知識分享是知識管理成敗的關鍵，網路社群又是資訊科技與網際網路中最適於互動與交流的應用方式，因此，本研究擬以網路社群為研究對象，探討以下研究目的：1.何種類型的個人動機、團隊與組織，較有益於知識的分享。2.資訊系統於知識分享過程中所扮演的角色。3.個人、團隊與組織因素之間的互動情形。

本研究採取「個案研究法」，以深度訪談、初步描述性統計分析以及網路上發言記錄的資料分析進行之。研究程序為確認以網路社群之知識分享為研究主題後，隨即進行相關文獻的蒐集與探討，進而發展出研究架構並據之以設計問卷。接下來，針對問卷的結果進行初步描述性統計分析，將整理後的結果與研究架構對照後，設計訪談大綱並進行深度訪談。最後進行個案分析與命題發展，並推導出結論與建議。

本研究的結論如下：個人因素、團隊設計、高階領導、組織文化與管理制度等因素，都會對知識分享意願產生影響，進而影響知識分享行為。個人因素會影響知識分享的意願。不一樣的想法、習慣、個性、限制或動機等個人因素，會形成不一樣的知識分享意願。不同的團隊成員或設計會有不同的知識分享意願。高階領導會影響知識分享的意願，且高階領導涉入越深，促進知識分享意願的效果越顯著。組織文化會影響知識分享的意願，其中非正式關係越好或是越容許犯錯，越能促進分享意願。管理制度會影響知識分享的意願，其中獎勵、舉辦專案或娛樂活動與建立實務社群等，皆能促進知識分享意願。組織因素中（高階領導、組織文化、管理制度），以高階領導對知識分享意願的影響最大，管理制度最小。個人、團隊、高階領導、組織文化與管理制度等各項影響知識分享意願的因素之間，彼此會互相影響，進而影響知識分享意願。知識分享意願受個人、團隊與組織因素的影響來決定，而良好的資訊系統會間接增強分享意願，資訊系統不好則會降低意願，性質較接近保健因子。影響知識分享行為的因素有知識分享意願與個人限制，如專業能力、電腦能力與時間壓力等，其中以分享意願最為重要。網路社群的知識分享行為對經驗傳承與溝通協調有正面的影響，其影響的效果又受高階領導與組織文化等因素的影響。

本研究的建議如下：1.進行知識管理時，不可忽略知識分享的重要性。本研究所提出的架構，或許還有些許參考的價值。2.可以將資訊系統視為一種限制條件，亦即在一定的資訊系統下，組織如何透過內部的調整與安排，使得知識分享的效果極大化。3.引進知識分享的資訊工具後，必須注意其他配套措施是否完善，諸如個人動機、團隊設計、高階領導、組織文化與管理制度等，以免空有知識分享的工具，而沒有具體的知識分享行為。

Knowledge sharing is the most important key of knowledge management. Network community, also called virtual community, is the best solution in Internet or Information Technology to communicate, interact and share information or knowledge with others.

One of network communities will be observed and three issues will be discussed: 1. What kinds of factors can improve the members’ inclination to share their own knowledge? 2. What is the correlation between the process of knowledge sharing and information technology? 3. How do influential factors interact with each other?

What the methodology is used is “Case Study”. There are three data sources-deep interview, elementary descriptive statistics analysis and the analysis of records in the database.

Personal factors as well as group and organizational ones can influence the inclination to share, which determines the sharing behavior. As for organizational factors, leadership should be considered with first priority. Poor information system will limit the sharing inclination of members. Using good information system; however, cannot surely improve the sharing. Personal factors, group factors, leadership, organizational culture and managerial system would interact with each other. Moreover, the critical factor of the interaction is leadership.

There's a distorting opinion on the correlation between knowledge sharing and information system. Information system wouldn’t work without supporting factors, such as leadership, managerial system and so on. In addition, Knowledge sharing could be done well even without excellent information system.

一、中文部分
1. 王秉鈞，「個案研究法在企業管理上之應用與評議」，定性研究研討會，民84。
2. 王俊程、戴榮賦，「以知識管理強化組織效能」，資訊與電腦雜誌，十一月號，民88，50-56頁。
3. 司徒達賢，策略管理，台北：遠流出版，民84。
4. 李仁芳，「財產權結構、專職性知識與管理統治效能之探索—台灣便利商店後機組織觀點的個案研究：統一超商7-eleven。」蔡敦浩編，管理資本在台灣。台北：遠流出版，民88，227-316頁。
5. 李弘暉，「團隊領導第一章—認清團隊的本質」，能力雜誌，七月，民86。
6. 汪美香等，「消費者特性與使用網站滿意度對網際網路購物意願之影響—以南部大專生為例」，1999中華民國科技管理研討會，民88。
7. 林俊役，「WWW使用者網路購物之研究」，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，民87。
8. 林祖德，「以實驗室實驗法探討等待對網際網路服務評估之影響─以WWW網站購物站台為例」，中央大學資管所碩士論文，民86。
9. 林益發，「葉垂景將在六年內挑戰一千億目標」，商業周刊，九月六日，56-66頁，民88。
10. 林瑞欽，「社區意識凝聚之道」，社會福利第118期，南投縣：臺灣省政府社會處，民84，8-17頁。
11. 孫本初，「學習型組織的內涵與運用」，空大行政學報第三期，五月，民84，4-5頁。
12. 徐椿輝，「網際網路線上服務服務品質評估模式之探討」，臺灣工業技術學院管理技術所碩士論文，民86。
13. 陳昱維，「消費品產業中知識管理之研究—以寶僑與聯合利華為例」，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，民88。
14. 張玉文，「知識管理的重要角色—CKO（知識長）」，遠見雜誌，三月，知識管理別冊，民89。
15. 郭恬如，「虛擬社區顧客輪廓資料、關係行銷及其隱私權議題」，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，民88。
16. 傅振瑞，「資訊負荷量與情緒對消費者效果的實驗室研究」，中央大學資管所碩士論文，民86。
17. 廖志德，「智價時代的創新求勝之道」，能力雜誌，六月，民88， 18-22頁。
18. 劉權瑩，「資訊服務業知識管理之研究--以台灣HP 與台灣IBM為例」，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，民88。
19. 鄭伊真，「企業導入學習型組織之研究—學習團隊發展過程之探討」，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，民87。
20. 譚大純、劉廷揚、蔡明洲，「知識管理文獻之回顧與分類」，1999中華民國科技管理研討會，民88。
二、英文部分
1. Anderson, C., ”Computer as Audience: Mediated Interactive Message”, Interactive Marketing, Chap11, NTC Business Books, 1996.
2. Armstrong & John Hagel, ”The real value of on-line communities”, Harvard Business Review, 1996.
3. Benbasat I., Goldstein D.K.& Mead M.,” The case research strategy in studies of information system”, MIS Quarterly, September, pp.369-374, 1987.
4. Chait & L.P., “Creating a successful knowledge management system”, The Journal of Business Strategy, 1999.
5. Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. Working Knowledge：How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998. 胡瑋珊譯，知識管理，台北：中國生產力中心，1999。
6. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, “P. R.User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, 35(8), pp.982-1003, 1989.
7. Drucker, P., ”The age of social transformation.” Atlantic Monthly, November, pp.53-80, 1994.
8. Eighmey, J.,“Profiling User Responses to Commercial Web Sites,”Journal of Advertising Research, pp.21-35, 1997.
9. Ellen M. Knapp, “Knowledge Management”, Business & Economic Review, July-Sept, pp.3-6, 1998.
10. Hedlund, G. ”A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp.73-90, 1994.
11. Hendriks, P., “Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 6, No.2, pp.91-100, 1999.
12. Herzberg, F. Work and the nature of man, London Granada Publishing, 1968.
13. Herzberg, F. ”One more time：How do you motivate employment”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.65, No.5, pp.109-120, 1987.
14. Hidding, G. & Shireen, M. C., ”Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at Andersen Consulting”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.5, No. 1, pp.3-13, 1998.
15. Hollingshead, “A. Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making：The effects of communication media”, Human Communication Research, Dec, 1996.
16. Hope, J., Competing in the 3rd Wave: The ten key management issues of the information age, 1997. 王瓊淑譯，笑傲第三波，台北：經典傳訊，1999。
17. Janz, B., Colquitt, J. & Noe, R.,” Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables”. Personal Psychology. Durham, Winter, 1997.
18. Jehn, K. Shah, A. & Pradhan,P., “Interpersonal relationship and task performance: an examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, April, 1997.
19. Katznbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K, The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-performance Organization, New York: Harper Collins, 1993.
20. Koenig, M.,” The 1998 Conference Board Conference”, Information Today, July/August, pp.13 & pp.51, 1998.
21. Korgaonkar, P. K., “Consumer Shopping Orientations Non-Store Retailers and Consumers’ Patronage Intentions: A Multivariate Investigation, ”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.11-22, 1984.
22. Kosiur, D., Understanding Electronic Commerce, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, USA, 1997.
23. Leonard-Barton, D., Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1995. 王美音譯，知識創新之泉：智價企業的經營，台北：遠流出版，1998。
24. Martiny, M. ”Knowledge management at HP consulting”. Organizational Dynamics. Autumn, 1998.
25. Master, M., “Making it work”. Across the Board, September, 1999.
26. McDermott, R., ”Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management”. California Management Review. Summer. , 1999.
27. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S.,” Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organization Advantage”. Academy of Management Review. Vol.23, No.2, 242-266, 1998.
28. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995. 楊子江、王美音譯，創新求勝：智價企業論，台北：遠流出版，1997。
29. Ojala, M., “Knowledge is power”. Econtent. June-July, 1999.
30. Pfeffer, J., The Human Equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. , 1998.
31. Philips, T., “The truth about sharing knowledge”. Director. July, 1999.
32. Pliskin, N. & Romm, C. T., “The impact of e-mail on the evolution of a virtual community during a strike”. Information & Management, 32:pp.245-254, 1997.
33. Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. , 1958.
34. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.
35. Puccinelli, B., ”Strategies for sharing knowledge”, Inform, October, 1998.
36. Purser, R., Pasmore, W. & Tenkasi, R.,” The influence of deliberations on learning in new product development teams”, Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, Vol. 9, March, pp.1-28, 1992.
37. Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P. & Finkelstein, S., ”Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, pp.71-80, 1996.
38. Richard L. Daft, Organization Theory and Design, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-western College Publishing, 1998.
39. Richmond, A.,“Enticing Online Shoppers to Buy: A Human Behavior Study,” Computer Network and ISDN Systems, Vol. 28, pp.1469-1480, 1996.
40. Sarvary, M., “Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry”, California Management Review, Vol. 41, pp.95-107, 1999.
41. Schneider, J., & Cook, K., ”Status inconsistency and gender: Combining revisited”, Small Group Research, Vol. 26, pp.372-399, 1995.
42. Senge, P.M., “Transforming the Practice of Management”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 1, Spring, pp. 5-31, 1993.
43. Silver, S.D., Cohen, B.P., & Crutchfield, J.H., ”Status differentiation and information exchange in face-to-face computer-mediated idea generation”, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 57, pp.108-123, 1994.
44. Stauffer, D., “Why people hoard knowledge”, Across the board, September, 1999.
45. Stewart, T., Intellectual capital：the new wealth of organizations, 1997. 宋偉航譯，智慧資本，台北：智庫出版，1998。
46. Stott, K. & Walker, A., Teams, Teamwork & Teambuilding: The manager's complete guide to teams in organizations, New York: Prentice Hall, 1995.
47. Sundstrom, E., Demeuse, K.P. & Futrell D., ”Work teams: Applications and effectiveness”, American Psychologist, Vol. 45, pp.120-133, 1990.
48. Tampoe, M., “Motivating knowledge workers—The challenge for the 1990s”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 26, No.3, pp.49-55, 1993.
49. Tylor S. J. & Bodan. R, Introduction to Qualitative Research Method: The Search for Meanings, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
50. Wah, L., ”Making knowledge stick”, Management Review, May, 1999.
51. Wijnhoven, F., “Knowledge Logistic in Business Contexts: Analyzing and Diagnosing Knowledge Sharing by Logistics Concepts”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 5, pp. 143-157, 1998.