| 研究生: |
林姿婷 Lin, Tzy-Ting |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
風險基礎資本與涉險值運用在保險監理上之比較 The Comparison of RBC and VaR in the Insurance Regulation |
| 指導教授: | 蔡政憲 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
商學院 - 風險管理與保險學系 Department of Risk Management and Insurance |
| 論文出版年: | 2001 |
| 畢業學年度: | 89 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 87 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 保險監理 、風險基礎資本 、風險值 、涉險值 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:201 下載:59 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
確保保險公司之清償能力是保險監理單位之首要目標,監理單位使用各種不同的監理制度以確保保險公司的財務體質,並防止保單持有人因為保險公司失去清償能力所遭致之損失。在各種監理制度中,RBC監理制度主要是衡量保險公司的資本適足性並且提供監理單位採取相關監理行動的準則;VaR監理制度則是目前銀行業之監理所嘗試採取的新監理方式,而且VaR也被廣泛運用在銀行內部的風險管理系統中,由銀行監理的發展趨勢看來,可以預期保險監理將來也會以VaR監理制度為主。
本研究的主要目的在於探討VaR監理制度適用在保險監理制度上的可行性以及與現行RBC監理制度的比較。在探討VaR監理制度的可行性前,本研究先就VaR監理制度運用在保險監理的前提以及影響保險公司失去清償能力的原因進行探討。
在瞭解影響保險公司失去清償能力的原因後,本研究分別對於在VaR監理制度下保險公司如何分別針對各種不同的風險因子決定所需持有的資本額度。經過相關文獻的探討以及考慮保險業的行業特性,本研究建議市場風險與核保風險可以用VaR計算其資本額度;信用風險由於尚未有十分完善的量化模型,所以本研究建議應以徵信方式因應此一風險,而業務風險則是以規定一固定比率的資本額度因應之。本研究也建議待保險公司累積足夠的VaR使用經驗後,保險監理制度可以開放使用預先承諾法。
在運用VaR於保險監理上時,本研究也建議監理單位必須注意有關VaR的實行風險與模型風險的影響,同時也強調監理單位的檢核與市場制度的力量是VaR監理制度能夠充分運作的必要條件;此外,由於制度實施的初期,無法驗證模型與資料的可用性,所以仍必須輔以最低固定比率的要求,以確保保險公司的清償能力。
在探討VaR運用在保險監理制度上的可行性後,本研究將進一步比較VaR與現行RBC監理制度的比較。本研究主要是由制度實行的難易程度、衡量資本適足的準確性,以及監理的成本三方面進行比較。制度實行的難易程度主要是比較VaR與RBC制度的複雜度與可行性,以及與公司內部風險管理和全球金融監理趨勢的整合程度。衡量資本適足的準確性主要是比較二種制度何者更可以衡量保險公司所面臨的各種風險、清償能力的效力,以及保險公司投資組合的風險分散效果。至於監理的成本則可分為監理者、保險公司與社會成本三方面來探討。
透過本研究的比較結果發現VaR監理制度除了在制度的複雜度與可行性較RBC制度差以外,其他項目皆優於RBC監理制度。除此之外,VaR與RBC都各自有其監理上的道德風險。本研究建議如同銀行監理一般,保險監理制度應朝向VaR監理制度的趨勢前進,以更可以確保保險公司的清償能力以及投保大眾的權益。
Assuring insurance company solvency has always been the focal point of insurance regulation. Regulators use various methods to promote insurers' financial strength and protect policyholders from losses due to insolvency. Among these methods, risk-based capital (RBC) is used to measure the insurer's capital adequacy and provide the relative action rule for the regulator, and the VaR (value-at-risk) regulation is new regulatory type the bank regulator attempt to adopt. Besides the regulatory application, VaR is also used in bank's risk management system broadly. We can expect the VaR-type regulation will be the new insurance regulation in the future according to the development of bank's regulation.
The methodology of this study adopt is literature review. The most important purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of VaR-type insurance regulation and compare the VaR regulation with current RBC regulation. Before the regulation system examination, this study firstly discusses the presupposition of the VaR regulation application and the causes of insurer insolvency.
For the purpose of developing the VaR-type capital requirement in insurance regulation, this study proposes that market and underwriting risk capital requirement can be directly calculated in VaR; credit and business risk capital requirement should be regulated a fixed-rate capital amount. This study also proposes the application of precommitment approach when the regulator assure the insurer accumulate good experience in VaR. In addition, this study also addresses some points for attention of VaR insurance regulation.
The other purpose of this study is to compare the RBC and VaR through the regulatory implementation, solvency measurement, and regulatory cost. The result of this study indicates that VaR is superior to RBC in any aspect, besides the complexity and feasibility. In addition, VaR and RBC both have their own regulatory moral hazard. This study suggests VaR should be used in the insurance regulation as other financial regulation in the future.
封面頁
證明書
致謝詞
論文摘要
目錄
壹、前言
貳、銀行業與保險業現行監理制度的介紹
一、RBC在保險監理的運用
二、RBC在銀行監理的運用
三、現行VaR制度在銀行監理的運用-----內部法
四、VaR制度運用在銀行監理的未來方案-----預先承諾法
參、涉險值(VaR)在保險監理上的運用
一、VaR運用在保險監理制度上的前提
二、影響保險公司失去清償能力的因素
三、VaR對於保險公司各種經營風險之衡量
(一) 市場風險
1、模型參數
(1) 持有期間
(2) 觀察期間
(3) 信賴水準
(4) 波動性與交互作用
2、模型方法
3、乘數限制
4、壓力測試法
(1) 使用壓力測試法的理由
(2) 壓力測試法的種類
(3) 壓力測試法的問題與解決之道
(4) 壓力測試法與VaR的結合
5、事後檢測與懲處機制
(二) 核保風險
(三) 信用風險
(四) 其他風險
四、預先承諾法在保險監理上的運用
五、實施VaR監理制度的其他注意事項
肆、VaR監理制度與RBC監理制度的比較
一、制度實行的難易程度
(一) 制度的複雜度
(二) 制度的可行性
(三) 與公司內部風險管理制度的整合
(四) 與全球金融監理趨勢的整合
二、衡量資本適足的準確性
(一) 衡量保險公司所面臨的各種風險
(二) 衡量清償能力的效力
(三) 衡量風險分散效果的效力
三、監理的成本
(一) 保險公司的成本
1、因應保險市場的變化
2、配合監理制度所需的成本
3、有效決定保險公司的資本配置
4、對保險公司競爭力的影響
(二) 監理者的成本
1、監理程序的簡化
2、監理上的道德風險
(三) 社會成本
1、提供保險市場正確資訊
2、對承保能量的影響
3、減少保險市場因為政府介入所致的不效率性
伍、結論
參考文獻
中文部分
蘇源拓,1994年6月,美國NAIC壽險業風險性資本需求之探討,碩士論文,政治大學保險研究所。
周國端,1997年2月,保險公司最適資本要求與破產風險基準:美國NAIC風險基準要求(RBC)模型的可行性分析,行政院國家科學委員會委託研究(NSC83-0301-H002-092)。
陳顯宜(Shien-Yi Chen),1997年6月,風險性資本(RBC)要求下產物保險公司投資策略之研究(The Investment Strategy of Property-Liability Insurer under Risk Based Capital Requirement),碩士論文,元智工學院管理研究所。
古瀨政敏,1998年11月,美國壽險公司之經營革新,保險事業發展中心。
鄭濟世,1998年12月,我國壽險業資本適足性之研究,保險事業發展中心Smithson W. Charles,1999年,金融風險管理:衍生性產品-金融工程-價值最大化,臺北市 :麥格羅希爾出版:寰宇發行。
張冠群,2000年6月,論保險業與其他金融行業組織上結合之監理,碩士論文,政治大學風險管理與保險研究所。
林景春,1996年9月,資本適足性之規定對台灣地區銀行風險影響之實證研究,台灣銀行季刊,第47卷,第三期,1-34。
曾令寧、黃仁德,1999年9月,新式資本適足性架構、資本協定衝擊與監理資本套利,存款保險資訊季刊,第13卷,第一期,25-50。
曾令寧、黃仁德,1997年3月,風險中價值與銀行市場風險管理,存款保險資訊季刊,第10卷,第三期,23-38。
曾令寧、黃仁德,1996年9月,銀行市場風險的資本規範,存款保險資訊季刊,第10卷,第一期,32-49。
許振明、唐正儀,1998年12月,銀行市場風險管理與市場風險值估測,存款保險資訊季刊,第12卷,第二期,107-131。
蔣松原,2000年5月,利用結構性蒙地卡羅模擬法來計算股票市場之風險值,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第23期,111-119。
睦傑、陳雅惠,2000年9月,信用風險之評估---介紹JP Morgan之CreditMetricesTM及若干國內實證,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第25期,113-125。
英文部分
Aggarwal, Raj ,and Kevin T, Jacques, 1998, Assessing the Impact of Prompt Corrective Action on Bank Capital and Risk, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4: 23-32.
Andersson, Fredrik, and Stanislav Uryasev, 1999, Credit Risk Optimization With Conditional Value-at-Risk Criterion, Mathematical Programming (December).
Alexander, Carol. O. and C.T. Leigh, 1997, On the Covariance Matrices Used in Value at Risk Model, The Journal of Derivatives, 4: 50-61.
Aragones, R. Jose, Carlos Blanco, and Kevin Dowd, 2001, Incorporating Stress Testing into Market Risk Modeling, Derivatives Quarterly, 7: 44-49.
Arnott, D. Robert , and David P. Flynn, 1993, Controlling Insurance Risk and Consumer Costs-Asset Risk Under Risk Based Capital Requirements, Journal of Insurance Regulations, 12: 81-94.
Artzner, Philippe, 1999, Application of Coherent Risk Measures to Capital Requirements in Insurance, North American Actuarial Journal, 3: 11-25.
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 1996, Overview of the Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks, Survey of disclosures about trading and derivatives activities of banks and securities firms (October).
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 1999, Performance of Models-Based Capital Charges for Market Risk—1 July-31 December 1998 (September).
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 1996, Supervisory Framework for the Use of “Backtesting” in Conjunction with the Internal Models Approach to Market Risk Capital Requirements (January).
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 1999, Capital Requirements and Bank Behaviour: The Impact of the Basle Accord (April).
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 1999, A New Capital Adequacy Framework (June).
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 2000, Stress Testing by Large Financial Institutions: Current Practice and Aggregation Issues (April).
Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, 2001, A Survey of Stress tests and Current Practice at Major Financial Institutions (April).
Batlin, Carl, and Barry Schachter, 2000, The Ten Great Challenges of Risk Management, www.gloriamundi.org (March).
Beder, Tanya Styblo, 1995, VAR: Seductive but Dangerous, Financial Analysts Journal, 51: 11-24.
Berkowitz, Jeremy, 1999, A Coherent Framework for Stress-Testing, Manuscript, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, July.
Brender, Allan, 1999, Cash-Flow Valuation and Value at Risk, North American Actuarial Journal, 3: 26-29.
Browne, Mark J., and Robert E. Hoyt, 1995, Economic and Market Predictors of Insolvencies in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 62: 309-327.
Browne, Mark J., James M. Carson, and Robert E. Hoyt, 1999, Economic and Market Predictors of Insolvencies in the Life-Health Insurance Industry, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 66: 643-659.
Browne, Mark J., James M. Carson, and Robert E. Hoyt, 2000, Dynamic Financial Models of Life Insurers, Working Paper (February).
Butsic, Robert P., 1994, Solvency Measurement for Property-Liability Risk-Based Capital Applications, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 61: 656-690.
Carson, James M., and Robert E. Hoyt, 1995, Identifying Life Insurer Financial Distress: Classification Models and Empirical Evidence, The Financial Dynamic of Insurance Industry (Homewood, IL: Irwin Professional Publishers).
Christoffersen, Peter F., Francis X. Diebold, and Til Schuermann, 1998, Horizon Problems and Extreme Events in Financial Risk Management, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4: 109-118.
Copyright Philip Best, 1999, Where Is The Next Iceberg? , www.gloriamundi.org.
Cordell, Lawrence R., and Kathleen Kuester King, 1995, A Market Evaluation of the Risk-Based Capital Standards for the U.S. Financial System, Journal of Banking and Finance, 19: 531-562.
Considine, Jill, 1998, Pilot Exercise---Pre-Commitment Approach to Market Risk, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4: 131-136.
Coronado, Maria, 2000, Comparing Different Methods for Estimating Value-a-Risk(VaR) for Actual Non-Linear Portfolios: Empirical Evidence, The European Journal of Finance, working paper.
Cumming, M. Chrietine, and Beverly J. Hirtle, 2001, The Challenges of Risk Management in Diversified Financial Companies, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 7:1-17.
Cummins, J. David, Martin F. Grace, and Richard D. Phillips, 1999, Regulatory Solvency Prediction: Risk-Based Capital, Audit Ratios, and Cash Flow Simulation, Journal of Risk and insurance, 66: 417-458.
Cummins, J. David, Scott E. Harrington, and Greg Niehaus, 1995, Risk-Based Capital Requirement for Property-Liability Insurers: A Financial analysis, The Financial Dynamic of Insurance Industry (Homewood, IL: Irwin Professional Publishers).
Cummins, J. David, Scott E. Harrington, and Greg Niehaus, 1993, An Economic Overview of Risk-Based Capital Requirements for the Property-Liability Insurance Industry, Journal of Insurance Regulation, 11: 427-447.
Cummins, J. David, Martin F. Grace, and Richard D. Phillips, 1999, Regulatory Solvency Predition in Property-Liability Insurance: Risk-Based Capital, Audit Ratios, and Cash Flow Simulation, Journal of Insurance Regulation, 3: 417-458.
Danielsson Jon, Casper G. de Vries, and Bjorn N. Jorgensen, 1998, The Value of Value at Risk: Statistical, Financial, and Regulatory Considerations, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4: 107-108.
Danielsson, J., P. Hartmann, and C. G. de Vries, 1998, The Cost of Conservatism: Extreme Returns, Value-at-Risk, and the Basle ‘Multiplication Factor’, Risk 11: 1-10.
Daripa, Arupratan and Simone Varatto, 1998, Value at Risk and Precommitment: Approaches to Market Risk Regulation, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4:137-143.
Dimson, Elroy and Paul Marsh, 1997, Stress Tests of Capital Requirements, Journal of Banking and Finance, 21:1515-1546.
Dowd, Kevin, 1998, Beyond Value At Risk: The new science of risk management, (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
Dowd, Kevin, 1999, Financial Risk Management, Financial Analysts Journal, 55: 65-71.
Duffie, Darrel and Jun Pan, 1997, An Overview of Value at Risk, The Journal of Derivatives, 4: 7-48.
Ediz, Tolga, Ian Michael, and William Perraudin, 1998, The Impact of Capital Requirements on U.K. Bank Behaviour, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4:15-22.
Estrella, Arturo, 1995, A Prolegomenon to Future Capital Requirements, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, July: 1-12.
Estrella, Arturo, 1998, Formulas or Supervision? Remarks on the Future of Regulatory Capital, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4:191-200.
Gamrowski, Bertrand and Svetlozar Rachev, 1996, Testing the Validity of Value-at-Risk Measures, Athens Conference on Applied Probability and Time Series, Volume I: Applied Probability. Springer-Verlag (ISBN 0-387-94788-4), 307-320.
Grace, Martin F., Scott E. Harrington, and Robert W. Klein, 1998, Risk-Based Capital and Solvency Screening in Property-Liability Insurance: Hypotheses and Empirical Tests, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 65: 213-243.
Greenspan, Alan, 1998, The Role of Capital in Optimal Banking Supervision and Regulation, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4:163-168.
Hendricks, Darryll, 1996, Evaluation of Value at Risk Models Using Historical Data, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 2: 152-171.
Hendricks, Darryll , and Beverly Hirtle, December 1997, Bank Capital Requirements for Market Risk:The Internal Models Approach, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 3: 1-12.
Hanweck, Gerald A. and Bernard Shull, 1993, Interest Rate Risk and Capital Adequacy, The Bankers Magazine, September/October: 41-48.
International Association of Insurance Supervisors, 2001, Principles on Capital Adequacy and Solvency, Principles No. 5.
Jackson, Patricia, David J. Maude and William Perraudin, 1997, Bank Capital and Value at Risk, The Journal of Derivatives, 4: 73-89.
Jacques, Kevin and Peter Nigro, 1997, Risk-Based Capital, Portfolio Risk, and Bank Capital: A Simultaneous Equations Approach, Journal of Economics and Business, 49: 533-547.
Jagtiani, Julapa and Anya Khanthavit, 1996, Scale and Scope Economies at Large Banks: Including Off-Balance Sheet Products and Regulatory Effects (1984-1991), Journal of Banking and Finance, 20: 1271-1287.
Jorion, Philippe, 1996, Risk2: Measuring the Risk in Value at Risk, Financial Analysts Journal, 52: 47-56.
Jorion, Philippe, 199, Value at Risk, The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk, (Chicago: IRWIN).
Ju, Xiogwei, and Neil D. Pearson, 1998,Using Value-at-Risk to Control Risk Taking:How Wrong Can You Be?, OFOR Paper Number 98-08. (October)
Khindanova, N. Irina and Svetlozar T. Rachev, 2000, Value At Risk:Recent Advances, Handbook on Analytic-Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, CRC Press.
Klein, Robert W., 1995, Solvency Monitoring of Insurance Companies: Regulators’ Role and Future Direction, The Financial Dynamic of Insurance Industry (Homewood, IL: Irwin Professional Publishers).
Klien, Robert W., 1995, Insurance Regulation in Transition, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 62:363-404.
Kobayakawa, Shuji, 1998,Designing Incentive-Compatible Regulation in Banking: The Role of Penalty in the Precommitment Approach, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4:145-153.
Kopcke, Richard W., 1996, Risk and the Capital of Insurance Companies, New England Economic Review, July/August: 27-42.
Kupiec, Paul H., 1995, Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models, Journal of Derivatives, 3: 73-84.
Kupiec, Paul H. and James M. O’Brien, 1997, The Pre-Commitment Approach: Using Incentives to Set Market Risk Capital Requirements, FEDS Working Paper No. 97-14, Federal Reserve Board.
Kupiec, Paul H., 1998, Stress Testing in a Value at Risk Framework, Journal of Derivatives, 1: 7-24.
Labrecque, Thomas G., 1998, Risk Management: One Institution’s Experience, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4:237-240.
Laurenzano, Vincent, 1995, Risk-Based Capital Requirement for Property and Casualty Insurers: Rules and Prospects, The Financial Dynamic of Insurance Industry (Homewood, IL: Irwin Professional Publishers).
Lennon, Terence, 1995, Objectives and Expected Impact of Risk-Based Capital Requirements for Life Insurance Companies, The Financial Dynamic of Insurance Industry (Homewood, IL: Irwin Professional Publishers).
Liao, Shih-Yun and Chenghsien Tsai, 1999,Value at Risk as an Insurance Solvency Regulation Tool-Comparisons with Risk-Based Capital, a paper presented at the 1999 American Risk and Insurance Association Annual Meeting.
Longin, M. Francois, 2000,From Value at Risk To Stress Testing:The Extreme Value Approach, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24: 1097-1130.
Lopez, A. Jose, 1997, Regulatory Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research Paper no. 9710.
Lopez, A. Jose, 1998, Methods for Evaluating Value-at-Risk Estimates, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4: 119-124.
Marshall Chris , and Michael Seigel, 1997, Value at Risk: Implementing a Risk Measurement Standard, The Journal of Derivatives, 4: 91-111.
Marshall, David, and Subu Venkataraman, 1999, Bank Capital Standards for Market Risk:A Welfare Analysis, European Finance Review, 2: 125-157.
Mckeet, Colin, 1999, A Bridge Too VaR, North American Actuarial Journal, 3: 66-71.
Meister, Edgar, 1998, Supervisory Capital Standards: Modernise or Redesign?, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4: 101-104.
Mullins M. Helena, and David H. Pyle, 1994, Liquidation Costs and Risk-Based Bank Capital, Journal of Banking and Finance, 18: 113-138.
NAIC, 1991, Report of the Industry Advisory Committee to the Life Risk Based Capital Working Group, November.
O’Connor, Ronan, James F. Golden, and Robert Rect, 1999, A Value-at-Risk Calculation of Required Reserves for Credit Risk in Corporate Lending Portfolios, North American Actuarial Journal, 3: 72-83.
Oda, Nobuyuki , and Jun Muranaga, 1997, A New Framework for Measuring the Credit Risk of a Portfolio: The “ExVaR” Model, Monetary and Economic Studies, 15: 27-62.
Oesterreichische Nationalbank, 1997, A Comparison of Value at Risk Approaches and Their Implications for Regulators (April).
Oesterreichische Nationalbank, 1999, Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models, volume 3 of the Guidelines on Market Risk (September).
Panning, William H., 1999, The Strategic Uses of Value at Risk: Long-Term Capital Management for Property/Casualty Insurers, North American Actuarial Journal, 3: 84-105.
Peabady, J. Lynn, 1994, Bank Financial Analysis: An Actuary’s-Eye View, The Bankers Magazine, November/December: 53-56.
Prescott, S. Edward, 1997, The Pre-Commitment Approach in a Model of Regulatory Banking Capital, Economic Quarterly-Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 1: 23-50. (Winter)
Rachev, T. Svetlozar, Irina N. Khindanova, and Bessy D. Athanasopoulos, Regulations and Risk Management in the Greek Financial Markets, www.gloriamundi.org.
Rebonato, Riccardo, and Peter Jackel, 1999,The Most General Methodology to Create a Valid Correlation Matrix For Risk Management and Option Pricing Purposes, www.gloriamundi.org.
Santomero M. Anthony, and David F. Babbel, 1997, Financial Risk Management by Insurers: An Analysis of the Process, Risk and Insurance, 2: 231-270.
Schachter, Barry, 1998, The Value of Stress Testing in Market Risk Management, Derivatives Risk Management Service, March, 5F-1-5F-11.
Schachter, Barry, 2000, Stress Testing for Fun and Profit, www.gloriamundi.org.
Shepheard, W. Tim, and Robert Litterman, 1998, Building a Coherent Risk Measurement and Capital Prtimisation Model for Financial Firms, Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Octorber: 171-182.
Simons, Katerina, 1996, Value at Risk-New Approach to Risk Management, New England Economic Review, Sepember/Octorber: 3-14.
Tom de Swaan, 1998, Capital Regulation: The Road Ahead, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4: 231-235.
Wirch, Julia Lynn, 1999, Raising Value at Risk, North American Actuarial Journal, 3: 106-115.