新聞進入社群媒體空間的當代，新聞閱聽人已可將媒體、媒介作為工具來表述個人觀點、參與公共討論、建立連結。在展現個體能動性的同時，也發展出複雜、多樣的新聞消費與日常實踐的樣態。如是消費與實踐樣態未必與新聞生產直接與新聞生產結構形塑的價值和規範對接，而是可能映照出閱聽人對社群新聞傳播生態的想像與期待。建構一個能夠能囊括這些想像、期待、日常媒介使用背後多樣意涵的研究框架，有助於日後進一步理解閱聽人參與形構理想社群新聞傳播生態的潛能。
本研究透過訪談23位背景迥異的臺灣閱聽人，了解其日常生活脈絡、媒介使用情境和動機，以及其文化意涵。受訪閱聽人展現出跨越媒介與空間疆界的媒介使用與搭配，利用閱讀、接收、消費、挪用、改寫等社群新聞日常實踐來劃定個人的社交界線、公私界線等。並且，閱聽人能夠運用特殊的戰術，在媒介科技、社群平台與人際社群的限制下，將個人的日常實踐轉化為資產與資本，用於持續優化新聞進用與消費體驗、累積「作品」、擴展人脈等。
閱聽人使用媒介、媒材、不同社群媒體的方式，也展現出跨越「強調輸出意義和製造文本的書寫」與「強調訴說與傾聽的言說」之間界限的表意方式。此外，這些與主流敘事不同的表意，象徵閱聽人在與新聞工作者有限的互動中，對於社群新聞傳播生態的一種表態與自主，也展現出他們反身性、對於所處媒介環境與文化的自覺。

In contemporary times, social media has transcended its role as a mere news distribution channel, evolving into a multifaceted tool that empowers audiences to express their viewpoints on news information, engage in public discourse, and foster connections with one another. Audiences’ multiple usage of news content and social media might not fairly reflect those rules and values created by the news production system, but shows audiences’ imagination and expectation regarding social media journalism. This phenomenon inspires researcher to embark on novel avenues of inquiry to comprehend the intricate contexts, diversification, motivation, and patterns of news information consumption and practices in their everyday life.
By employing a methodology of 23 semi-structured interviews to examine the media practices of Taiwanese audiences in their daily interactions with news information, the finding reveals these audiences’ capacity to integrate various social media platforms and devices, and their flexibility to go beyond the spatial and media boundaries as well as the boundaries between publicity and privacy. Audiences’ reading, reception, consumption, misappropriation, and rewriting of news information, also understood as their tactical approaches, demonstrate the mobile rebellion potential to overcome the constraints from media technologies, social platforms, and interpersonal stress. Moreover, some of these audiences transform their trace of everyday practices on news information into some kind of property and capital with which they could continuously improve their news information searching experience, accumulate “news review workpieces” to show their commenting ability, build up connections and so on.
These manifold meanings and contexts surrounding social media usage may further explain the blooming of audiences’ new expression technique that break through the boundaries of writing and speech act. This exploration offers valuable insights into the potential for audiences to actively contribute to the development of an ideal news information environment of social media and media culture while having limited collaboration with journalists and news organizations.

原文期刊論文
Abbott, J., Y. (2017) Tensions in the scholarship on participatory journalism and citizen journalism. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41:3-4, 278-297.
Bastos, M., T. (2015) Shares, Pins, and Tweets, Journalism Studies, 16:3, 305-325.
Bengtsson, S. (2023): The Relevance of Digital News: Themes, Scales and Temporalities, Digital Journalism.
Benson, R. (2009). What makes news more multiperspectival? A field analysis. Poetics, 37(5-6), 402-418.
Boczkowski, P. J., Mitchelstein, E., & Matassi, M. (2018). “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New media & society, 20(10), 3523-3539.
Bright, J. (2016) The Social News Gap: How News Reading and News Sharing Diverge, Journal of Communication, 66(3), 343-365.
Chang, Y. K., Lei, S. S., & Zhou, X. G. (2023). Critical Media Literacy in the Times of Subjective Online Media Consumption. heiEDUCATION Journal. Transdisziplinäre Studien zur Lehrerbildung, (10), 51-72.
Couldry, N. (2004) Theorising media as practice, Social Semiotics, 14:2, 115-132.
Deuze, M. (2014). Journalism, media life and the entrepreneurial society. Australian Journalism Review, 36(2), 119–130.
Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008) Participatory Journalism Practices in the Media and Beyond, Journalism Practice, 2:3, 326-342.
dos Santos Jr., M. A., Lycarião, D., & de Aquino, J. A. (2019). The virtuous cycle of news sharing on Facebook: Effects of platform affordances and journalistic routines on news sharing. New Media & Society, 21(2), 398–418.
Ferrucci, P. (2015). Public journalism no more: The digitally native news nonprofit and public service journalism. Journalism, 16(7), 904–919.
Flores, P. M., & Hilbert, M. (2023). Lean-back and lean-forward online behaviors: The role of emotions in passive versus proactive information diffusion of social media content. Computers in Human Behavior, 107841.
García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Brown, D., K., & Harlow, S. (2018) To Share or Not to Share: The influence of news values and topics on popular social media content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina, Journalism Studies, 19:8, 1180-1201.
Hassoun, D. (2012) Costly attentions: Governing the media multitasker, Continuum, 26:4, 653-664.
Hermida, A. (2010) Twittering the News, Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297-308.
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D. & Logan, D. (2012) SHARE, LIKE, RECOMMEND, Journalism Studies, 13:5-6, 815-824.
Hermida, A. & Mellado, C. (2020) Dimensions of Social Media Logics: Mapping Forms of Journalistic Norms and Practices on Twitter and Instagram, Digital Journalism, 8(7), 864-884.
Humayun, M., F. & Ferrucci, P. (2022) Understanding Social Media in Journalism Practice: A Typology, Digital Journalism, 10:9, 1502-1525.
Kalsnes, B. & Larsson, A., O. (2018) Understanding News Sharing Across Social Media, Journalism Studies, 19:11, 1669-1688.
Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2014). Facebook time: Technological and institutional affordances for media memories. New media & society, 16(7), 1154-1168.
Kermani, H. (2018). Telegramming News: How have Telegram channels transformed journalism in Iran? Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (31), 168-187.
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018) Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media, The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62-84.
Lawrence, R. G., Radcliffe, D. & Schmidt, T. R. (2018) Practicing Engagement, Journalism Practice, 12:10, 1220-1240.
Loosen, W. & Schmidt, J. (2012) (Re-)Discovering the Audience, Information, Communication & Society, 15:6, 867-887.
Mathews, N., Bélair-Gagnon, V., & Lewis, S. C. (2022). News is “toxic”: Exploring the non-sharing of news online. New Media & Society, 0(0), 1-18.
Mellado, C. & Hermida, A. (2021) The Promoter, Celebrity, and Joker Roles in Journalists’ Social Media Performance, Social Media＋Society, 7(1), 1-11,
Mellado, C. & Hermida, A. (2022) A Conceptual Framework for Journalistic Identity on Social Media: How the Personal and Professional Contribute to Power and Profit, Digital Journalism, 10:2, 284-299.
Molyneux, L., Holton, A. & Lewis, S. C. (2018) How journalists engage in branding on Twitter: individual, organizational, and institutional levels, Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1386-1401.
Molyneux, L. & Mourão, R. R. (2019) Political Journalists’ Normalization of Twitter: Interaction and new affordances, Journalism Studies, 20:2, 248-266
Ottovordemgentschenfelde, S. (2017). ‘Organizational, professional, personal’: An exploratory study of political journalists and their hybrid brand on Twitter. Journalism, 18(1), 64–80.
Stsiampkouskaya, K., Joinson, A., Piwek, L., & Ahlbom, C. P. (2021). Emotional responses to likes and comments regulate posting frequency and content change behaviour on social media: An experimental study and mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106940.
Van den Bogaert, Geerts, D., & Harambam, J. (2022). Putting a Human Face on the Algorithm: Co-Designing Recommender Personae to Democratize News Recommender Systems. Digital Journalism, 1–21.
Velkova, J. & Kaun, A. (2021) Algorithmic resistance: media practices and the politics of repair, Information, Communication & Society, 24:4, 523-540.
Wagner, M., C. & Boczkowski, P., J. (2019) The Reception of Fake News: The Interpretations and Practices That Shape the Consumption of Perceived Misinformation, Digital Journalism, 7:7, 870-885.
Waisbord, S. (2022) Trolling Journalists and the Risks of Digital Publicity, Journalism Practice, 16:5, 984-1000.
Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Ruigrok, N., & Schaper, J. (2016). News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism, 17(8), 1037–1053.
Wilkerson, H. S., Riedl, M. J., & Whipple, K. N. (2021) Affective Affordances: Exploring Facebook Reactions as Emotional Responses to Hyperpartisan Political News, Digital Journalism, 9(8), 1040-1061.
Xia, Y., Robinson, S,. Zahay, M., & Freelon, D. (2020) The Evolving Journalistic Roles on Social Media: Exploring “Engagement” as Relationship- Building between Journalists and Citizens, Journalism Practice, 14:5, 556-573.
Zeller, F., O’Kane, J., Godo, E. & Goodrum, A. (2014) A Subjective User-Typology of Online News Consumption, Digital Journalism, 2:2, 214-231.

線上資料
S. Dixon (2022) Number of daily active Facebook users worldwide as of 3rd quarter 2022.。上網日期：2022年10月31日，取自：https://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-dau/
蔡毓華（2021年2月3日）。〈促進數位資產流通機制建立之法制初探〉，資訊工業策進會科技法律研究所。上網日期：2023年12月20日，取自：https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=66&tp=1&d=8617 - _ftnref10
法源編輯室（2013年9月30日）。〈壽險業務員在社群網站或部落格行銷保險商品 金管會：加強管制〉。上網日期：2023年7月31日，取自：https://www.lawbank.com.tw/news/NewsContent.aspx?NID=114223
Wenka Media（2023年2月22日）。〈LINE 社群與群組功能差異一次看，快速上手成為社群達人〉。上網日期：2023年8月16日，取自：https://blog.wenk-media.com/?p=3658#四、LINE社群廣告
Line支援中心（無日期）。〈基本說明：群發訊息〉。上網日期：2023年8月16日，取自：https://help2.line.me/official_account_tw/web/categoryId/20006390/3/pc?lang=zh-Hant
Meta使用說明（無日期）。〈瞭解 Facebook 「頭號粉絲」徽章和「最常留言的粉絲」徽章〉。上網日期：2023年8月16日，取自：https://www.facebook.com/help/215734232362020/?helpref=uf_share

電子報新聞
李定宇（2023年8月16日）。〈噴槍洗地寫出「落跑巿長侯友宜」 罰不罰？環保局回應了〉，《聯合新聞網》。上網日期：2023年10月1日，取自：https://udn.com/news/story/7321/7173919
丘采葳（2023年8月8日）。〈2025會缺電？賴清德：跟實際上的數字不合〉，《聯合新聞網》。上網日期：2023年9月2日，取自：https://udn.com/news/story/123307/7353651
許雲凱（2023年6月28日）。〈【議題觀察室】巴比妥事件簿 時序和爭議懶人包〉，事實查核中心。上網日期：2023年9月2日，取自：https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/9295
〈香港加工的「芒果乾」，臺灣不宜食用〉（2019年8月31日）。《聯合報》，A2。（上網日期：2023年9月10日）
陳宣良（2018年11月26日）。〈民主聖地宜蘭縣大敗 林聰賢被指難辭其咎〉，《嘎瑪蘭新聞網》。上網日期：2023年9月20日，取自：https://www.kamalan-news.com/local/4/4586
ETtoday新聞雲政治中心（2015年11月11日）〈好大的官威！議員不爽同僚被開單　飆罵：你不認識我？〉，《ETtoday新聞雲》。上網日期：2023年9月20日，取自：https://www.ettoday.net/news/20151111/595141.htm#ixzz8Ey1Eapir
李忠一、宜蘭地方中心，（2012年1月11日）。〈誰抹黑陳定南　綠落淚喊冤　藍要討公道〉，《中時新聞網》。上網日期：2023年9月20日，取自：https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20120111001673-260102?chdtv
江志雄，（2005年11月29日）。〈陳定南：若賄選永遠退出政壇〉，《自由時報》。上網日期：2023年10月2日，取自：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/45578
Fifield, A. (2019, Dec 27). Taiwan's 'born independent' millennials digging in. The Washington Post. P.A10. 上網日期：2023年9月10日，取自：https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/taiwans-born-independent-millennials-are-becoming-xi-jinpings-lost-generation/2019/12/24/ce1da5c8-20d5-11ea-9c2b-060477c13959_story.html