| 研究生: |
陳進棋 Chen,Chin-Chi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
在網路上建構以SWRL為主的數位版權管理規範及應用 Building SWRL-Based Digital Rights Management Policy and Application on the Web |
| 指導教授: |
胡毓忠
Hu,Yuh-Jong |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 資訊科學系 |
| 論文出版年: | 2007 |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 57 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 本體論 、語意網 、版權表達語言 、數位版權管理 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Ontology, Semantic Web, Rights Expression Language, Digital Rights Management |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:101 下載:51 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究是探討如何運用語意網規則語言(Semantic Web Rule Language, SWRL)來表示網路上的數位版權管理(DRM)。以XML為主的版權表達語言(Rights Expression Language, REL)因為無法處理具有語意內涵層級的版權管理規則,所以在概念表達和處理能力上有所限制。因此,我們運用了結合本體論(Ontology)和規則(Rule)語言的SWRL來探討比較現有XML為主的版權表達語言的不足,並以實作驗證本體論和規則結合所具有語意特性,讓使用者能在網路上加以應用數位內容。
In this research, we show how to use Semantic Web Rule language (Semantic Web Rule Language, SWRL) for the digit rights management (DRM) on the Web. Since XML-based Rights Expression Languages (REL) can not deal with the right management policies at the semantic level, their expression abilities for concept descriptions are limited. Therefore, we use SWLR to contrast the insufficiencies in existing XML-based RELs. In summary, we take advantage of semantic-supported REL for DRM systems on the Web.
第一章 導論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究目的 1
1.3研究方向 2
1.4各章節簡述 3
第二章 相關研究 4
2.1數位版權管理系統:定義、運作模式、架構元件、相關技術與現況 4
2.1.1數位版權管理系統定義 4
2.1.2數位版權管理系統運作模式 5
2.1.3數位版權管理系統架構元件 7
2.1.3數位版權管理系統相關技術 9
2.1.4商業數位版權管理系統概述 16
2.2語意網與語意網規則語言 16
2.2.1語意網 16
2.2.2語意網規則語言 17
2.2.3相關本體論與規則的研究 19
第三章 以語意網規則語言之數位版權管理系統 20
3.1建置數位版權管理之本體論及規則 20
3.1.1 DRM授權條款本體論的設計 20
3.1.2 權利屬性本體論與規則的設計 22
3.1.3 複製權利與移轉權利規則的設計 24
3.1.5 運用SWRL-R的使用案例之設計 27
使用案例1: Alex複製產生播放權利給予Bob 28
使用案例2: Alex複製產生播放權利及移轉權利給予Bob 29
使用案例3: Alex複製產生播放權利、複製及移轉權利給予Bob 31
3.16 SWRL-R與限制(Constraint)權利屬性 32
限制權利屬性使用案例1:播放次數 33
限制權利屬性使用案例2:編輯期限 33
3.2 要求授權條款通訊協定機制 33
3.3 播放工具與授權條款的關係:使用數位內容或新授權條款的產生 35
3.4從創作者、內容提供者到末端使用者的完整案例: 37
第四章 系統架構 44
4.1實驗架構步驟:推論模組 44
4.2驗證SWRL-R與事實的關係 46
4.3實驗場景:從創作者、內容提供者到末端使用者的完整案例 49
4.3.1 Bob向Alex要求play與transfer權利事實 49
4.3.2 Christ向Bob要求play與transfer權利事實 51
第五章 結論與未來展望 53
5.1結論 53
5.2未來展望 54
參考文獻 55
[1] Borda, E.(2004).“Digital rights protection - a great challenge of the new millennium,” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting.
[2] Bradshaw, J. M.,et al. (1997). “KAoS: Toward An Industrial-Strength
Open Agent Architecture. Software Agents.”, AAAI Press.
[3] ContentGuard, “eXtensible rights Markup Language (XrML).” , 2.0 Specification. http://www.xrml.org/.
[4] Damianou, N. N. Dulay, E. Lupu, and M. Sloman.(2001).“The ponder policy specification language.”The Policy Workshop, Bristol U.K. Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1995.
[5] Erickson, J. S.(2002)“OpenDRM: A Standards Framework for Digital Rights Expression, Messaging, and Enforcement,” Hewlett-Packard Laboratories OpenDRM Project Report http://xml.coverpages.org/-EricksonOpenDRM20020902.pdf.
[6] FRIEDMAN-HILL, E. J.(1997).“Jess: The Java Expert System Shell.” Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA. http://herzberg1.ca.sandia.gov/jess/.
[7] Golbreich, C., (2004).“Combining Rule and Ontology Reasoners for the Semantic Web.” In Third International Workshop, RuleML 2004, Hiroshima, Japan,November 8, 2004., pages 155–169. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg.
[8] Golbreich ,C .,et al.(2005). “What Reasoning Support for Ontology and Rules? the Brain Anatomy Case Study”In 8th International Protégé Conference.
[9] Golbreich ,C.,et al.(2004).“Biomedical Information Integration, a hot issue.” MEDINFO 2004, San Francisco.
[10] Gu, G.,et al.(2003). "PLI: A New Framework to Protect Digital Content for P2P Networks." Int. Conf. Applied Cryptography and Network Security (ACNS 2003),LNCS, Springer, Vol. 2846, pp. 206-216.
[11] Horrocks,I.,et al.(2004).“SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML.”.TUhttp://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/UT.
[12] Horrocks, I.,et al (2003).“Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic”, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web.
[13] Iannella, R. (2002). “Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) .”, version 1.1.
http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl.
[14] Joshi, D.(2004). “Access-control language for multidomain environments.” Internet Computing, IEEE Volume 8, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec 40 – 50.
[15] Kagal, L. Rei Ontology Specifications, Ver 2.0. http://www.cs.umbc.edu/~lkagal1/rei/.
[16] Kagal, L., T. Finin, and A. Joshi.(2003).“A policy language for a pervasive computing environment.” IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks.
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/kagal03policy.html.
[17] Knublauch, H.,et al. (2004).“Editing description logics ontologies with the Protege OWL plugin.”International Workshop on Description Logics, Whistler, BC, Canada.
[18] LaMacchia1, B. A.(2002).“Key Challenges in DRM: An Industry Perspective.”, Proc. 2nd ACM Digital Right Management Workshop.
[19] Lassila, J., J. Prados & J. Delgado.(2004).“Interworking of Rights Expression Languages for Secure Music Distribution”, Proc. 4th International Conf. on Web Delivering of Music, Barcelona (Spain).
[20] Mandal, P.,,et al.(2005).“Watermark based digital rights management.”Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, VOL. 1, pp. 74-78, 2005.
[21] Moses, T., Entrust Inc, eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML), Ver 2.0.
http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/2.0/access_control-xacml-2.0-core-spec-os.pdf.
[22] Qu, Y.,et al .(2004).“Design and Application of Rule Based Access Control Policies.”Proceeding of the Semantic Web and Policy Workshop, Galway,IR.
[23] Qu, Y.,et al. (2004).“OREL: An ontology-based rights expression language. ”In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM WorldWide Web Conference.
[24] Rump, N.(2003).“Digital Rights Management:Technological Aspects.”Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects, LNCS ,Springer,Vol.2770,pp.3-15.
[25] Schmidt, A. U.,et al.(2004). “Interoperability challenges for DRM systems.”In International Workshop for Technology, Economy, Social and Legal Aspects of Virtual Goods, Ilmenau, Germany.
[26] Stefik, M. (1996). “Letting Loose the Light: Igniting Commerce in Elec¬tronic Publication. ” Internet Dreams: Archetypes, Myths, and Metaphors, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press. 219-253.
[27] Suwanmannee, S.,et al.(2005) “OWL-based Approach for Semantic Interoperability.” Proceedings of AINA, IEEE Computer Science Press.
[28] Trusted Computing Group.(2004). “TCG Specification Architecture Overview, Revision 1.2”.
[29] WIPO.(2002).“Intellectual Property on the Internet: A Survey of Issues” TUhttp://www.wipo.org/copyright/ecommerce/en/pdf/survey.pdfUT.