words of Typical Life Scenes Rated by Older Adults (ANCO). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(4), 1115-1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09948-1

    Štajner, S., Yaneva, V., Mitkov, R., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2017). Effects of lexical properties on viewing time per word in autistic and neurotypical readers. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 271-281. https://aclanthology.org/W17-5030

    Sylvester, T., Liebig, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2021). Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults. Scientific Reports. 11(945). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1

    Tager‐Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. (2005). Language and communication in autism. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, 1, 335-364. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939345

    Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 110, 67– 85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67

    Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95 (1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36

    van Berkum, J. J. (2020). Inclusive affective neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1665191

    Wang, X., Shangguan, C., & Lu, J. (2019). Time course of emotion effects during emotion-label and emotion-laden word processing. Neuroscience Letters, 699, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.028

    Was, C. A., & Hamrick, P. (2021). What did they mean by that? Young adults' interpretations of 105 common emojis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655297

    Watson, L. A., Dritschel, B., Jentzsch, I., & Obonsawin, M. C. (2008). Changes in the relationship between self‐reference and emotional valence as a function of dysphoria. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X248689

    Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr

    Xu, X., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2022). Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 26-41. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01607-4

    Yao, Z., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017). Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words. Behavior Research Method, 49(4), 1374-1385. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2

    Yee, L. T. (2017). Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong. PloS one, 12(3), e0174569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174569

    Yu, B. & Cao, H. (1992). A new exploration on the effect of stroke-number in the identification of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2, 120-126.

    Yu, L. C., Lee, L. H., Hao, S., Wang, J., He, Y., Hu, J., Lai, K. R., & Zhang, X. (2016). Building Chinese affective resources in valence-arousal dimensions. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016, 540-545. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1066

    Zhang, M., Piñango, M. M., & Deo, A. (2022). Word-meaning variation in English have-sentences: the impact of cognitive versus social factors on individuals' linguistic context-sensitivity. Language, 98(1), 123-156. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0088

    Zhang, J., Wu, C., Meng, Y., & Meng, Y. (2017). Different neural correlates of emotion label words and emotion-laden words: an ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00455

    Zhang, J., Wu, C., Yuan, Z., & Meng, Y. (2019). Differentiating emotion-label words and emotion-laden words in emotion conflict: an ERP study. Experimental Brain
    Research, 237, 2423-2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05600-4

    Zhu, L., Wang, C. X., He, J. C., Chen, X. J., Guo, Y. X., & Lu, F. (2008). The effect of font, stroke and contrast on the reading speed of Chinese characters. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 10(2), 96-99.

    QR CODE
    :::