跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 潘恩傑
Prince Ernest Eugene Ronson D. Sabado
論文名稱: 菲律賓共和國難民身分認定之國內實施:於選定入約後情境(1982–2025)下與國際難民法之接軌與一致性
Domestic Implementation of Refugee Status Determination in the Philippines: Alignment with International Refugee Law Across Selected Post-Accession Contexts (1982-2025)
指導教授: 蔡沛倫
Tsai, Pei-lun
口試委員: 翁燕菁
Weng, Yan-jing
蔡季廷
Tsai, Chi-ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際事務學院 - 國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
International Master's Program in International Studies(IMPIS)
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 191
中文關鍵詞: 關於難民地位的公約國際難民法菲律賓關於難民地位的議定書難民難民身分認定
外文關鍵詞: Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, international refugee law, Philippines, Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, refugee, refugee status determination
相關次數: 點閱:114下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 2026年為菲律賓加入1951年《難民地位公約》45週年,菲律賓作為《難民地位公約》締約國,在區域內占有獨特地位,並建立了難民資格認定(Refugee Status Determination, RSD)的行政程序。然而,由於《難民地位公約》並未規定統一且具體的難民資格認定程序模式,締約國得依其裁量設計各自的制度機制,使包括菲律賓在內的各國於不同難民潮及不同法域下,發展出多元的實施機制。本文分析菲律賓成為《難民地位公約》締約國後,來自越南、伊朗、中南半島及東帝汶等地之難民抵達菲律賓之情形,並探討近年來自阿富汗及緬甸遷徙至菲律賓之難民處境。研究採用法釋義研究法(doctrinal legal research)及個案研究法(case study),並透過三項分析面向檢視菲律賓履行其難民保護義務之情形:第一,國際義務之規範性內國法化;第二,最低程序保障之適用;第三,相關責任之制度性分配。
    本研究發現,菲律賓於加入《難民地位公約》後所面對之各波難民潮,始終傾向透過行政措施而非制定成文法的方式進行難民資格認定以決定保護範圍。早期歷史性難民潮主要透過具彈性且因應個案需求的臨時性機制予以處理;相較之下,本研究所探討之當代個案則面臨現代邊境管制措施,以及舉證責任分配與個別化審查標準不明確等問題。此外,本研究亦發現,由於各波難民潮期間主管機關職權屢經調整,難民保護責任之制度性分配呈現分散且缺乏一致性的情形。研究進一步指出,長期依賴零散且片段化的行政框架處理難民資格認定案件,已對菲律賓長期履行《難民地位公約》義務之能力帶來挑戰,且導致制度上的脆弱性。


    The year 2026 marked the 45th year of the Philippines’ accession to the 1951 Refugee Convention. Since its accession, the Philippines has occupied a distinct position in the region as a treaty-participating State with an established administrative procedure for refugee status determination. However, the absence of a prescribed and uniformed procedural model for refugee status determination (RSD) in the Convention enabled States Parties such as the Philippines to have a discretion in designing its own institutional mechanisms which birthed a variation of implementation mechanisms across refugee waves and jurisdictions. In particular, it analyzed the historical arrivals of the Vietnamese boat peoples, Iranian, Indochinese and East Timorese populations, alongside contemporary humanitarian movements involving Afghan nationals and Rohingya Muslims. Employing a doctrinal approach and case study methods, the study explored the country’s adherence through three analytical pillars: normative incorporation of obligations, the application of minimum procedural safeguards and the institutional allocation of responsibilities.
    The study revealed the Philippines’ consistent reliance on administrative measures than statutory incorporation to extend its RSD protection to the identified post-accession waves. Earlier historical waves have been accommodated through flexible and ad-hoc mechanisms while contemporary cases identified in the study have faced modern border protocols and ambiguities surrounding burden of proof and individualized assessments. Institutional allocation of responsibility is identified to be fragmented due to the shifting bureaucratic mandates across the post-accession waves and has identified that relying on fragmented administrative frameworks in handling RSD cases have created vulnerabilities with the country’s long-term compliance.

    LIST OF TABLES iv
    LIST OF FIGURES iv
    LIST OF CASES vi
    LIST OF INSTRUMENTS viii
    CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
    1.1 Background of the Study 1
    1.2 Statement of the Problem 5
    1.3 Significance of the Study 8
    1.4 Methodology 13
    1.5 Scope and Limitations 19
    CHAPTER 2: RSD-RELATED CORE OBLIGATIONS OF A CONTRACTING PARTY UNDER THE 1951 REFUGEE CONVENTION AND 1967 PROTOCOL 24
    2.1 Criteria and interpretation of a "refugee" under international law 26
    2.2 Principle of non-refoulement 28
    2.3 Access to fair RSD procedure 34
    2.4 Chapter conclusion 38
    2.4.1 Normative incorporation 40
    2.4.2 Procedural safeguards for protection 41
    2.4.3 Institutional allocation of refugee protection responsibilities 43
    CHAPTER 3: DOMESTIC APPROACHES FOR REFUGEE STATUS DETERMINATION IN THE PHILIPPINES 45
    3.1 The Philippines’ constitutional, statutory and administrative RSD-related instruments 45
    3.1.1 Domestic legal status of treaties in the Philippines 45
    3.1.2 Historical background 47
    3.1.3 Development of the Philippines’ post-accession coordination 49
    3.1.4 Clarification on judicial review and evidentiary standards 58
    3.2 Implementation mechanisms 60
    3.2.1 The Vietnamese boat people’s arrival in the Philippines 62
    3.3.2 The Iranian refugees' arrival in the Philippines 73
    3.3.3 The Indochinese refugees’ arrival in the Philippines 82
    3.3.4 The East Timorese refugees’ arrival in the Philippines 89
    3.4 Contemporary cases 95
    3.4.1 Afghans 98
    3.4.2 Rohingya Muslims 99
    3.5 Chapter synthesis 103
    3.5.1 Identification of a "refugee" under the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol 105
    3.5.2 The State’s operationalization of non–refoulement 106
    3.5.3 Guidance of the fair RSD procedure in Philippine context 107
    CHAPTER 4: THE PHILIPPINES’ RSD COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1951 CONVENTION AND 1967 PROTOCOL 110
    4.1 Normative incorporation of international obligations 111
    4.2 Procedural safeguards assessment 119
    4.2.1 Access to procedures and border gatekeeping 121
    4.2.2 Individualized assessment and the burden of proof 124
    4.2.3 Refoulement protection 129
    4.3 Institutional allocation of responsibility 131
    4.3.1 Vietnamese boat people and Indochinese waves 132
    4.3.2 Iranian wave 133
    4.3.3 East Timorese wave 134
    4.3.4 Contemporary cases 134
    4.4 Chapter conclusion 136
    CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 139
    REFERENCES 147
    APPENDIX A: Comparison table of the recent bills filed in the Congress of the Philippines and the current circular on the structure of the Philippines’ RSD structure 160
    APPENDIX B: Conditions of the term "refugee" under the 1951 Refugee Convention 162
    APPENDIX C: Overview of the UNHCR Procedural Safeguards for RSD 177

    Book and book chapters
    Abuju, Uwakwe (2021). “Legal Research Methodology and Applicable Procedures to Legal Research in Nigeria. Research Tool for Effective Justice Dispensation.” National Judicial Institute.
    Achiume, Tendayi (2021). “Race, Refugees and International Law,” in Cathryn Costello, Michelle Foster, and Jane McAdam (eds.)’s The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law, 4, 56. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3636518
    Boslaugh, Sarah (2007). "An introduction to secondary data analysis." In Secondary Data Sources for Public Health: A Practical Guide, 1-11. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/secondary-data-sources-for-public-health/an-introduction-to-secondary-data-analysis/77BA8EDAF0C18E28C3CFAB531B0096BF.
    Davies, Sara (2008). “Legitimising Rejection: International Refugee Law in Southeast Asia.” Martinus Nijhoff, 18, 225. http://librarysearch.bond.edu.au/nde/fulldisplay?vid=61BOND_INST:NDE&offset=0&docid=alma9930323473502381&context=L&prevPersonId=n2018027278&lang=en&fromFeaturedResult=true.
    Goodwin-Gill, Guy and McAdam, Jane (2021). “The Refugee in International Law, 4th Edition.” Oxford Law Pro. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198808565.001.0001.
    Hutchinson, Terry (2006). “Researching and Writing in Law – Second Edition.” Thomas Lawbook Co.. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/6601/.
    Mayblin, Lucy (2017). “Asylum after Empire: Postcolonial Legacies in the Politics of Asylum Seeking.” Rowman & Littlefield. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316739420_Asylum_After_Empire_Postcolonial_legacies_in_the_politics_of_asylum_seeking.
    McConville, Mike and Chui, Wing Hong (2017). “Research Methods for Law: Second Edition,” Edinburgh University Press. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/pub/media/resources/9781474404259_Research_Methods_for_Law_-_Introduction_and_Overview.pdf.
    Shukla, Gaurav (2023). “Doctrinal legal research: A library-based research.” In Social Research Methodology and Publishing Results: A Guide to Non-Native English Speakers, 226-239. (2023). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369164115_Doctrinal_Legal_Research_A_Library-Based_Research.
    Thompson, Larry Clinton (2010). “Refugee workers in the Indochina exodus, 1975-1982.” McFarland.
    Van Hoecke, Mark (ed.) (2011). “Methodologies of Legal Research Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline?” Hart Publishing. https://www.academia.edu/70512862/Methodologies_of_legal_research_which_kind_of_method_for_what_kind_of_discipline.
    Vartanian, Thomas (2010). "Secondary data analysis.” Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/25873.
    Muntarbhorn, Vitit (1992). “The status of refugees in Asia.” Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-status-of-refugees-in-asia-9780198256687?cc=tw&lang=en.
    Journal articles and research papers
    Aravind, Alka (2025). “The use of case study methodology in research,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(5). www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/5/57319.pdf.
    Barnett, Michael (2001). “Humanitarianism with a Sovereign Face: UNHCR in the Global Undertow.” International Migration Review, 35(1): 244-277.
    Candelaria, Sedfrey (1995). “The practice of refugee law in the Philippines.” Philippine Law Journal. https://philippinelawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/70PLJ187_CANDELARIA.pdf.
    Casella, Alexander (2016). “Managing the ‘boat people’ crisis: The Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese Refugees.” International Peace Institute. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2893267_code2566685.pdf?abstractid=2893267&mirid=1.
    Casis, Rommel (2022). Refugee protection and border control in the Philippines. Asian Yearbook of International Law, 28: 104-127. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386096082_Refugee_Protection_and_Border_Control_in_the_Philippines.
    Cheung, Shing Kit (1997). “Immigrating visitors: The case of overstaying Chinese in the Philippines, 1947-75.” University of Hong Kong. https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/39416/1/FullText.pdf.
    Chimni, BS (1998). “The geopolitics of refugee studies: A view from the South’ 11 Journal of Refugee Studies 350, 351. https://academic.oup.com/jrs/article-abstract/11/4/350/1587519?redirectedFrom=fulltext.
    Choi, Woo Geun (2019). “Asian civil society and reconfiguration of refugee protection in Asia.” Human Rights Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-019-0548-4.
    Dobinson, Ian and Johns, Francis (2025). “Legal research as qualitative research.’ University of Technology Sydney. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/rest/bitstreams/931e14b1-ffb9-4e75-a4d0-874f82ab364e/retrieve.
    Espiritu, Yen Le (2020). “The Philippine Refugee Processing Center: The relational displacements of Vietnamese refugees and the indigenous Aetas”. Verge: Studies in Global Asias, 6(1): 118-141. https://escholarship.org/content/qt152912sj/qt152912sj.pdf
    Feliciano, Florentino (1982). “The principle of non-refoulement: A note on international legal protection of refugees and displaced persons.” Philippine Law Journal. 598. https://philippinelawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/57PLJ598_FELICIANO.pdf.
    Fink, Arlene (2014). “Conducting Research Literature Review: From the Internet to Paper.” SAGE Publications.
    Fragomen Jr., Austin (1970). “The Refugee: A problem of definition.” 3 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 45. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2101&context=jil.
    Gawas, Vijay (2017). “Doctrinal legal research method: A guiding principle in reforming the law and legal system towards the research development,” Law, 3(5): 128-130. https://www.lawjournals.org/assets/archives/2017/vol3issue5/3-5-130-248.pdf.
    Grahl-Madsen, Atle (1979). “Territorial asylum,” Studies in International Law, 1(5). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000037541.
    Hathaway, James (1990). “A reconsideration of the underlying premise of refugee law.” 31 Harvard International Law Journal 129. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315092478-4/reconsideration-underlying-premise-refugee-law-james-hathaway.
    Helton, Arthur (1990). “The Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indo-Chinese refugees: An experiment in refugee protection and control,” (1990). Journal of Human Rights, 1(8): 111-148. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1176&context=journal_of_human_rights.
    Khan, Sadruddin Aga (1976). “Legal problems relating to refugees and displaced persons.” https://www.unhcr.org/publications/lectures-prince-sadruddin-aga-khan-united-nations-high-commissioner-refugees-legal.
    Krause, Ulrike (2021). “Colonial roots of the 1951 Refugee Convention and its effects on the global refugee regime.” Journal of International Relations and Development 627.
    Kotlowski, Dean (2009). “Breaching the paper walls: Paul V. McNutt and Jewish refugees in the Philippines, 1938-1939.” Diplomatic History, 33(5): 865-896. https://academic.oup.com/dh/article-abstract/33/5/865/418288.
    Lakmali, Kalupe Hirosha (2017). “Refugee integration and role of CBOs in the host country.” University of Agder. https://uia.brage.unit.no/uia-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2565634/Kalupe,%20Hirosha%20Lakmali.pdf?sequence=1.
    Lambert, Helene (2017). "Temporary refuge from war: Customary international law and the Syrian conflict.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(3):723 – 745. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/temporary-refuge-from-war-customary-international-law-and-the-syrian-conflict/DF263D23465A40A85EA3F4DD02DE03EC.
    Layder, Derek and O’Connell Davidson, Julia (1995). "Methods, sex and madness (1st ed.).” Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203423455.
    Lilly, Damian (2021). “Palestinian refugees and the global compact on refugees.” Refugee Studies Centre. https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/publications/palestinian-refugees-and-the-global-compact-on-refugees/@@download/file.
    Majeed, Naseer, Hilal, Amjad and Khan, Arshad Nawaz (2023). “Doctrinal Research in Law: Meaning, Scope and Methodology.” Business and Economics, 12(4): 559-563. https://bbejournal.com/index.php/BBE/article/view/666.
    Manderson, Desmond and Mohr, Richard (2001). “From oxymoron to itersection: An epidemiology of legal research” 6. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2122861.
    Martins, Fellipe Silve (2018). "Secondary data in research - uses and opportunities.” Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management, 17(4):1-4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328363920_Secondary_Data_in_Research_-_Uses_and_Opportunities.
    Moos, Felix and Morrison, C. S. (2005). “The Vietnamese refugees at our doorstop: Political ambiguity and successful improvisation.” Review of Policy Research 1: 28– 46.
    Palattao, Jamelyn (2022). “The Philippines and the making of a refugee policy in the context of the Cold War (1948-1986). Queen’s University Belfast. https://pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/466785411/Thesis_Philippines_and_the_Making_of_a_Refugee_Policy_Palattao.pdf.
    Peterson, Glen (2015). “Sovereignty, international law, and the uneven development of the international refugee regime.” 49, Modern Asian Studies 439. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24495409.
    Pradiskool, Sirawit (2017). “Refugee protection in time of mass influx: A case study on Southeast Asian countries and their intergovernmental arrangements.” Lund University (2017). https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8952946&fileOId=8952965
    Robinson, W. Courtland (2004). “The Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese refugees, 1989-1997: Sharing the burden and passing the buck.” Journal of Refugee Studies. 17:3. https://cihs-shic.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Robinson_2004_CPAforIndochineseRefugees_JRS.pdf
    Rushagama, Faraji (2024). “Combined doctrinal and qualitative approach in legal researches: An overview.” Innovative Science and Research Technology. https://zenodo.org/records/10634265.
    Sevilla, Jr., Henelito (2015). “West Asian communities: An exploratory study of migrant Iranians, Jews, Arabs and Turkish.” Journal of Critical Perspectives in Asia, 51(1). https://asj.upd.edu.ph/mediabox/archive/ASJ-51-1-2015/West%20Asian%20Communities%20in%20the%20Philippines%20-%20Migrant%20Iranians%20Jews%20Arabs%20and%20Turkish.pdf.
    Tharun, R. (2025). "Use of case study in doctrinal legal research: Methodological challenges.” Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 2(2): 2397-2410. https://3fdef50c-add3-4615-a675-a91741bcb5c0.usrfiles.com/ugd/3fdef5_5b071fe271a74ae3a8c257bf23c2c871.pdf.
    Theil, Stefan (2025). “Carefully tailored: Doctrinal methods and empirical contributions,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(4): 1047-1075. https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article/45/4/1047/8240731.
    Thuy, Bui (2022). “Refugee protection in ASEAN: The right to be recognized as a refugee.” University of Melbourne. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/4356650/BUI-Thu-Thuy.pdf.
    Towle, Richard (2006). “Process and critiques of the Indo-Chinese Comprehensive Plan of Action: An instrument of international burden-sharing?.” International Journal of Refugee Law, 18(3-4):537-570. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eel015.
    Other government documents
    Australian Embassy in the Republic of the Philippines (2015). “SP151210 - Awarding of INTERFET medals.” https://philippines.embassy.gov.au/mnla/Speech151210.html.
    Department of Economy, Planning and Development of the Philippines (2023). “Philippine development plan 2023-2028.” https://pdp.depdev.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/PDP-2023-2028.pdf.
    Department of Economy, Planning and Development of the Philippines (2021). “Updated Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022.” https://pdp.depdev.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Pre-publication-copy-Updated-PDP.
    Department of Labor and Employment of the Philippines (2017). “Department order no. 186, series of 2017.” https://www.dole.gov.ph/php_assets/uploads/2017/11/DO-186-17-Revised-Rules-For-The-Issuance-Of-Employment-Permits-To-Foreign-Nationals.pdf.
    Department of Labor and Employment of the Philippines (2020). “Department order no. 218, series of 2020: Guidelines on the implementation of COVID-19 adjustment measures program (CAMP) under the Bayanihan to Recover as One Act.” phttps://www.dole.gov.ph/php_assets/uploads/2020/10/DO-218-20-Guidelines-on-the-Implementation-of-COVID-19-Adjustment-Measures-Program-CAMP-under-the-Bayanihan-To-Recover-As-One-Act.pdf.
    Department of Labor and Employment of the Philippines (2020). “Joint memorandum circular no. 2020-001: Implementing guidelines on providing financial assistance and cash-for-work program for displaced workers in tourism sector.” https://www.dole.gov.ph/php_assets/uploads/2020/11/JointMemoCircularNo2020001.pdf.
    Department of Social Welfare and Development of the Philippines (2022). “Memorandum circular no. 16, series of 2022.” https://aics.dswd.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/MC_2022-016.pdf.
    Department of Social Welfare and Development of the Philippines (2022). “Memorandum circular no. 15, series of 2022: Updated guidelines for the implementation of the assistance to individuals in crisis situation program.” https://aics.dswd.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/MC_2022-015.pdf2017-2022.pdf.
    Department of Trade and Industry of the Philippines (2018). “Department administrative order no. 18-07: Revised rules and regulations implementing act no. 3883 as amended, otherwise known as an act to regulate the use in business transactions of names other than true names.” https://bnrs-testing.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/files/20200409/4crodmqmo81250.pdf.
    Immigration Bureau of Thailand, “พระราชบัญญัติคนเข้าเมือง พ.ศ.๒๕๒๒ (Phra rāch bạỵỵạti khn k̄hêā meụ̄xng ph.Ṣ̄.2522) [Immigration Act B.E. 2522].” https://www.immigration.go.th/?page_id=2577
    Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia (Immigration Department of Malaysia), “Immigration Act 1959/63.” https://www.imi.gov.my/index.php/pekeliling/immigration-act-1959-63-act-155/
    Republic of Indonesia, “Law No. 37/2009 on Foreign Relations.” https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/28109/UU%20Nomor%2037%20Tahun%202009.pdf.
    Republic of Indonesia, “Law No. 6/2011 on Immigration.” https://peraturan.go.id/files2/uu-no-6-tahun-2011_terjemah.pdf
    Republic of Singapore, Immigration Act 1959. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/act/ia1959
    “Revised rules on evidence (rules 128-134, rules of court) as amended per resolution,” (1989). Arellano Law Foundation, 133(5). https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_128-134_evidence.html.
    United States Department of Education (1985). “Passage: A journal of refugee education.” https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED254099.pdf.
    United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights (1982). "Burma Citizenship Law." 3. https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1982/en/49622
    Official international organization documents
    Asian African Legal Consultative Organization (2001). “Final text of the AALCO’s 1996 Bangkok Principles on the Status and Treatment of Refugees” as adopted on 24 June 2001 at the AALCO’s 40th season, New Delhi.” III(1). https://www.aalco.int/final%20text%20of%20bangkok%20principles.pdf
    Council of Europe (1967). “Committee of ministers, Resolution (67) 14 : Asylum to persons in danger of persecution, 14 (1967), 29 June 1967.” https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/coeministers/1967/28626
    Organization of African Unity (1969). “OAU convention governing the specific aspects of refugee problems in Africa.” II(3). https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/36400-treaty-36400-treaty-oau_convention_1963.pdf
    Salcedo, Rico (n.d.) “Iranian businessman becomes first refugee to get Philippine citizenship” United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/news/iranian-businessman-becomes-first-refugee-get-philippine-citizenship.
    United Nations (1969). "American Convention on Human Rights: Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica. Signed at San Jose, Costa Rica, on 22 November 1969.” https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201144/volume-1144-i-17955-english.pdf
    Internet resources / miscellaneous
    Asylum Capacity Support Group (n.d.). "Philippines: Capacity strengthening initiatives on refugee protection and statelessness," https://acsg-portal.org/tools/54760/.
    Bakshian, Douglas (2009). “Last of Vietnamese boat people in Philippines start for United States.” VOA News. https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-2005-09-26-voa13/303046.html.
    Bisht, Tulsi Charan (2024). “Forced displacement: A rapidly rising vulnerability and its challenges for an inclusive and sustainable Asia and the Pacific.” Asian Development Bank Institute (2024). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/305399/1/1903885957.pdf.
    Council of Australian Law Deans (2017). “CALD statement on the nature of legal research,’ (2017). https://cald.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/cald-statement-on-the-nature-of-legal-research20051.pdf.
    “East Timorese find temporary refuge in Philippine cities” (1999). Union of Catholic Asian News. https://www.ucanews.com/story-archive/?post_name=/1999/11/01/east-timorese-find-temporary-refuge-in-philippine-cities&post_id=14728.
    Pulta, Benjamin and Caliwan, Christopher Lloyd (2021). “Safeguards in place for Afghan refugees: DOJ.” Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1150828.
    Rocamora, Joyce Ann (2021). “PH welcomes Afghan refugees.” Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1153008.
    Rocamora, Joyce Ann (2025). “PH hosts 8 more Rohingya refugees - DFA.” Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1253571.
    Sunga, Therese (2021). “Exploring the foundations of Philippine refugee policy towards Vietnamese refugees.” https://refugeehistory.org/blog/2021/7/29/exploring-the-foundations-of-philippine-refugee-policy-towards-vietnamese-refugees.
    Tran, Mai and Curtius, Mary (2004). “Ordeal for boat people may end.” Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-apr-30-me-boatpeople30-story.html.

    無法下載圖示 此全文未授權公開
    QR CODE
    :::