| 研究生: |
温柔 Wen, Rou |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
當AI傷害品牌:跨文化與高涉入產品情境下,AI內容揭露策略邊界之探討與建構 When AI Hurts the Brand: Mapping Strategic Boundaries for AI Content Disclosure Across Cultures and High-Involvement Products |
| 指導教授: |
蔡葵希
Christine Cook |
| 口試委員: |
侯宗佑
Hou, Tsung-Yu 畢南怡 Bi, Nan-Yi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
創新國際學院 - 全球傳播與創新科技碩士學位學程 Master’s Program in Global Communication and Innovation Technology |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 74 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 人工智慧揭露 、品牌信任 、購買意願 、跨文化研究 、感知風險 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | AI Content Disclosure, Perceived Risk, Cross-Cultural Research, Purchase Intention, Brand Trust |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:13 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在生成式人工智慧(Gen-AI)蓬勃發展的時代,品牌日益依賴 AI 工具進行行銷內容創作,然而揭露 AI 使用是否會對品牌帶來負面衝擊,仍具學術探討空間。本研究旨在探討在「高涉入產品」情境下,AI 內容揭露對消費者之品牌信任與購買意願的直接影響,並進一步檢視跨文化背景(台灣與美國)以及個體層次變項(AI 熟悉度與知覺風險)的調節效應。本研究採用 2(國家:台灣對美國)× 3(內容情境:AI揭露對AI未揭露對人類創作)的受試者間階乘實驗設計。受試者為來自台灣與美國共 324 名活躍的社群媒體用戶,實驗刺激物則採用模擬的 Instagram 穿戴式科技產品貼文。量化與質性分析結果顯示:第一,對於高涉入產品,明確揭露 AI 參與並不會直接對品牌信任或購買意願產生顯著的直接負面效應,反映出消費者存在「技術適應」與「品質重於來源」的理性評估傾向。第二,不論文化背景為何,AI 生成的內容與人類創作相比,皆會導致消費者購買意願的普遍下滑,顯示出跨文化的「普遍懷疑論」。第三,在調節效應方面,消費者的 AI 熟悉度無法有效緩解 AI 揭露帶來的衝擊;相反地,「知覺風險」發揮了強烈的調節與放大作用,即基準知覺風險較高的消費者,在得知 AI 參與後,其品牌信任與購買意願會出現顯著且更劇烈的跌幅。質性分析進一步證實,台灣消費者對於 AI 揭露多抱持「謹慎中立」態度,關注品牌誠意與去人性化風險;而美國消費者則更為兩極,易引發倫理與透明度方面的強烈反彈。最後,本研究根據上述發現,針對跨國品牌提出了兼顧「脈絡化標籤」與「人機協同」的全球 AI 內容揭露策略架構。
In the era of booming generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI), brands increasingly rely on AI tools for marketing content creation; however, whether disclosing AI usage brings negative shocks to brands remains academically debated. This study aims to investigate the direct impact of AI content disclosure on consumer brand trust and purchase intention within the context of "high-involvement products," while further examining the moderating effects of cross-cultural backgrounds (Taiwan vs. USA) and individual-level variables (AI familiarity and perceived risk).This study adopts a 2 (Country: Taiwan vs. USA) × 3 (Content Condition: AI-Disclosed vs. AI-Undisclosed vs. Human) between-subjects factorial experimental design. A total of 324 active social media users from Taiwan and the United States participated in the study, with simulated Instagram posts promoting a fictional wearable technology product serving as experimental stimuli.The quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal several critical findings: First, for high-involvement products, explicitly disclosing AI involvement does not exert a significant direct negative impact on either brand trust or purchase intention, reflecting consumers' tendencies toward "technological adaptation" and rational evaluation of "quality over source". Second, regardless of cultural background, AI-generated content consistently leads to a decline in purchase intention compared to human-created content, demonstrating a cross-cultural phenomenon of "universal skepticism". Third, regarding moderating effects, consumers' AI familiarity does not effectively mitigate the shock of AI disclosure. Conversely, "perceived risk" acts as a powerful moderator that amplifies negative outcomes; consumers with higher baseline risk perceptions exhibit a significantly sharper decline in brand trust and purchase intention once AI involvement is revealed. Qualitative analysis further confirms that Taiwanese consumers maintain a "cautious neutrality" toward AI disclosure, focusing on brand sincerity and dehumanization risks, whereas American consumers exhibit more polarized stances, triggering sharper backlash regarding ethics and transparency. Finally, based on these findings, this study proposes a strategic global framework for AI content disclosure that balances "contextual labeling" and "human-in-the-loop" creative approaches for multinational brands.
1. Introduction 2
2. Theoretical Background 5
2.1 Effects of AI Content Disclosure on Consumer Perception 5
2.2 Cultural Differences in AI Trust and Technology Perception 7
2.2.1 Regulatory Frameworks and Privacy Norms 8
2.2.2 Cross-Cultural Patterns of AI Trust 8
2.3 Individual-level Moderators of AI Disclosure Effects 10
2.4 Summary and Hypotheses Development 12
3. Methodology 14
3.1 Research Design 14
4. Results 19
5. Discussion 30
5.1 Discussion of Research Findings 30
5.1.1 Hypothesis 1 – The Effect of AI Disclosure on Consumer Evaluation 30
5.1.2 Hypothesis 2 & 3 – The Moderating Role of Cultural Background 31
5.1.3 Hypothesis 4 & 5 – Individual-level Moderators 33
5.2 Practical Implications: Strategic Guidelines for AI Marketing 34
5.2.1 Risk-Mitigation Framing: Positioning AI as a Precision Instrument 35
5.2.2 Cultural Adaptation: Relational Trust vs. Functional Autonomy 35
5.2.3 Navigating Expert Skepticism: From "Tech-Coolness" to Process Transparency 36
5.2.4 The Global AI Disclosure Strategy Framework 37
5.3 Limitations and Future DirectionS 39
References 41
Appendix A: Research Questionnaire 47
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Altay, S., & Gilardi, F. (2024). People are skeptical of headlines labeled as AI-generated, even if true or human-made, because they assume full AI automation. PNAS nexus, 3(10), pgae403. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae403
Ananthakrishnan, R., & Arunachalam, T. (2022). Comparison Of Consumers Perception Between Human Generated And Ai Aided Brand Content. Webology, 19(2).
Arce-Urriza, M., Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M., & Marcos-Matas, G. (2025). From familiarity to acceptance: The impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on consumer adoption of retail chatbots. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 84, 104234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104234
Barnes, A. J., Zhang, Y., & Valenzuela, A. (2024). AI and culture: Culturally dependent responses to AI systems. Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101838
Brauner, P., Glawe, F., Liehner, G. L., Vervier, L., & Ziefle, M. (2024). AI perceptions across cultures: Similarities and differences in expectations, risks, benefits, tradeoffs, and value in Germany and China. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13841.
Chen, Y., Wang, H., Hill, S. R., & Li, B. (2024). Consumer attitudes toward AI-generated ads: Appeal types, self-efficacy and AI’s social role. Journal of Business Research, 185, 114867.
Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727-1739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543
Cicek, M., Gursoy, D., & Lu, L. (2025). Adverse impacts of revealing the presence of “Artificial Intelligence (AI)” technology in product and service descriptions on purchase intentions: the mediating role of emotional trust and the moderating role of perceived risk. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 34(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2024.2368040
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205(219), 5.
Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Alemán, J. L., & Yagüe-Guillén, M. J. (2003). Development and validation of a brand trust scale. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 35-53.
Edelman. (2025). 2025 Edelman trust barometer. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2025/trust-barometer/report-tech-sector
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
Gasaymeh, A. M. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. A. (2024). University students' insights of generative artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
Greenleaf, G. (2014). Asian data privacy laws: trade & human rights perspectives. Oup Oxford. Gu, C., Jia, S., Lai, J., Chen, R., & Chang, X. (2024). Exploring consumer acceptance of AI- generated advertisements: From the perspectives of perceived eeriness and perceived intelligence. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 2218-2238.
Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30-41.
Kadence International. (2025). AI's great divide: East vs West [Research study]. https://kadence.com/ais-great-divide-east-vs-west
Kang, S., Potinteu, A.-E., & Said, N. (2025). ExplainitAI: When do we trust artificial intelligence? The influence of content and explainability in a cross-cultural comparison. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '25). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3720222
Khonkanen, E. (2023). The Role of Chatbot Marketing Efforts in Enhancing Customer-Brand Relationships for the Finnish Fashion Brands.
Kirk, C. P., & Givi, J. (2025). The AI-authorship effect: Understanding authenticity, moral disgust, and consumer responses to AI-generated marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114984
KPMG and University of Melbourne. (2025). Trust, attitudes and use of artificial intelligence: A global study 2025[Research report]. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/xx/pdf/2025/05/trust-attitudes-and-use-of -ai-global-report.pdf
Kučinskas, G. (2024). Negative effects of revealing AI involvement in products: Mediation by authenticity and risk, moderation by trust in AI and familiarity with AI. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(22s), 1530-1547. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13337499
Labajová, L. (2023). The state of AI: Exploring the perceptions, credibility, and trustworthiness of the users towards AI-Generated Content.
Lima, S., & Schmälzle, R. (2023). The effect of source disclosure on evaluation of AI-generated messages: A two-part study. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15544
Liu, Y., & Rao, Q. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Generative AI Tools in Making Marketing Copywriting in the Era of New Media. In Proceedings of ICILLP 2024 Workshop: Today's College Students and Faculty: How AI is Transforming Their Behaviors, Legally. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/74/2024.BO17882
Mariadassou, S., Klesse, A. K., & Boegershausen, J. (2024). Averse to what: Consumer aversion to algorithmic labels, but not their outputs? Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101839
Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090-1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.001
Owusu, P., Yusuf, S. O., Ocran, G., Boateng, E. A., Krampah, S. O., & Paul-Adeleye, A. H. (2024). Privacy, confidentiality and ethical concerns in audio AI assistants: A comparative study of North American, European, and Asian markets. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(01), 3023-3035. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.2002
Panigutti, C., Hamon, R., Hupont, I., Fernandez Llorca, D., Fano Yela, D., Junklewitz, H., Scalzo, S., Mazzini, G., Sanchez, I., Soler Garrido, J., & Gomez, E. (2023). The role of explainable AI in the context of the AI Act. In 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '23). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594069
Park, J., Oh, C., & Kim, H. Y. (2024). AI vs. human-generated content and accounts on Instagram: User preferences, evaluations, and ethical considerations. Technology in Society, 79, 102705.
Pangarkar, T. (2025, January 14). Wearable technology statistics 2025 by tech and human. Market.us Scoop. https://www.market.us/scoop/wearable-technology-statistics-2025-by-tech-and-human
Rajasekhar, S., & Makesh, D. (2013). Impact of advertising on brand preference of high involvement products. IRACST - International Journal of Commerce, Business and Management (IJCBM), 2(4), 202-210.
Renieris, E. M., Kiron, D., & Mills, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence disclosures are key to customer trust. MIT Sloan Management Review, 65(3), 1-6.
Roganović, J. (2024). Familiarity with ChatGPT features modifies expectations and learning outcomes of dental students. International Dental Journal, 74(6), 1456-1462.
Sands, S., Campbell, C. L., Plangger, K., & Ferraro, C. (2022). Unreal influence: Leveraging AI in influencer marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1721-1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2019-0949
Sindermann, C., Yang, H., Elhai, J. D., Yang, S., Quan, L., Li, M., & Montag, C. (2022). Acceptance and fear of artificial intelligence: Associations with personality in a German and a Chinese sample. Discover Psychology, 2(8), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-022-00020-y
Smith, R., & Yang, X. (2004). Toward a general theory of creativity in advertising: Examining the role of divergence. Marketing Theory, 4(1), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044086
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
Stein, J. P., Messingschlager, T., Gnambs, T., Hutmacher, F., & Appel, M. (2024). Attitudes towards AI: Measurement and associations with personality. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2909.
Storti, F. (2024). The role of generative AI in content generation: An empirical case study [Master's thesis, Università degli Studi di Padova].
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., Ng, K. Y., Rockstuhl, T., Tan, M. L., & Koh, C. (2015). Sub-dimensions of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence: Expanding the conceptualization and measurement of cultural intelligence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(4), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00429.x
Wang, C., Ahmad, S. F., Ayassrah, A. Y. B. A., Awwad, E. M., Irshad, M., Ali, Y. A., ... & Han, H. (2023). An empirical evaluation of technology acceptance model for Artificial Intelligence in E-commerce. Heliyon, 9(8).
Xavier, D. F., & Korunka, C. (2025). Integrating Artificial Intelligence across cultural orientations: A longitudinal examination of creative self-efficacy and employee autonomy. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18, 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100623