跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 區煜明
Au, Yuk Ming
論文名稱: 稀土的地緣政治及武器化:中、美、台的案例
Geopolitics and Weaponization of Rare Earths: Case Studies of China, the US, and Taiwan
指導教授: 彭保羅
Paul Jobin
口試委員: 冷則剛
Tse-Kang Leng
蔡中民
Chung-Min Tsai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學學院 - 政治學系
Department of Political Science
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 141
中文關鍵詞: 稀土戰略性礦產資源武器化民族主義產業政策美中關係國際制度
相關次數: 點閱:18下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以比較政治經濟學的角度,探討美中兩國在稀土資源治理中的「武器化」邏輯與制度。稀土是支撐新能源、高科技與國防工業的重要關鍵礦產,亦是近年大國競逐的焦點。既有研究多從供應鏈脆弱性與地緣政治衝突解釋稀土風險,但較少系統性處理:在「國家安全/經濟安全」框架下,稀土如何被政策行動者安全化並進一步武器化,以及不同制度條件下的政策工具使用是否呈現趨同。

    本研究以比較政治經濟與安全化視角為主線,分析中國與美國在稀土政策中如何動員出口管制、投資審查、補貼與供應鏈重組等工具,並提出「趨同/不趨同」的判準。另以台灣作為延伸觀察點,討論在材料依賴與供應鏈安全化雙重壓力下的結構性風險與策略空間。


    From the perspective of comparative political economy (CPE), this study examines the logic and institutions of "weaponization" within the governance of rare earth resources by the United States and China. Rare earths are critical minerals vital to supporting new energy, high-tech, and defense industries, making them a focal point of recent great power competition. While existing literature predominantly explains rare earth risks through the lenses of supply chain vulnerability and geopolitical conflict, it rarely offers a systematic analysis of how policy actors securitize and subsequently weaponize rare earths within a "national security/economic security" framework, or whether the deployment of policy tools under distinct institutional conditions exhibits convergence.

    Adopting comparative political economy and securitization perspectives as its analytical core, this thesis analyzes how China and the United States mobilize policy tools—such as export controls, investment screening, subsidies, and supply chain restructuring—in their respective rare earth policies, while establishing criteria to evaluate "convergence versus divergence." Furthermore, using Taiwan as an extended case study, this research discusses the structural risks and strategic maneuvering room available under the dual pressures of material dependence and supply chain securitization.

    第一章 緒論 5
    第一節 研究背景與動機 5
    第二節 問題意識 6
    第三節 研究問題 7
    第二章 文獻回顧、理論框架與研究方法 8
    第一節 安全化理論:稀土如何被「變成」國家安全議題 9
    第二節 從安全化到武器化:地緣經濟與「武器化」 11
    第三節 比較政治經濟(CPE)作為差異解釋 13
    第四節 研究設計與方法 15
    第三章 個案分析:中國 22
    第一節 中國稀土安全化與武器化治理模式及稀土發展歷程 22
    第二節 中國國內制度背景及企業與產業鏈治理 24
    第三節 從內動員到外強制:中國稀土武器化治理的雙軌機制與制度成本 26
    第四章 個案分析:美國 33
    第一節 美國稀土安全化與武器化治理模式及稀土產業的發展歷程 33
    第二節 安全需求與市場邏輯的結構性矛盾:美國稀土去風險治理的雙軌防禦及其程序摩擦 36
    第五章 中美實質撐控稀土比較、稀土武器化治理模式的趨同與分歧分析及台灣在中美稀土競逐中的結構性位置 41
    第一節 安全化邏輯的趨同:威脅敘事與例外狀態的正當化 44
    第二節 敵對性模仿與不完全趨同:中美稀土武器化的體制異質性及其工具之重疊性 53
    第三節 台灣在中美稀土競逐中的結構性位置 60
    第六章 結論、預期貢獻及研究限制及未來研究方向 68
    第一節 研究發現 68
    第二節 理論意涵 70
    第三節 研究限制 73
    第四節 未來研究方向 75
    參考資料 77
    附錄 88

    1. Balaram, V. (2019). Rare earth elements: A review of applications, occurrence, exploration, analysis, recycling, and environmental impact. Geoscience Frontiers, 10(4), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.005
    2. Benton, J. (2021). Rare earth elements: Texas rare earths show economic potential for state. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
    3. Brunelli, K. (2026). Chinese Customs Data Reveal Deeper US Dependence on Chinese Rare Earths. Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University SIPA. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/chinese-customs-data-reveal-deeper-us-dependence-on-chinese-rare-earths/
    4. Campbell, K. M., & Ratner, E. (2018). The China reckoning: How Beijing defied American expectations. Foreign Affairs, 97(2), 60–70.
    5. Cheminfo Services Inc. (2012). Review of the rare earth elements and lithium mining sectors: Final report. Environment Canada.
    6. China Daily. (2019). President Xi inspects high-tech company. ChinaDaily.com.cn. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201905/20/WS5ce26789a3104842260bcb09.html
    7. Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense. (2019). Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Restriction on the acquisition of certain magnets and tungsten (DFARS Case 2018-D054). Federal Register, 84, 72239–72245. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/31/2019-27825/defense-federal-acquisition-regulation-supplement-restriction-on-the-acquisition-of-certain-magnets
    8. Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense. (2024). Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Restriction on certain metal products (DFARS Case 2021-D015). Federal Register, 89, 46816–46821. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/30/2024-11513/defense-federal-acquisition-regulation-supplement-restriction-on-certain-metal-products-dfars-case
    9. Executive Office of the President. (2017). A federal strategy to ensure secure and reliable supplies of critical minerals (Executive Order 13817). Federal Register, 82, 60835–60837. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/26/2017-27899/a-federal-strategy-to-ensure-secure-and-reliable-supplies-of-critical-minerals
    10. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
    11. Geological Society of London. (2011). Rare earth elements: A briefing note by the Geological Society of London.
    12. Gholz, E. (2014). Rare earth elements and national security (Council on Foreign Relations Special Report No. 68). Council on Foreign Relations.
    13. Gilmore, T. (2023). Mountain Pass rare earth mine. NASA Earth Observatory. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/mountain-pass-rare-earth-mine-151085/
    14. Gramling, C. (2023). Rare earth mining may be key to our renewable energy future. But at what cost? Science News. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/rare-earth-mining-renewable-energy-future
    15. Harvard Law School Environmental & Energy Law Program. (n.d.). NEPA environmental review requirements. Retrieved March 1, 2026, from https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/tracker/nepa-environmental-review-requirements/
    16. Hu, Y., Florek, J., Larivière, D., Fontaine, F.-G., & Kleitz, F. (2018). Recent advances in the separation of rare earth elements using mesoporous hybrid materials. The Chemical Record, 18, 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201800012
    17. Humphreys, M. (2005). Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 508–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002705277545
    18. Humphries, M. (2013). Rare earth elements: The global supply chain (CRS Report R41347). Congressional Research Service.
    19. Hurst, C. (2010). China’s rare earth elements industry: What can the West learn? Institute for the Analysis of Global Security.
    20. Jobin, P., & Chen, T.-W. (2023). Toward an upgrade of Gaia-politics: A view from the East Asian critical zone. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 48(5), 1018–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439231191602
    21. Kiggins, R. D. (2015). The political economy of rare earth elements: Rising powers and technological change. Palgrave Macmillan.
    22. Klinger, J. M. (2017). Rare earth frontiers: From terrestrial subsoils to lunar landscapes. Cornell University Press.
    23. Korinek, J., & Kim, J. (2010). Export restrictions on strategic raw materials and their impact on trade and global supply (OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 95). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kggc7jmjvnq-en
    24. Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Polity.
    25. Lopez, C. T. (2024). DOD looks to establish “mine-to-magnet” supply chain for rare earth materials. DOD News, U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3700059/dod-looks-to-establish-mine-to-magnet-supply-chain-for-rare-earth-materials/
    26. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. (2023). U.S. DoD strengthens support for Lynas U.S. facility. https://lynasrareearths.com/u-s-dod-strengthens-support-for-lynas-u-s-facility/
    27. Mancheri, N. A., & Marukawa, T. (2016). Rare earth elements: China and Japan in industry, trade and value chain. Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo.
    28. McCurry, J. (2010). Japan-China row escalates over fishing boat collision. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/sep/09/japan-china-fishing-boat-collision
    29. McKie, R. (2012). Rachel Carson and the legacy of Silent Spring. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/may/27/rachel-carson-silent-spring-anniversary
    30. Miles, T., & Blanchard, B. (2011). China 2010 rare earth exports slip, value rockets. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/environment/china-2010-rare-earth-exports-slip-value-rockets-idUSTRE70I11T/
    31. Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, & General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China. (2025). Announcement No. 18 of 2025 of the Ministry of Commerce and the General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China: Implementing export control on some medium and heavy rare earth related items. https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/AnnouncementsOrders/art/2025/art_0dd87cbee7b045bf93fabe6ab2faceee.html
    32. MP Materials Corp. (2020). MP Materials awarded technology investment agreement with the Department of Defense. https://mpmaterials.com/news/press-release-11182020/
    33. MP Materials. (2024). MP Materials awarded $58.5 million to advance U.S. rare earth magnet manufacturing. https://investors.mpmaterials.com/investor-news/news-details/2024/MP-Materials-Awarded-58.5-Million-to-Advance-U.S.-Rare-Earth-Magnet-Manufacturing/default.aspx
    34. Nassar, N. T., & Fortier, S. M. (2021). Methodology and Technical Input for the 2021 Review and Revision of the U.S. Critical Minerals List. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211045
    35. Neely, J., Onstad, E., & Jackson, L. (2025). What are rare earths and why are they so important? Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/what-are-rare-earth-metals-why-are-they-demand-2025-02-26/
    36. Nolan, P. (2012). Is China buying the world? Polity Press.
    37. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
    38. Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2012). United States challenges China’s export restraints on rare earths. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2012/march/united-states-challenges-china%E2%80%99s-export-restraints-r
    39. Pitron, G. 著;蔡宗樺譯。(2020)。《稀有金屬戰爭》。遠見天下文化。
    40. Reuters. (2023). China bans export of rare earths processing tech over national security. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/china-bans-export-rare-earths-processing-technologies-2023-12-21/
    41. Reuters. (2025). China hits back at US tariffs with rare earth export controls. https://www.reuters.com/world/china-hits-back-us-tariffs-with-rare-earth-export-controls-2025-04-04/
    42. Science History Institute. (n.d.). Producers case study. https://www.sciencehistory.org/education/classroom-activities/role-playing-games/case-of-rare-earth-elements/producers/case-study/
    43. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2015). Made in China 2025. Beijing: State Council.
    44. Tang, R. (2012). China’s rare earth industry and export regime: Economic and trade implications for the United States (CRS Report No. R42510). Congressional Research Service.
    45. U.S. Department of Energy. (2024). DOE Releases Final Interpretive Guidance on the Definition of Foreign Entity of Concern. https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-releases-final-interpretive-guidance-definition-foreign-entity-concern
    46. U.S. Department of Energy. (2024). Interpretation of Foreign Entity of Concern. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/06/2024-08913/interpretation-of-foreign-entity-of-concern
    47. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2023). Treasury releases proposed guidance on new clean vehicle credit to lower costs for consumers, build U.S. industrial base, strengthen supply chains. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1379
    48. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2024). Clean Vehicle Credits Under Sections 25E and 30D; Transfer of Credits; Critical Minerals and Battery Components; Foreign Entities of Concern. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/06/2024-09094/clean-vehicle-credits-under-sections-25e-and-30d-transfer-of-credits-critical-minerals-and-battery
    49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2025). National Environmental Policy Act review process. https://www.epa.gov/nepa/national-environmental-policy-act-review-process
    50. U.S. Geological Survey. (2022). Mineral commodity summaries: Rare earths. U.S. Department of the Interior.
    51. U.S. Geological Survey. (2023). Mineral commodity summaries: Rare earths. U.S. Department of the Interior.
    52. U.S. Geological Survey. (2024). Mineral commodity summaries: Rare earths. U.S. Department of the Interior.
    53. Vivoda, V. (2009). Resource nationalism, bargaining and international oil companies: Challenges and change in the new millennium. New Political Economy, 14(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903288274
    54. White House. (2020). Executive Order on addressing the threat to the domestic supply chain from reliance on critical minerals from foreign adversaries. The White House. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-addressing-threat-domestic-supply-chain-reliance-critical-minerals-foreign-adversaries/
    55. White House. (2021). Building resilient supply chains, revitalizing American manufacturing, and fostering broad-based growth: 100-day reviews under Executive Order 14017. The White House.
    56. White House. (2021). Executive Order 14017 on America’s supply chains. The White House. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/03/01/2021-04280/americas-supply-chains
    57. World Trade Organization. (2014). China—Measures related to the exportation of rare earths, tungsten, and molybdenum (DS431, DS432, DS433). WTO.
    58. World Trade Organization. (2012). US, Japan and EU file disputes against China. WTO News. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news12_e/dsrfc_13mar12_e.htm
    59. World Trade Organization. (2014). China—Measures related to the exportation of rare earths, tungsten, and molybdenum: Reports of the Appellate Body (WT/DS431/AB/R; WT/DS432/AB/R; WT/DS433/AB/R). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/431_432_433abr_e.pdf
    60. World Trade Organization. (n.d.). DS431: China — Measures related to the exportation of rare earths, tungsten and molybdenum. Dispute settlement: The disputes. Retrieved March 1, 2026, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds431_e.htm
    61. Zhu, M., Wei, N., Wang, J., & Xu, G. (2014). Interview with Academician Xu Guangxian: Rare-earth separation—From being constrained by others to global leadership. Science & Technology Review, 32(10). https://html.rhhz.net/kjdb/20141003.htm
    62. 人民日報海外版(2013)。「稀土之父」徐光憲。https://paper.people.com.cn/rmrbhwb/html/2013-06/14/content_1254596.htm
    63. 中國科學院(2009)。徐光憲院士:用創新改變了世界稀土市場格局。https://www.cas.cn/kxyj/kj/zg/2008n/xgx/mtbd/200907/t20090729_2282673.shtml
    64. 中華人民共和國國防安全研究院(2025)。稀土金屬的戰略價值。https://indsr.org.tw/focus?uid=11&pid=2822&typeid=36
    65. 中華人民共和國國務院(1991)。國務院關於將鈷、錫、銻、離子型稀土礦產列為國家實行保護性開採特定礦種的通知(國發〔1991〕5號)。中國政府網(國務院政策文件庫)。https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2016-07/01/content_5087381.htm
    66. 中華人民共和國國務院(2012)。中國的稀土狀況與政策(白皮書)。http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/ndhf/2012n/202207/t20220704_130078.html
    67. 中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室(2010)。中國的稀土狀況與政策。https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2014/08/23/content_281474983043156.htm
    68. 包田美等(2018)。包頭市稀土礦週邊居民區環境中鑭、鈰、镨、釹水平的調查,《職業與環境醫學雜誌》,35 (11)。https://doi.org/10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2018.17524
    69. 朱育賢(2020)。美中經貿衝突對臺灣產業之經濟影響評估:以半導體及資通訊為例,《臺灣經濟研究月刊》,43 (12),33–71。
    70. 朱建喜(2021)。“工業味精-稀土”——我國稀土資源概況。中國科學院廣州地球化學研究所。http://www.gig.ac.cn/kxcb/202110/t20211012_6221301.html
    71. 艾麗蓉(2024)。夾在兩個巨人之間:中美科技戰下台灣半導體與中國的貿易,國立政治大學。
    72. 東方財富網(2024)。回顧2009年至2011年稀土史詩級行情。https://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20241206095327430251580?from=guba&gubaurl=aHR0cDovL2d1YmFwb3N0LmVhc3Rtb25leS5jb20vbGlzdCw2MDAyNTkuaHRtbA%3D%3D&name=5bm%2F5pmf5pyJ6Imy5ZCn&utm_source=chatgpt.com
    73. 徐遵慈、鐘雲曦、李明勳(2024)。中國大陸《稀土管理條例》對國際供應鏈之意涵和影響,展望與探索,22 (9),9–19。
    74. 財團法人國防安全研究院(2025)。中國稀土管制反而加速全球產業鏈的重建。https://indsr.org.tw/focus?uid=11&pid=2926&typeid=36
    75. 莊凡緯(2024),印太供應鏈韌性與台灣國家安全之研究,國立政治大學。
    76. 郭芳、董顯蘋(2012)。贛州官員百姓瘋狂偷採稀土:比海洛因上癮。中國證券報。https://www.cs.com.cn/ssgs/14/201204/t20120417_3319945.html
    77. 郭建榮(2013)。一清如水:徐光憲傳。中國科學技術出版社。
    78. 郭春煌(2023)。稀土資源概要,金屬工業(2023/06 增刊),1–12。
    79. 麥哲瑋(2025)。中美競爭下半導體產業全球佈局與發展策略之分析,國立成功大學。
    80. 搜狐綠色(2010)。包鋼建1.7億噸「稀土湖」 環境污染擾民居住。搜狐網。https://green.sohu.com/20101108/n277244629.shtml
    81. 新浪財經(2025)。美國稀土國產化,為何失敗?。新浪財經。https://cj.sina.com.cn/articles/view/5953741034/162dee0ea06702360q
    82. 新華社(2011)。詳解全球稀土發展格局。新浪財經。https://m.cj.sina.cn/page/aHR0cDovL2ZpbmFuY2Uuc2luYS5jb20uY24vZy8yMDExMDIyMS8xMzM0OTQwNjgwNl8zLnNodG1s
    83. 新華網(2011)。包頭稀土尾礦庫之危:村民常年受環境污染困擾。新華網。https://finance.sina.cn/sa/2011-01-13/detail-ikftpnnx9800772.d.html
    84. 新華網(2014)。江西安遠涉20餘名官員稀土腐敗案透視:腐敗穿上“隱身衣”。https://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-12/17/c_1113681761.htm
    85. 新華網(2019)。貫徹新發展概念推動高品質發展 奮力開創中部地區崛起新局面。新華網。https://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2019-05/22/c_1124529225.htm?
    86. 雷晨(2021)。中國稀土集團正式成立,五礦稀土股價年內大漲234.57%。21世紀經濟通報。 https://www.21jingji.com/article/20211223/herald/9f924249ac0218f0ed1fb72a6c2f64f4.html
    87. 劉潤(2025)。一篇看懂稀土:卡住美國脖子的“中國王牌” https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/zHfqwU1x94kUk-6o-O9uJQ
    88. 龍長啟(2019)。白雲鄂博稀土礦區的發現者丁道衡。貴州政協報。https://www.gzszx.gov.cn/gzzxb/web/doc/detail/d_1299441436854208
    89. 蘇紫雲(2022)。中國稀土集團整併對戰略供應鏈衝擊有限,國防安全雙週報,(45),1–4。https://indsr.org.tw/respublicationcon?pid=1980&resid=843&typeid=3&uid=12

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/07/01
    QR CODE
    :::