| 研究生: |
曾於萱 Tzean, Yu-Shien (Bess) |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
台灣高等教育入學公平性之利害關係人分析 Stakeholder Analysis of Higher Education Admission Equity in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
陳敦源
Chen, Don-Yun |
| 口試委員: | 劉宜君 |
| 學位類別: |
博士
Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學學院 - 亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS) International Doctor Program in Asia-Pacific Studies(IDAS) |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 285 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 高教入學政策 、入學機制 、多元入學 、公平性 、積極平權措施 、利害關係人的評估與分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | higher education admission, equity, diversity, strategic policies, preferential treatment policy, stakeholder analysis |
| DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU201901115 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:109 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
This study investigates the transformation, paradigm shifts, and strategic policy making involved in Taiwan’s higher education system along a two-decade historical continuum. By utilizing a value-based, conceptual stakeholder framework, this study weaves through the intricacy and multiplicity of the ideological evolution of Taiwan’s higher education admission policy planning and implementation of multiple admission schemes from a sociopolitical, socioeconomic, and sociocultural perspective. The findings suggest that the notions of diversity, equity, and inclusivity have manifested into four current unique and embracive admission channels. Further, the study describes the advantages of a working relationship between main strategic players, government agencies, and higher education institutions for a diverse range of policy initiatives in meeting equity-relevant challenges. The research also demonstrated that Taiwan’s higher education system, with its present liberal and encompassing definition of fairness and equity, as well as proactive government policies with preferential considerations, has yet to withstand the multifarious public opinions. Overall, the study confirms the positive direction of Taiwan’s higher education admission system in screening and selecting students from diverse backgrounds toward the synergetic goals of economic development and upward social mobility ideals.
List of Figures ix
List of Tables x
List of Abbreviations xi
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
1.1 Statement of the Problem- Equity Debate with New Dimension 3
1.2 Rationale for the Study 4
1.2.1 Content Challenges: Polarization, Paradox and Stratification 5
1.2.2 Stakeholders Theory Mapping 7
1.2.3 Methodological Challenge 9
1.3 Research Objectives 10
1.4 Research Questions 12
1.5 Contributions and Significance of the Study 13
Chapter 2: Literature Review 17
2.1 Higher Education Development in Modern Human History 17
2.1.1 Transformation Factors – External Pressures 19
2.1.1.1 Industrialization and Modernization 20
2.1.1.2 Globalization and Knowledge Economy 20
2.1.1.3 Internalization of Higher Education 22
2.1.2 Transformation Factors- Internal Response 23
2.1.2.1 Binary Educational System 24
2.1.2.2 Privatization and Marketization of Higher Education 25
2.1.2.3 Diversification of Higher Education 26
2.2 Policy Value Conflicts 28
2.2.1 Efficiency and Equity in Higher Education 29
2.2.2 Dilemmatic Policy Values 32
2.2.2.1 Operationalization Model- Neoclassic Liberalism 33
2.2.3 Efficiency in Higher Education 34
2.2.3.1 Definition of Efficiency 37
2.2.3.2 Economic and Social Efficiency of Higher Education 39
2.2.4 Equity Conception in the Educational Sphere 40
2.2.4.1 Equity in Higher Education—Evolutionary Notion 40
2.2.4.2 Definition of Equity 41
2.2.5 Market Mechanism Versus Government Intervention 42
2.2.5.1 Neoliberalism Versus Equity 43
2.3 Political Economy Theories of Higher Education 45
2.3.1 Stakeholder Theory 46
2.3.1.1 Definitions of stakeholders 47
2.3.1.2 Stakeholder Theory in the Education Sector 48
2.3.2 Socio-economic Theory of Higher Education Inequity 50
2.3.2.1 Effectively Maintained Inequality (EMI) 50
2.3.3 Market Mechanisms, Market Failures and Government Intervention 53
2.3.3.1 Market Failures—Reasons 54
2.3.3.2 Types of Market Failures 55
2.3.3.3 Government Interventions 59
2.3.4 Value-Balancing Stakeholder Theory 63
2.4 Research Context: Taiwan’s Higher Education Admission 65
2.4.1 Taiwan’s Higher Education: An Overview 66
2.4.1.1 Implementation of the Diversified System of College Admissions 68
2.4.2 Persistent Inequity and the Paradoxical Situation 69
2.4.3 Taiwan’s Preferential Admission Policies 71
2.4.4 Efficiency of Higher-Education Admission—Contested Issue 73
2.4.5 Ideological Debate and Dilemmatic Policy Values 76
Chapter 3: Methodology 77
3.1 Research Approach 77
3.1.1. Stakeholder Analysis 78
3.2 Research Methods 80
3.2.1 Interviewing 80
3.2.1.1 Semi-Structured interviews 82
3.2.2 Document Analysis 85
3.2.3 Content Analysis 87
3.3 Stakeholder Theory Analysis 88
3.3.1 Operationalization of Stakeholder Theory 90
3.3.1.1 Research Matrix- Stakeholder Identification 91
3.3.1.2 Stakeholder Attributes- Definition and Categorization 93
3.3.1.3 Interview Data Analysis-Coding and Interpretation 96
3.3.2 Research Conduction – Stakeholder Analysis 97
3.3.2.1 Identification of Main Strategic Players 97
3.3.3 Purposive Sampling 99
3.4 Research Dimensions, Methods, and Sources 104
Chapter 4: Findings and Discussions: Historical Analysis 107
4.1 Taiwan’s Higher Education Expansion: Historical Development and Equity-Related Dimensions 107
4.1.1 Democratization and Higher Education Governance 111
4.2 Higher Education Equality: Ideology and Admission System 114
4.2.1 Taiwan’s Higher Education Admission Methods: Historical Developments, Goals, and Equity Concerns 115
4.2.2 Multiple-Channel Admissions: Mission, Merits, and Shortfalls 117
4.3 Multiple-Channel Entrance Policy: Admissions Methods and Specifications 120
4.3.1 Recommendation Screening: Self-Application for Enrollment 122
4.3.2 The Star Recommendation 122
4.3.3 Admission by College Entrance Examination 123
4.3.4 Special Entry Admission 124
4.3.5 Current DSCA Admission Methods: Challenges Faced 124
4.4 Taiwan’s Preferential Admission Policies: A Historical Account and Analysis 129
4.4.1 Adoption of Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Rationales and Incentives 130
4.4.2 Preferential Consideration: Indigenous Ethnic Minorities 131
4.4.3 Preferential Consideration: The Stars Recommendation 135
4.4.4 Preferential Admissions in Higher Education: Disadvantaged Socioeconomic Strata 136
4.4.5 Rationales and Ideologies: Implementation of Class-Based Affirmative Action Program 139
4.5 Current Policy Orientation: Policy Initiatives for Disadvantaged SES Students 143
4.5.1 The Implementation of Class-Based Affirmative-Action Program: Context and Policy Details 150
4.5.2 Class-Based Affirmative Action Program: Policy Direction and Aims 151
Chapter 5: Findings and Discussion: Ideological Debates and Policy Evaluation 157
5.1 Ideological Debate 157
5.1.1 New Ideological Perceptions and Main Policy Transformation: The Tipping Point 159
5.1.2 Equity and Efficiency: New Conceptions and Paradigm Shift 160
5.1.3 Market Mechanism: Effectively Maintained Inequality and Market Failures 164
5.1.4 Ideological Debate: Equity Redefined and Governmental Intervention 166
5.1.5 Pendulum Swing: Efficiency and Equity in Taiwan’s Higher Education System 169
5.1.6 Future Orientation of Higher Education Admission Policies 172
5.2 Ideological Transformation—Historical Points 173
5.2.1 Civilian Stakeholder Involvement 173
5.2.2 Prelude—Liberalization and Modernization of Education 174
5.2.3 University Act: Autonomous Decision-Making and Power Influence 175
5.3 Ideological Argument—Equitability of Multiple-Channel Admissions 176
5.3.1 Merits and Shortcomings of DSCA 177
5.3.2 The United Entrance Examination 179
5.3.3 Equitability of the Self-Application Channel 181
5.3.3.1 Self-Application Program Information Asymmetry and Market Failure 182
5.3.3.2 Stakeholders’ Overall Evaluation: Equitability of Diversified Admission System 183
5.4 Free-Market Mechanism versus Governmental Intervention 187
5.4.1 Effectiveness of Affirmative Action Program 189
5.4.2 EMI Phenomenon by Free Market Mechanism 189
5.4.3 Efficacy of Preferential Treatment 189
5.5 Stakeholder Salience, Policy Influences, Strategic Actions and Working Mechanisms 198
5.5.1 Classification of Studied Stakeholders 198
5.5.2 Salience Influence: Key Strategic Players with High Salience 201
5.5.3 Peripheral Stakeholder Influence in Policy Initiatives and Implementation
201
5.5.4 Stakeholder Strategic Actions and Engagements 206
5.5.5 Stakeholder Relationship and Engagement—Collaborative Strategy and Involvement Strategy Stakeholder Strategic Actions and Engagements 206
5.5.6 Stakeholder Mapping 212
5.6 Pluralistic Perspectives in Higher Education Admissions 215
5.6.1 Cooperation: Adaptation, Adjustments, and Additions in Policies and Methods 217
5.6.2 Strategic Players’ Evaluation of Higher Education Admission Policies, Initiatives and Methods 219
Chapter 6: Conclusion 223
6.1 Educational Policy Implication 223
6.2 Outcome Findings 225
6.3 Application of a Value-Based Model 226
6.4 Future Outlook 227
Reference List 229
Appendix 267
Appendix A: Interview Protocol and Interview Questions 267
Appendix B: Regualr Students and Low-Income Students’ Admission Situation 275
Appendix C: Regular Students and Low-Income Students’ Admittance Rate 276
Appendix D: Higher Education Entrance Opportunities and Supervision Provided for Disadvantaged Students- Application Form 277
Appendix E: MOE’s Policy to Increase the Publicness of Higher Education 278
Appendix F. Information of the Interviewed Government Officials, University Administrators and Faculty Members 281
Appendix G. Information of the Interviewed Participants (Students group) 283
Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2), 701–728.
Agarwal, P.(2008). Higher Education and the Labour Market in India, in Justin Y. Lin and Boris Pleskovic (eds), Higher Education and Development, Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC: World Bank
Agasisti, Tommaso and Egorov, Alexey and Zinchenko, Daria and Leshukov, Oleg, Universities' Efficiency and Regional Economic Short-Run Grownth: Empirical Evidence from Russia (November 22, 2018). Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 203/EC/2018.
Alagappa, Muthia. (2004). Civil Society and Political Change in Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Alexander, N. A. (2004). Exploring the changing face of adequacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(3), 81-10
Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). The elephant curve of global inequality and growth. American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings, 108, 103–108.
Almendarez, L. (2010). Human Capital Theory: Implications for Educational Development. Paper presented at the Second conference of Belize Country Conference November, 2010. University of West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
Almendarez, L. (2011). Human capital theory: Implications for educational development. Belize Country Conference paper. University of the West Indies.
Alon, S. (2009). The Evolution of Class Inequality in Higher Education: Competition, Exclusion, and Adaptation. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 731-755.
Altbach, P.G. (2006) International Higher Education: Reflections on Policy and Practice. Chestnut Hill: Center for International Higher Education, Boston College.
Altbach, P, G., Reisberg, L., and Rumbley, L.E. (2009). Trends in Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution, Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.
Amaral, A. and Magalhães, A. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In: Amaral, A., Jones, G. and Karseth, B. (Eds.), Governing higher education: national perspectives on institutional governance (56-79). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Andres, L. (2016). Theories of the sociology of higher education access and participation, in J. E. Côté. & A. Furlong (Eds.), A Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Higher Education (Eds.).Abingdon: Routledge.
Andersen, T. M., & Maibom, J. (2016). The Big Trade-Off between Efficiency and Equity - Is it There? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2766484). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from Arkes, J. (1999). What do Educational Credentials Signal and Why do Employers Value Credentials? Economics of Education Review, 18(1), 133– 141.
Arum, R., Gamoran, A., & Shavit, Y. (2007). More inclusion than diversion: Expansion, differentiation, and market structure in higher education. In Y. Shavit, R. Arum, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Stratification in higher education: A comparative study (pp. 1 – 35). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Arrow, K.J. (1973). Higher education as a filter. Journal of Public Economics, 2(3), 193216.
Atkins, M and Ebdon, L. 2014. National Strategy for Access and Student Success in Higher Education. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. .
Avci, O., Ring, E., & Mitchell, L. (2015). Stakeholders in U.S. higher education: An analysis through two theories of stakeholders. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, 10, 45-54.
Bailur, S. (2006). Using Stakeholder Theory to Analyze Telecenter Projects. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(3): 61–80.
Baker, D. (2011). Forward and backward, horizontal and vertical: Transformation of occupational credentialing in the schooled society. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 5–29
Baker, D.P. and Wiseman, A.W. (2008). Preface. In D.P. Baker and A.W. (Eds.), The Worldwide Transformation of Higher Education. Bingley: Emerald, pp. ix-xii.
Ball, S. J. and Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, New Governance and Education. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, 2012.
Barriball, K. & While, A. (1994) Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19 (2), 328-335.
Bastedo, M. N. (2007). Sociological Frameworks for Higher Education Policy Research. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: contributions and their contexts (pp. 295-318). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bathmaker, A.M. (2003). The Expansion of Higher Education: A Consideration of Control, Funding and Quality In Bartlett, S. and Burton, D. (Eds.) Education Studies. Essential Issues (pp.169-189).London: Sage.
Bauer, T. K., & Vorell, M. (2010). External effects of education: Human capital spillovers in regions and firms (RUHR #195). Bochum, Germany: Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Bachman, L. F. (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beach, S. (2009). Who or what decides how stakeholders are optimally engaged by governance networks delivering public outcomes? Article presented at the 13th International Research Society for Public Management Conference (IRSPM XIII), Copenhagen Business School, Fredericksberg, April. Bertrand, D.
Becker, G. (1962). Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), pp. 9-49. Becker G (1964) Human Capital, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New York, 1975 and 3rd 1994
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Belfield, C. R. (2000). nEconomic principles for education: Theory and evidence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Bell, D.(1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books Inc.
Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Benoot, C., Hannes, K., & Bilsen, J. (2016). The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16, 21. doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6
Bertolin, J. C. G. (2011). The quasi-markets in higher education: from the improbable perfectly competitive markets to the unavoidable State regulation. Educação E Pesquisa, 37(2), 237–247.
Bevc, M., & Ursiˇ c, S. (2008). Relations between funding, equity, and efficiency of higher education. Education Economics, 16(3), 229–244
Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Blessinger, P., Hoffman, J., & Makhanya, M. (2018). An introduction to equity and diversity in higher education. Chapter in J. Hoffman, P. Blessinger, & M. Makhanya (Eds.) Contexts for Diversity and Gender Identities: International Perspectives in Higher Education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Blossfeld, H.P. & Y. Shavit (1993). Persisting Barriers: Changes in Educational Opportunities in Thirteen Countries. In Shavit, Y. and H.-P. Blossfeld (eds.) Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries (1-24). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, Boulder.
Shavit, Y., and H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.). 1993. Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Boliver, V. (2010) Maximally maintained inequality and effectively maintained inequality in education: operationalizing the expansion-inequality relationship. Sociology Working Paper no. 2010-05, Oxford University.
Boliver, V. (2011). Expansion, differentiation, and the persistence of social class inequalities in British higher education. Higher Education, 61(3), 229-242.
Boliver, V. (2013). How fair is access to more prestigious UK universities? British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 344–364.
Bourdieu, P. (1974). The school as a conservative force. Translated in J. Eggleston (Ed.), Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education (pp.32-46). London: Methuen.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction, in J. Karabel and A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and Ideology in Education (pp.487-551). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: An illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 305- 316.
Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Muller, W., & Pollak, R. (2009). Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5), 1475–1521.
Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2010). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs and rewards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Brown, S., & Sessions, J. G. (2004). 2 Signalling and screening. International handbook on the economics of education, 58.
Bowen, W.G. & Shapiro, H. T. (1998). Universities and their leadership. Princeton University Press (pp. 33-37).
Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. 2000. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning, 15, 239–46.
Brazer, S. D., & Keller, L. R. (2006). A conceptual framework for multiple stakeholder educational decision making. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 1(3).
Brest, P., & Oshigo,. M. (1997). Affirmative action for whom? Stanford Law Review, 47(22), 855-900.
Bryson, J. (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53
Burrows, J. (1999). Going beyond labels: a framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 5-10.
Byun, S.-y. & Park, H. (2012). The Academic Success of East Asian American Youth: The Role of Shadow Education. Sociology of Education, 85(1):40-60.
Cardak, B., Bowden, M., & Bahtsevanoglou, J. (2015). Are low SES students disadvantaged in the university application process? Perth, WA: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, Curtin University.
Chan, S.J. & Lin, L.W. (2015). Massification of Higher Education in Taiwan: Shifting Pressure from Admission to Employment. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 17–33.
Chang, D.F., Wu, C.T., Ching, G., Tang, C.W., and Xiao, L. (2011). Globalization and higher education in Taiwan. In P. Pachura (Ed.), New Knowledge in a New Era of Globalization. Croatia: InTech, pp. 35-48.
Chapleo C. & Sims, C. (2010) Stakeholder Analysis in Higher Education. Perspectives. 14(1) pp. 12-20.
Chen, P. (2008). Strategic leadership and school reform in Taiwan. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 293–318.
Cheng, S. & Jacob, W. (2012).Expansion and stratification of higher educational opportunity in Taiwan. Chinese Education and Society, 45(5-6), 112-133.
Chesters, J., & Watson, L. (2013). Understanding the persistence of inequality in higher education: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2), 198-215.
Chiang, C.-H. (2013). Toward a universal higher education system: a case study of Taiwan. Quality & Quantity, 47(1), 411-420.
Chou, C. P. (2008). The Impact of Neo-Liberalism on Taiwanese Higher Education. International perspectives on education and society, 9(1), 297-311.
Chou, C. P. (2012). Who Benefits from University Evaluation under Article 5 of University Act? Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 1(8), 7-10.
Chou, C.P. (2014). Education in Taiwan: Taiwan’s Colleges and Universities Taiwan-U.S. Quarterly Analysis, No. 16 (November 2014)
Chou, C. P. (2015). Who benefits from Taiwan’s mass higher education? In J. C. Shin, G. A. Postiglione, & F. Huang (Eds.), Mass higher education development in East Asia: Strategy, quality, and challenges (pp. 231-243). Singapore: Springer.
Chou, C.P. & Wang, L.T. (2012). Who benefits from the popularization of higher education in Taiwan? Chinese Education and Society, 45 (5–6) 8-20.
Cemmell, J. (2003). Public vs Private Higher Education: Public Good, Equality, Access. Is Higher Education a Public Good? Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2: 201-215.
Chigona, W., Roode, D., Nazeer, N. & Pinnock, B. (2010). Investigating the Impact of Stakeholder Management on the Implementation of a Public Access Project: Case of Smart Cape. South African Journal of Business Management, 41(2), 39-40.
Cingano, F. (2014) Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163, OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ 5jxrjncwxv6j-en (accessed 20 June 2016).
Clancy, P., & Goastellec, G. (2007). Exploring access and equity in higher education: Policy and performance in a comparative perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(2), 136-154.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92–117.
Clark, Nick. Editor, World Education News & Reviews. Title: Education in Taiwan.May 1, 2010. Retrieved from https://wenr.wes.org/2016/06/education-in-taiwan on June 5, 2016.
Cohen, Bernard P. 1989. Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Cohen, D. (2001). Taiwan announces changes in college admission policy. The Guardian Retrieved from
http:// https://www.theguardian.com/education/2001/jul/10/highereducation.uk3on Jan. 15, 2017
Cohn, E., & Cooper, S. T. (2004). Multiproduct cost functions for universities: economics of scale and scope. In G. Johnes, & J. Johnes (Eds.), International handbook of the economics of education. Cheltenham, UK and Lyme, US: Edward Elgar.
Collins, R. (1971). Functional and Conflict Theories of Educational Stratification. American Sociological Review, 36, 1002-1019.
Committee of Education Reform, The Executive Yuan. (1996). ‘‘Final Report’’ of the Council on Education Reform. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37, 39 – 67.
Cooper, J., & Davis, L. (2017). Exploring comparative economic theories: Human capital formation theory vs screening theory. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 19(6), 68-73.
Cooper, J., & Davis, L. (2017). Exploring comparative economic theories: Human capital formation theory vs screening theory. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 19(6), 68-73.
Corson, J. (1971). Governance: Interacting roles of faculty, students, and administrators. Paper presented at the American Association for Higher Education National Conference on Higher Education, Chicago, IL.
Costigan, C. L., & Cox, M. J. (2001). Fathers’ participation in family research: Is there a self-selection bias? Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 706–720.
Crawford, C. & van der Erve, L. (2015) Does higher education level the playing field? Socioeconomic differences in graduate earnings, Education Sciences, 5(4), 380–412.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crosby, B. Stakeholder analysis: A vital tool for strategic managers. Washington, DC, USAID.
Davidovitch, N., & Iram, Y. (2009). The Struggle for legitimacy: Academic colleges on the map of higher education in Israel. Research in Comparative and International Education, 4(2), 151–162.
Daviet, B. (2016, July). Revisiting the Principle of Education as a Public Good. Education Research and Foresight: Working Papers. United Nations: Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Dawkins, J.S. (1988). Higher Education: A Policy Statement, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Dumais S. A. 2002. Cultural capital, gender, and school success: the role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44-68.
DesJardins, S. L. (2002). Understanding and using efficiency and equity criteria in the study of higher education policy. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, edited by J. C. Smart and W. G. Tierney. New York: Agathon Press.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dill, D. D. and Soo, M.(2004) Transparency and Quality in Higher Education Markets in: The Rising Strength of Markets in Higher Education: The Case of Mature Economies (eds.) A. Amaral, D. Dill, B. Jongbloed, and P. Teixeira, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dill, D. D. (2003). Allowing the Market to Rule: The Case of the United States. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 136-157.
Dill, D. D. (1997) Higher education markets and public policy, Higher Education Policy, 10(3/4), pp. 167–185.
Dill, D and van Vught, F. (2010). National Innovation and the Academic Research Enterprise: Public Policy in Global Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dinkelman, T., & Martínez, A. C. (2013). Investing in Schooling In Chile: The Role of Information about Financial Aid for Higher Education. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(2), 244-257.
Drislane, Robert and Parkinson, Gary (2010). Online Dictionary of the Social Science, Athabasca University & International Consortium for the Advancement of Academic Publication. 2010. http://bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 106-124.
DiCicco-Bloom, B. & Crabtree, B. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314-321.
Dixit, A. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector: an interpretative review’. Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 696–727.
Dobbs, R.L., Sun, J.Y., & Roberts, P.B. (2008). Human capital and screening theories: Implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(6), 788-801.
Duru-Bellat, M., Kieffer A. & Reimer, D. (2008) Patterns of social inequalities in access to higher education in France and Germany, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49(4-5), pp. 347–368.
East L, Stokes R and Walker M (2014) Universities, the public good and professional education in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9): 1617–1633.
Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ermisch, J. and Pronzato, C. (2011). Causal effects of parents’ education on children’s education. In Smeeding, T., Erikson, R. and Jäntti, M. (Eds.), Persistence, Privilege, and Parenting. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Escrigas, C. (2008) “Forward” in GUNI Higher Education in the World 3. Palgrave Mcmillan: London
Evans, C., Rees, G., Taylor, C. & Wright, C. (2017). "Widening Access" to higher education: the reproduction of university hierarchies through policy enactment. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1390165
Espenshade, T. J. & Chung, C. Y. (2010). Standardized Admission Test, College Performance, and Campus Diversity. Office of Population Research, Princeton University.
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Fernandez, R. & Rogerson, R. (1995). On the political economy of education subsidies. Review of Economic Studies, 62(2), 249–262.
Follesdal, A., (2014). John Rawls’ Theory of Justice as Fairness. Contemporary Philosophy, 2014, 311-328.
Fukuyama, F. (2011, August). The Historical Pattern of Political Development in East Asia. Keynote speech presented at the International Conference on Democracy in East Asia and Taiwan, Taipei, ROC. Accessed from: http://www.asianbarometer.org/publications//84ef4e7ba2e504469c73630281c51cd3.pdf.
Gatete, Ricardo (2012). Pluralist University Government. An Analysis Proposal Based on Stakeholder Theory”. In: “Innovation and Good Practices in University Government and Management”. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC). 9(2), 296-310.
Gubrium, J.E. & Holstein, J.A. (2002). From the Individual Interview to the Interview Society, in J.E. Gubrium and J.A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method (pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Harrison J.S. & St. John C.H. (1994). Strategic Management of Organizations and Stakeholders. St. Paul, MN: West.
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501.
Hsueh, H.H. (1996). Local education reform movement in Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: Avanguard. (in Chinese)
Hung, C. C. and Cheng, Sheng Yao (2008). Accessibility and Equitability: Who are the Students at Taiwan's Top Universities. In Don B. Holsinger and W. James Jacob (Ed.),Inequality in Education :Comparative and International Perspectives (pp.290 306). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre at the Hong Kong University.
Fan, A. P., Tsai, T. C., Su, T. P., Kosik, R. O., Morisky, D. E., Chen, C. H., & Lee, C. H. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of interviews on medical school admissions in Taiwan. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 33(2), 140-163.
Florea, R., & Florea, R. (2013). Stakeholders Interests Analyse and Harmonization – Starting Point of Strategic Approach. Economy Transdisciplinary Cognition, 16(1): 130–135.
Foray D. and B.-A. Lundvall, 1996, ‘The Knowledge-Based Economy: From the Economics of Knowledge to the Learning Economy,’ in OECD, Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy ( pp. 11–32). Paris: OECD,.
Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholders approach. Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Furedi, F. (2011). Changing societal attitudes and regulatory responses to risk taking in adult care. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2013). Widening Participation in Australian Higher Education. Report to the Higher Education Funding Council of England (HEFCE) and the Office of Fair Access (OFFA), England. CFE (Research and Consulting) Ltd, Leicester, UK and Edge Hill University, Lancashire, UK.
Gaertner, M., & Hart, M. (2013). Considering class: College access and diversity. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 7(2) 367-403.
Gewirtz, S. (1998). Conceptualizing social justice in education: Mapping the territory. Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 469-484.
Gewirtz, S. (2006). Towards a contextualized analysis of social justice in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(1), 69-81.
Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). Understanding—and Misunderstanding—Social Mobility in Britain: The Entry of the Economists, the Confusion of Politicians and the Limits of Educational Policy. Journal of Social Policy, 42(3), 431-450.
Gomes, R. C. (2006). Stakeholder Management in the local government decision making area: evidences from a triangulation study with the English local government." Brazilian Administration Review, 3(1), 46-63.
Green, F. and Zhu, Y. (2010). Overqualification, job dissatisfaction, and increasing dispersion in the returns to graduate education, Oxford Economic Papers, 62(2), 740–63.
Greenaway, D., and Haynes, M. (2003), Funding Higher Education in the UK: The Role of Fees and Loans, Economic Journal 113, F150-F166.
Guri-Rosenblit, S., Sebkova, H., and Teichler, U. (2007). Massification and Diversity of Higher Education Systems: Interplay of Complex Dimensions. Paris: UNESCO.
Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F., & Ridge, J. M. (1980) Origins and Destinations: Family, Class, and Education in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hall, J. C. (2006). Positive Externalities and Government. Involvement inEducation. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(2), 165–175.
Hall, M. (2012). Inequality and higher education: Marketplace or social justice? Stimulus Paper 01. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
Hill, C. (2015). Higher Education and the Market. Journal of Educational Issues, 1(2), 35-47.
Hanley, C. (2011). Investigating the Organizational Sources of High-Wage Earnings Growth and Rising Inequality. Social Science Research, 40 (3), 902–916
Hanushek, E. A. (2016). Will more higher education improve economic growth? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(4), 538-552.
Hardy, C. (1996, March). Understanding power: bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management, 7(special issue), S3-S16.
Harrell, M.C. and Bradley, M.A. (2009) Data Collection Methods: Semi-Structured Interview and Focus Groups. RAND National Defense Research Institute, Santa Monica.
Hazelkorn, Ellen & Andrew Gibson (2017). Public goods and public policy: what is public good and who and what decides? CGHE working papers series. Working paper np. 18. May 2017.
Hemsley-Brown, J. (2011). Market heal thyself: The challenges of a free market in higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(2), 115 – 132.
Hewitt, F. e Clayton, M. (1999), Quality and complexity – lessons from English higher education. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 16(9), 838-858.
Holden, L. & Biddle, J. (2017). The introduction of human capital theory into education policy in the United States. History of Political Economy, 49(4), 537-574.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2003). Inside interviewing. New lenses, new concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hoxby, C., and C. Avery. (2013). The Missing ‘One-Offs’: The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students. Spring: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.
Hoxby, C. M. (1996). Are efficiency and equity in school finance substitutes or complements? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 51-72.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Huang, C, Yuan, Y., & Huang, C. (2008). Differences between public and private institutions of Taiwan: HTVE system in determinants of competitiveness. US-China Education Review, 5(7), 1-12.
Hungerford, T. & Solon, G. (1987). Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 175-177.
Hungerford, Thomas, and Gary Solon. 1987. "Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education." Review of Economics and Statistics 69(1):174-77. Jencks, Christopher, Marshall Smith, Henry Acland, Mary Jo Bane, David Cohen, Herbert Gintis, Barbara Heyns, and Stephan Michelson. 1972.
Kodelja, Z. (2016). Equality of opportunity and equality of outcome. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(2), 9-24.
James, R. 2007. Social equity in a mass, globalised higher education environment: the unresolved issue of widening access to university. Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J. and Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and research agenda, Higher Education, 56(3), 303-324.
Kainuwa, A. and M. Yusuf. (2013). Influence of socio-economic and educational background of parents on their children’s education in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(10): 1‒8.
Kariya, T. (2011). Japanese solutions to the equity and efficiency dilemma? Secondary schools, inequity and the arrival of ‘universal’ higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2), 241–266
Kariya, T. (2011). Credential Inflation and Employment in 'Universal' Higher Education: enrolment, expansion, and (in) equality via privatization in Japan, Journal of Education and work, 24(1), 69-94.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J., Harbinson, F. & Myers, C. (1960) Industrialism and Industrial Man. Cambridge. Mass: Harvard University Press.
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J., Harbinson, F. & Myers, C. (1973) Industrialism and Industrial Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kim, S. & Lee, J.-H. (2006). Changing facets of Korean higher education: market competition and the role of state. Higher Education, 52(3), 557–587.
Kirkevold, M. & Bergland, A. (2007). The quality of qualitative data: Issues to consider when interviewing participants who have difficulties providing detailed accounts of their experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2, 68–75.
Kotler, P. and Fox, K. F. A., (1985). Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.
Kuo, W. F. (1996). Education reform in Taiwan, R. O. C. in Comparative Education Society-Taipei (Eds.) .Taipei: Shih Ta Publishers Company.
Layard, R., & Psacharopoulos, G. (1974). The screening hypothesis and the returns to education. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 985–998.
LeGrand, J. (1991). Equity and Choice: An Essay in Economics and Applied Philosophy. London: Harper Collins Academic.
Law, W. W. (1998) Higher education in Taiwan: the rule of law and democracy, International Higher Education (11), pp. 4–6.
Lin, C.Y. (2012). The impact of the high tuition policy on disadvantaged students in Taiwan. Chinese Education and Society, 45(5–6), 21–30.
Lin, E.S., Lu, Y.L, Lin, M.C. (2015). Assessment of Admission Methods on Academic Performance for Economics Majors: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Data Science and Institutional Research (DSIR), Okayama, Japan.
Lynch, K. & Baker, J. (2005) Equality in Education: an equality of condition perspective, Theory and Research in Education, 3(2), pp. 131-164.
Liu, Y., Green, A., & Pensiero, N. (2016). Expansion of higher education and inequality of opportunities: a cross-national analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(3), 242-263.
Lo, M. C. (2002). Who are Students at National Taiwan University? Differences in Gender, Provincialism, and Living Area. Taiwan Economic Review, 31(1), 113-147.
Lo, H. C., & Tai. H. H. (2003). Centralization and decentralization in higher education: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Taiwan. In K. H. Mok (Ed.), Centralization and decentralization: Educational reforms and changing governance in Chinese studies (pp. 137–156). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Lo, Y.W.W. (2014). University Rankings: Implications for Higher Education in Taiwan, Singapore: Springer.
Lo, W. Y. W., & Gu, J. O. (2008). Reforming school governance in Taiwan and South Korea: Empowerment and autonomization in school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 506-526
Lockheed, M. E., & Hanushek, E. (1994). Concepts of educational efficiency and effectiveness. Human Resources Development and Operations Policy. Working Paper Series.
Lucas, S. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.
Marginson, S. (2016). The Worldwide Trend to High Participation Higher Education: Dynamics of Social Stratification in Inclusive Systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413-434.
Marginson, S. (2017). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 1–15.
Marginson, S. and M. van der Wende (2007). Globalisation and Higher Education. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 8, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Maas, I. and Van Leeuwen, M.H.D. (2005). Total and relative endogamy by social origin: A first international comparison of changes in marriage choices during the nineteenth century. International Review of Social History, 50(S13): 275– 295.
Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2010). An exploratory research on the stakeholders of a university. Journal of Management and Strategy, 1, 76–88.
Maitland, I. (2001). Distributive justice in firms: Do the rules of corporate governance matter? Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1):129-143.
Moghadamnejhad, N. M, Rahimabadi, R. K., Fomani, F, K. (2014). The role of higher education in globalization and its challenges. Multitemas, 25(2), 41-44.
Moore, R. (2004). Education and society: Issues and explanations in the sociology of education. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Nyangau, J. (2014). Higher education as an instrument of economic growth in Kenya. Forum for international research in education, 1(1), 7-25.
Nelson, K., Creagh, T. & Clarke, J. (2012). Social justice and equity issue in the higher education context. Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
Macerinskiene, I., & Vaiksnoraite, B. (2006). The role of higher education to economic development. Vadyba / Management, 2(11), 82-90
Maric, I. (2013). Stakeholder analysis of higher education institutions. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 11
Marshall, A. (1961). Principles of Economics (9th Ed. Variorum, 2 vols.), with annotations by C. W. Guillebaud. London: MacMillan.
McCowan, T. (2016). Three dimensions of equity of Access to higher education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International education, 46(4), 645-665.
Méndez Ramírez, O. (2015). “Neoliberalism and equity: Chilean society analyzed from the student´s perspective”, Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(2), 171- 186.
Mihaljević Kosor M. (2013): Efficiency Measurement in Higher Education: Concepts, Methods and Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1031 – 1038
Miles MB, Huberman M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.
Miller,D.(1976). Social Justice.London: Oxford University Press.
Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. The Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 281-302.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Mishra, A., & Mishra, D. (2013). Applications of Stakeholder Theory in Information Systems and Technology. Engineering Economics, 24(3), 254–266.
Mok, K. H. & Tan, J. (2004) Globalisation and marketisation in education: a comparative analysis of Hong Kong and Singapore (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar).
Mok, K.H., & Jiang, J. (2017). Massification of Higher Education: Challenges for Admissions and Graduate Employment in China. In Mok, K.H. (Ed.) Managing International Connectivity, Diversity of Learning and Changing Labour Markets: East Asian Perspectives (pp. 219-243), Singapore: Springer.
Moneva, J., Rivera-Lirio, J.M., & Munoz-Torres, M.J. 2007. The corporate stakeholder commitment and social and financial performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 107(1): 84-102.
Mundy K, Green A, Lingard B, and Verger A (2016) Introduction: The Globalization of Education Policy – Key Approaches and Debates. In: Mundy K, Green A, Lingard B and Verger A (eds.) The Handbook of Global Education Policy, (pp.1-20). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Nicaise, I. (2012), A smart social inclusion policy for the EU: The role of education and training, European Journal of Education, 47(2), 327–42.
North, C. (2006). More than words? Delving into the substantive meaning(s) of “social justice” in education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 507-535.
Ma, Jennifer, Matea Pender, and Meredith Welch. 2016. Education Pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. New York: College Board.
Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2013). Identifying stakeholders in a Portuguese university: a case study. Revista de Educación, 362, 429-457.
Marginson, S. (2016). The Worldwide Trend to High Participation Higher Education: Dynamics of Social Stratification in Inclusive Systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413-434.
Marginson, S. (2017). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 2(4), 1-15.
Mason, R. O. & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases, and techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Marshall, A. (1961). Principles of Economics (9th Ed. Variorum, 2 vols.), with annotations by C. W. Guillebaud. London: MacMillan.
Maxwell, J.A. (1998). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D.J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McGrath, C., Palmgren, P. J. & Liljedahl, M. (2018). Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews, Medical Teacher. Taylor & Francis, 1–5.
Merton, R. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press
Meyer, H.-D., St. John, E. P., Chankseliani, M., & Uribe, L. (eds.). (2013). Fairness in Access to Higher Education in a Global Perspective: Reconciling Excellence, Efficiency, and Justice. Rotterdam: SENSE Publisher
Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Milligan, K., Moretti, E.& Oreopoulos, P. (2004). Does Education Improve Citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom, Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 1667-1695.
Mingat, A., and Tan, J.P. (1988). Analytical tools for sector work in education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B. and Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts, Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-858.
Ministry of Education. (2013). Educational statistics. Retrieved from
https://www.edu.tw/Default.aspx?WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-%20a075-15a9eb7aecdf
Ministry of Education (2017). Multi-Opportunities for School Entrance. National Academy for Educational Research Main Educational Policies. Accessed from: http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=3
Mok, K.H. (2000). Reflecting globalization effects on local policy: Higher education reform in Taiwan. Journal of Education Policy, 15(6), 637–660.
Mok, K. H. (2003). Globalisation and higher education restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(2), 117–129.
Mok, K.H. (2006). Education Reform and Education Policy in East Asia, London: Routledge
Muller, W. and Karle, W. (1993). Social selection in educational systems in Europe. European Sociological Review, 9(1), 1–23.
Nuffic: the Dutch organization for internationalisation in Education (2011, 2015). The Taiwanese education system described and compared with the Dutch system. Accessed from: https://www.nuffic.nl/en/publications/find-a-publication/education-system-taiwan.pdf
Nyborg, P. (2003) Higher Education as a Public Good and a Public Responsibility, Higher Education in Europe, XXVIII(3), 355-359.
Oesterle A (2002) Evaluating equity in social policy: a framework for comparative analysis. Evaluation 8(1): 46–59.
OECD (2012), Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from:
https://www.oecdilibrary.org/education/equity-and-quality-in-education_9789264130852-en
Ohmae, K. (2006). The Impact of Rising Lower-Middle Class Population in Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha Publishing.
Okun, A, M. (1975). Equality and efficiency, the big tradeoff, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Olaniyan, D.A. & Akemakinde, T. (2008). Human capital theory: Implications for educational development. European Journal of Scientific Research 24(2), 157-162.
Orr, D. (2004). Earth in Mind: on education, environment and the human prospect, Chicago, Island Press, 2nd Edition
Ortiz, L., & Rodríguez-Menés, J. (2015). The positional value of education and its effect on general and technical fields of education: Educational expansion and occupational returns to education in Spain. European Sociological Review, 24,1 –22.
Pan, H.L., & Yu, C. (1999). Educational reforms with their impacts on school effectiveness and school improvement in Taiwan, R.O.C. School Effectiveness and School Reform, 10(1), 72– 85.
Palinkas, L., Horwitz, S., Green, C., Wisdom, J., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Parjanadze, N. & Kapanadze, I.. (2016). Equity in access to higher education for special needs and socially deprived students in Georgia. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. 1(2), pp.55-77.
Parsons, T. (1959). The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society, Harvard Educational Review, 29(4), 297-318.
Parsons, T. (1970). Equality and inequality in modern society, or social stratification revisited. In E.O. Laumann, (Eds.), Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s (pp. 13–72). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pereira, M. A. C., and Da Silva, M. T. (2003). A key question for higher education: Who are the customers? 31st Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society, POM-2003, Atlanta, GE.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard University Press
Pfeffer, J.(1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 8(3), 238-264.
Quiggin, J. (1999). Human capital theory and education policy in Australia. Australian Economic Review, 32(2), 130–144.
Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921-75. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41-62.
Rahman, M. S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “Testing and Assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102-112.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reimer, D., Noelke, C., & Kucel, A. (2008). Labor market effects of field of study in comparative perspective: An analysis of 22 European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49(4–5), 233–256.
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009). Strangers in paradise? Working-class students in elite universities. Sociology, 43(6): 1103–1121.
Rivera, L. (2015). Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rice, J. (2004). Equity and Efficiency in School Finance Reform: Competing or Complementary Goods. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(2), 134–151.
Riehl, C. (2001). Bridges to the future: the contribution of qualitative research to the sociology of education. Sociology of Education, 74(Extra Issue), 115-134.
Riley, J. C. (2001). Silver signals: Twenty-five years of screening and signaling. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 432-478.
Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research" by Jane Ritchie and Liz Spencer in A.Bryman and R. G. Burgess [eds.] “Analyzing qualitative data”, 1994, pp.173- 194.
Robinson, O. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41.
Rohling, T. (1986). Screening and human capital theory: An empirical test. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 41(4), 817-826.
Rodriguez, G. M. (2004). Vertical equity in school finance and the potential for increasing school responsiveness to student and staff needs. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(3), 7-30.
Roellke, C., Green, P., & Zielewski, E. (2004). School finance litigation: The promises and limitations of the third wave. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(3), 104-133.
Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(Suppl.): S71-S102.
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16 (12), 738–744.
Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admission tests and post-secondary academic performance? Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 1-22.
Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Beatty, A. S., Rigdon, J. L., Shen, W., & Kiger, T. B. (2012). The role of socioeconomic status in SAT-grade relationships and in college admissions decisions. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1000–1007.
Sadlak, J. (1978). Efficiency in higher education: Concepts and problems. Higher Education, 7(2) 213-220.
Samuelson, Paul, A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 387-90
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991, May). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61- 75.
Schilling, J. (2006). On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 28-37.
Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898-920.
Scholl, H.J. (2001) Applying Stakeholder Theory to E-Government: Benefits and Limits, available at http://www.ischool.washington.edu/jscholl/Papers/Scholl_IFIP_2001.pdf (accessed on November 12, 2018).
Schultz, T. W. (1960).Capital Formation by Education. Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), 571-583.
Schultz, T.W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Shapiro, J. M. (2006), Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 324–335.
Shavit, Y., Yaish, M. and Eyal, B.-H. (2007). The persistence of persistent inequality. In Scherer, S., Pollak, R., Otte, G. and Gangl, M. (Eds), Origin to Destination. Trends and Mechanisms in Social Stratification Research. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Shulruf, B., Turner, R., Hattie, J., 2009. A dual admission model for equity in higher education: a multi-cohort longitudinal study. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1 (1), 2416–2420.
Silwa, M., & Johansson, M. (2013). The discourse of meritocracy contested/reproduced: Foreign women academics in UK business schools. Organization. Advance online publication. doi:10. 1177/1350508413486850
Singh, M. (2011). The place of social justice in higher education and social change discourses. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(4), 481-494.
Skyrme, J. (2014). Contextual Admissions and Social Justice in Selective English Higher Education Institutions. (Doctor in Education), The University of Manchester, Manchester.
Smith, J. A., Larkin, S. &Trinidad, S. (2015). Participation in higher education in Australia among under- represented groups: What can we learn from the Higher Education Participation Program to better support Indigenous learners? In Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts. Special Issue: Indigenous Pathways and Transitions into Higher Education, 17, (pp. 12-28).
Sontaite, M. (2011). Stakeholder role of corporate reputation management. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 129–140.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Spence, M.A. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
Spence, M.A. (2002). Signalling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434-459.
Sriyan de Silva (1997, May). Human resources development for competitiveness. A paper presented at the ILO workshop on Employers’ Organization in pacific Asia in the Twenty-First Century. Turin, Italy. Accessed from: http//:www.ilo.org/public/English/dialogue /actemp/ downloads.
Staley, D. J., & Trinkle, D. A. (2011). The changing landscape of higher education. Educause Review, 46(1), 16-33.
Stiglitz, J.E. (1975). The theory of screening, education, and the distribution of income. American Economic Review, 65(3), 283-300.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Contribution of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478.
Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639-1657.
Stowell, M. (2004). Equity, justice and standards: assessment decision making in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), 495–510.
Sun C-S. & Huang, Y-K. (2010). The recruitment of private technical colleges in Taiwan. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 2(5), pp. 75-81.
Sulaiman, C., Bala, U., Tijani, B.A., Waziri, S.I. & Maji, I.K. (2015). Human capital, technology, and economic growth evidence from Nigeria. SAGE Open, 5(4).
Sullivan, A. (2002). Bourdieu and Education: How Useful Is Bourdieu’s Theory for Researchers? The Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 144-166.
Swanson, R. A. (2008). Economic foundation of human resource development: Advancing the theory and practice of the discipline. Advances in Developing Human Resources.
Swartz, D. L. (2002). The Sociology of Habit: The Perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health,22(1_suppl), 61S-69S.
Tapper, T. and Palfreyman, D. (2005). The Rise of Mass Higher Education’, in T.
Tapper and D. Palfreyman (eds.) Understanding Mass Higher Education: Comparative Perspectives on Access (pp. 1–5). London and New York: Routledg Falmer,
Teichler, U. (1998). The changing roles of the university and the non-university sectors. European Review, 6(4), 475-487.
Teichler, U. (2004). Changing Structures of the Higher Education Systems: The Increasing Complexity of Underlying Forces, UNESCO Forum Occasional Forum Series, Paper No. 6 - " Diversification of Higher Education and the Changing Role of Knowledge and Research", 2-15.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative Research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer Press.
Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B., Dill, D., & Amaral, A. (eds) (2004). Markets in Higher Education; Rhetoric or Reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Temple, J. (2001). Growth Effects of Education and Social Capital in the OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies, 2(33), 57–101.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Falmer, New York.
Thomson, A. (2008). Exploring the Relationship Between Higher Education and Development: A Review and Report. Brighton.
Tilak, J. (2008). Higher education: A public good or a commodity for trade?: Commitment to higher education or commitment of higher education to trade. Prospects, 38(4), 449-466.
Tomlinson, M. (2008). The degree is not enough: Students’ perceptions of the role of higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 49–61.
Torche, F. (2011). Is a College Degree Still the Great Equalizer? Intergenerational Mobility across Levels of Schooling in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 763-807.
Treiman, D, J. (1970). Industrialization and Social Stratification. In E.O. Laumann (Eds.), Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970s (pp. 207-234). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Tremblay, K., Lalancette, D., & Roseveare, D. (2012) Assessment of higher education learning outcomes feasibility study report: Vol. 1. Design and implementation. Paris: OECD.
Triventi, M. (2013). The role of higher education stratification in the reproduction of social inequality in the labor market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,32(1), 45–63.
Trow, M. (1973) Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education. Berkeley, California: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education
Tsai, C.C. (2015). A Review of Taiwan’s Current Higher Education Development and Challenges. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 2 (3); 89-92.
Tsai, S.-L., Gates, H., & Chiu, H.-Y. (1994). Schooling Taiwan’s women: Women’s educational attainment in the mid-twentieth century. Sociology of Education, 67(4), 243 – 263.
Tsai, S. L., & Shavit, Y. (2007). Taiwan: Higher Education-Expansion and Equality of Educational Opportunity. In Y. Shavit, R. Arum, & A. Gamoran (Eds.). Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study (pp. 140-164). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tzanakis, M. (2011). Bourdieu’s social reproduction thesis and the role of cultural capital in educational attainment: A critical review of key empirical studies. ” Educate ~ – The Journal of Doctoral Research in Education, 11(1), 76-90.
Tu, C-S. (2007, January). Taiwan’s Educational Reform and the Future of Taiwan. Paper presented at London School of Economics and Political Science. London, UK. Accessed from http://www.lse.ac.uk/websitearchive/publicEvents/pdf/20070110TaiwanEducationalReform_English.pdf
Valero, A., & Reenen, J.V. (2016). The Economic Impact of Universities: Evidence from Across the Globe, Retrieved from http://cep.lse.ac.uk/textonly/_new/staff/ValeroMimeo2016.pdf
Van der Merwe, A. (2010). Does human capital theory explain the value of higher education? a South African case study, American Journal of Business Education, 3(1), 107–118.
Van Niekerk, M., & Getz, D. (2016). The identification and differentiation of festival stakeholders. Event Management, 20(3), 419–431.
Varvasovszky, Z., & Brugha, R. (2000). How to do (or not to do) . . . A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338–345. doi:10.1093/heapol/15.3.338
Van Vught, F. (2009) Diversity and differentiation in higher education. In F. Van Vught (ed.) Mapping the Higher Education Landscape, pp. 1–16. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vishnevshky, T., & Beanland, H. (2004). Interpreting research in nephrology nursing: Qualitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 31(2), 234-238.
Walt, G. (1994). Can interest groups influence government policy? Health Policy: An introduction to process and power, Zed Publications, London.
Wang, R.J. (2012). Social class barriers of the massification of higher education in Taiwan, Chinese Education and Society 45(5–6): 70–81.
Wang, G. & Shulruf, B. (2013). Admission Model and Equity in Higher Education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.), 22(1), 111-117.
Watson, P. (1995). Equality of treatment: A variable concept. Industrial Law Journal, 24, (1), 33-49.
Weiner, B.J., Amick, H.R., Lund, J.L., Lee, S.D., & Hoff, T.J. (2011). Review: Use of qualitative methods in published health sciences and management research: A 10-year review. Medical Care Research and Review, 68(1), 3–33.
Weiss, A. (1995). Human capital vs. signalling explanations of wages,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 133–154.
Wende, M.C. van der, (2008). Rankings and Classifications in Higher Education. A European perspective. In: J.C. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol 23. Springer. Pp. 49-71.
Wolf, C.. (1993). Markets or Governments: Choosing between Imperfect Alternatives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolf, J. (2014). The Relationship between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3): 317–328.
Wolniak, G.C., Wells, R.C., Engberg, M.E., & Manly, C.A. (2016). College Enhancement Strategies and Socioeconomic Inequality. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 310-334.
Yaro, I., Arshad, R., & Salleh, D. (2017). Relevance of stakeholders in policy implementation. Journal of Public Management Research, 3(1), 1–16. www.macrothink.org/journal/ index.php/jpmr/article/download/10632/8613
Yang, P. (2014). Who will success in college? Effects of high school and socioeconomic status. International Journal of Chinese Education, 3(1), 30–52.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Xiao, J. (2001). Determinants of employee salary growth in Shanghai: an analysis of formal education, on-the-job training, and adult education with a three-level model. The China Review, 1(1), 73-110.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B.M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 308–319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Chinese Books and Articles
中華民國大學入學考試中心(編) (1992) 。我國大學入學制度改革建議書—大學多元入學方案。台北 : 大學入學考試中心 。
大學招生委員會聯合會(2017)。多元入學方案(111學年度起適用)。取自 http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/multi3.html
大學招生委員會聯合會(2019)。甄選入學過篩後 弱勢生錄取率高於一般生。http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/documents/news/20190310%20%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E%E7%A8%BF.pdf
立法院(2015)。立法院第 8 屆修憲委員會第 11 次全體委員會議紀錄。立法院公報。第104卷,第53 期。https://lci.ly.gov.tw/LyLCEW/communique1/final/pdf//104/53/LCIDC01_1045301_00006.pdf
立法院(2017)。作者:李高英。「大專校院弱勢學生助學計畫」相關問題研析。編號:R00264取自https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=146931
王秀槐 (2014) 。多元入學制度下的教育機會均等:經由不同入學管道進入不同類型大學的大一學生家庭社經背景之研究。北市教育學刊,47,21-45
王如哲(2013)。我國推動經濟弱勢學生之人才培育政策分析與發展(行政院經. 濟建設委員會研究計畫成果報告編號:(102)010.802)。臺北:行政院經濟.建設委員會。
王如哲、楊瑩、劉秀曦、張珍瑋、黃家凱(2014)。我國推動經濟弱勢學生之人才培育政策分析與發展。臺灣經濟論衡,12(2),51-73。
王俊權(1990)。從大學聯考到多元入學。台灣教育,592,7-19。
田芳華、傅祖壇 (2009) 。大學多元入學制度—學生家庭社經背景與學業成就之比較 。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),209-233。
江明修、蕭鈺 (2007)取自教育市場化衝擊下國民中小學人力資源發展之轉型策略125。 教育資料與研究雙月刊。79, 125-138。
林曉雲(2012) 台大醫學院院長:甄選制度不利弱勢小孩。自由時報。取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/562301https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/562301https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/562301
李浩仲、李文傑、連賢明(2016)。多「錢」人學?從政大學生組成看多元入學。經濟論文,44(2)207-250。
Cheers快樂工作人雜誌 (2011) 。2011年企業最愛大學生:血統偏好,4成企業挑人潛規則 Cheers雜誌。取自
https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5020988
邱思瀛(2009)。大學多元入學方案之探究。銘傳教育電子期刊,創刊號,83-93。
吳清基(2000) 中華民國教育改革的發展與未來(上)。教育人力與專業發展歷史期刊論文,第17卷第5期 。
林佩錡(2018)吐故納新―大學如何因應「特殊選才」 學生之學習、適應與支援。清華教育學報 35(2),35-70。
柯志堂(2007)。我國高等教育弱勢學生平等權利保護之初探。載於鄧毓浩主編,高等教育與學生事務 (頁517-545)。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
胡清暉(2015)避免貧窮世襲 頂尖大學明年弱勢生招收2%。中時電子報,取自 https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20151111003876-260405?chdtv
姜添輝(2015)。臺灣高等教育政策依循新自由主義的現象與缺失。臺灣教育社 會學研究,15(2),131-165。
莊勝義(2007)。面對全球化與市場化的高等教育。教育資料與研究, 79,61-88。
財團法人國家政策研究基金會(2012)。我國大學多元入學制度之評估 研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告(編號:RDECRES-100-022),未出版。
徐明珠 (2009)。升學考試制度產生、問題及改革。國家研究報告。取自https://www.npf.org.tw/2/6175?County=%25E5%25AE%259C%25E8%2598%25AD%25E7%25B8%25A3&site=
教育部(2003)。大學多元入學 之問題與檢討專案報告內容。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2004)。教育政策白皮書。台北市:作者。
教育部行政院原住民族委員會(2011)。「原住民族教育政策白皮書」取自
https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6922/100.04%E5%8E%9F%E4%BD%8F%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8.pdf
教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育白皮書-轉型與突破、培育多元優質人才、共創幸福繁榮社會。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/5/pta_2189_2524507_39227.pdf
教育部(2014)。103 學年度大專校院助學措施。臺北市:作者。取自
https://www.lhu.edu.tw/night/osa/table/help/%E5%BC%B1%E5%8B%A2%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E5%8A%A9%E5%AD%B8%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.pdf
教育部(2015,2月22日)。精進弱勢扶助、落實社會正義,教育部推動大學校院弱勢學生學習輔導補助計畫。取自
https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2200/News_Content.aspx?n=90774906111B0527&sms=F0EAFEB716DE7FFA&s=D8483086D09E9223
教育部統計處 (2015a,5月)。近年經濟弱勢生以多元管道 進入大學之概況分析,撰稿:蘇婉芬,取自
https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/%E8%BF%91%E5%B9%B4%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F%E5%BC%B1%E5%8B%A2%E7%94%9F%E4%BB%A5%E5%A4%9A%E5%85%83%E7%AE%A1%E9%81%93%E9%80%B2%E5%85%A5%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E4%B9%8B%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90.pdf
教育部統計處(2015b,5 月 12 日)。近年經濟弱勢生以多元管道進入大學之概況分析教育統計簡訊《第 34 號》,取自
https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/%E8%BF%91%E5%B9%B4%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F%E5%BC%B1%E5%8B%A2%E7%94%9F%E4%BB%A5%E5%A4%9A%E5%85%83%E7%AE%A1%E9%81%93%E9%80%B2%E5%85%A5%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E4%B9%8B%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90.pdf
教育部(2015c,7月1日)。推動弱勢學生入學保障及助學扶助措施 用教育實現夢想臺北市:作者。Ministry of Education (2015)。取自
https://www.edu.tw/news_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=311DB6B0B5304D90
教育部 (2015d,8月18日) 起飛計畫-啟動對弱勢學生的全程關照。取自 https://www.edu.tw/news_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=1FEB9E95590E50D8#
教育部(2015e,11月12日)教育部鼓勵頂尖大學擴大招收弱勢學生促進社會流動(澄清稿)。取自
https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&sms=169B8E91BB75571F&s=E59D4BCE5620F7A0)
教育部(2015f,11月12日)多元入學 -Multi-Opportunities for School Entrance。取自http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=3
秦夢群 (2004)。大學多元入學制度實施與改革之研究。教育政策論壇,7 (2),59-83。
國立成功大學(2018) 。成功深耕弱勢扶助計畫平台。http://sys.osa.ncku.edu.tw/soar/
國立臺灣海洋大學(2018)。國立臺灣海洋大學深耕計畫,招收弱勢學生之機制。取自http://ctl.ntou.edu.tw/files/11-1014-6293.php?Lang=zh-tw
黃政傑(2001)。大學教育改革。台北:師大書苑。
黃政仁、黃偉婷 (2017)。家庭資源、學習態度、多元入學管道與學習成效關聯性之研究:以臺灣某大學為例 教育科學研究期刊。62(4),117-143。
陳伯璋(2005)。臺灣高等教育的發展與改革。載於陳伯璋、蓋浙生(主編),新世紀高等教育政策與行政,3-37。臺北市:高等教育。
陳明玲(2006)。從教育機會均等的觀點檢視大學多元入學。網路社會學通訊期刊第57期。取自 http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/58/58-22.htm
陳政亮、林敏聰(2012)。關於高教市場化的批判。臺灣社會研究季刊,89,269-280。
陳建州、劉正(2004)。論多元入學方案之教育機會均等性。教育研究集刊,50 (4),115-146。
陳盈宏(2016)。 美國高等教育階段扶助弱勢學生就學措施及其啟示。教育脈動電子期刊,5。
陳榮順 (2012)。借鏡美國:陳榮順多元入學發現明日之星。高教技職簡訊61期。
黃雯玲 (2015)。行政院第3436次院會 「大專校院弱勢助學措施 成果及未來策略」報告 報告機關:教育部
黃佳玉(2016)。「人人可以上大學」的真相:窮人借錢穩定高等教育—民進黨立委鄭麗君:教育公共化才是教改唯一解https://buzzorange.com/2016/03/11/ddp_cheng/
張鈿富、葉連祺、張奕華(2005)。大學多元入學方案對入學機會之影響。教育政策論壇,8 (2),1-23。
張宜君、林宗弘(2013)。高等教育擴張與階級不平等:以台灣高等教育改革為例。取自http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/ios/msg/friday/20131227.pdf
蔡淑鈴 (2004)。高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響。台灣社會學,7,47-88。
蔡永彬 (2015)。吳思華:頂大不應是百分之百的菁英。取自 https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20150603/621795/
楊國賜(1998)。高等教育改革與國家發展。教育資料集刊,23,149- 169。
楊朝祥(2007)。多元入學制度之檢討與再出發。國家研究報告。取自https://www.npf.org.tw/2/1610
楊思偉、陳盛賢 (2011)。我國高等教育發展特色與趨勢分析。載於我國百年教育回顧與展望(國家教育研究院主編) ,21-32。
廖振輝(2015)。談大學入學折磨年輕人 李家同:改回聯招吧。取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1271580
鄭勝耀 (2013)。弱勢學生與補救教學之研究。教育人力與專業發展,30(1),13-26
駱明慶 (2002)。誰是台大學生?--- 性別、省籍和城鄉差異。經濟論文叢刊,30(1),113-147。
駱明慶 (2004)。升學機會與家庭背景, 經濟論文叢刊, 32(4),417-445。
劉正 (2006)。補習在臺灣的變遷、效能與階層化。教育研究集刊,52 (4) ,1-33。
關秉寅、黃泓溥、曾於萱 (2016) 。提高經濟弱勢學生進入頂尖大學。[教務處] 校務發展計畫,政大機構典藏。取自 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102163
關秉寅 (2016) 。台灣高等教育擴張後,仍然鳳生鳳、鼠兒打洞嗎?巷仔口社會學,取自https://twstreetcorner.org/2016/03/08/kuanpingyin/
蘇峰山. 2003. "教育市場化論述分析:教育鬆綁的雙重詮釋." Pp. 1-26 in 市場、國家與教育教育社會學的分析, edited by 齊力、蘇峰山. 嘉義縣: 南華大學教社所