| 研究生: |
陳盈竹 |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
最適仿冒品查緝率的制定 Establishment of the optimal enforcement rate of counterfeit |
| 指導教授: | 王智賢 |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 財政學系 Department of Public Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2009 |
| 畢業學年度: | 97 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 43 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 仿冒查緝率 、智慧財產權 、遊說 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | the optimal enforcement rate of counterfeit, intellectual property, lobby |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:124 下載:36 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在這多元化社會,資訊及科技的高度發展除了帶給全民便利以及更充足完整的資訊外,卻也帶來了侵權與犯罪。本文根據王智賢與楊敦雅 (2008) 一文做進一步的延伸,採用 Grossman and Helpman (1994) 的菜單式拍賣模型,探討當智慧財產權等無形資產為外國正版商所擁有時,外國正版廠商、國內仿冒商,以及國內部份消費者所組成的團體,三者的利益分配相互衝突時,本國政府將如何制定國內的仿冒查緝率。此外,我們將模型設定了外生變數查緝率下限以盼能更貼近現實社會,透過本研究我們可以發現在增加查緝率下限後,雙方共同遊說之下均衡查緝率可能由原先的零大幅提高至仿冒商品剛好可以生存的門檻,並且在均衡時只會有一方願意提供給本國政府政治獻金。
In this multiple society, although highly developing information and technology not only make all the people more convenient but also earn more sufficient information, it has brought the tort and crime as well. In this essay, we extend the essay written by Jue-Shyan Wang & Tun-Ya Yang (2008) and adapt a simple framework based on the Menu-auction Model of Grossman and Helpman (1994). Discussing about how a domestic government decides optimal enforcement rate of counterfeit when intellectual property is held by a foreign company and foreign company、domestic consumers and domestic illegally copied company had a conflict between their benefit distribution. Furthermore, we are going to add a lower bound of enforcement rate as an external variable to close reality. After this study, we found that under the lobby of both foreign company and domestic consumers, the equilibrium of enforcement rate may change from zero to the entry barrier; what’s more, only one of the sides will be willing to pay political contributions to domestic government under equilibrium.
一、前言......................................1
二、基本模型..................................8
三、政治獻金遊說下本國政府的最適查緝率決策......16
四、結論.....................................32
附錄.........................................34
參考文獻.....................................40
中文部分
王智賢、蔡坤良 (2005),「政治獻金限額與關稅遊說」,經濟研究,第 41 卷 2 期,207-247。
王智賢、翁永和 (2006),「最適自製率與政治獻金」,人文與社會科學集刊,第 18 卷 2 期,269-291。
王智賢、楊敦雅 (2008),「仿冒查緝與政治獻金」,經濟研究,第 44 卷 1 期,107-138。
吳芝文、周建富 (2004),「智慧財產權與經濟效率」,經濟論文,第 32 卷 2 期,335-361。
吳依芳、王智賢 (2005),「勞資遊說賽局與關稅保護模型」,經社法制論叢,第 36 期,199-241。
林奇蓉 (2004),「政治遊說與策略性貿易政策」,經濟論文叢刊,第 32 輯 3 期,347-367。
賴育邦 (2005a),「全球經濟整合對地方環境政策之衝擊-一個共同代理人模型的應用」,經社法制論叢,第35期,259-284。
賴育邦 (2005b),「利益團體、工資談判與環境政策」,農業與經濟,第 35 期,87-118。
賴育邦 (2006),「污染許可交易與利益團體」,經濟論文叢刊,第 34 輯 3 期,264-284。
蔡明芳、邱俊榮 (2006),仿冒與政府政策,未發表論文。
英文部分
Adit, T. S. (1997), “Cooperative Lobbying and Endogenous Trade Policy, ” Public Choice, 93(3-4), 455-475.
Banerjee, D. S. (2003), “Software Piracy: A Strategic Analysis and Policy Instruments, ”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 97-127.
Bernheim, B. D. and M. D. Whinston (1986), “Menu Auction, Resource Allocation,and Economic Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 1-31.
Besen, S. M. and S. N. Kirby (1989), “Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties,” Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 255-280.
Conner, K. and R. P. Rumelt (1991), “Software Piracy : An Analysis of Protection Strategies,” Management Science, 37, 125-139.
Dahm, M. and N. Porteiro (2005), “Informational Lobbying under the Shadow of Political Pressure,” Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Discussion Papers: 1409.
Dixit, A., G. M. Grossman and E. Helpman (1997), “Common Agency and Coordination: General Theory and Application to Government Policy Making,” Journal of Political Economy, 105, 752-769.
Encaoua, D. and Y. Lefouili (2006), “Choosing Intellectual Protection: Imitation, Patent Strength and Licensing,” CESifo GmbH, CESifo Working Paper Series: CESifo Working Paper: 1715.
Freedman, D. H. (1999), “Fakers Paradise,” Forbes, 5, Special Supplement, 48-55.
Gallini, N. (1992), “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation,” Rand Journal Economics, 23, 52-63.
Glass, A. J. and K. Saggi. (2002), “Intellectual Property Right and Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 56, 387-410.
Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1994), “Protection for Sale,” American Economic Review, 84, 833-850.
Helpman, E. (1993), “Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Right,” Econometrica, 61, 1247-1280.
Higgins, R. S. and P. H. Rubin (1986), “Counterfeit Goods,” Journal of Law and Economics, 29, 211-230.
Johnson, W. R. (1985), “The Economics of Copying,” Journal of Political Economy, 93, 158-174.
Kee,H. L.,M. Ollareaga and P. Silva (2007), “Market Access for Sale,” Journal of Development Economics, 82(1), 79-94.
Konishi, H., K. Saggi, and S. Weber (1999), “Endogenous Trade Policy under Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 49, 289-308.
Krugman, P. R. (1979), “A model of Innovation Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, 253-266.
Lai, Y. B. (2003), “Interest Groups, Economic Competition, and Endogenous Public Policy,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159(2), 342-61.
Lai, Y. B. (2006), “Interest Groups, Trade Liberalization, and Environmental Standards,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 34(2), 269-90.
Lai, Y. B. (2007), “The Optimal Distribution of Pollution Rights in the Presence of Political Distortions,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 36(3), 367-88.
Ludema, R. D. (2001), “Market Collusion and the Politics of Protection,” European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4), 817-833.
Magee, C. (2002), “Endogenous Trade Policy and Lobbying Formation: An Application to the Free-rider Problem,” Journal of International Economics, 57(2), 449-471.
Maggi, G. and A. Rodriguez-Clare (1998), “The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures,” Journal of Political Economy, 106(3), 574-601.
McCalman, P. (2004), “Protection for Sale and Trade Liberalization: An Empirical Investigation,” Review of International Economics, 12(1), 81-94.
Mitra, D. (2002), “Endogenous Political Organization and the Value of Trade Agreements,” Journal of International Economics, 57, 473-485.
Mondal, D. and M. R. Gupta (2006), “Innovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Right: A Note on Helpman’s model ,” Journal of Economics, 87(1), 29-53.
Nascimento, F. and W. R. Vanhonacker (1988), “Optimal Strategic Pricing of Reproducible Consumer Products” Management Science, 34, 921-935.
Novos, I. E and M. Waldman (1984), “The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 92, 236-246.
Panagariya, A. and R. Duttagupta (2002), “Politics of Free Trade Area: Tarffs versus Quotas,” Journal of International Economics, 58, 413-427.
Rama, M. and G. Tabellinni (1998), “Lobbying by Capital and Labor over Trade and Labor Market Policies,” European Economic Review, 42, 1295-1316.
Shy, O. and J. F. Thisse (1999), “A Strategic Approach to Software Protection,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8, 163-190.
Takalo, T. and V. Kanniainen (2000), “Do Patent Slow Down Techonological Progress? Real Options in Research, Patenting, and Market Introduction,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 1105-1127.
Takeyama, L. N. (1994), “The Welfare Implications of Unauthorized Reproduction of Intellectual Property in the Presence of Demand Network Externalities,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 155-166.
Teata, C. (2001), “Reform, Lobbies and Welfare: A Common Agency Approach ” Departmemt of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, Royal Holloway University of London ,Discussion Paper in Economics: 01/6.
Wang, J.-S., H.-W. Koo and T.-J. Chen (2006), “Resource Rivalry and Endogenous Lobby,” Japan and the World Economy, 18(4), 488-511.
Yang, G. and K. E. Maskus (2001), “Intellectual Property Right, Licensing and Innovation in an Endogenous Product-Cycle Model,” Journal of International Economics, 53, 169-187.
You, K. and S. Katayama (2005), “Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Imitation: An Empirical Examination of Japanese F.D.I. in China,” Pacific Economic Review, 10(4), 591-604.